RX8Club.com

RX8Club.com (https://www.rx8club.com/)
-   Series I Tech Garage (https://www.rx8club.com/series-i-tech-garage-22/)
-   -   New TSB 3/14/08 (https://www.rx8club.com/series-i-tech-garage-22/new-tsb-3-14-08-a-140732/)

Nemesis8 03-17-2008 10:06 AM

New TSB 3/14/08
 
http://www.finishlineperformance.com...14-08-1924.pdf

I wonder if that spray can is actually Seafoam's Deep Creep...

http://www.seafoamsales.com/images/Deep-Creep-small.jpg

zoom44 03-17-2008 10:13 AM

thanks kevin- just saw that. will be adding the pdf to teh sticky thread in just a moment.

its a pretty thorough procedure for diagnosing any power stumble of loss of power issue.


notice its for 04-08 so they are still seeing some issues with newer models or they just want to get it covered prior to the 09 changes

Nemesis8 03-17-2008 10:28 AM

You can move, edit delete this if you want. Makes me wonder about doing a Seafoam cleaning like Jeff mentioned.

MazdaManiac 03-17-2008 02:38 PM

The new calibration also has slightly different ignition timing as I noted elsewhere.

Old Rotor 03-17-2008 02:44 PM

I believe they will be retarding the timing.

Razz1 03-17-2008 02:54 PM

Wow, and I was just thinking of looking up the thread and cleaning with Sea Foam myself.

Why would one not want to put a T fitting on two hoses and clean both ports at the same time?

Good thing to note is:

They do not want you to drive more than 45mph and accelerate quiclky.

Must be to prevent Sea Foam creep into the Cat canverter, thus destroying on prematurely ending its life real soon.

What is really amazing is the whole procedure does what we have been saying for two years.

I just posted in the Aussy forum two days ago that we were doing the same thing in the states. Mis-diagnoises and then an engine replacement.

rotarygod 03-17-2008 02:59 PM

Does this scare anyone else but me?

"Poor rotor sealing of rotor chambers due to worn apex seals. This may be caused by lack of metering oil lubrication during high ambient air temperature conditions."

Huey52 03-17-2008 03:05 PM

Worst case scenario if they've become worn. But no self respectin' RX8 clubber, especially a Rotary god, would let it get that far (e.g. pre-mix in harsh environments and/or the 'emission recall' flash and an occasional de-carbonizing fuel additive*). No worries.

* http://www.seafoamsales.com/motorTuneUpTechGas.htm

* http://www.gumout.com/products.asp?products=1_4


Originally Posted by rotarygod (Post 2353702)
Does this scare anyone else but me?

"Poor rotor sealing of rotor chambers due to worn apex seals. This may be caused by lack of metering oil lubrication during high ambient air temperature conditions."


MazdaManiac 03-17-2008 03:22 PM


Originally Posted by Old Rotor (Post 2353650)
I believe they will be retarding the timing.

No, they advanced the trailing timing.

They reduced the timing split to 5° across the board except at maximum load and heavy load at very low RPM, where it is 10° - 15°.
It used to be 15° - 20° in most of those same ranges.
They probably could have gone all the way to 0° in the mid-throttle spots. I'm not sure why they didn't, other than to permit the use of crappy gas.

dmc27 03-17-2008 04:20 PM


Originally Posted by rotarygod (Post 2353702)
Does this scare anyone else but me?

"Poor rotor sealing of rotor chambers due to worn apex seals. This may be caused by lack of metering oil lubrication during high ambient air temperature conditions."

Yes it does. I thought the along the same lines as Zoom: problem still NOT solved. There was also mention of poor lube during start up - which scares me even more. Possibly explaining why we've seen plenty of engine replacements in areas that are not deserts??


Originally Posted by zoom44 (Post 2353102)
. . . notice its for 04-08 so they are still seeing some issues with newer models or they just want to get it covered prior to the 09 changes


Detrich 03-17-2008 04:31 PM

will we all be getting letters in the mail for this recall?

Nemesis8 03-17-2008 04:44 PM

^ It's not a recall, it's Technical Service Bulletin. You have to complain of "loss of power" to have the TSB applied to your car.

Ericok 03-17-2008 05:11 PM

Bulletin MSP16 is pretty clear that it applies to EVERY 04-08 car within the VIN range. The other two are symptom dependent.

Nubo 03-17-2008 05:13 PM

Well, at least we have a formalized procedure for de-carbonizing the engine :)

I assume

"...revised PCM calibration is available which increases
metering oil lubrication during high ambient air temperature conditions."

refers to the flash applied with the previous recall, since it isn't directly referenced otherwise?

MazdaManiac 03-17-2008 06:08 PM


Originally Posted by Nubo (Post 2353958)
refers to the flash applied with the previous recall, since it isn't directly referenced otherwise?

No. That was "T".
The new one is "U" or "V", depending on where you live.

Old Rotor 03-17-2008 06:09 PM

We have to look at it as the exotic it is and hope they keep taking care of us because we Love the Rotary! There is so much to learn yet! D I...cant wait for the next thing... I bought my first one in '71 and have not had to pay for a engine yet.

onefatsurfer 03-17-2008 07:01 PM

I'm confused.. Is there now a new updated pcm reflash for all models? I got my '05 reflashed to "G" on Jan 3. Is my car protected? Is this basically an official mazda thumbs up for premixing?

Edit: Nevermind. I should be upgraded to H it seems like in the tsb. Guess I'll be "upgrading" my pcm. Still may start premixing anyway, though. Thanks

For those wondering:

2004
M/T - All N3Z2-18-881U SW-N3Z2EU000 - U flash
A/T - All N3Z1-18-881V SW-N3Z1EV000 - V flash
2005
M/T - Calif. N3ZD-18-881H SW-N3ZDEH000 - H flash
A/T - Calif. N3ZC-18-881J SW-N3ZCEJ000 - J flash
M/T - Fed. N3ZB-18-881H SW-N3ZBEH000 - H flash
A/T - Fed. N3ZA-18-881J SW-N3ZAEJ000 - J flash
2006-2008
M/T - Calif. N3M1-18-881K SW-N3M1EK000 - K flash
A/T - Calif. N3M2-18-881M SW-N3M2EM000 - M flash
M/T - Fed. N3M5-18-881K SW-N3M5EK000 - K flash
A/T - Fed. N3M6-18-881M SW-N3M6EM000 - M flash

TrochoidMagic 03-17-2008 11:29 PM


Originally Posted by Razz1 (Post 2353681)
Wow, and I was just thinking of looking up the thread and cleaning with Sea Foam myself.

Why would one not want to put a T fitting on two hoses and clean both ports at the same time?

Good thing to note is:

They do not want you to drive more than 45mph and accelerate quiclky.

Must be to prevent Sea Foam creep into the Cat canverter, thus destroying on prematurely ending its life real soon.

What is really amazing is the whole procedure does what we have been saying for two years.

I just posted in the Aussy forum two days ago that we were doing the same thing in the states. Mis-diagnoises and then an engine replacement.


was posting this curiousity in the other issues&problem thread. didn't get much help tho...
i did do the test-drive procedure, but need to double check if i followed the right steps. but did keep under 3k rpm for 20 mins city drive, brought up to 8k rpm. idle for 1min and see if idle speed drops under 700...

this was stated somewhere in the 2nd bulletin 01-014-08 iirc. and its for actual customer complaint on lack of power. i'd only quickly ran this procedure... but i think i'll feel much safer when i get the new revised flash. i must've been lucky cause i've premixed since the first mile its been in my belonging.

btw, its good someone actually made a new thread on this. i wasn't getting much info or help on this subject in the older threads. keep coming with the feed-backs and comments.

TrochoidMagic 03-17-2008 11:50 PM


Originally Posted by Ericok (Post 2353954)
Bulletin MSP16 is pretty clear that it applies to EVERY 04-08 car within the VIN range. The other two are symptom dependent.

*so catch me on this if i'm wrong peoples:
-so that means 01-013-08 SHOULD be set and updated with the pcm reflash for model cars 2004-08. (mine being the "K" flash for '07 6mt)
-whereas 01-014-08 is for testing procedures for customers who brings their car in that are experiencing problems... where they will do carbon removal; test drive procedure; and sensor volt tests... and engine replacements for these tests are dependent on results???

so yeah... my car may not be the worst due to my premixing. either way, it seems like some kinda long break-in procedure. and i'm still very eager for the flash as i've been wondering why my dip stick hasn't been moving much.

Nubo 03-17-2008 11:53 PM


Originally Posted by MazdaManiac (Post 2354049)
No. That was "T".
The new one is "U" or "V", depending on where you live.

Edit, nevermind I didn't realize there was more than one bulletin.

So what if I never to to Mazda for "regular maintenance or repair"... Can I just call to get the MSP reflash?

Razz1 03-18-2008 12:21 AM

Don't need the U flash with the AP unit!

:)
:)

MazdaManiac 03-18-2008 01:42 AM


Originally Posted by Razz1 (Post 2354619)
Don't need the U flash with the AP unit!

:)
:)

That's true.
Not everyone wants that option, but it is a good one - especially if you are off warranty or don't have a useful dealership nearby.

BrianGT 03-18-2008 05:52 PM


Originally Posted by MazdaManiac (Post 2354709)
...especially if you are off warranty or don't have a useful dealership nearby.

This is my situation, I'll be ordering an AP in the next couple of weeks.

New Yorker 03-18-2008 06:38 PM


Originally Posted by onefatsurfer (Post 2354112)
Is this basically an official mazda thumbs up for premixing?

Where do you get that? The TSBs explain—in great detail—what needs to be done. In fact, in one of them, a specific engine cleaner is mentioned, along with incredibly specific instructions on how it's to be used. In the 35 pages of the three new TSBs, do you see the word "premix" mentioned? Even once?

A few facts:
1) Mazda wants your engine to last as long as possible. Having to replace your engine is bad. Bad for you. Bad for Mazda.
2) If there are things that can be done to help make your engine last longer, Mazda will make those things known. Even if they're an inconvenience. Like having to drag your car to the dealer for a new flash.
3) If the new TSBs wanted you to premix, they would use the word "premix" somewhere in the 35 pages. At least once, if not several times. (That's how language works.) What's more, Mazda would explain, in tedious detail—and with multiple illustrations—what to premix with, how to premix, and when to premix. Yet there's no mention of premix in 35 pages. Not one mention.

That tells me something.

MazdaManiac 03-18-2008 06:51 PM


Originally Posted by New Yorker (Post 2355956)
1) Mazda wants your engine to last as long as possible. Having to replace your engine is bad. Bad for you. Bad for Mazda.

They might have thought of that 5 years ago.


Poor sealing of rotor chambers due to worn apex seals. This may be caused by lack of metering of oil lubrication during high ambient air conditions.
How much more of an admission of culpability do you expect from Mazda?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:33 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands