Notices
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades This is the place to discuss Super Chargers and Turbos, Nitrous, Porting, etc

Log Manifold (SFR/Esmeril) Vs Tubular (turboblown) Turbo Manifolds, and setups

Thread Tools
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 5 votes, 5.00 average.
 
Old Jan 15, 2011 | 10:13 PM
  #51  
Turblown's Avatar
Boostin'
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 641
Likes: 1
From: Twin Cities, MN
Rather than sidetracking another thread I am posting this here;

Originally Posted by FazdaRX_8
Looks great


still comparing apples and oranges, I haven't seen two setups with the same turbo but one with a log manifold and one with a tubular manifold

also I have not seen the dyno charts from SFR's kit with Mazdamaniacs Tune.....

there is not enough public/Presented data to say one is better then the other
I started a thread tubular vs log, Post some DATA..... Comparing the two

https://www.rx8club.com/showthread.p...95#post3831395

I have attached the highest hp dyno thread.
This shows our manifold with the aux ports wired open, which hurt the power curve under 7200rpms by around 20+hp/tq.

Can you tell me the exact specs on the other turbos? I am pretty sure they are either 60 trim To4Es, or 61mm turbos. The To4E cars should be spooling faster than the GT35R, and therefore making more torque than our kit down low, but are they? Nope. The 61mm turbo dyno is extremely laggy compared to ours, just look at the graph, and that is a the same compressor as a GT35R.

I am not sure what more proof you want?

If you are interested in a kit & not in a rush, I will build you both style manifolds and do a back to back.

I am also not using that size tubing anymore for the turbo manifolds, I am stepping down in size, which will help increase response. Just wait til you see a 60 trim To4E from us @ 15psi, it will beat the posted graph everywhere.
Attached Thumbnails Log Manifold (SFR/Esmeril) Vs Tubular (turboblown) Turbo Manifolds, and setups-fi-chart.jpg  

Last edited by Turblown; Jan 15, 2011 at 10:30 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2011 | 10:43 PM
  #52  
Mawnee's Avatar
I divide by zero
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
From: Spring Hill, FL
Just to be fair, my dyno graph was with a hack of a tune with no timing and sub 10 AFRs above 6k. I'm proud that I went over 300hp on my first dyno with a built in my garage setup, but its hardly worthy for any real comparisons to professionally built(and tuned) setups.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2011 | 11:52 PM
  #53  
Turblown's Avatar
Boostin'
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 641
Likes: 1
From: Twin Cities, MN
I wasn't trying to take a dig at you Mawnee. It can be hard to read into " tone " over the internet. There will never be a fair comparison unless its the same car anyhow. Dynos vary, engine compression varies, tune varies etc etc...
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 02:23 AM
  #54  
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 5
I think if mawnee's or SFR's setup was fully tuned with mazdamaniac then we would be able to say if the tubular one is significantly better then a log

MM did tune an SFR kit, but we have not seen the numbers from it or anything, once that car gets on the dyno then we would have more usable data, you have provided wonderful data, we just need more from others

as far as Torque your kit does very well, but brettus does not included torque in his graphs, for comparison.

Don't get me wrong I think you have a great Product, and its very unique!!!

what was the diameter of runners you used and plan to use next?

also where did the oxygen sensor end up? before or after the turbo?
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 09:21 AM
  #55  
Mawnee's Avatar
I divide by zero
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
From: Spring Hill, FL
Originally Posted by Turblown
I wasn't trying to take a dig at you Mawnee. It can be hard to read into " tone " over the internet. There will never be a fair comparison unless its the same car anyhow. Dynos vary, engine compression varies, tune varies etc etc...
oh no, no offense taken. Was just pointing out that the only graph I have posted was far from the end result of my build
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 11:53 AM
  #56  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,936
Likes: 2,140
not all log manifolds are created equal, no different than all tubular manifolds are not created equal either
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 12:49 PM
  #57  
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 5
Jeff

where is the best place to put the o2 sensor for the cobbs to tune for it?

I remember reading 18-24 inches away but I was curious if Before or after the turbo mattered on a top mount setup?

and with the MAF housing how much straight pipe is needed before and after it, also how far do you like it away from the turbo intake?

Thanks
Branden
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 02:01 PM
  #58  
09Factor's Avatar
Original Turbo 'd Auto !!
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,136
Likes: 5
From: Surprise, Arizona
Originally Posted by FazdaRX_8
Jeff

where is the best place to put the o2 sensor for the cobbs to tune for it?

I remember reading 18-24 inches away but I was curious if Before or after the turbo mattered on a top mount setup?

and with the MAF housing how much straight pipe is needed before and after it, also how far do you like it away from the turbo intake?

Thanks
Branden
In a top-mount it needs to be before the turbo.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 11:46 AM
  #59  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 28
From: Under my car
I prefer it before the turbo, but the SFR does it at the start of the downpipe, IIRC.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2011 | 02:00 PM
  #60  
SpeedForceRacing's Avatar
TurboTim
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
From my understanding of working with rotaries(both Renesis and the old 13B) over the years is that you need to use a minimum of 2.25" piping from the front and rear rotor to feed the turbo(for maximum power ofcourse).The center port is not as big of a concern.When we designed our header,we could not figure out a way to run twin 2.25" pipes up to the turbo so we went with a log style manifold instead.Defintiely not optimum, but seems to work well:-)
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2011 | 12:57 PM
  #61  
SpeedForceRacing's Avatar
TurboTim
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
I prefer it before the turbo, but the SFR does it at the start of the downpipe, IIRC.


We moved it to before the turbo if guys are going to be using the Cobb Access Port

Last edited by SpeedForceRacing; Jan 31, 2011 at 12:59 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2011 | 01:07 PM
  #62  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 28
From: Under my car
Tim is awesome.
That is all.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2011 | 02:53 PM
  #63  
SpeedForceRacing's Avatar
TurboTim
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
Tim is awesome.
That is all.
Your awesome!
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2011 | 04:25 PM
  #64  
Charles R. Hill's Avatar
Owner of BHR
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,101
Likes: 45
Everybody spread out.... the dick-touching is about to begin.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2011 | 05:03 PM
  #65  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 28
From: Under my car
lulz!

It's all good amongst friends...
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2011 | 05:04 PM
  #66  
Jedi54's Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 22,600
Likes: 3,455
From: The Dark Side
it's only ghey if your swords cross.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2011 | 06:16 AM
  #67  
Jamaalsmith's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: Your Mouth
Originally Posted by Charles R. Hill
Everybody spread out.... the dick-touching is about to begin.
Lol...im sorry..these smiley's are the best thing ever...
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2011 | 02:06 PM
  #68  
Turblown's Avatar
Boostin'
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 641
Likes: 1
From: Twin Cities, MN
Our new design; 321SS double slip merge collector. Also moved down in size from Jamaals car. It should " spool " even faster..
Attached Thumbnails Log Manifold (SFR/Esmeril) Vs Tubular (turboblown) Turbo Manifolds, and setups-100_5558.jpg  
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2011 | 03:43 PM
  #69  
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 5
After reading an assesment of a greddy turbo failure and causes on a the 8, i would be wery of going to much smaller. Perhaps with a bigger turbo the setup will be fine. I just cant help to think the excess heat and pressure is gonna kill the seals pretty quick.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2011 | 04:15 PM
  #70  
Turblown's Avatar
Boostin'
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 641
Likes: 1
From: Twin Cities, MN
Originally Posted by FazdaRX_8
After reading an assesment of a greddy turbo failure and causes on a the 8, i would be wery of going to much smaller. Perhaps with a bigger turbo the setup will be fine. I just cant help to think the excess heat and pressure is gonna kill the seals pretty quick.
The greddy manifold cracks because of the tight radius turns, and the turbine wheel/housings restriction. The turbo fails because the turbine wheel & housing being too small, the oil drain, and the fact that its oil cooled only. Turbine wheel and housing selection will be the restriction well before tubing size on a top mount turbo setup. Smaller tubing makes a considerable difference in boost response. We recently build an FD with a 1.15 P trim Gt35R that makes 22psi by 3400rpms! Stock engine...
Car was also doing near 600rwhp.

For those that don't understand, the double slip merge collected allows each pipe to expand individually of the others, and there is zero pre-stress on the exhaust manifold( if built correctly). Turbo manifolds that don't have this, are pre-stressed, and this leads to cracking.

Last edited by Turblown; Feb 2, 2011 at 04:17 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2011 | 05:17 PM
  #71  
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 5
So there was no excessive back preassure and heat? I have read that the internal seals on the exhaust side can fail because of excessive heat. Did it start to loose power in the top end?
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2011 | 07:35 AM
  #72  
WantedTwo's Avatar
C4 burns real good
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 848
Likes: 2
From: Layton, Utah
My car will be put on the dyno mid February to be properly tuned. From there we will have some good numbers and data to show everyone and prove the quality of the SFR kit. As Jeff stated before, MAF housing quality proves to be very important when tuning the system, and my AFR gauge might as well be painted on when under boost. If you all want specifics on my kit look in my build thread, its in my siggy. I really wish I could be there for her first time on a dyno, but I’m in Afghanistan…

Jeff, the car will be in your hands, I'm looking for some GOOD numbers, she is built to handle it. If you want a parts list of what is on the car so you can really open her up let me know and I'll send you the sheet, aw screw it, I'll post it here...

Edit - the fuel pump, and dampener are installed, the plugs and clutch will be installed by ray before the dyno.
Attached Thumbnails Log Manifold (SFR/Esmeril) Vs Tubular (turboblown) Turbo Manifolds, and setups-car.jpg  

Last edited by WantedTwo; Feb 3, 2011 at 07:38 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2011 | 11:35 AM
  #73  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 28
From: Under my car
Pretty decent result:



340 hp, 260 tq. (+/- 3 or 4)
Attached Thumbnails Log Manifold (SFR/Esmeril) Vs Tubular (turboblown) Turbo Manifolds, and setups-sfr-dyno.jpg  
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2011 | 11:48 AM
  #74  
olddragger's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 40
From: macon, georgia
apvs closed?
I do like that that Tq number. Better start buying some rear tires
OD
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2011 | 02:23 PM
  #75  
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 5
Very nice!!!!
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 5 votes, 5.00 average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:33 PM.