Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
(Post 2543162)
Simply not true.
Here is the proper way to install an external wastegate in that position: http://www.mazdamaniac.com/images/mi...bo1%5B1%5D.jpg http://www.mazdamaniac.com/images/mi...bo2%5B1%5D.jpg http://www.mazdamaniac.com/images/mi...bo3%5B1%5D.jpg Chris |
I saw this Kit first hand at a Dyno meet, it does look sexy but the WG was pretty damn close to the ground. I would say about 3 to 5 inches max. I am no expert but from what I can tell many people are apprehensive in buying this kit due to the WG position. Why not change it's design? Is it a huge problem in doing so?
|
The wastegate unfortunately IS too low on this kit, seen it in person. I would not feel comfortable driving over speed bumps or small obstacles. Especially when the city is redoing pavement, they tear the old layer away and the manholes stick out a few inches, now way in hell you would make it with them in between the wheels. The kit does look nice though :)
|
Originally Posted by devildog1679
(Post 2543287)
I saw this Kit first hand at a Dyno meet, it does look sexy but the WG was pretty damn close to the ground. I would say about 3 to 5 inches max. I am no expert but from what I can tell many people are apprehensive in buying this kit due to the WG position. Why not change it's design? Is it a huge problem in doing so?
Chris |
Originally Posted by ChrisRX8PR
(Post 2543296)
We'll look into it.
Chris |
Yes, some of us have seen this kit installed and everyone, including the owner and the shop that installed it said the wastegate location is a problem. I am not a "hater" againts any products that shops/companies/people are willing to make for the 8. I just try to provide constructive critism. In this case you should seriously look into redesigning the wastegate location for this kit.
|
Originally Posted by ChrisRX8PR
(Post 2543284)
Try doing that with a 60mm wastegate instead of a 35-38mm.....
Chris |
4 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by tdiddy
(Post 2543347)
I am almost certain that is a 44mm wastegate. Granted its not a 60mm but size doesn't always matter. :)
Here are some pics of a 35, 38, 40 and 44mm wastegates. The flanges change. the 35 and 38 are the only ones with two bolt flanges. The 44 has a V-band setup. If you have seen a HKS 60mm wastegate....its about the size of the stock turbo in the greddy kit. I totally see your point and like I said, we will look into it, its just that in this particular case, size does matter. Chris |
You are probably right Chris. I was just assuming those were pictures of a Mazsport Type 1 kit and their website says that the type 1 kit comes with a 44mm extermal wastegate so that is where I was getting my information from. The real question is what turbo kit is that in the pictures?
Jeff - care to let us in on what kit is in the pictures? |
Until we see someone with an actual problem with the wastegate being "that low", we can't say it's "too low" or a "problem".
|
Originally Posted by SayNoToPistons
(Post 2543650)
Until we see someone with an actual problem with the wastegate being "that low", we can't say it's "too low" or a "problem".
|
Yep, he had a problem with it.
|
what happened?
--Jonathan |
After looking at the pictures again of staticlag's car...I don't think I like the looks of the I/C. It's massive and to me doesn't look right with the front of the car. I'm sure it serves it's purpose, but I like things a little more stealth than that. Just my opinion of course.
--Jonathan |
I regularly hit my under-braces on speed bumps and the like.
The WG in this kit is almost 2" lower than that. The intercooler is bling, but it would be less silly looking if it were right-side-up! |
Oh wow, I didn't even notice it was upside down. lol.....
--Jonathan |
Come on lol Chris at esmeril engineered this ebay kit perfectly
|
Well, technically, there is no right-side-up for an intercooler, but it ALWAYS looks better to have the small end up.
Originally Posted by tdiddy
(Post 2543439)
Jeff - care to let us in on what kit is in the pictures?
|
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
(Post 2544216)
Racing Beat built it for Mazda.
|
Originally Posted by jbvrx8
(Post 2544210)
Come on lol Chris at esmeril engineered this ebay kit perfectly
|
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
(Post 2544216)
Well, technically, there is no right-side-up for an intercooler, but it ALWAYS looks better to have the small end up.
Racing Beat built it for Mazda. |
Originally Posted by jbvrx8
(Post 2544210)
Come on lol Chris at esmeril engineered this ebay kit perfectly
|
from the pictures on the esmeril site the construction looks really well made. the waste gate location should be an easy fix also.
|
Originally Posted by 05rex8
(Post 2544170)
After looking at the pictures again of staticlag's car...I don't think I like the looks of the I/C. It's massive and to me doesn't look right with the front of the car. I'm sure it serves it's purpose, but I like things a little more stealth than that. Just my opinion of course.
--Jonathan |
Originally Posted by truemagellen
(Post 2546347)
You can keep the grill installed and not even see the intercooler if you want that stealth look. As for the size of the Intercooler you want won't regret the size as you increase the hp and the turbo isn't self-destructing.
--Jonathan |
anyone who's serious gets the MS bumper at a minimum anyway.
|
Originally Posted by mysql
(Post 2547423)
anyone who's serious gets the MS bumper at a minimum anyway.
--Jonathan |
they look good, and aren't made from fiberglass. I'm sold.
|
Agreed on MS being played out.
|
Originally Posted by mysql
(Post 2547455)
they look good, and aren't made from fiberglass. I'm sold.
--Jonathan |
So...static...where'd you go? What's up with your car? After having this kit on for a while...what are your impressions about it now?
|
Originally Posted by 05rex8
(Post 2580186)
So...static...where'd you go? What's up with your car? After having this kit on for a while...what are your impressions about it now?
I just recently talked with Static and he can't really give his impressions on the car cause he isn't driving it. :wallbash: He has had a few problems & things are looking to good for his Rotary, mainly the engine. I didn't get too many details from him though. |
oh snap.....tell him to get on here sometime so we know what's up. I'm afraid to turbo my car now...so many people lately losing there engines.
|
Tuning is key. The higher the power level, the more accurate your tuning must be. People are running around with crap ass tunes, or no fuel management and wonder what went wrong. Go figure.
|
Yeah, I dont want anything that much over 300 at the wheels anyways. Hopefully the tune with the BHR/MM turbo will be ok. I mean I shouldn't be second guessing that in the first place. Just gets me worried when I see these things happen.
|
Even without turbo, just watching NA engines die is enough to give anyone pause about owning a RX-8.
I'm sure there are plenty of people who have had more FI miles than me, but I put on 25k without issue. Engine had normal compression and everything. |
True. I know you have been pretty successful with it (except for some coil issues :icon_no2:) and its a DD for you if i'm not mistaken. Mine would only be a nice weather car.
|
Originally Posted by mysql
(Post 2580381)
Even without turbo, just watching NA engines die is enough to give anyone pause about owning a RX-8.
I'm sure there are plenty of people who have had more FI miles than me, but I put on 25k without issue. Engine had normal compression and everything. One thing I've noticed from reading a lot of the threads on the forum over time is that detonations and popped engines seem less likely since the AccessPORT came out. I just ordered my AP and will use it NA until I get the time/money to get a BHR/MM kit installed. |
^nice choice!
|
Originally Posted by ChrisRX8PR
(Post 2543283)
uhh...did you actually measure that?
Originally Posted by ChrisRX8PR
(Post 2543283)
Have you actually seen an installed kit and looked under the car.
Originally Posted by ChrisRX8PR
(Post 2543283)
Your estimate is pretty off actually..
Originally Posted by ChrisRX8PR
(Post 2543284)
Try doing that with a 60mm wastegate instead of a 35-38mm.....
Originally Posted by ChrisRX8PR
(Post 2543296)
We'll look into it.
Originally Posted by ChrisRX8PR
(Post 2543392)
I totally see your point and like I said, we will look into it, its just that in this particular case, size does matter.
|
Originally Posted by SayNoToPistons
(Post 2543650)
Until we see someone with an actual problem with the wastegate being "that low", we can't say it's "too low" or a "problem".
Now I am worrying about the clearance of a whole new thing. Just put in the TurboXS exhaust and it looks really low near the differential. I think I grazed it a couple times when rounding this bend near my house at speed with a slight dip which causes my shocks to compress and I think I heard it hit a couple times. Gonna check it for scratches later. After all my worrying about the wastegate, now my exhaust is causing a ruckus. edit: And fyi my car is NOT lowered, and I would not consider lowering it due to the wastegate. If your car IS lowered, think twice. I love this kit, but the only real flaw I have come across is the wastegate clearance. Other than that, I am quite happy. Personally, I wasn't going to lower my car anyway, because I drive really hard and beat on it, so I didnt want the hassle of worrying about hitting this or that or grazing the lip of my bumper etc. |
great review! thanks!and aw poop, i was considering this kit and another but i also want to lower it :/
and if you can pull from a c5 z06, does that mean u could do 0-60 in less than 4 seconds? :P |
Originally Posted by always.anthony
(Post 3352949)
great review! thanks!and aw poop, i was considering this kit and another but i also want to lower it :/
and if you can pull from a c5 z06, does that mean u could do 0-60 in less than 4 seconds? :P The kit now has a new design with a specialty low profile tial wastegate so customers with lowered vehicles no longer have any trouble with it. That review was from October 2008 and the design change occurred January of 2009. Best Regards, Jason |
I also believe it offers upgrades name brand turbo's to! The quality of these parts are very reliable if your lucky to be around a great tuner I see this kit a big win!
|
Originally Posted by ssspeedfreak
(Post 3353085)
I also believe it offers upgrades name brand turbo's to! The quality of these parts are very reliable if your lucky to be around a great tuner I see this kit a big win!
I have this kit on my car and I have to say that so far everything has been great. No issue whatsoever. Car runs strong and the kit comes with quality components. The turbo spools up quickly as mine see boost at around 3200 rpm and it goes ballistic when it hits 7200 rpm. I am lucky to have Chris as a tuner for my car. He spends a great deal of time answers my questions. He also install Esmeril Apex seals in my engine as well. I am very happy with his service and his turbo kit. |
Originally Posted by truemagellen
(Post 3353048)
hi Anthony,
The kit now has a new design with a specialty low profile tial wastegate so customers with lowered vehicles no longer have any trouble with it. That review was from October 2008 and the design change occurred January of 2009. Best Regards, Jason there goes another point to the esmeril turbo |
Originally Posted by always.anthony
(Post 3353648)
thnaks! :D
there goes another point to the esmeril turbo |
Originally Posted by Luckycat
(Post 3353133)
and it goes ballistic when it hits 7200 rpm.
|
Originally Posted by paulmasoner
(Post 3355735)
what good is that? reminds me of the 1000HP Supras that are no faster than the 500-600HP Supras.
Here come party crasher....keep your opinion to yourself please. |
Originally Posted by paulmasoner
(Post 3355735)
what good is that? reminds me of the 1000HP Supras that are no faster than the 500-600HP Supras.
The car has full boost from just above 3krpm, lucky cat specified this in his post. The reason it goes "ballistic" above 7k rpm or so is because all six ports are open at around that time. Hello?, its an RX-8 and it runs on 4 ports until the APV opens and unlike the Greddy, this kit has the air flow to feed these ports so when they open it feels like another shot of power just like the stock car. TQ remains pretty flat throughout the entire powerband and when it "should" drop (based on a 4port powerband) the APV opens and keeps it up just like in the stock car all the way up to redline. I don't know what people's problem with having power up top is, Luckycat didn't say it didn't have power below 7.2k rpm, he just said it went balistic, how is that a bad thing? All he is saying is that when you would expect the power to taper off like with every other engine in history the APV opens and the tq goes/keeps up there high in the RPM range. Basically, no tapering down of power until you hit the redline. Best regards, Chris |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:50 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands