Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

16X Swap??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-15-2008, 08:52 PM
  #1  
Drop it into 3rd
Thread Starter
 
Falken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
16X Swap??

Will it be possible to swap a 16X into my 2006 RX-8 (when it comes out of course)? I always assumed it would, so I've been saving and I'm up to 5k or so but lately I have been hearing around that it won't work. If it won't I really want to know now, than money can be put to excellent use somewhere else.

Yes, I searched...

Last edited by Falken; 04-15-2008 at 08:55 PM.
Old 04-15-2008, 08:59 PM
  #2  
He's as bad as Can
 
expo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manchester, NJ
Posts: 4,309
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Your asking a question about an engine that only exists in Mazda test cars. How can we know without having a few of them on the road? Also how much do you think Mazda is going to charge you for a new 16x?? Its not like there are any in junkyards.
Old 04-15-2008, 09:03 PM
  #3  
Drop it into 3rd
Thread Starter
 
Falken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by expo1
Your asking a question about an engine that only exists in Mazda test cars. How can we know without having a few of them on the road? Also how much do you think Mazda is going to charge you for a new 16x?? Its not like there are any in junkyards.
I am asking the question specifically because in another thread someone specifically stated that 16Xs will not be swappable into current RX-8s.

I expect that I will be pumping out 10k for it. I am willing to do that, I've always viewed it as a not-so-thirsty version of the 20B swap. Wrong??

Last edited by Falken; 04-15-2008 at 09:07 PM. Reason: I wanted a frowny face...
Old 04-15-2008, 09:25 PM
  #4  
Doppelgänger
 
mysql's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Falken
I expect that I will be pumping out 10k for it. I am willing to do that, I've always viewed it as a not-so-thirsty version of the 20B swap. Wrong??

How did you always view it as that? News about it has only recently surfaced. And it's not going to be like a 20b either.
Old 04-15-2008, 09:42 PM
  #5  
Registered
 
rotarygod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
Odds are that by the time the 16X ever hits the streets (assuming it ever does), you'll long be past your current car and on to the next or the one after that.

Now to answer the question, from what it looks like in the pictures the transmission bell housing bolt pattern is the same which would mean that it will in fact bolt up to the current transmission (or any back to 1974!). You would probably have to fabricate motor mounts but that's not hard. The big issue will be the fuel and ecu upgrades as you'll most certainly need to use the ecu and fuel pump from the new engine. Since it is getting direct injection, the stock ecu won't be able to control it. Neither will the current fuel system.

The short of it is that any engine is swappable into any car with enough time and money. If these 2 things aren't going to be an issue for you then you'll only have to wait for the last problem and that is the wait to see when and if it ever comes out. Then you'll have to find one.
Old 04-15-2008, 09:43 PM
  #6  
Drop it into 3rd
Thread Starter
 
Falken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mysql
How did you always view it as that? News about it has only recently surfaced. And it's not going to be like a 20b either.
Mathematically, like I view everything else.

The 20B-REW out of the 90's cosmo produces 300HP and 300 pound-feet of torque. It also gets 10MPG and I would be hard pressed to find one with low miles. Those run around $5,000 online with installation running $2-5K from what I've heard.

The 16X Engine is predicted to produce similar 280-300HP, likely similar torque. The engine is lighter and smaller so it will not displace handling like the heavy 20B would. They are all brand new seeing as how none really exist right now, and will get more than double the mileage of the 20B. The engine should run 7-10K and the install can't be that outrageously much more than that of the 20B.

Thus we arrive at my view that the 16X is basically a solved 20B and a solved 13B. And thus we arrive at my decision that if possible I will pay for the swap the day it's available.
Old 04-15-2008, 09:49 PM
  #7  
Registered
 
fahrfegneugen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wash/Idaho
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
save your money for something else.

Which Cosmo are you talking about from the 90s? I only know about the one from the 60s.
Old 04-15-2008, 09:57 PM
  #8  
Drop it into 3rd
Thread Starter
 
Falken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fahrfegneugen
save your money for something else.

Which Cosmo are you talking about from the 90s? I only know about the one from the 60s.
I'm fairly sure they were made up through 1995. Anyway this is the engine I was referring to:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...mo_3_rotor.jpg

That is the triple rotor, 300HP engine from the 90s cosmo. It produces similar power numbers to the projected 16X ones but falls far short of it in all other aspects.
Old 04-15-2008, 10:20 PM
  #9  
Registered
 
fahrfegneugen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wash/Idaho
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
They were under the RX badge in the U.S. though. You had the RX-7 till about '95. Maybe in another country it was the Cosmo though? IDK
Old 04-15-2008, 10:28 PM
  #10  
Drop it into 3rd
Thread Starter
 
Falken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sure. My point is that is the engine I was comparing the 16X to.

Can anyone confirm the claim I have seen floating around that "16X engines will not be swappable into current RX-8s"??
Old 04-16-2008, 12:18 AM
  #11  
I 8 your Big Block up
 
RX-LR-8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Smile

No nobody can confirm that. It seems like it will be possible as Rotarygod has said.
If u wanted u could put any engine into any car its all about money.
Here just put this one in your 8 http://www.rotarygod.com/index.php?t...TARY_HISTORY_1 its a 5cc .30 cu in Wankel it makes 1.27 hp and its a rotary that doesnt use to much fuel hehe
Old 04-16-2008, 12:21 AM
  #12  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,731
Received 2,015 Likes on 1,642 Posts
wait for the warp drive flux generator instead ...
Old 04-16-2008, 12:24 AM
  #13  
Registered
 
fahrfegneugen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wash/Idaho
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
wait for the warp drive flux generator instead ...
That will be a while, they are still having issues sorting out the flux capacitors.
Old 04-16-2008, 08:42 AM
  #14  
Registered
 
rotarygod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by RX-LR-8
No nobody can confirm that. It seems like it will be possible as Rotarygod has said.
If u wanted u could put any engine into any car its all about money.
Here just put this one in your 8 http://www.rotarygod.com/index.php?t...TARY_HISTORY_1 its a 5cc .30 cu in Wankel it makes 1.27 hp and its a rotary that doesnt use to much fuel hehe
rotarygod.com? Imposter!!!!!!!
Old 04-16-2008, 09:19 AM
  #15  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally Posted by fahrfegneugen
save your money for something else.

Which Cosmo are you talking about from the 90s? I only know about the one from the 60s.
hello. he means one of these



Mazda Cosmo
Old 04-16-2008, 09:32 AM
  #16  
Drop it into 3rd
Thread Starter
 
Falken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the replies.

All I really wanted to know was if anyone at mazda had explicitly stated that the 16Xs would not be swappable into RX-8s, like I had heard had happened.

Thank you!!
Old 04-16-2008, 10:06 AM
  #17  
jersey fresh
 
dillsrotary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 3,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
do you realize the weirdest of you question? The engine practically doesn't exist yet, and won't for quite a long time. Anything is swappable with time and money, but even if you had that you'd have to wait at least 5-7 years till the engine see's production.
Old 04-16-2008, 10:19 AM
  #18  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
no no one has said explicitly. as stated above by RG there are only a couple thing sthat would slow you down. PCM Mounts and tranny. you may have to swap the tranny. you'll definitely not be able to use the RX-8s PCM and you will need different mounts.
Old 04-16-2008, 01:16 PM
  #19  
Drop it into 3rd
Thread Starter
 
Falken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dillsrotary
do you realize the weirdest of you question? The engine practically doesn't exist yet, and won't for quite a long time. Anything is swappable with time and money, but even if you had that you'd have to wait at least 5-7 years till the engine see's production.
Really? I thought we would be seeing it around 2010-ish, in the RX-8s replacement.
Old 04-16-2008, 02:36 PM
  #20  
Registered
 
fahrfegneugen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wash/Idaho
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by zoom44
hello. he means one of these

Mazda Cosmo
Thanks.
Old 04-16-2008, 03:39 PM
  #21  
Registered
 
davefzr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Diamond Bar, Ca
Posts: 1,473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
premature threadding??
Old 04-16-2008, 05:31 PM
  #22  
Registered User
 
therx8man's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I heard that the 16x won't fit, but good news: the 24x will!
Old 04-17-2008, 09:00 AM
  #23  
Registered
iTrader: (12)
 
Mazmart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,792
Received 63 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by Falken
Really? I thought we would be seeing it around 2010-ish, in the RX-8s replacement.
Don't worry. I'll get you your desired engine as soon as it's available. I can supply the 09 engines presently for those who want to spend that kind of dough.
You're looking at $6500 to $7000 on that. I don't think the 1.6l will be much more.

Paul.
Old 04-17-2008, 12:43 PM
  #24  
road warrior
 
LionZoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Oakland and Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Then again for the money you spend on the swap and the money that will be required to troubleshoot the car, you're probably close to being able to buy the car that the 16X comes in anyway. Throw in the RX-8 as trade-in and you're probably there.
Old 04-17-2008, 06:31 PM
  #25  
rotorized!!!
 
daisuke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 653
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the new 09 engines aren't a direct swap either are they?


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 16X Swap??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:49 PM.