Notices
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades This is the place to discuss Super Chargers and Turbos, Nitrous, Porting, etc

Axial Flow Supercharger

Thread Tools
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 34 votes, 4.53 average.
 
Old Feb 28, 2006 | 10:47 PM
  #2901  
rotarygod's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 26
From: Houston
OK got it straight now. I had it backwards. A good piston engine will make about 10 hp per lb of air whereas a rotary will make about 8 hp per lb of air. This means it takes more air on the rotary to make the same power which is why the comparison to a Miata engine is absurd.

An Eaton that is maxed out to the point of absurdity and unreliability that can make 360 hp on a piston engine can only make about 288 hp on a rotary. If that is an M62, it is spinning really fast, making tons of heat that need "all the tricks in the book" to control it, and it is probably making an awful lot of boost. That proves an M62 would be way too small. If the average power of an M62 is 170-250 hp on a piston engine, then it would only make it about 136-200hp on a rotary at 6-8 psi. The rotary can hit the upper end of this range with no boost. Too small. An M90 is nearly 50% larger but it isn't going to give a 50% increase in power over the M62. To many other variables and losses with spinning a heavier blower among other things.

I stick to my story that to make large horsepower over 300 on a rotary isn't going to happen with an M90 for the above air usage differences with the rotary. If you do, you're using "all the tricks in the book" and it would just be easier to size a different blower. It'll take at least an M112 to have that potential but then again other issues arise with larger units. You can't go larger forever.

Last edited by rotarygod; Feb 28, 2006 at 10:57 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2006 | 10:53 PM
  #2902  
Richard Paul's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 20
From: Chatsworth Ca
Yes that is about it. We need to be carefull here because we assume a perfect engine build. But a rule of thumb for the well built piston engne is 10hp for 1lbs of air per min.

We use min because that is what the HP is using. Remember it has a time factor in the equation. RPM being time. Work done in time. If you want to just know how strong it is you use torque.

If you want to use CFM it is a little tricky because you must factor in the barometric pressure, humidity and temp.
I use .072 but it can be as low as .069 (or less at true sea level)
one lbs/min over .069 is aprox 14.5CFM
Edit) .069 is for 85 degrees f at 28.4hg.
The constant will go down if the temp goes down or the press goes up.

It is my experience that ten hp from that much air is a good engine at 6000 or maybe less. As you go up the rpm range you lose to friction so the numbers must be adjusted.
Example might be an engine tuned for low RPM might get 10hp for 10cfm at 3000.

Last edited by Richard Paul; Mar 1, 2006 at 12:29 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 01:52 AM
  #2903  
Hymee's Avatar
Race Steward
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,430
Likes: 2
From: Brisbane, Australia
Originally Posted by rotarygod
OK got it straight now. I had it backwards. A good piston engine will make about 10 hp per lb of air whereas a rotary will make about 8 hp per lb of air.
Yep - 10 hp per lb of air per minute.

I reckon 8 is about right for the Renesis, in stock form. MAF readings I've taken are about 220 g/s at max power. I've publised that graph elsewhere in this place. That works out to 29.1 lbs/min. Therefore, 29.1 lbs/min @ 8 HP per lb/min is about 233HP. The Renesis is rated at 238, so for a sanity check it is pretty close. Flywheel figures we are talking about.

The problem is that it is not widely known what they actually make on an engine dyno. I have the means to do that, if enough folk are interested. It all depends on if you all want to help fund it It would be interesting to see how close we get to the "claimed" figures, especialy in light of the HP debacle in the early days.

Of course, there are others who have claim they make lower that that. If anyone published the figures, please point me to them.

Cheers,
Hymee.

Last edited by Hymee; Mar 1, 2006 at 01:57 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 03:20 AM
  #2904  
Japan8's Avatar
Int'l Man of Mystery
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 0
From: Central Florida
^^ under the new SAE ratings isn't the RX-8 being rated as 232hp now?

... yep... just checked MNAO's website...

212 hp 1.3-liter RENESIS 2-rotor, 4-intake-port, rotary engine
232 hp 1.3-liter RENESIS 2-rotor, 6-intake-port, rotary engine
And it looks like the new 6-speed AT still has the 4 port motor...

Anyway... by your figures Hymee, the RX-8 is making the power that mazda claims (now).
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 03:59 AM
  #2905  
Hymee's Avatar
Race Steward
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,430
Likes: 2
From: Brisbane, Australia
Well, there you go!
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 10:22 AM
  #2906  
bripab007's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Interesting, shows how much (read: little :D) I know about the Wankel; I was unware that they're incapable of converting the same amount of air into power as a piston engine. Yes, the Eaton used on the Miata kits is the MP62, which is the 4th or 5th generation of the M62. And yes, if you're using all the tricks in the book with a particular compressor to utilize all the CFM of air it can provide and turn it into usable power, then that's probably a pretty good sign you need to move up to the next size compressor I was merely using these as examples of what the Miata world sees from a positive-displacement "Heaton" supercharger (and twin-screw)

BTW, what do RX-8's typically dyno at the wheels? I seem to recall some rumors of seriously low numbers that were possibly caused by engine management/traction control systems being thrown into limp mode due to the front wheels not turning on the dyno? Aside from that, I would guess somewhere in the 185-195rwhp range?
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 11:06 AM
  #2907  
Red Devil's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 1
From: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
185 whp seems to be typical for the RX-8.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 11:25 AM
  #2908  
Mazmart's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,794
Likes: 66
Originally Posted by Red Devil
185 whp seems to be typical for the RX-8.
Red Devil,
As usual, you are on the money. That's about the average.
Paul.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 11:41 AM
  #2909  
Nemesis8's Avatar
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 1
From: Missouri
Originally Posted by Hymee
MAF readings I've taken are about 220 g/s at max power.
I can validate that one. I recorded in third gear the following:
RPM 8425
Advance 30
Throttle WOT
Lambda .8898985
Airflow in g/s 218.02
MPH 88.2388

I think if I was at .91 lambda, I would have made more power, but 200 to the wheels feels pretty good.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 03:13 PM
  #2910  
Hymee's Avatar
Race Steward
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,430
Likes: 2
From: Brisbane, Australia
Our horses must be bigger over here. We only get about 170-ish at the wheels.

Cheers,
Hymee.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 03:27 PM
  #2911  
zoom44's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21,958
Likes: 115
From: portland oregon
thats about where nemisis started i think. 175ish - 180
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 03:44 PM
  #2912  
therm8's Avatar
Bummed, but bring on OU!
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 1
From: Charleston, SC
Originally Posted by Japan8
And it looks like the new 6-speed AT still has the 4 port motor...
Hmm, interesting. Wonder where they dug up 15hp then? Could be a typo I guess, but I hope not. More than 15 with the switch to SAE.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 08:29 PM
  #2913  
Japan8's Avatar
Int'l Man of Mystery
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 0
From: Central Florida
^^ Either that or a higher redline afforded by the new tranny combined with the SAE rating gave the engine a boost. Not really sure though. I'd like to know what the REAL story is...
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 08:39 PM
  #2914  
rotarygod's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 26
From: Houston
Isn't this the axial flow thread?
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 08:41 PM
  #2915  
caribbean_spice_boy_73's Avatar
Work in Progress
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Orange, CA
Originally Posted by rotarygod
Isn't this the axial flow thread?

Hmm I though it was just me.. I did not see when lanes was changed.. ha ha
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 08:46 PM
  #2916  
Hymee's Avatar
Race Steward
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,430
Likes: 2
From: Brisbane, Australia
So, lets get it back on track then

If RAP makes a S/C that makes 80 lb/min of air, and takes 100HP to drive the thing, he should end up with 8 x 80 = 640HP, less 100 HP to drive the blower = 540 HP.

Cool

Note well: Numbers made up!!!!

Cheers,
Hymee.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 09:11 PM
  #2917  
RotaryNoob's Avatar
Hi
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Speaking of axial flow... How many more years until it's ready?
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 09:18 PM
  #2918  
zoom44's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21,958
Likes: 115
From: portland oregon
Originally Posted by Japan8
^^ Either that or a higher redline afforded by the new tranny combined with the SAE rating gave the engine a boost. Not really sure though. I'd like to know what the REAL story is...
Its the 6port used with the 6AT. thats the truth.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 09:27 PM
  #2919  
rotarygod's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 26
From: Houston
^with the lower 4 port redline.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 09:29 PM
  #2920  
Gomez's Avatar
Shifty Bastard.
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,835
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne, Australia.
Originally Posted by RotaryNoob
Speaking of axial flow... How many more years until it's ready?
It'll be ready when I say it'll be ready. Right now I'm pouring all my efforts into rebuilding my house. When I get five minutes I'll give Richard a bell, we'll nut through any niggles the project has outstanding.....and release it to market.

PM me if you want pictures of the ongoing construction at Château Gomez. You'll get some kind of idea how long it'll be before Richard and I can get together.

Cheers,

Gomez.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 09:32 PM
  #2921  
Hymee's Avatar
Race Steward
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,430
Likes: 2
From: Brisbane, Australia
Originally Posted by zoom44
Its the 6port used with the 6AT. thats the truth.
With "4-port" in it's name/description ! ? ! ?

Cheers,
Hymee.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 09:34 PM
  #2922  
Gomez's Avatar
Shifty Bastard.
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,835
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne, Australia.
Originally Posted by Hymee
With "4-port" in it's name/description ! ? ! ?
Website typo?
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 09:43 PM
  #2923  
Hymee's Avatar
Race Steward
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,430
Likes: 2
From: Brisbane, Australia
Originally Posted by Gomez
Website typo?
'spose so. Just blindly accepting what Japan 8 posted.

Cheers,
Hymee.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 09:47 PM
  #2924  
Japan8's Avatar
Int'l Man of Mystery
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 0
From: Central Florida
^^ could be a website typo, but companies this size supposedly heavily check the copy and the UAT pages before uploading the to the Production server. This doesn't mean no,... just that it seems odd...
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 10:53 PM
  #2925  
Hymee's Avatar
Race Steward
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,430
Likes: 2
From: Brisbane, Australia
Originally Posted by Japan8
^^ could be a website typo, but companies this size supposedly heavily check the copy and the UAT pages before uploading the to the Production server. This doesn't mean no,... just that it seems odd...
I guess they supposedly check the power figures before they publish them as well

Cheers,
Hymee.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 34 votes, 4.53 average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:15 AM.