Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

My 17-cylinder RX8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 01-15-2008, 04:20 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
thered1996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My 17-cylinder RX8

Read the whole post in the SE regional forum, if you want to or live in Georgia. The long and short of it is this: in order to test emissions here in Georgia, the tester needed to manually enter the engine data...as a 1.3 L 17-cylinder!!!

This really piques my curiosity. Can anyone think of a technical reason why this could be?

Also, they could not get communications with the OBD to work. The guys at the testing station claim this is the case with testing all '8s this year. They had to test it old-style: probe in the tailpipe and running for so long at such-and-such RPM. (Which made me smile because the max RPM was 3000..."Oh, yeah...you're *really* giving my engine a workout there!")
Old 01-16-2008, 03:23 PM
  #2  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
thered1996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Really...no one has a technical reason for 17-cylinder?
Old 01-16-2008, 03:25 PM
  #3  
Registered
 
rotarygod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
16 isn't accurate enough and 18 is just showing off.
Old 01-16-2008, 03:26 PM
  #4  
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
Because Georgia's DMV are morons and dont know **** about automobiles.

Maybe you should file a complain to DMV.

in NY, when you go do the emission testing, theres an option there is something like

Enter the number of cylinders for the engine __
Press 'R' for Rotary.

Old 01-16-2008, 04:50 PM
  #5  
DGAF
iTrader: (1)
 
Rootski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
3 rotor faces x 2 rotors x 2 fires per cycle = 12 + 1 cylinder x 4 brake calipers = 16 + master cylinder = 17. They don't count clutch cylinders because then ATs would get off easy.
Old 01-16-2008, 08:30 PM
  #6  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
why would they even have a 17 cylinder option?

sounds like that station has issues. not able to communicate with the diagnostic port? is the place not CAN compatible? why not? someone get charlie/marietta8 in here
Old 01-16-2008, 10:48 PM
  #7  
No means yes
iTrader: (1)
 
CnnmnSchnpps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Jersey City NJ
Posts: 1,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm betting the database / software they use only allows them to classify engines by number of cylinders (someone didn't do their research ). So when they realized there was such a thing as a rotary, the easy fix was to put it in a slot where you are sure no piston engine will ever sit (who the hell is gonna build a 17 cylinder engine??).

No clue about the OBDII not working thou
Old 01-16-2008, 11:20 PM
  #8  
Hit & Run Magnet
iTrader: (3)
 
kersh4w's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: DC Area
Posts: 6,690
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
^ sounds plausible.

this is pretty funny.
Old 01-17-2008, 01:37 AM
  #9  
rotorized!!!
 
daisuke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 653
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think it's really even possible to make a 17 cylinder engine, I mean.. it IS, but you'd have to make it a straight-17, it's the only way you could get the engine balanced, and such a monster wouldn't fit in anything.

The only large engines I can think of with an odd number of pistons are aircraft radials, and I think the biggest ones ever made only had 9 or 11 cylinders.

whoever made that up and actually put it in the DMV database is one of the stupidest ppl ever
Old 01-17-2008, 02:37 AM
  #10  
Registered
 
fmzambon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Reggio Emilia - Italy
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by daisuke
I don't think it's really even possible to make a 17 cylinder engine, I mean.. it IS, but you'd have to make it a straight-17, it's the only way you could get the engine balanced, and such a monster wouldn't fit in anything.

The only large engines I can think of with an odd number of pistons are aircraft radials, and I think the biggest ones ever made only had 9 or 11 cylinders.

whoever made that up and actually put it in the DMV database is one of the stupidest ppl ever
Actually, there can be rotary engines with cylinders

Just look at the aircraft engines used during WWI. Those were rotary radials,

The only thing is, I really don't think that a 17 cylinder radial (and we're talking single row radial) ever existed. Maybe a three row radial with two rows of five and one of seven cylinders?
Old 01-17-2008, 07:47 AM
  #11  
No means yes
iTrader: (1)
 
CnnmnSchnpps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Jersey City NJ
Posts: 1,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^ they also had a 5-cyl volvo
Old 01-17-2008, 03:56 PM
  #12  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
thered1996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The ironic part is that the RX7 tests fine here in GA...the DMV computer system is savvy to rotaries in those cars.

In retrospect, the cylinder thing must have something to do with timing and the ability to read EMPs. When they tested the car, they put a probe in the tailpipe and laid some type of sensor on the dashboard. The sensor was likely a pickup for engine RPMs. This must mean a 17-cylinder engine would have the same electromagnetic signature as a rotary. This will make good conversation if I should ever meet a 17-cyl engine owner..."Say, did you know..."
Old 01-17-2008, 06:11 PM
  #13  
rotorized!!!
 
daisuke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 653
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fmzambon
Actually, there can be rotary engines with cylinders

Just look at the aircraft engines used during WWI. Those were rotary radials,

The only thing is, I really don't think that a 17 cylinder radial (and we're talking single row radial) ever existed. Maybe a three row radial with two rows of five and one of seven cylinders?
rotary radials... lol yeah those had so much torque that some airplanes were forbidden to turn left after takeoff lest they go into a torque induced spin and crash

Biggest gasoline powered radial for airplanes was the 28 cylinder (4 banks of 7 pistons) Pratt & Whitney Wasp Major.

The biggest ever was the russian zvezda 42 cylinder radial (6 banks of 7 pistons) diesel boat engine that made 6000 hp I want one of those in my car!
Old 01-17-2008, 06:20 PM
  #14  
Finally a MT
iTrader: (11)
 
lilring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
see thats why im glad to live in IL... there are emissions that you have to get tested all the time.. on all the cars i have had, there hasnt been one thati had to get tested.
Old 01-17-2008, 06:36 PM
  #15  
Registered
iTrader: (7)
 
invasion08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New jersey
Posts: 2,079
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I live in nj any got my car inspected in oct. While talking to the people they said sometimes when they put the rotary engine in it messes up their computer system. But my car went through no problem and did the test through the computer.
Old 01-17-2008, 09:09 PM
  #16  
Yellow Fever
 
AndrewE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lanark, ON
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by CnnmnSchnpps
I'm betting the database / software they use only allows them to classify engines by number of cylinders (someone didn't do their research ). So when they realized there was such a thing as a rotary, the easy fix was to put it in a slot where you are sure no piston engine will ever sit (who the hell is gonna build a 17 cylinder engine??).

No clue about the OBDII not working thou
sounds like this would be right, considering the biggest engine going through an emissions test would be a bugatti veyron with the W16
Old 01-17-2008, 09:26 PM
  #17  
*BEEP*
 
Mendossa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CnnmnSchnpps
I'm betting the database / software they use only allows them to classify engines by number of cylinders (someone didn't do their research ). So when they realized there was such a thing as a rotary, the easy fix was to put it in a slot where you are sure no piston engine will ever sit (who the hell is gonna build a 17 cylinder engine??).
I absolutely *love* the fact that the renesis being an "exception" confuses most people/computers when it comes to classification. That's how my insurer classified my 8 as a "4 doors, 1.3L 4 cylinders".
Old 01-17-2008, 09:28 PM
  #18  
No means yes
iTrader: (1)
 
CnnmnSchnpps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Jersey City NJ
Posts: 1,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In NJ mine got registered as a 2dr coupe. BS I tell you!
Old 01-18-2008, 02:21 AM
  #19  
Registered
 
fmzambon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Reggio Emilia - Italy
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by daisuke
... I want one of those in my car!
Hmmm... You'd need a really big and round hood to fit one of those. And also a really big fuel tank
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
05TR1CH
New Member Forum
14
04-18-2023 04:56 AM
Skyl3r
New Member Forum
148
12-02-2019 04:51 PM
SupraG
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
7
09-21-2015 12:09 AM
vetteor8
New Member Forum
14
07-25-2015 11:43 AM
RX7.9
New Member Forum
0
07-20-2015 12:01 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: My 17-cylinder RX8



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:57 AM.