How many horses would a light flywheel free up
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Nicosia, Cyprus
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How many horses would a light flywheel free up
Anybody know how many HP a lightened flywheel (act prolite/mazdaspeed/Rb) is expected to free up?
#3
The Professor
A long time ago somone said about 10 hp in 1st gear, 6-8 in second, 4-5 iin third, 2-3 in fourth and about 1 in fifth.
Being able to rev quicker does free up horse power. and a .1-.4 faster quarter mile is a heck of a huge difference.
Being able to rev quicker does free up horse power. and a .1-.4 faster quarter mile is a heck of a huge difference.
#5
It doesn't free up any horsepower at all..........the car just revs quicker due to less inertia meaning you hit the powerband sooner. It does have side effects though....when I had one in my last car, the car didn't like to idle with the A/C on. You need that inertia to keep the motor running smoothly so there comes a point where lighter isn't always better, but shedding a few pounds won't hurt!
#6
The Professor
Originally Posted by 18bsTiRX8
It doesn't free up any horsepower at all..........the car just revs quicker due to less inertia meaning you hit the powerband sooner. It does have side effects though....when I had one in my last car, the car didn't like to idle with the A/C on. You need that inertia to keep the motor running smoothly so there comes a point where lighter isn't always better, but shedding a few pounds won't hurt!
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/gear-ratio.htm
#7
RX8 and a Truk....
I had a .xls spreadsheet - one could enter variables and show "the car would accelerate as if it had 'x' much power in 'x' gear...I've forgotten who created the spreadsheet - but it was made for a miata; you'll have to adjust stuff.
http://www.d-mphotos.com/movies/flywheelcalculator.xls
http://www.d-mphotos.com/movies/flywheelcalculator.xls
#8
Registered
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by staticlag
A long time ago somone said about 10 hp in 1st gear, 6-8 in second, 4-5 iin third, 2-3 in fourth and about 1 in fifth.
Being able to rev quicker does free up horse power. and a .1-.4 faster quarter mile is a heck of a huge difference.
Being able to rev quicker does free up horse power. and a .1-.4 faster quarter mile is a heck of a huge difference.
on another note...
also, if your car "revs faster" and its in gear while its "revving faster", then you are accelerating faster because of putting more power to the wheels/pavement or have a slipping clutch
#9
Interesting question. My 2-cents (flame suit ON)
From an dyno perspective, you might not see see any (some dyno testing is done at a constant rpm, or only slightly changing rpm where the flywheel's inertia wouldn''t affect the resulting torque much). Practically speaking, the engine is able to increase rpm faster which does translate into getting more energy to the rest of the drivetrain (vs the flywheel) during acceleration, so could be converted into a net hp difference. The effect is more pronounced at lower gearing, because the engine is accelerating faster (you go through the rpm range faster). The results will very with the weight/inertia of the car and drivetrain, including the flywheel.
The folks above seem to have some practical experience...it's a good start.
Maybe I should build a mathmatical model for this to see how pronounced it would be. Hmmm....
From an dyno perspective, you might not see see any (some dyno testing is done at a constant rpm, or only slightly changing rpm where the flywheel's inertia wouldn''t affect the resulting torque much). Practically speaking, the engine is able to increase rpm faster which does translate into getting more energy to the rest of the drivetrain (vs the flywheel) during acceleration, so could be converted into a net hp difference. The effect is more pronounced at lower gearing, because the engine is accelerating faster (you go through the rpm range faster). The results will very with the weight/inertia of the car and drivetrain, including the flywheel.
The folks above seem to have some practical experience...it's a good start.
Maybe I should build a mathmatical model for this to see how pronounced it would be. Hmmm....
#10
Lot's of discussion on this.
I believe at least 1-2 more HP is freed up to the rear wheel just from the fact of the reduced weight and the power need to move the fly wheel.
Quicker acceleration and 1/4 mile times are great improvements.
Unfortunately, there is a reduction of torque. Torque is needed on the top end and to pull a heavy load. Load increase as speed increases.
Many drag racers and track guys will take torque over HP.
Then others will tell you you don't need athe fly wheel if you increase your HP through other means such as FI.
Oh yea, do a search it's worht the reading.
I believe at least 1-2 more HP is freed up to the rear wheel just from the fact of the reduced weight and the power need to move the fly wheel.
Quicker acceleration and 1/4 mile times are great improvements.
Unfortunately, there is a reduction of torque. Torque is needed on the top end and to pull a heavy load. Load increase as speed increases.
Many drag racers and track guys will take torque over HP.
Then others will tell you you don't need athe fly wheel if you increase your HP through other means such as FI.
Oh yea, do a search it's worht the reading.
#11
You don't have to guess. Theres a complete set of dyno charts for "before" and "after" LWFW, and in several gears posted somewhere in this forum. Try searching on "LWFW" for lighe weight flywheel etc.
#12
Rotary Public
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern Virginia near DC
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Question for those with the lightweight flywheel... I've heard that switching to the LWFW makes the car shudder or jerk more as you change gears? Do you find this to be the case? Any other day-to-day impacts?
#13
U-Stink-But-I-♥-U
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 12 o'clock on the Beltway.
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by Paul_in_DC
Question for those with the lightweight flywheel... I've heard that switching to the LWFW makes the car shudder or jerk more as you change gears? Do you find this to be the case? Any other day-to-day impacts?
#14
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Nicosia, Cyprus
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#16
Originally Posted by MintyFresh
BTW, if the reduced rotating inertial losses due to lighter flywheelscan be translated to HP gains, would lighter weight/tires wheels also show up similarly on a dyno? I'd think it would.
#17
Rotary Wanker
Horsepower=(Torque X RPM/5252). I don't see any flywheel weight in that formula. Might help in engine response, making the car marginally lighter, but no HP increase.
#19
Rotary Public
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern Virginia near DC
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally Posted by Ericok
Horsepower=(Torque X RPM/5252). I don't see any flywheel weight in that formula. Might help in engine response, making the car marginally lighter, but no HP increase.
#20
Rotary Wanker
Originally Posted by Paul_in_DC
I don't have the lightened flywheel, but I think those that do report it as "revving faster." So, using your formula, if the engine reaches a given RPM in less time than before, that would mean that you'd reach that horsepower in less time as well. That should result in faster acceleration, even though actual horsepower hasn't changed.
#21
Registered
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ericok
Horsepower=(Torque X RPM/5252). I don't see any flywheel weight in that formula. Might help in engine response, making the car marginally lighter, but no HP increase.
HP at wheels = HP at crank - flywheel inertial - transmission inertia - transmission friction - driveshaft inertia - differential inertia - differential friction - axel inertia - wheel bearing friction - brake inertia - wheel/tire inertia - tire rolling resistance
#23
Registered
I'm going to just pose this scenario for those who don't think that a lighter weight flywheel frees up horsepower to the wheels. Technically you gain no power as the engine makes no more power. You are reducing drivetrain loss though which means more power goes to the ground so in terms of what gets to where it counts, you do have more. If you don't believe me, think about this.
Let's say that instead of a 20 lb flywheel, you have a 200 lb flywheel. Now lets also say that we pulled off 200 lbs from somewhere else on the vehicle just to keep the total weight the same. The car weighs the same and has the same total flywheel horsepower. Which one will win in a race? Of course it's not the one with the 200 lb flywheel. As someone pointed out, it can't rev as fast. That's because it lacks the power to get it moving as fast. Power is being functionally absorbed by the flywheel. This is seen as the effort to turn it. That means that less power is making it to the ground. Once you get it up to speed, you don't see that much loss as it takes far more energy to get it turning initially than it does to keep it going but it still does take power never the less. This weight is stored energy which is also harder to slow down.
The lower the gear you are in, the larger the gain will be perceived as. This has to do with the amount of "leverage" that the gearing gives you.
Let's say that instead of a 20 lb flywheel, you have a 200 lb flywheel. Now lets also say that we pulled off 200 lbs from somewhere else on the vehicle just to keep the total weight the same. The car weighs the same and has the same total flywheel horsepower. Which one will win in a race? Of course it's not the one with the 200 lb flywheel. As someone pointed out, it can't rev as fast. That's because it lacks the power to get it moving as fast. Power is being functionally absorbed by the flywheel. This is seen as the effort to turn it. That means that less power is making it to the ground. Once you get it up to speed, you don't see that much loss as it takes far more energy to get it turning initially than it does to keep it going but it still does take power never the less. This weight is stored energy which is also harder to slow down.
The lower the gear you are in, the larger the gain will be perceived as. This has to do with the amount of "leverage" that the gearing gives you.
#24
Licenced to Race
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Markham, Ont. Canada
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the best way to explain to people that a LWFW is a good thing is to simply point them to real race cars and professionals. I bet a F1 car's flywheel is almost non-existent.
The real questions to ask yourself:
1. Is the gain worth the cost?
2. What weight do I want?
For question 1 the answer is a resounding maybe.
For question 2 I can only say that I went with the RB 12lb flywheel because I was a bit worried about drivability issues but I was 100% back to normal with my takeoff after just 15min in the car with the new flywheel.
The real questions to ask yourself:
1. Is the gain worth the cost?
2. What weight do I want?
For question 1 the answer is a resounding maybe.
For question 2 I can only say that I went with the RB 12lb flywheel because I was a bit worried about drivability issues but I was 100% back to normal with my takeoff after just 15min in the car with the new flywheel.
#25
Lascivious Post Whore
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Razz1
Lot's of discussion on this.
Many drag racers and track guys will take torque over HP.
Many drag racers and track guys will take torque over HP.