Notices
Series I Trouble Shooting This is the place to learn more about or discuss any issues you're having with your RX-8
View Poll Results: Have you flooded your Renesis?
YES
1,349
54.86%
NO
1,110
45.14%
Voters: 2459. You may not vote on this poll

Engine Flooding Info/Questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 6 votes, 4.67 average.
 
Old 11-03-2003, 05:04 PM
  #26  
Registered User
 
newki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Booyah!! I've just joined the ranks of the flooded. Dealership towed it in and are replacing the plugs for me, and I should have it back on the road by tomorrow. Got a 2003 Mazda6 as a loaner. (NOTE, this is the second trip to the shop for the car. I had to take it in a few weeks ago to have a bad ECU replaced).

Regarding the flooding:

I've had a couple of first gen '7's for over 10 years, so out of habit, warm up before taking it out regardless of the trip. With the '8, I didn't think it was as necessary. However, I was in a rush, was going on a long trip, and didn't let it warm up this morning. Stalled it pulling out of the driveway, and I managed to flood it.

Now, neither of my first gens would have flooded with this scenario. It simply a hit or miss thing, and I happend to have bad luck this morning or are '8s super-easy to flood?

The way I look at it, anybody that would bother to read/post to the forum is more car conscience then the average consumer. I doubt most people even read the manual, let alone follow it to the letter. If it floods that easily, shouldn't driveways be packed w/ flooded '8's these days?
Old 11-03-2003, 06:03 PM
  #27  
FourOneMuthaFcuknFive
 
Dookie_Rx-8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
um... whats flooding? How do you flood the car? sorry dont know stuff like that
Old 11-04-2003, 06:05 PM
  #28  
Registered User
 
wonkazoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Being a manly man I went out a couple of weeks ago and started up to go get some coffee. Given that I live on a hill, and equally importantly that I had not had any coffee I stalled the engine. Five minutes later, after burning up the battery cables I got it started. Idiosyncratic?? No, just cranky!!
Old 11-04-2003, 10:30 PM
  #29  
Registered User
 
s1mike22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Northern Va.
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so what long term effects does flooding your engine have? if you get the plugs replaced, should everything be okay afterwards?
Old 11-05-2003, 03:16 AM
  #30  
_________________
Thread Starter
 
Lensman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cambridge - UK
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks to everyone who has voted: very interesting. All that really concerns me is that one day I will inevitably stall the engine when it's cooler than optimum and I won't be able to restart it. Not ideal but I can cope...
Old 11-05-2003, 09:03 AM
  #31  
Registered User
 
spypondtom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: arlington, MA
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Add me to the list of flood victims. A short move in the driveway on Monday and she's been dead ever since. I followed the directions in the owners manual to no avail. A tow to the dealer tomorrow. Too bad
Old 11-06-2003, 08:33 AM
  #32  
Hubble has been saved!
 
msrecant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The warning in the "Quick Tips" is not that the engine will flood but that the plugs will foul. It sounds like the people who get a tow to the dealership end up with new or cleaned set of spark plugs, excluding the very small percentage who get new engines due to the front rotor compression issue (not related to short drives).

Can anyone explain to me how flooding the engine once can foul spark plugs to the point where the car will not start?
Old 11-06-2003, 08:43 AM
  #33  
Registered User
 
newki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Got my car back last night. The dealership told me that another '8 had been brought in the same day w/ a flooded engine.

The dealership had me fill out a "Won't Start" questionairre that basically asked about my driving habits. (avg diststance per day, avg speed, avg warm-up time, what rpm do you shift at, etc).

The last couple of pages was filled out by the service center that looked like a bunch of readings from my engine. So it looks like Mazda is collecting information about all these flooded engine reports.
Old 11-06-2003, 10:01 PM
  #34  
Registered
 
Canada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry, fellow skeptics, but these reports are of a real flooding problem. How do I know it is not just skewed voting from disgruntled complainers? Because it happened to me with my new RX-8 and it has never happened with any other car I've ever owned or rented before.

Mine is a similar story to previous ones. I went to my driveway & jumped into the car last Thursday morning, a cold one. Nearly late for work, big meeting.

Big rush.

Started the car, no problem. Immediately saw from the fuel gauge that my wife had left the car from her previous nights' use with almost NO GAS in it. Knew that I'd really be late for work if we drove that car and had to stop for a fill-up. Made a (fateful) snap decision - switched off the car and took our other car to work (the Protege 5 which we haven't sold yet since getting the RX-8). Came back after work around 6PM, guess what - the RX-8 wouldn't start.

Tried it many times. Went to after-dinner event (again in other car) and came back around 10PM with a can of gas in hand, thinking "maybe it is really OUT of fuel"....Added the can of gas into the tank...No go.

Had it towed (free) to dealer around MIDNIGHT - what a pain it was searching for that towing eyelet in the cold, dark night. Wrecker piggy-backed it and then off-loaded it at the dealer's (locked) gate and I dropped off my keys in the drop box.

Weekend goes by. Dealer says motor was flooded, had to change spark plugs, oil (gas got in it) and oil filter.

No other car has shown me this sensitivity to being turned off cold. Anyway, the RX-8 starts & runs fine now. I understand from these posts how the back-pressure causes flooding of the combustion chambers. I will not stop her cold, ever again - PROMISE!
Old 11-06-2003, 11:35 PM
  #35  
Registered User
 
RX8U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dad was in a rush to go to town last nite, jumped in, didnt warm it up at all, backed out of the garage and stalled it, couldnt get it going again, tryed again this morning just got going with heaps of smoke!
Old 11-09-2003, 05:43 PM
  #36  
Registered User
 
Silver7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I started up the 8 and moved into the garage the other night. The next morning it wouldn't start. I did the whole "flooded procedure" which involved:
1. pulling the plugs
2. cleaning and blowing them out
3. cranking the engine with the fuel pump disabled
4. replacing the plugs
5. attempting to restart the car.

Needless to say, this didn't work even after 3 tries. I called mazda and they didn't have any other suggestions except to bring it in and have them tinker with it. I thought about just replacing the plugs but there is no way I'm paying $50 for new plugs when the car is only 2 months old. Personally I think this flooding issue is rediculous! I have owned a 93 rx7 since 1998 and have never had a problem like this. This isn't just rotary related, this is a Renesis problem. Not only am I extremely disappointed with the power output of this engine, but now I find out it's even more quirky than the already quirky 13BREW. If this continues to be a problem I might have to consider getting rid of it. After all, I bought the car as a reliable daily driver. I realize that starting the car and shutting it down a minute later is a big no no when it comes to rotaries, but I am hearing from others that these cars are stalling and not starting afterwards because the engine get flooded. Again, I have experienced none of these problems with my last rotary, and I would start and shut that engine down all the time while it was still cold. I really hope madza comes up with a fix for this. Maybe they could adjust the fuel maps a little at startup so the car doesn't run so rich and fould the plugs out so easily. They need to come up with something. So far this poll is up to about 12 % of rx8 owners who have experienced engine flooding. That number is just too high for this car to be considered reliable.
The following users liked this post:
Dboy006 (07-12-2019)
Old 11-10-2003, 09:47 AM
  #37  
Registered User
 
1stRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had this flooding problem many times with my 84 GSL-SE (Still have it). I thought 20 years of refinement would have taken care of it, but my car flooded last Sunday.

I took care of it the way I always have. I pull-started it with my SUV. The starter can't spin fast enough, but a 15mph pull in second gear is plenty fast to push excess fuel out of the chambers, dry the plugs, and it starts. Not NEARLY as bad as a tow to the dealer.
Old 11-10-2003, 11:41 AM
  #38  
_________________
Thread Starter
 
Lensman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cambridge - UK
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good grief!
Am I buying a consumer product or a prototype?! This is surely the RX-8s Achilles Heel.
Old 11-10-2003, 12:00 PM
  #39  
Hubble has been saved!
 
msrecant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Lensman
This is surely the RX-8s Achilles Heel.
I would agree that, unfortunately, the RENESIS engine is the RX-8's Achilles Heel. Poor gas mileage, low power, prone to spark-plug fouling, hard to meet pollution standards, etc.

Yesterday, I read the Consumer Report's review of the WRX, RX-8, EVO, 350Z and Crossfire. Bottom line ... RX-8 is tops in every category except for the engine.

Last edited by msrecant; 11-10-2003 at 12:02 PM.
Old 11-16-2003, 09:43 AM
  #40  
Registered
 
Canada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And the RENESIS got an award for motor of the year???
Old 11-16-2003, 11:30 AM
  #41  
Hubble has been saved!
 
msrecant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Canada
And the RENESIS got an award for motor of the year???
Yeah, it does seem to be a contradiction.

To be fair, the motor is quite a technological achievement. I can certainly understand why it won awards. Beyond that, the engine makes a number of other aspects of the RX-8 possible like a car, with a passenger cabin that large, having such amazing handling and braking ability with such a low price.

Unfortunately, back in the real world, issues like flooding, clean emissions and power make it hard to fully appreciate the elegance of the technology.
Old 11-16-2003, 01:18 PM
  #42  
Registered User
 
selmeralto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by msrecant
Yeah, it does seem to be a contradiction.

To be fair, the motor is quite a technological achievement. I can certainly understand why it won awards. Beyond that, the engine makes a number of other aspects of the RX-8 possible like a car, with a passenger cabin that large, having such amazing handling and braking ability with such a low price.

Unfortunately, back in the real world, issues like flooding, clean emissions and power make it hard to fully appreciate the elegance of the technology.
Well, OK, but remember that the jury is still out on these three issues (flooding because there are questions about the statistical validity of the sampling of the forum reports and polls; emissions because there have been published reports of very low emissions; and power because there is a by now very long discussion of off-the-line stats v. overall power characteristics as experienced by drivers in real-world conditions).
Old 11-16-2003, 02:07 PM
  #43  
Registered User
 
Silver7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I don't understand what you mean by statistical validity of the polls dealing with the flooding issues. What is invalid? I don't see this issue popping up on any other forum. If it wasn't an issue then there wouldn't be so many people experiencing the problem. For those who daily drive their RX8s, this is a serious reliability issue.

As for emissions, I agree with you. I haven't seen an issue with it. I think mazda has this supposed issue under control.

I still feel the car is underpowered. You can give me all the peak HP numbers you want and it still won't make me feel any better when I take my car out for a spin. There is a reason mazda put turbos on the RX7. A two rotor needs a turbo to be competative with todays high performance V6 and V8 engines. I would honestly like to see mazda grow some ***** and start using 3 rotors. But I'm sure I'm not the only one.
Old 11-16-2003, 02:21 PM
  #44  
Registered User
 
selmeralto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Silver7
I don't understand what you mean by statistical validity of the polls dealing with the flooding issues. What is invalid? I don't see this issue popping up on any other forum. If it wasn't an issue then there wouldn't be so many people experiencing the problem. For those who daily drive their RX8s, this is a serious reliability issue.

As for emissions, I agree with you. I haven't seen an issue with it. I think mazda has this supposed issue under control.

I still feel the car is underpowered. You can give me all the peak HP numbers you want and it still won't make me feel any better when I take my car out for a spin. There is a reason mazda put turbos on the RX7. A two rotor needs a turbo to be competative with todays high performance V6 and V8 engines. I would honestly like to see mazda grow some ***** and start using 3 rotors. But I'm sure I'm not the only one.
By "statistical validity" all I meant was (1) that we have reports of a problem from (at the moment) 15 people, as against an undetermined number of owners, so we don't know what percentage of the population of drivers are experiencing the problemand (2) there is no control to determine what people mean by "flooding". (Some people surely have experienced legitimate issues and have been inconvenienced but I remember at least one other person saying that by flooding he meant that starter turned over several times. This is to say that the forum and poll doesn't represent a controlled study.)

On the power matter, as I said , I was referring to people's experience in the real world of driving. You report wishing the car had more more power. I appreciate your report about your experience. Others are very happy with the power of their cars. I appreciate your reports as well.

Edit: Sorry for the typos: "don't" for "doesn't" and "I appreciate their reports as well. "

Last edited by selmeralto; 11-16-2003 at 02:30 PM.
Old 11-16-2003, 09:24 PM
  #45  
Hubble has been saved!
 
msrecant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by selmeralto
Well, OK, but remember that the jury is still out on these three issues (flooding because there are questions about the statistical validity of the sampling of the forum reports and polls; emissions because there have been published reports of very low emissions; and power because there is a by now very long discussion of off-the-line stats v. overall power characteristics as experienced by drivers in real-world conditions).
I disagree.

If flooding were an unproven statistical issue, then why would Mazda include a "short trip" warning in the QuickTips booklet that came with the car. After doing research I have discovered that "short trip" flooding has been a long-time issue with fuel-injected rotary engines. Also, once a rotary is flooded, it is hard, if not impossible to clear the fuel out of the combustion chambers without substantial measures. The warning and the anechdotal reports on the forum simply confirm that the issue is still with us.

On the emissions and power issues I would say that Canzoomer's work strongly implies that Mazda sacrificed substantial power and gas mileage to meet US pollution standards. One has to question a brand new high-tech engine that is so tight on its ability to meet emission standards that the only alternative to deal with a last minute standards-change is to seriously impact engine performance (about a 10% hit).

On the power issue, I may be wrong but I have not seen any evidence that the US production cars can meet the performance levels reported by the Car Mags running pre-production cars. The Consumer Reports tests (December 2003) on a production RX-8 were substantially off the mark (0-60 in 6.7 sec and 1/4 mile in 15.2) while the other cars came in around the Car Mag numbers.
Old 11-16-2003, 09:43 PM
  #46  
Registered User
 
selmeralto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by msrecant
I disagree.

If flooding were an unproven statistical issue, then why would Mazda include a "short trip" warning in the QuickTips booklet that came with the car. After doing research I have discovered that "short trip" flooding has been a long-time issue with fuel-injected rotary engines. Also, once a rotary is flooded, it is hard, if not impossible to clear the fuel out of the combustion chambers without substantial measures. The warning and the anechdotal reports on the forum simply confirm that the issue is still with us.

On the emissions and power issues I would say that Canzoomer's work strongly implies that Mazda sacrificed substantial power and gas mileage to meet US pollution standards. One has to question a brand new high-tech engine that is so tight on its ability to meet emission standards that the only alternative to deal with a last minute standards-change is to seriously impact engine performance (about a 10% hit).

On the power issue, I may be wrong but I have not seen any evidence that the US production cars can meet the performance levels reported by the Car Mags running pre-production cars. The Consumer Reports tests (December 2003) on a production RX-8 were substantially off the mark (0-60 in 6.7 sec and 1/4 mile in 15.2) while the other cars came in around the Car Mag numbers.
Dear msrecant,

You make some good points.

But remember I didn't deny that flooding was an issue. I only made the point that we don't know how much of an issue it is statistically (i.e., how widespread the problem is).

On emissions, I wasn't commenting on the alleged trade-off for power but only on whether the car, as delivered, has high emissions.

And, as I said, people have reported different reactions to the car's acceleration.
Old 11-18-2003, 12:42 PM
  #47  
Registered User
 
martinl78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Denton, TX (area)
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mine flooded recently and had to be towed in. However, when it happened on my trying to start the car after sitting in the garage for two days -- it seemed that the battery wasn't strong enough to turn the engine over. The dash dimmed out significantly almost to the point of not being visible. Finally it slowly began to spin the engine and it tried to start. However, after that it was flooded. The engine flooded starting technique in the manual was of no help. The car stayed at the dealer for 3 days. Got it back and they said it was flooded. I asked about the battery which on previous complaint tested at 320 CCA out of 400 CCA rated. They said this time it was in the 300-325 CCA range and isn't low enough for Mazda to replace it.

I believe on this instance that the battery somehow couldn't spin the engine fast enough at initial start and the injection system dumped in too much fuel for the slow turning.

I plan to contact Mazda and plead for a new battery that checks out somewhere reasonably close to what it's rated for.
Old 11-24-2003, 12:15 PM
  #48  
Registered User
 
godai00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Haymarket, Virginia
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flooded today

Yesterday, I backed my RX8 into the driveway and later drove it back into the garage. It started OK going into the garage but would not start this morning. I was not aware of the potential to flood this easily. I was towed and the dealer sprayed starter fluid to get it started. I'll try to avoid the quick drives and rev to 4000 when turning off. Hope this solves this problem.
Old 11-24-2003, 01:01 PM
  #49  
Hubble has been saved!
 
msrecant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Flooded today

Originally posted by godai00
I was towed and the dealer sprayed starter fluid to get it started.
General question to the forum .....

Is this an OK way to deal with Rotary flooding? Is there a possibility that it will damage the engine if done by a non-mechanic type person?

Should I (we all) get a can of starter fluid, just in case?
Old 11-25-2003, 06:39 PM
  #50  
Registered User
 
dablues's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tidewater, VA
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Had my car taken to the dealer today. Washed and waxed the car Sunday, pulled into the garage and today it wouldn't start. Talked to service rep and I should have it back tomorrow. He made it sound like there's a reprograming fix for the flooding problem. I'll try to clarify the fix tomorrow. Based on some of the input off this board, think I'll try for a free oil change, after all I've got 1300 miles on the car. I traded in a 93 RX7 and it never flooded.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 6 votes, 4.67 average.

Quick Reply: Engine Flooding Info/Questions



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:28 PM.