Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

0-60 SMT vs MT

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jun 8, 2003 | 11:51 PM
  #1  
crouzer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: NC, USA
0-60 SMT vs MT

Has anyone discussed this yet?

Audi says its new sequential transmission is faster than its six speed (0.06 I think).

With a high RPM engine would there be programming for the SMT that could bring your RPMs up when pulling off from a stop similar to doing this with a manual transmission?

Or will the SMT transmission lag from a stand still?

Clue me in! :D Thanks!
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2003 | 12:21 AM
  #2  
tribal azn2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
From: irvine/fullerton, ca
bmw's smg2 is faster then its "regular" manual
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2003 | 12:42 AM
  #3  
crouzer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: NC, USA
But don't the power bands on BMWs start in the lower RPM range?
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2003 | 01:19 AM
  #4  
babylou's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Originally posted by tribal azn2
bmw's smg2 is faster then its "regular" manual
The SMG2 shifts are faster but acceleration from a standstill is almost always not as fast. The reason is the BMW has programmed in an aggressive launch control for European cars but one is only allowed to use it twenty times over the life of the car or the warranty is voided. How does BMW know? The ECU records each each instance. I guess BMW is trying to reduce driveline stresses.

I like these SMT's but they need more development. All but BMW shift in a minimum 0.2-0.3 seconds which is slower than shifting manually. In addition, without launch control these cars are about 0.4 sec slower to 60 mph.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2003 | 01:35 AM
  #5  
crouzer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: NC, USA
Ahh.. ok, so that is one way they are labeling this type of programming "launch control". Haha

Its good to know that this exist, I agree it would be "slow" without it. Should be required equipment on a high RPM car IMO.

I can see it being hard on a clutch but thats about it. Wonder what the status of aftermarket high performance clutches for SMTs are.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2003 | 01:51 PM
  #6  
Gord96BRG's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,845
Likes: 1
From: Calgary, AB
Originally posted by babylou

All but BMW shift in a minimum 0.2-0.3 seconds which is slower than shifting manually. In addition, without launch control these cars are about 0.4 sec slower to 60 mph.
Nope, not Audi's new DSG (stands for Dual Shaft Gearbox, with two clutches) - it's faster shifting than anyone's, including BMW's. Also smoother and has less clutch wear, and is faster than the equivalent manual gearbox.

Regards,
Gordon
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2003 | 08:56 PM
  #7  
babylou's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Originally posted by Gord96BRG


Nope, not Audi's new DSG (stands for Dual Shaft Gearbox, with two clutches) - it's faster shifting than anyone's, including BMW's. Also smoother and has less clutch wear, and is faster than the equivalent manual gearbox.

Regards,
Gordon
I haven't seen any data on shift times for the Audi yet. I do know the concept has good potential because of the preselecting gears but I think there might be a problem with this setup. For instance, when accelerating in say 3rd gear the tranny has preselected 4th gear. Right? Well what happens if while in 3rd gear you approach a 2nd gear corner and 4th gear is preselected? Are the downshifts real laggy or what? Also, how does the tranny reduce clutch wear? Finally, what about standing starts? Is there launch control?
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2003 | 03:43 PM
  #8  
varchild's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
Originally posted by babylou


I haven't seen any data on shift times for the Audi yet. I do know the concept has good potential because of the preselecting gears but I think there might be a problem with this setup. For instance, when accelerating in say 3rd gear the tranny has preselected 4th gear. Right? Well what happens if while in 3rd gear you approach a 2nd gear corner and 4th gear is preselected? Are the downshifts real laggy or what? Also, how does the tranny reduce clutch wear? Finally, what about standing starts? Is there launch control?

I thought this might be a problem but then I saw how it is set up each Drive shaft (one nexted inside the other) has three gears one does the odds 1,3,5 and one the evens 2,4,6. So basically if you are in 3rd then whether you are shifting into 2nd or 4th you are still switching to the 2nd drive shaft with only a minor change in selection time slowing down to normal smg-like times but still quite fast and smooth. all of the auto magazines did test drives on the new TT with this gearbox a few months back and noone noticed any lag in sudden downshifts.

Oh and DSG stands for Direct Shift Gearbox not dual shaft gearbox.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2003 | 05:39 PM
  #9  
DijabutiA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
yes, you can do an "F1" start on the DSG gearbox ; you stop and put the car into first, hold the brake and press the gas... the tranny automatically recognizes the stopped car with brake and gas and it will let you launch at 3-4k rpm
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NashuaCLS
Series I Tech Garage
15
Aug 31, 2003 01:02 PM
co3
RX-8 Discussion
17
Aug 27, 2003 01:35 PM
MarkRx
RX-8 Discussion
38
Aug 9, 2003 01:31 PM
NoVa
RX-8 Discussion
111
Jun 5, 2003 04:14 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:50 PM.