Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

K&N Intake problems

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-15-2004, 01:26 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
AdictiveRx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
K&N Intake problems

Hey all, i just got the K&N short ram intake kit. I am wondering if Anyone has had any problems with this unit.

I am personally experiencing a LOT of sputtering noise above 8K RPM. No lag or reduction of power that i can tell. just sounds like crap.

I only have 750 miles on it so maybe thats it?

Let me know!

Rev on...
Old 04-15-2004, 08:38 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Crichton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Moya
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Check out this thread and see if it helps you at all. Not sure if it's the problem you are having, but well worth a try.
Old 04-15-2004, 10:52 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
rx8miami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have the short arm. Runs just fine and is loudest intake I have ever owned. But it's a noticable difference in power. They say almost 10hp but I think it's a but less. Check your install and make sure all your sensors are in correctly and you followed the steps.
Old 04-15-2004, 03:17 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
Xystas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hell
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From what I've heard and read, the stock intake on the Mazda is supposed to be exceptional and doesn't need modifying. I would wait some time before making any changes to the air intake system of the RX-8... wait until more companies do further testing.
Old 04-15-2004, 11:22 PM
  #5  
Mmmmm... Rotary Donut
 
G8rboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lake in the Hills, IL (NW Chicago Burbs)
Posts: 2,376
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by rx8miami
They say almost 10hp but I think it's a but less.
Getting 10HP after changing out Mazda's factory tuned intake... no way. I would be astounded if K&N could show a 1HP increase on the RX8... and might even make less than stock. I'll admit I miss the growl of a good K&N setup, but Mazda spent too much time engineering and tuning the intake on the RX8 to have it bested by a short arm aftermarket setup by 10hp.
Old 04-16-2004, 12:22 AM
  #6  
Registered Lunatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Tamas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SF Bay Area, California
Posts: 3,575
Received 37 Likes on 32 Posts
It's louder... for many people, louder will seem to be stronger as well.
Old 04-16-2004, 12:27 AM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
AdictiveRx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
good point guys. Looks like its going back to the store. Thanks for all the advice. The link to the previous thread was great !

Rev on
Old 04-16-2004, 08:39 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
RX8Lover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I always love how people think that throwing on an aftermarket intake is gonna make all the difference in the world and shave off a half second off 1/4 mile times or something.

Can you honestly tell me that you would be able to "feel" the difference of 5 measily horses? I doubt that. I think that if you HEAR it louder, you automatically THINK it's faster. Puhlease.

Like others have said - some of the intakes have been proven to actually LOSE horsepower, as Mazda did a pretty good job tuning the stock airbox. But go ahead, throw $200 away on the chance that you'll gain a couple horsepower. Woohoo!
Old 04-16-2004, 09:44 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
rx8miami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[URL=http://www.kandn.com/dynocharts/69-6030TP.jpg]

Check it out guys. You think they are blatantly lying about a 9.5 hp gain? I don't know K&N has quite a rep. WHat ya think?
Old 04-16-2004, 11:00 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
rx8miami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Guys sorry I stink at setting up links. Copy it from the http to the jpg, do not include the bracket.
Old 04-16-2004, 11:01 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
rx8miami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
blue is k&n and red is factory. this is straight from the k&n site.
Old 04-16-2004, 04:31 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
grifster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fort Campbell, KY
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: K&N Intake

I just installed one on my AT. I have not noticed any sputtering at high RPM. Actually I noticed a stronger pull under acceleration. Yes it is loud, but only if you really step on it. Under normal acceleration it isn't unreasonably loud. Since I bought the Automatic to share the driving duties with my girlfriend, I am looking for every kind of boost possible.
Old 04-16-2004, 05:16 PM
  #13  
Sideways, No not me sir
 
rjacobs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
shooda taught her to drive a stick, or gotten a new girlfriend.
Old 04-16-2004, 06:05 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
snap-on's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AFTERMARKET AIR INTAKE SYSTEM - ROUGH ENGINE IDLE
Applicable Models
Model Starting S/N Ending S/N
2004 RX8 00000000 ZZZZZZZZ

Some customers may complain of rough or poor idling condition. The RX8's airbox N intake system is specially designed to eliminate restriction N create a smooth airflow over the MAF. If the customer has installed an aftermarket air cleaner or intake system, the airflow stream to the MAF element may be disrupted N cause an improper MAF signal. This erratic signal results in a rough idle condition. Also, aftermarket air cleaner elements are sometimes coated in oil to better filter the incoming air. The oil from this type of elemnt may damage theMAF resulting in a poor idle or MIL related to the MAF. If a customer complains of a rough engine idle, see the repair instructions below. 1. Check for aftermarket air intake system or aftermarket air filter element. (Replace with factory system if necessary.) 2. If rough idle continues, check for additional bulletins / M-tips, workshop manual troubleshotting. 3. Confirm repair.
Old 04-16-2004, 06:34 PM
  #15  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
search my posts for MAF. i have been preaching intakes/filters causing MAF related problems for months!
Old 04-17-2004, 12:05 AM
  #17  
Registered Lunatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Tamas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SF Bay Area, California
Posts: 3,575
Received 37 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally posted by rx8miami
You think they are blatantly lying about a 9.5 hp gain?
Yes.
I can also draw nice dyno graphs about almost anything.
As it was said, the stock intake is pretty well designed. Finding almost 10 HP by slapping on just an intake is VERY unlikely.
Old 04-17-2004, 07:19 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
rx8miami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tamas,
The reason I sited the web page is because K&N has made living out of producing quality high performance aftermarket intakes for man y years. Maybe problems are caused by the system, however you can't deny that the system is functional and produces more hp. I have had in my car for 4 months now and acceleration has been better than facotry all along. Back to my original question. You actually think K&N's dyno's are lying?
Old 04-19-2004, 03:47 AM
  #19  
Registered Lunatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Tamas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SF Bay Area, California
Posts: 3,575
Received 37 Likes on 32 Posts
Well, you said that even though they claim almost 10 HP, it seems to be less...
Also, yours is the short intake, correct? Does that have a heat shield or is it practically a hot air intake? The pictures I remember seeing about the short K&N seem to be unshielded thus they will almost certainly lose power with the hot air ingested by the engine. I seriously doubt the 9.5 HP but I'm not an expert. It just seems to be high, especially considering that according to other opinions of reputable vendors (was that Racing Beat?), there is not too much room for improvement with slapping an intake onto the RX-8 and do nothing otherwise. But what do I know :D
Old 04-19-2004, 04:09 AM
  #20  
Ricer is Nicer.....
 
Doctorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Canada.
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Cool Dyno.....

As an observer who has never 'dyno'ed' a car in his life, I followed that link to the K&N graph, and I have a question.....

Does that temp in the top left really mean that the ambient temperature for the 'stock' run was 12*F HIGHER?

Surely such a difference in conditions negates ANY significant comparisons?

If a company cannot produce results based on identical baselines, you are just comparing apples to orangutans.......
.
.
.
doc
Old 04-19-2004, 09:06 AM
  #21  
Mmmmm... Rotary Donut
 
G8rboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lake in the Hills, IL (NW Chicago Burbs)
Posts: 2,376
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Re: Dyno.....

Originally posted by Doctorr
As an observer who has never 'dyno'ed' a car in his life, I followed that link to the K&N graph, and I have a question.....

Does that temp in the top left really mean that the ambient temperature for the 'stock' run was 12*F HIGHER?

Surely such a difference in conditions negates ANY significant comparisons?

If a company cannot produce results based on identical baselines, you are just comparing apples to orangutans.......
.
.
.
doc
I didn't even notice that- excellent point... that certainly makes their evidence questionable. I believe K&N makes some decent products for vehicles that /need/ to breath better, but the RX8 just isn't one of them.

Prior to anyone ripping out their stock intake, 8 owners should be required to read about the work that went into the VFAD+SDAIS variable tuned induction. It's not like we're driving around Civics here.
Old 04-19-2004, 11:12 AM
  #22  
Registered User
 
rx8miami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nice point doc. that definitely needs to be cleared up. I will say this since I am not a dyno and who cna really tell besides the speedo reving up that much faster. I really wish I had dynoed my car prior to intake and exhaust. I will say this the car noticabbly faster with both. who in the world would can actually know without a pre-post dyno. it feels good though.
Old 04-19-2004, 06:43 PM
  #23  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
Re: Re: Dyno.....

Originally posted by G8rboy


Prior to anyone ripping out their stock intake, 8 owners should be required to read about the work that went into the VFAD+SDAIS variable tuned induction. It's not like we're driving around Civics here.
right on G8rboy. which is exactly why i started the S-DAIS thread which is now a sticky at the top of this thread.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RevMeHarder
New Member Forum
6
08-16-2023 06:23 PM
Carbon8
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
42
02-27-2020 08:39 AM
ed0128
New Member Forum
7
09-09-2015 04:50 PM
Kim Jong Illest
Series I Trouble Shooting
3
09-04-2015 04:27 PM
Octomus
New Member Forum
2
09-03-2015 11:40 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: K&N Intake problems



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:26 PM.