Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

More "Marbles in a Can" Observations

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Nov 26, 2009 | 04:02 AM
  #301  
swoope's Avatar
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,603
Likes: 36
From: orlando, fl
Originally Posted by ASH8
Hi Scott...

My info has been corrected...I got it wrong...thanks to Jeff....

All the 30,000 (approx) S1 RX-8 made UP to Dec 1st, 2004 had the Orifice Installed..

AFTER Dec 1st, 2004 Mazda ceased to install them in ANY Series RX-8 since..

So, in some ways this is more of a revelation (call it what you want ), that Mazda removed these restrict-ors (whatever you want to call them), so MORE RX-8's, 2005,6,7,8,9 could potentially have these "noise" symptoms.....

NO wonder Mazda don't want a TSB on this???
any guess on vin #s or is build date accurate enough? i have a build date of 10/03. never had an issue. i have had a rare knock now and then. but it was spark knock before i think it was the T flash..

it does explain a lot! now get to work on 2010 mazdaspeed3 fun facts!!!

thanks for all the hard work.. (you to jeff!)

beers
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2009 | 08:02 AM
  #302  
Mazurfer's Avatar
Surf Hard, Drive Hard
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,840
Likes: 13
From: Indialantic, Florida
Kinda weird it took this long(end of 09) for this to surface.
Here's a link to the short thread where we were discussing it and it came to light thanks to a new owner and Ash8.

https://www.rx8club.com/rx-8-discussion-3/please-help-potential-new-owner-question-miac-181950/

Wondering about potential heater issues down the road as well.

Seems as if at least two 09's have now had this done in the last month or so..........and MIAC went away.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2009 | 10:31 AM
  #303  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 28
From: Under my car
Well, I took mine out to increase water flow through my heater core.
I frequently turn on the heater to help out the cooling system on the track and I didn't want to reduce the flow.
It is also worthwhile to note that I do NOT have any sort of "marbles in a can" or heater core noises.

Last edited by MazdaManiac; Nov 26, 2009 at 10:36 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2009 | 10:45 AM
  #304  
Mazurfer's Avatar
Surf Hard, Drive Hard
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,840
Likes: 13
From: Indialantic, Florida
Seems like it's kinda car specific anyway.
Some are cured by simple octane changes and some aren't.
Some have always had it.......(including 09's) and some have not.
I don't track mine(yet), but I do beat on it pretty good and have never heard/had it.
Might be interesting if we could find a car that actually has MIAC and has the orifice in there???????
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2009 | 12:16 PM
  #305  
ASH8's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,880
Likes: 340
From: Australia
This is the "Application Description" Info direct from the AUST/UK EPC for the "Orifice"..

- 041201
FE10** -103028
SE17** -129710

The DASH - before the build date and VIN # means Used Up To, if the dash was After the Numbers it would mean USED From.

IF there is NO Application Description then there is NO change in this part and has been used since day ONE of Production and Year.

So Scott, if your car is a 10/2003 then you have this orifice installed, definitely.

IMO there is more than one MIAC type noise, this (it appears?), High Carbon build up, Old or fowled Spark Plugs ,Coils and or Leads, Gas/Fuel, extra HOT Throttle Body = Air Intake.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2009 | 12:20 PM
  #306  
ASH8's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,880
Likes: 340
From: Australia
This is the USED FROM..." Application Description" which applies to the ''Hose SET'' Part Number, NOT including the Orifice.

041201 -
FE10**103028-
SE17**129710-

The Parts Screen shot here is the 'Orifice' Used Up to ( I still can't believe I overlooked this..I should be shot!)

Attached Thumbnails More "Marbles in a Can" Observations-2.jpg  

Last edited by ASH8; Nov 26, 2009 at 12:40 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2009 | 05:18 PM
  #307  
olddragger's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 40
From: macon, georgia
i took this out when i installed my secondary radiator--Charlie at Mazcare told me then it was only there to decrease the sounds in the heater core.
I dont have any marbles in can noises--never have--before or after.
OD
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2009 | 10:13 PM
  #308  
ASH8's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,880
Likes: 340
From: Australia
Originally Posted by olddragger
i took this out when i installed my secondary radiator--Charlie at Mazcare told me then it was only there to decrease the sounds in the heater core.
I dont have any marbles in can noises--never have--before or after.
OD
Yes, I think Mazcare are correct OD, IMO that is all it can do, reduce the Coolant flow (Rush) into the Heater Core (radiator)...

As Jeff said, many are getting confused with "other" similar sounds that are not related.

But I still wonder why Mazda removed it ( the exact same part was installed in 1992 (ONLY) FD RX-7's BTW, then not in 93,94,96 series RX-7's).

SEE 1992 RX-7 Heater Parts Pic...

Attached Thumbnails More "Marbles in a Can" Observations-7.jpg  

Last edited by ASH8; Nov 26, 2009 at 10:18 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 10:31 PM
  #309  
csracer's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Shelby Township, MI USA
I got my coolant restrictor orifice today p/n F100-61-E09. here is what it looks like. It is 17.5mm OD, 7mm ID and 10mm long.

Reply
Old Dec 23, 2009 | 01:18 AM
  #310  
ASH8's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,880
Likes: 340
From: Australia
Thanks for the Pic...

What I find "perplexing" is why did Mazda installs this 'orifice restrictor' in every rotary first series production start in the FD RX-7 and RX-8, then stops using it after about a year of production in both model cases?..

RX-8 (FE) Installed Up To 1 st December 2004, never re-introduced.
RX-7 (FD) Installed Up To August, 1993, never re-introduced.

Then to re-install this device once an owner complains.

How does it effect the performance of the cars Heater?
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2009 | 06:33 AM
  #311  
Mazurfer's Avatar
Surf Hard, Drive Hard
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,840
Likes: 13
From: Indialantic, Florida
^...................good question Ash. Glad I don't have MIAC or any symptoms thereof.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2010 | 07:41 PM
  #312  
JinDesu's Avatar
went back to srsly broke
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,040
Likes: 1
From: Flushing, NY
Time to drag this topic back up once again:

I noticed mine suffering this at 7500-9000. It sounds like the video, although I would say my first impression was more of paper fluttering against the wind. I took out my AP to measure the coolant temps while recreating the sound, and saw no change in temps.

So if anyone can answer my questions:
1) Does cavitation create lack of cooling? I'm pretty sure the answer to this is yes, but it'd be nice to hear people say so.
2) How quick will the temperatures rise if cavitation occurs? How long does the cavitation have to occur for the temperature to rise?
3) How does the engine read the water temp? Is it a continuous reading, or after set periods of time?

MM (if you are still reading this thread), how can one differentiate the sound between the aux port rattling, and cavitation?
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2010 | 08:16 PM
  #313  
Mazurfer's Avatar
Surf Hard, Drive Hard
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,840
Likes: 13
From: Indialantic, Florida
I believe I can answer #3, but nothing else......sorry.
I'm reading water temp right off the ODBII port and mine is continuous.
It reads it right off the ECT sensor which I believe is on the block.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2010 | 04:03 PM
  #314  
redmarlin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: MD
Originally Posted by Mazurfer
Seems like it's kinda car specific anyway.
Some are cured by simple octane changes and some aren't.
Some have always had it.......(including 09's) and some have not.
I don't track mine(yet), but I do beat on it pretty good and have never heard/had it.
Might be interesting if we could find a car that actually has MIAC and has the orifice in there???????
After living with MIAC for nearly 3 years I finally thought the coolant restrictor orifice part F100-61-E09 looked like a fix that has not been refuted. So off I went and got the dealer to order and fit part F100-61-E09. After getting confirmation from their tech line, they did this (just within the warrantee).

My MIAC noise is transformed, but the results are not all I'd hoped for:

Before: a "hard to be sure just what it is" noise at 7500+ rpm that resembled sand being thrown at the back of the glove box. I could have believed it was many things.

After: quite obviously liquid whooshing about noises at a lower 5500+ rpm, actually tailing off by 7000+ rpm. The sand against glove box noise has gone.

The original noise was worrying as it was hard to be sure what it was. The new noise is more obtrusive, not least because it occurs at "every day" revs. If I end up having to choose between one of these two noises I'll be going back to without the orifice (now I'm really convinced my noise was coolant flow).


'07 Sport
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2010 | 04:59 PM
  #315  
Mazurfer's Avatar
Surf Hard, Drive Hard
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,840
Likes: 13
From: Indialantic, Florida
Originally Posted by redmarlin
After living with MIAC for nearly 3 years I finally thought the coolant restrictor orifice part F100-61-E09 looked like a fix that has not been refuted. So off I went and got the dealer to order and fit part F100-61-E09. After getting confirmation from their tech line, they did this (just within the warrantee).

My MIAC noise is transformed, but the results are not all I'd hoped for:

Before: a "hard to be sure just what it is" noise at 7500+ rpm that resembled sand being thrown at the back of the glove box. I could have believed it was many things.

After: quite obviously liquid whooshing about noises at a lower 5500+ rpm, actually tailing off by 7000+ rpm. The sand against glove box noise has gone.

The original noise was worrying as it was hard to be sure what it was. The new noise is more obtrusive, not least because it occurs at "every day" revs. If I end up having to choose between one of these two noises I'll be going back to without the orifice (now I'm really convinced my noise was coolant flow).


'07 Sport



^..............Well, I guess it was a good datapoint if nothing else.
Guess I might give it some time before yanking it out.
Least it didn't cost an ungodly sum of money to try it.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2010 | 05:08 PM
  #316  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 28
From: Under my car
Its funny - after years of hearing about this phenomenon, my car developed it on the current motor.

Its a definite, clinky "gurgling" that occurs immediately after lifting the throttle on a high-RPM excursion.

I think I'll just live with it since its more amusing than annoying and its a pretty meaningless noise, anyway.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2010 | 08:01 PM
  #317  
ferg's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 974
Likes: 1
From: south florida
i sold my rx8 because of this, i know it sounds crazy but it sounded like crap. now i have no 8 anymore, i was really looking forward at the toyota ft-86 when it comes out but toyota really went down hill with recalls

Last edited by ferg; Feb 17, 2010 at 08:04 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2010 | 08:41 PM
  #318  
robrecht's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,932
Likes: 0
From: Hunterdon County
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
Its funny - after years of hearing about this phenomenon, my car developed it on the current motor.

Its a definite, clinky "gurgling" that occurs immediately after lifting the throttle on a high-RPM excursion.

I think I'll just live with it since its more amusing than annoying and its a pretty meaningless noise, anyway.
You have the REmedy water pump mod on this engine, I imagine?
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2010 | 09:06 PM
  #319  
Nemesis8's Avatar
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 1
From: Missouri
I have an 09/03 build and just had the sound develop at 85K. I believe mine is the APV sleeves rattling. After going through my struugles of broken APV sleeves connecting mounts on my new engine build, I fear that I may actually break one if it keeps rattling like it is doing now.

Maybe a bridgeported 4-port turbo would be the cure
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 07:11 PM
  #320  
jasonrxeight's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,487
Likes: 3
From: Omaha, NE
cant believe people still talking about this
its just the air in the heater core that gets pushed around
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2011 | 03:45 PM
  #321  
devtec's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 57
Likes: 1
From: Chicago, IL
What was the consensus on MIAC at low rpms? Mine occurs between 2-3k then goes away, only under light acceleration/load, and sounds exactly like the sound from the YouTube video except seems to be coming more from the engine bay than the glove box. I know that the alternative explanations for this sound other than the heater core fix are detonation or bad cat, but if anyone could give me more details specifically about low RPM MIAC, I'd appreciate it.

'07 MT with 42k miles, stock, plugs and coils never replaced (BHR kit ordered and awaiting), no loss of power or hesitation that I can appreciate, always 93 octane.

Thanks in advance...

Last edited by devtec; Apr 14, 2011 at 04:00 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2011 | 01:34 PM
  #322  
KBelmont's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Harrisburg, PA
Originally Posted by devtec
What was the consensus on MIAC at low rpms? Mine occurs between 2-3k then goes away, only under light acceleration/load, and sounds exactly like the sound from the YouTube video except seems to be coming more from the engine bay than the glove box. I know that the alternative explanations for this sound other than the heater core fix are detonation or bad cat, but if anyone could give me more details specifically about low RPM MIAC, I'd appreciate it.

'07 MT with 42k miles, stock, plugs and coils never replaced (BHR kit ordered and awaiting), no loss of power or hesitation that I can appreciate, always 93 octane.

Thanks in advance...
your issue sounds to be more similar to mine... mine rattles right around 3500 rpm, and only under light throttle... i already ordered the oriface piece and installed it into the hose, and it didn't change a thing...

as we speak, it is sitting at the shop, having it's plugs and coils replaced... they are also going to check out my cat, and check it's condition as well... i have 45k miles, stock, and plugs and coils were never replaced... i have no noticeable loss in power or any hesitation, and always 93 octane as well... but, the sound is driving me totally insane...

i'll be leaving work here in about an hour and a half... and will be putting about 100 miles of driving into it tonight, so i should have a good idea on if it helped at all...

will post an update when i get home...

Last edited by KBelmont; Apr 15, 2011 at 01:42 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2011 | 01:44 PM
  #323  
devtec's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 57
Likes: 1
From: Chicago, IL
Thanks K.... looking forward to hearing what your results are.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2011 | 08:17 AM
  #324  
KBelmont's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Harrisburg, PA
so... plugs, coils, and wires replaced... ecu reflashed, and retuned...

verdict is, noise is still there around 3500ish RPMs...



speaking with the rotary tech at the shop... he let me know what the issue is, though...

the noise is coming from the intake manifold control shutter valve... when it opens it is chattering...

i got some pricing on fixing the issue...

$115 to try running some sort of cleaner through it, which is supposedly from a mazda service bulletin... that includes labor and tax, but he stated that they would have to keep the car overnight, as it has to soak in for a while...

$650-$700 to replace the valve entirely... which he said is mostly labor, as it is a nightmare to get to...



on the plus side, after the reflash, plugs, coils, and wires... i have boatloads more power from the engine... and, maybe i'm crazy, or i've just been playing music more-so lately... but the chattering of the shutter valve is far less pronounced...
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2011 | 01:46 PM
  #325  
devtec's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 57
Likes: 1
From: Chicago, IL
Thanks K, very informative post. Anyone else do this IM control shutter valve cleaning or replacement?
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:47 AM.