Notices
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades This is the place to discuss Super Chargers and Turbos, Nitrous, Porting, etc

Axial Flow Supercharger

Old May 24, 2006 | 10:40 AM
  #3376  
Rotary Rasp's Avatar
503wtq Boosted Bimmer
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,038
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, California
Originally Posted by Richard Paul
You may keep it but you will have to cut some of it away to fit the supercharger.
The better idea if you must keep it is to hang it on the wall in your office.
Smart move would be to sell it and just use the one in the kit.

Three choices, that's nice isn't it?
Ouch, that was pretty harsh.
Reply
Old May 24, 2006 | 11:00 AM
  #3377  
rotarygod's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 26
From: Houston
lol
Reply
Old May 24, 2006 | 11:16 AM
  #3378  
Nemesis8's Avatar
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 1
From: Missouri
I don't care anymore about keeping it, but can you add the the master cylinder brace like I mentioned to your custom 4130 brace?

CFM is good for you
Reply
Old May 24, 2006 | 11:50 AM
  #3379  
Aseras's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,587
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Richard Paul
You may keep it but you will have to cut some of it away to fit the supercharger.
The better idea if you must keep it is to hang it on the wall in your office.
Smart move would be to sell it and just use the one in the kit.

Three choices, that's nice isn't it?
what about maybe just adding a billet spacer to raise it just a hair to clear the SC?
Reply
Old May 24, 2006 | 12:48 PM
  #3380  
Richard Paul's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 20
From: Chatsworth Ca
Fer crizzz sakes guys, they occupy the same piece of real estate. If I didn't have to supply a new brace I really wouldn't. About that brake brace, I might develop a stand alone one for sale. I have been thinking about it as a product since I found out that it really works, even on the street.

If it will be welded to the brace or not we haven't figured out yet.
Reply
Old May 24, 2006 | 01:21 PM
  #3381  
Nemesis8's Avatar
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 1
From: Missouri
Got it - now get back to work and quit replying to our dumb *** requests
Reply
Old May 24, 2006 | 02:59 PM
  #3382  
Aseras's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,587
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Nemesis8
Got it - now get back to work and quit replying to our dumb *** requests
exactly working SC kit first then pretty stuff later...
Reply
Old May 24, 2006 | 03:37 PM
  #3383  
Jedi54's Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 22,600
Likes: 3,451
From: The Dark Side
RP's To Do List:

1) Working Supercharger........CHECK!
2) Finely tuned supercharger......coming very soon.


Thanks for all your hard work on this project RP.
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 07:56 AM
  #3384  
Umbra's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Can't tell from the photo's but I assume there is going to be an intercooler as well or maybe not?
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 08:25 AM
  #3385  
Aseras's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,587
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Umbra
Can't tell from the photo's but I assume there is going to be an intercooler as well or maybe not?
no intercooler needed, this SC is ~80% efficient. That's what makes a axial flow SC so special.
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 04:41 PM
  #3386  
Rootski's Avatar
DGAF
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Explain how that stops it from heating up the air.
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 04:56 PM
  #3387  
Umbra's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
no intercooler needed, this SC is ~80% efficient. That's what makes a axial flow SC so special.
Compress any volume of gas and you get more heat.
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 05:07 PM
  #3388  
RX8SaxMan's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
From: Palmdale, CA
True, but if the SC is really that efficient it could, in theory, reduce the mechanical heat from the compressor. Obviously the air will still heat up from compression, but it may not be enough to warrant the need for an IC with the kit.
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 05:55 PM
  #3389  
caribbean_spice_boy_73's Avatar
Work in Progress
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Orange, CA
Good job RP...your SC is still a work in progress...but so far I am one satisfied reader..
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 06:07 PM
  #3390  
Richard Paul's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 20
From: Chatsworth Ca
I can't make you go back to the begining of the thread, it's to long, so:


Heat added to air from compression=YxT1 abs over eff of compressor

Y=Pr^.283-1
So if you have 7.5psi pressure that is Pr1.5
1.5^.283-1=.12
.12x(70+460)=63.6 degrees temp rise with 100% eff
You can't get 100% no way no how, but if you could it would still heat the air this much.
Find the heat rise for given eff, divide by eff.

Therefore if you have 50% eff you put 63.6 over .50 = 127 deg temp rise.
Or 60%= 63.6 over .6=106
50 is good for a roots 60 for a centrifugal and 85 for my axial flow.

So 63.6 over .85=75 temp rise

So while there is temp rise it is under the limits for safe operation of the Rotary.

IC or more correctly AC are not free tools, they have negatives mostly for street engines. The add complications, weight and cost. It take pressure away to push air through the radiator. Use them when you have to and not just to say you have one. I think somewhere in this thread RotaryGod has given you a lecture on how the IC can add heat to your street engine. I'm sure he will give it again if you ask nice.


As long as we are doing math I'll give yo something else. HP to compress air.
lbs/sec x T delta X .3395 = HP to work the air. To that you must add the external loss. Like bearings, gears, belt drive and more.

So .5lbs X 75 X .3395 is 12.73
.5 X 127 X .3395 = 21.5

It doesn't matter if you take the HP from a belt or the exhause or an electric motor or a steam engine in the trunk that's what it takes.
BTW I just took .5 lbs/sec out of the air it doesn't mean anything. It could be close but not exact.

Edit: For a stock unblown Rx8 it is .5/sec. How about that, I just guessed. For a blown engine it is .5 X the density ratio. The density ratio is dependent upon the heat of the gas. Dr=Pr x T1 over T2
So if you have 75 + 530=605
560 over 605=.87
1.5 x .87=1.3
x .5=.65 lbs/sec
.65x75x.3395=16.5 HP to compress the air with 85% eff

I'll let you figure out the other blowers

Last edited by Richard Paul; Jun 13, 2006 at 10:54 PM.
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 06:18 PM
  #3391  
Rootski's Avatar
DGAF
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Let's just pack the boost pipe in ice then.
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 06:53 PM
  #3392  
Aseras's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,587
Likes: 1
153 mph not bad... what's it gotta do with the SC?
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 07:10 PM
  #3393  
juanjux's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From: Madrid, Spain
Wow, wrong thread, deleting...
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 07:45 PM
  #3394  
Richard Paul's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 20
From: Chatsworth Ca
I edited 3295 with some more numbers.
But I just did another one. Using the Dr of 1.3 times the original HP of my car at 170 it comes out 221. We got 219. That shows that the additional air was of more value because all the drains were taken by the original air.

All this can be adjusted for this and that but it is a better predictor then using Pr or just psig. Use the Dr now that you know how to get it, to estimate HP when FI.

But wait we were only running 5psi for the dyno runs?????????? Guess I got something from the tuning.

Last edited by Richard Paul; May 25, 2006 at 07:48 PM.
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 07:57 PM
  #3395  
Rootski's Avatar
DGAF
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
So, wait... only 219 horsepower?
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 08:43 PM
  #3396  
therm8's Avatar
Bummed, but bring on OU!
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 1
From: Charleston, SC
Originally Posted by Rootski
So, wait... only 219 horsepower?
...


Originally Posted by Richard Paul
...we were only running 5psi for the dyno runs
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 08:44 PM
  #3397  
Richard Paul's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 20
From: Chatsworth Ca
Originally Posted by Rootski
So, wait... only 219 horsepower?
That's with only 5 psi. And using my prior math that is good power increase.
50hp from 5psi. It'll get more boost when we find some tuning bugs we have. It has nothing to do with the sc, it always had some problems since it was new.
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 08:52 PM
  #3398  
Nemesis8's Avatar
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 1
From: Missouri
I have a great idea - put it on my car
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 08:54 PM
  #3399  
zoom44's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21,958
Likes: 115
From: portland oregon
you want his low power stock engine/bad intake in your car Kevin?
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 09:02 PM
  #3400  
Nemesis8's Avatar
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 1
From: Missouri
LOL - no, but I know my engine is strong from the factory - no isuues yet, except going up Mt. St. Helens on the 13th under heavy load the car acted up like I had a compression brake applied. Let off the gas, and everything retuned to normal. Hasn't done it since - weird.
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 34 votes, 4.53 average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:15 AM.