Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

Oil catch can vs breather vs breather catch can

Thread Tools
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 5.00 average.
 
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 03:45 AM
  #1  
sosonic's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 792
Likes: 2
Oil catch can vs breather vs breather catch can

Oil catch can vs breather vs breather catch can

I saw a nice looking breather catch can for the mini-cooper and it started me thinking. Which of the 3 was really better and why? Oil catch can, breather, or breather catch can.

Case of each:

1. The oil catch can




The theory for this is that intake vacuum sucks in oil vapors and oil into the catch can. The catch can helps condense a lot of the oil, but vapors and gases may still enter the intake. This method would reduce the problem but not totally eliminate it. Some oil vapors would still make it back into the intake.

Note- a good oil catch can would have baffles to help condense the oil and bad ones would not. For the types without baffles you would need to put some type of steel wool/brillo inside for the purpose. Baffle or no, some oil vapor would get past.

2. The breather or inline oil catch can and breather

oil in intake?-p1000465.jpg


Usually is done inline and perhaps with a small catch can in front of it. This would prevent any oil or oil vapor from getting into the intake, but the problem is vacuum necessary for "blow back" oil coming from the oil filler pipe? Other issues are using too small of an inline catch can and too much oil get into it. The other problem is excessive oil vapor being vented by the breather.

3. Breather catch can






This seems to be the best of both worlds. It will help condense larger oil vapor, oily gasses would be expelled by the breather, and all this would be done with the aid of vacuum pressure from the intake. In theory, the breather catch can would have "cleaned" the air going into the intake so that very little vapor would be there.

However what do you guys think about number 3?

Note: Oil Catch Can of any type is not required for Series II's 2009-2012.

Last edited by sosonic; Feb 13, 2008 at 05:50 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 07:07 AM
  #2  
r0tor's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 1
From: PA
unless there is a check valve in that breather, #3 looks like a giant vacuum leak
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 11:39 PM
  #3  
sosonic's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 792
Likes: 2
I'm looking into this about the check valve. I see what you mean, suction from the intake could cause a "reverse flow" from the small air filter thus a giant vacuum leak.

The breather catch can would have to be constructed to allow only flow from the oil filler piper > to catch can > to breather or to intake.

The breather/filter should only "exhale"/push out vapor and never inhale/suck air or it is worthless.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 11:59 PM
  #4  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
No vacuum leak.
The catch can is vented pre-MAF on a recirculating setup.
If you just do a vented can (like most people), you are just ventilating the "crankcase", which isn't under vacuum to begin with.

Because of the way the Renesis ventilates, you don't need anything more. You just want to catch the oily water vapor that boils out of the pan.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2008 | 01:46 PM
  #5  
Spinning Sushi's Avatar
I <3 Sushi
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,967
Likes: 4
From: SoCal
You only need an oil catch can or breather if you drive an 04 or 05.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2008 | 02:57 PM
  #6  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
Originally Posted by Renesis SE3P
You only need an oil catch can or breather if you drive an 04 or 05.
Right, because if you drive an '06 or later (or have had the TSB countermeasure installed), the crap from your crankcase goes directly into the upper intake manifold and sh*ts on your motor more completely.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2008 | 06:20 AM
  #7  
sosonic's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 792
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
Right, because if you drive an '06 or later (or have had the TSB countermeasure installed), the crap from your crankcase goes directly into the upper intake manifold and sh*ts on your motor more completely.
Totally agree. Rather have "clean" air going into my intake and crap from my crankcase going some other place than my intake or upper intake manifold.

I have a catch can and breather. But, the idea of a breather catch can is intriguing. If it works, seems like it might have been the way to go.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2008 | 10:15 AM
  #8  
Bester's Avatar
07 6M Black
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: Apopka, Fl
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
Right, because if you drive an '06 or later (or have had the TSB countermeasure installed), the crap from your crankcase goes directly into the upper intake manifold and sh*ts on your motor more completely.
Yea,...been thinking about this. I have an 07. And the hose routing looks like it dumps the fumes in the two primary intake runners. Well I dont like the idea of oil coating the intake runners over the years,....so I am considering adding a catch can of some sort. This newer setup looks like it would cause a vacuum leak if I simply added a breather (hoses feed intake manifold versus intake tube). Or I am missing something here.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2008 | 09:37 PM
  #9  
Razz1's Avatar
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 3
From: Cali
Don't need the can just a filter and a plug into the intake.

Check the DIY section.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 12:38 AM
  #10  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
Originally Posted by Razz1
Don't need the can just a filter and a plug into the intake.

Check the DIY section.
Only if you want an oily little filter dripping on your alternator.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2008 | 10:37 AM
  #11  
Rhythmic's Avatar
Laid back in the pocket
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
From: Blacksburg, VA
MM, what's your catch can/breather setup? Any pics? Suggestions?

I'm really considering doing this, especially because the other day I had a BIG oil blowback/overflow issue into my intake.

It happened (I think) when I accelerated briskly up to about 7000-7500 rpm and held it there for a few seconds. I went to check my oil level after I got home and found oil had blown all over the place, and was running down my intake tube and out the filter (K&N v.2 intake).

The weird part was that my oil level was barely at the full mark-not overfilled at all.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2008 | 10:57 AM
  #12  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
This is what I got going on at the moment:

Attached Thumbnails Oil catch can vs breather vs  breather catch can-dsc00007.jpg  
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2008 | 11:00 AM
  #13  
mysql's Avatar
Doppelgänger
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 1
From: Florida
I have a breather on the end of my catch can too. It's been this way for a long time, there haven't been any issues with the engine bay getting dirty.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2008 | 09:43 PM
  #14  
NgoRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,239
Likes: 4
From: CA, Rowland Hts.
MM, is your catch can vented and running only from the oil filler neck?

would you suggest this method or having a sealed can running from both intake and oil filler neck?
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2008 | 11:26 PM
  #15  
Razz1's Avatar
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 3
From: Cali
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
Only if you want an oily little filter dripping on your alternator.
Depends upon where and how you mount it.

You can alwayes get a longer hose or an extension to make it hang down the side of the engine.


Last edited by Razz1; Feb 26, 2008 at 09:29 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2008 | 11:40 PM
  #16  
Spinning Sushi's Avatar
I <3 Sushi
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,967
Likes: 4
From: SoCal
I've been reading up and doing alot of research on oil catch cans and I believe that running it back into the intake would be the best choice.

Reason:
The catch can will catch all the oil but the oil fumes will go back into the intake and can also grease up parts the throttle body. It has other advantages as well... mostly serve as lubrication though. Hell, it might be good for our apex seals as well!
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2008 | 11:49 PM
  #17  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
Originally Posted by Renesis SE3P
The catch can will catch all the oil but the oil fumes will go back into the intake and can also grease up parts the throttle body.
Then why use the catch can at all? This is exactly what we are trying to avoid!
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2008 | 11:50 PM
  #18  
Spinning Sushi's Avatar
I <3 Sushi
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,967
Likes: 4
From: SoCal
I'm talking about catching the blow back oil itself, not the fumes.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2008 | 12:21 AM
  #19  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
You don't want ANY of that going through your intake.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2008 | 07:19 AM
  #20  
mysql's Avatar
Doppelgänger
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Originally Posted by Razz1
Depends upon where and how you mount it.

You can alwayes get a loner hose or an extension to make it hang down the side of the engine.

I actually did that once. The result isn't as you'd expect. As oil drips, the air passing under the car pushes the oil up and you end up with the bottom of your car slick with oil. Not really the best solution.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2008 | 09:31 AM
  #21  
Razz1's Avatar
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 3
From: Cali
Originally Posted by mysql
I actually did that once. The result isn't as you'd expect. As oil drips, the air passing under the car pushes the oil up and you end up with the bottom of your car slick with oil. Not really the best solution.
That's why you still need to use a filter.

I actuality mine has barley turned color in over a year. Of cource I only put on about 4k miles, it has seen several track days.

It's not like oil gushes out of the fill pipe into the intake.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2008 | 02:44 PM
  #22  
Rhythmic's Avatar
Laid back in the pocket
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
From: Blacksburg, VA
Originally Posted by Razz1
It's not like oil gushes out of the fill pipe into the intake.
I with that were true. See my previous post.

I've looked at a few catch cans online (ebay, etc.) and I can't find one that has a breather on it, like MM's. Anybody know where to find one, hopefully for a decent price?
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2008 | 02:49 PM
  #23  
mysql's Avatar
Doppelgänger
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 1
From: Florida
you don't buy a catch can with a breather.

you buy a catch can, and instead of connecting one end to the intake, you buy a breather filter at your local auto store and install that instead.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2008 | 02:55 PM
  #24  
tdiddy's Avatar
Finally Boosted!!!!!!!
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
From: Central IL
The Mazsport Oil Catch Tank doesn't have a breather "nipple/port" on it. I never asked why.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 02:42 PM
  #25  
Rhythmic's Avatar
Laid back in the pocket
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
From: Blacksburg, VA
Originally Posted by mysql
you don't buy a catch can with a breather.

you buy a catch can, and instead of connecting one end to the intake, you buy a breather filter at your local auto store and install that instead.
thank you, sir.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 5.00 average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:00 PM.