Notices
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension

gold? did someone say gold?!

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 01:26 PM
  #26  
truemagellen's Avatar
Attracts tree branches
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,940
Likes: 3
two words:

locking lug nutz

okat that was three nevermind

looks great bud!
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 01:30 PM
  #27  
Im_DANomite's Avatar
Thread Starter
I love GOOOLD
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,845
Likes: 3
From: Severn, MD
the work wheels are cast and they "felt" heavier than the volks. but i have a pretty poor sense of weight. i only get wheels because of looks. the car is my daily driving toy that gets me to point A to point B. yes it is a performance sports car, but in my every day to day life, i don't push the car anywhere near it's potential. i'm setting my car up for the street. i may once in awhile go to a track event and see how well the car handles, but the works or volks will never see that kind of abuse. it's the same reason for all the parts i buy. my strut bars don't do as much as a brace would, but then i would have to do away with my engine cover. my RB exhaust was purposely bought just because of the looks and sound...not so much for the performance. i have tein s-tech lowering springs because i wanted to lower the ride height but not alter the stock feel. coilovers are just a hassle for me...i've dealt with them in the past and always ended up getting annoyed with them.

but yea...soon as i get tires for the volks i will slap them on and take a butt load of pictures for you guys. the rolling picture idea is going to be hard...none of my friends can take pictures and i don't feel comfortable with any of them driving my car
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 01:54 PM
  #28  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,936
Likes: 2,141
Originally Posted by XDEEDUBBX
but the other 98% i'd rather look better...tee hee

well help me find a clue here, how does having smaller wheel/tire widths in the front look better than having the same fat wheels and tires you plan to put on the rear be put on all four corners instead?

Last edited by TeamRX8; Dec 21, 2005 at 01:56 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 01:59 PM
  #29  
L8APEX's Avatar
Smooth Criminal
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,467
Likes: 1
From: Atlanta, Georgia
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
well help me find a clue here, how does having smaller wheel/tire widths in the front look better than having the same fat wheels and tire you plan to put on the rear be on all four corners instead?
stupid question for you, but have you seen what an 8 looks like with 10" wheels on the front. I have not, but I have seen what they look like on the back, and they would look really stupid on the front.

While I am not going to stagger anything on my car, I will admit that it does look good. Most exotics do it, so the recipe must be working for someone, even if you dont like it.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 02:08 PM
  #30  
XDEEDUBBX's Avatar
RX8 HA HA
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,772
Likes: 5
From: Gardena Cali 310
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
well help me find a clue here, how does having smaller wheel/tire widths in the front look better than having the same fat wheels and tires you plan to put on the rear be put on all four corners instead?
well in my case here, my rims will becoming in within a month or so, with the offset i got my rears would never fit in the front without without having to camber them even more, they would rub like crazy...

but having fat wheels all around can be done, look at the mazdatrix car. they have 18x10 simmons (don't know their offset) all around, but not to sure if they were having any rubbing or fitment issues..
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 02:17 PM
  #31  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,936
Likes: 2,141
Originally Posted by L8APEX
stupid question for you, but have you seen what an 8 looks like with 10" wheels on the front. I have not, but I have seen what they look like on the back, and they would look really stupid on the front.

While I am not going to stagger anything on my car, I will admit that it does look good. Most exotics do it, so the recipe must be working for someone, even if you dont like it.

only if you're too STUPID to not order the correct offset, they fit under there fine

https://www.rx8club.com/series-i-wheels-tires-brakes-suspension-55/18x10s-14912/

these 9.5"s with 275 tires all around really look STUPID, don't they, there's plenty of room to get another 1/2", maybe 1", with the correct offset:

http://www.good-win-racing.com/mazda...topic.php?t=53

and when your RX-8 puts out 400+ hp then you might need the extra rear traction like the exotic cars, but then I'll assume you aren't STUPID enough not to know better than to take a well balanced car and make it understeer, now that would really be STUPID

hope that wasn't too STUPID for you to understand
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 02:23 PM
  #32  
lazi's Avatar
drivelinestore.com
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 0
From: OC
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
well help me find a clue here, how does having smaller wheel/tire widths in the front look better than having the same fat wheels and tires you plan to put on the rear be put on all four corners instead?
uh ok
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 02:30 PM
  #33  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,936
Likes: 2,141
staggered setups can only be rotated side-side on the same axle, equal setups can be swapped between any corner
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 02:31 PM
  #34  
khtm's Avatar
I like rusty spoons
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta
Very STI-esque...but I like.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 02:48 PM
  #35  
L8APEX's Avatar
Smooth Criminal
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,467
Likes: 1
From: Atlanta, Georgia
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
only if you're too STUPID to not order the correct offset, they fit under there fine

https://www.rx8club.com/showthread.php?t=14912

these 9.5"s with 275 tires all around really look STUPID, don't they, there's plenty of room to get another 1/2", maybe 1", with the correct offset:

http://www.good-win-racing.com/mazda...topic.php?t=53

and when your RX-8 puts out 400+ hp then you might need the extra rear traction like the exotic cars, but then I'll assume you aren't STUPID enough not to know better than to take a well balanced car and make it understeer, now that would really be STUPID

hope that wasn't too STUPID for you to understand
goddam you are an ***. I was voicing MY opinion. Dont just start calling me stupid, you have no f'n clue about me. I have seen a car with 275's, on stock rims, on all 4 corners. I thought the front tires were too wide, and looked bad, maybe stupid was a poor choice of words.

Just in case you are BLIND, i did say I was NOT going to stagger my wheel and tire setups, hell, I am on stock rims, and plan to stay that way. Get off your soap box, you dont know everything. So quit acting like it.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 05:03 PM
  #36  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,936
Likes: 2,141
umm, I didn't call you anything, I merely emphasized a word that you chose to interject into the conversation to say that I did would be kind of ... oh, never mind, one of us resorting to name calling is enough

TeamSTUPIDASS

Last edited by TeamRX8; Dec 21, 2005 at 05:06 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 05:21 PM
  #37  
\\Konig\\'s Avatar
turrrbo!
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,325
Likes: 4
From: Santa Barbara
Same size rims all around are better for performance/handling on the RX-8.

Staggered setups are more for style and look better than having the same size all around (an opinion, I know).

Just let it be.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 05:34 PM
  #38  
L8APEX's Avatar
Smooth Criminal
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,467
Likes: 1
From: Atlanta, Georgia
I would have been glad to. My statements were not based on one post, in this one thread. As someone who spends a lot of time reading in the racing section of this forum, I have come to form an opinion. It is my opnion, and in no way reflects the opinion of this forum, it's users or owners in any way, implied or explicit.

Do I hold a grudge, no, just didn't appreciate the sentiments offered by TeamRX8. It could have been done better, with a little more attention to details of a post, rather than a skimming over.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 05:46 PM
  #39  
XDEEDUBBX's Avatar
RX8 HA HA
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,772
Likes: 5
From: Gardena Cali 310
rodney king "can't we all just get along?" hahaha
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 06:16 PM
  #40  
L8APEX's Avatar
Smooth Criminal
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,467
Likes: 1
From: Atlanta, Georgia
sure thing.

back to the wheels, and the real reaosn this thread is here.

Post pics once you get them installed, they always look a lot different once they are on the car.

Again, what are your plans for the wheels you are currently using.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 06:47 PM
  #41  
BlueFrenzy's Avatar
Rotary Powered Decepticon
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,618
Likes: 1
From: Calgary, AB
GOLD!!! Very nice. What are you doing with your current ones because those are pretty nice as well.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 07:13 PM
  #42  
lazi's Avatar
drivelinestore.com
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 0
From: OC
blah. jus get along. were all club members here. were all neighbors. jus CHILlzz OUT YoZ hahaha
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 07:15 PM
  #43  
mikeb's Avatar
100% Italian
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,422
Likes: 0
From: orange,ca
3 pages and no update pics yet
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 10:05 PM
  #44  
Im_DANomite's Avatar
Thread Starter
I love GOOOLD
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,845
Likes: 3
From: Severn, MD
man...i feel like i'm repeating myself. i won't put them on til spring, which is when i'll be getting tires.

this whole staggered debate is really annoying. and if staggered setups were so bad in the performance aspect, why do so many manufacturers do it from the factory? prime example of a low torque, staggered setup, awesome handling car...Honda S2000. no one said that equal sizes all around is better performance. it all depends. with suspension, there are infinite variations to achieve what you think is the perfect setup.

as for my bronze Work wheels, they are my daily driving wheels. the Volks are more for showing off and the stock wheels are for the winter.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 11:46 PM
  #45  
nomopistons's Avatar
nomo RX-8, it's sold
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
From: Queen of the suburbs-Kirkwood Mo.
Has anyone seen my gold wheels. I parked my 8 at a convenience store in Severn and when I came out, it was sitting on concrete blocks with some old stock 8 rims leaning against my door.

Somebody, please help me locate my gold wheels!!!!
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 02:36 AM
  #46  
mikeb's Avatar
100% Italian
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,422
Likes: 0
From: orange,ca
Originally Posted by Im_DANomite
man...i feel like i'm repeating myself. i won't put them on til spring, which is when i'll be getting tires.

this whole staggered debate is really annoying. and if staggered setups were so bad in the performance aspect, why do so many manufacturers do it from the factory? prime example of a low torque, staggered setup, awesome handling car...Honda S2000. no one said that equal sizes all around is better performance. it all depends. with suspension, there are infinite variations to achieve what you think is the perfect setup.

as for my bronze Work wheels, they are my daily driving wheels. the Volks are more for showing off and the stock wheels are for the winter.
my bad sorry
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 06:16 AM
  #47  
RX4life's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
From: Burnaby, BC
seriously a word of advice to you man dont start the debate on the factory staggered setup...half the close minded racing fools on this forum will just give you a whole load of ***** on minor performance deficiencies that you will barely or never experience on your day to day drive .. seriously they should just STFU ( not you) and stick that crap in the racing forum...

most wheels made today are for looks.

BTW love your wheels loooking good..cant wait to see them on..
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 09:53 AM
  #48  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,936
Likes: 2,141
LOL, you guys want the lightest most expensive wheels, electronic adjusting stiffly sprung coilovers, baddest swaybars, hottest tires, chassis stiffening braces, etc., etc. but somebody mentions that staggered tire/wheel widths will mess it all up and we're just a bunch of racing jerks trying to make your life miserable ... I mistakenly assumed there was more going on here than poseur status ... my bad

if it makes you feel better I won't ever bring the staggered issue up again, afterall it's no skin off my back what you do, but I'm still trying to understand how it "looks" better ...
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 09:56 AM
  #49  
L8APEX's Avatar
Smooth Criminal
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,467
Likes: 1
From: Atlanta, Georgia
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
LOL, you guys want the lightest most expensive wheels, electronic adjusting stiffly sprung coilovers, baddest swaybars, hottest tires, chassis stiffening braces, etc., etc. but somebody mentions that staggered tire/wheel widths will mess it all up and we're just a bunch of racing jerks trying to make your life miserable ... I mistakenly assumed there was more going on here than poseur status ... my bad
scary, i completely agree with you. maybe you not so bad after all...
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 10:48 AM
  #50  
Im_DANomite's Avatar
Thread Starter
I love GOOOLD
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,845
Likes: 3
From: Severn, MD
you just too "old skool"
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:27 PM.