Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
(Post 3908097)
Pretty decent result
340 hp, 260 tq. (+/- 3 or 4) |
Is that the dyno of the SFR kit?
|
/\ although he didn't say , the previous post seems to point to it being the SFR belonging to Wanted Two
|
That is what I was thinking. Love the numbers! Makes me want more :lol:
|
Originally Posted by Brettus
(Post 3908304)
very nice - deserves a spot in the highest whp thread . What boost at peak whp ?
|
2 Attachment(s)
Got a scan of the boost curve?
I know its not the exact turbo, however it is a lot closer comparison as a 1.06 GT35R is very close to a .84 turbine P trim housing( even so this one is a .70 according to the build thread). Compressor wheels are also very similar. I have attached a photo of the difference between the turbine wheels. Results again are tipping in favor of the tubular manifold design, boost comes on sooner, and higher rpms carry more power, and this is still at lower boost pressure. Not down playing your results, just staying on topic. |
I'm afraid I don't. Either Ray or Jeff might as they were with the car, I'm still in Afghan-o-land. You can read exactly what Ray told me in my build thread about what the boost was doing.
|
Also, I am very curious about the idea of adapting one of your manifolds to my kit, PM me if you would be willing to take a look at it and possible cost involved. The results would quell this entire discussion!
|
Cfm > psi......
|
Originally Posted by WantedTwo
(Post 3908942)
I'm afraid I don't. Either Ray or Jeff might as they were with the car, I'm still in Afghan-o-land. You can read exactly what Ray told me in my build thread about what the boost was doing.
Go enjoy your car before you even think of doing more mods. Stay safe out there! |
Where is the new shop going to be? I should be home at the end of this month... hopefully.
|
Originally Posted by WantedTwo
(Post 3908956)
Where is the new shop going to be? I should be home at the end of this month... hopefully.
|
wanted, its only a 60hp difference, and I am still incline to believe this is due to the turbo selection, what you should do is match Turblown 426whp turbo for yours then go back the dyno..
|
Originally Posted by Turblown
(Post 3908958)
Out side of the twin cities in Minnesota.
Originally Posted by FazdaRX_8
(Post 3908960)
wanted, its only a 60hp difference, and I am still incline to believe this is due to the turbo selection, what you should do is match Turblown 426whp turbo for yours then go back the dyno..
60-1 , P-trim, .70AR, BB T-4 water cooled |
Originally Posted by FazdaRX_8
(Post 3908947)
Cfm > psi......
Originally Posted by olddragger
(Post 3908105)
apvs closed?
Originally Posted by WantedTwo
(Post 3908970)
60-1 , P-trim, .70AR, BB T-4 water cooled
Originally Posted by Brettus
(Post 3908304)
What boost at peak whp ?
Wanted has one of those "Gizmo" boost controllers that I knew absolutely nothing about. Tony from UMS and I spent a good 20 minutes trying to decipher the instructions. In all, it seems like a good controller, but it wasn't intuitive at all. We basically got it to hit 12 PSI as a sort of "spike" (you can see it in the dyno plot) which immediately settled down to 11.5 PSI, trailing down to about 10.8 PSI at the redline. |
I'm afraid that is all the info I have reguarding the Turbo, but I seem to remember .96 in there somewhere...
I thought I had left the instructions sitting on the seat just incase, if I forgot, my apologies. Also let me know what I owe you and how you would like to be paid. Thanks for all the work Jeff!! |
Originally Posted by WantedTwo
(Post 3909009)
I'm afraid that is all the info I have reguarding the Turbo, but I seem to remember .96 in there somewhere...
Originally Posted by WantedTwo
(Post 3909009)
I thought I had left the instructions sitting on the seat just incase, if I forgot, my apologies.
The printed instructions would have been no less cryptic than the online PDF, anyway.
Originally Posted by WantedTwo
(Post 3909009)
Also let me know what I owe you and how you would like to be paid. Thanks for all the work Jeff!!
|
Originally Posted by FazdaRX_8
(Post 3908947)
Cfm > psi......
PSI presumes it is not. |
Originally Posted by Turblown
(Post 3908958)
Out side of the twin cities in Minnesota.
|
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
(Post 3909004)
Uh, whut? CFM is almost as useless as PSI.
I am pretty sure turblowns turbo has a higher g/sec then SFR's kit, can you confirm?
Originally Posted by Charles R. Hill
(Post 3909108)
CFM presumes air is moving.
PSI presumes it is not. |
Originally Posted by FazdaRX_8
(Post 3909272)
an engine is moving air, cfm, the PSI is how much resistance the engine is providing, so I always thought that if one engine can make x power at 10psi with a curtain turbo while the same engine makes more power with the same 10psi but a different turbo, what is the change? I thought CFM is what makes the change, an I wrong?
|
Originally Posted by Charles R. Hill
(Post 3909108)
CFM presumes air is moving.
PSI presumes it is not. |
I am stating they are the same with the exception of the turbo
|
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
(Post 3909304)
And neither represents mass without temperature.
|
Yeah, I just feel compelled to scream out "Temperature!" whenever someone says "Pressure!".
It's like a sick game of Marco Polo. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:16 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands