alanmx6

Just thinking about it, do you think there would be any benifit to filling the front strut brace with expanding foam? maybe make it a little stiffer?

9krpmrx8

iTrader: (46)

Nope, strut bars are not even really needed on the RX-8. Strut braces are designed for macpherson strut suspension systems which the RX-8 does not have. I'm not sure why the RX-8 has one.

bse50

It may not be needed for autoX, it surely is on a track
Yamaguchi's rx8 book says it's meant to be there and renderings of the stock chassis show it too.
Filling the stock upper brace would be a waste of time and money though. Its shape makes it very hard to fill and the results would be negligible. I'd either keep the oe one or buy something used from the fs section.

WreakLoosE

Maybe Chassis Rigidity for the front of the car. Help prevent flexing in the upper part of the engine compartment is my guess? oh what He^ said.. lol

nlsolja123

What about filling the stock engine cradle?

alnielsen

iTrader: (4)

The engine cradle on the Shinka, 40th Anniversary and the R3's are urethane foam filled. I don't think that is available at your local Home Depot. If it is and it was used, I don't know how much it work.

9krpmrx8

iTrader: (46)

I'll have to take a look at the Yamaguchi book and see what it says. I did not have mine on for a long time and didn't notice a difference. I do like strut bars though, I have three of them

alnielsen

iTrader: (4)

With three of them, it must be really rigid.
I have the MS bar for the looks and the brake brace.

bse50

The oe subframes can be reinforced by seam welding them after adding 2 layers (1 up, 1 down) of sheet metal (2mm thick) to the border\perimeter.
Looks ugly as sin afterwards but weighs considerably less than autoexe braces.

monchie

Just for looks brah, just for looks...