VeilSide Hood
#1
SomebodyMust'veDruggedMe.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Canada eh?
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
VeilSide Hood
i saw this hood on another pic and thankls to d menac it has been photoshopped onto some stock 8's here's some pics. i think it's sweet. i contacted veilside and this is what they said--
Thank you for your inquiry, the hood will be available, however at this time
the price has not been set.We anticipate the first shipment to arrive in
May.
Regards,
VeilSide USA
1250 East 223rd #105
Carson CA 90745
Tel. 310-835-5684
-----------------------------------------
i'm gone for a month. i'll miss you *****! peace. drive fast.
Thank you for your inquiry, the hood will be available, however at this time
the price has not been set.We anticipate the first shipment to arrive in
May.
Regards,
VeilSide USA
1250 East 223rd #105
Carson CA 90745
Tel. 310-835-5684
-----------------------------------------
i'm gone for a month. i'll miss you *****! peace. drive fast.
Last edited by Formula 420; 03-30-2004 at 06:32 PM.
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Fremont, California
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd also want to know what it's made out of and what the weight is on it.
I do like the styling (probably because it's so close to stock) but I'd want to know if there's any performance reason to spend the extra money on something like that (the vents look aesthetic, I can't see much functionality in them).
I do like the styling (probably because it's so close to stock) but I'd want to know if there's any performance reason to spend the extra money on something like that (the vents look aesthetic, I can't see much functionality in them).
#7
Moderator with a mycocardium
Originally posted by EstonRX
(The vents up close, thanks shawrf1 for posting this pic - they look cool in my opinion, but can't do very much)
(The vents up close, thanks shawrf1 for posting this pic - they look cool in my opinion, but can't do very much)
#8
SomebodyMust'veDruggedMe.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Canada eh?
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
lol i didn'ty know there were wvenbts either d,
i don't know how much i like it anymore. it woyuld take getting used to, but i think i could handle it.
i don't know how much i like it anymore. it woyuld take getting used to, but i think i could handle it.
#11
the vents are reverse vent they are functional, and will help keep your motor cool. As you drive the air from the engine bay is sucked out the vents. The hood is made of FRP and weights under 10lbs.
#21
Grand Poobah
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: New England
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by swifty949
the vents are reverse vent they are functional, and will help keep your motor cool. As you drive the air from the engine bay is sucked out the vents.
the vents are reverse vent they are functional, and will help keep your motor cool. As you drive the air from the engine bay is sucked out the vents.
While you're at it, would you mind explaining why the radiator is better positioned next to the firewall behind the engine and why we don't really need a grill in the front end of a car that has its engine in front?
Thanks!
-Eric
#22
Originally posted by Sue Esponte
Would you mind explaining the physics on that one? Too bad all of those ram-air guys keep getting it wrong. They might appreciate the explanation too.
While you're at it, would you mind explaining why the radiator is better positioned next to the firewall behind the engine and why we don't really need a grill in the front end of a car that has its engine in front?
Thanks!
-Eric
Would you mind explaining the physics on that one? Too bad all of those ram-air guys keep getting it wrong. They might appreciate the explanation too.
While you're at it, would you mind explaining why the radiator is better positioned next to the firewall behind the engine and why we don't really need a grill in the front end of a car that has its engine in front?
Thanks!
-Eric
*reposted* https://www.rx8club.com/showthread.p...referrerid=619
I am no expert in fluid dynamics & air movement, but I do understand your sarcasm regarding ram-air hoods and what-not. Good job; I like your sense of humor. For what it's worth re: functionality, a quick google on reverse hood vents revealed this (Taken from an EvoVIII press release):
"The hot air extraction vents in the engine hood... Extraction efficiency has also been improved... by adding a kickup to the leading edge to generate more negative pressure. As well as reducing drag and front lift, these detail improvements also boost radiator cooling performance. "
So. Assuming that the ambient air temp is cooler than under-hood temps, at speed, this negative air pressure created by the lip in front of the vent(s) creates a suction effect under the flow of air; the only air then readily available to fill the vacuum is the air under the hood. This hot(ter) air is sucked out and the engine bay is cooler. I could be wrong. Feel free to rebut.
Rob
p.s. The ram-air (hood)/hood scoop guys don't have it wrong at all. They're good, smart, people, too. The radiator is not better positioned behind the engine next to the firewall. That's just silly.
Last edited by shawrf1; 04-02-2004 at 08:41 AM.
#23
I LIKE THE REST OF THE BODY KIT BUT THE HOOD KINDA LOOKS LIKE THE CAR WENT TO FAST AND GOT SOME SPEED RIPPLES IN IT OR SOMETHING!!! and again, I like the rest of the kit (am pry going to get it) but the hood just makes me feel....................well uncomfortable really! GO TEAM!
#24
Grand Poobah
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: New England
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rob,
My sarcasm was towards the reverse vents not ram-air hoods (the functionality of which is clear - cold air in - these guys have it right). I hope you understood that I was also teasing about the position of the radiator.
I think most would agree that the more places hot air can escape from an engine bay the better. So, vents in generally are not inherently bad. The greater the heat soak the less efficient the engine. So, are some hood vents better than no hood vents? Sure. Maybe. Vents for everyone.
The notion, however, that cold air tumbling over the reverse vents will create a vacuum to suck out the hot air just doesn't make sense especially since (a) the hood doesn't allow for any additional cold airflow INTO the engine bay; and (b) cold air is more dense, thus heavier than hot air! To me, it's much like doing a FMIC without an exhaust. You get the add'l cold air into the engine but you don't give it anywhere to go. Air may be invisible but it doesn't just disappear. In this case you're supposedly extracting air more quickly but not feeding it into the engine at an equal rate. Doesn't make sense to me...but what do I know?
The explanation you provided also said the vents reduced drag which only further discredits the source in my book! I'll ignore the comments about marginal (if any) downforce created by the product....but how does creating add'l turbulent airflow on the front of a car reduce drag? Adding something, anything, to a smooth surface will create drag. In some instances, there is a greater benefit to the element creating the drag: a front wing on an F1 car, which creates downforce.
If you've ever driven a convertible for an extended period of time your neck is certainly familiar with the way turbulent air flows over the windshield and into the cabin. The air in the cabin doesn't get sucked out into the ether.
I'd say whatever marginal benefit the reverse vents may provide is seriously offset by the sheer heinous-ness of the design...but that's not very scientific, now is it? The notion of venting isn't bad, but side or flush vents would probably be equally as helpful in cooling, and any vents are likely to create drag issues...some more than others.
That's my non-scientific $.02. And, of course, all of this is assuming there isn't a larger intake or grill on the front air dam.
-Eric
P.S. Regarding the pic of the EVO, I'd say the removal of the forward intakes on that car would be a big mistake. All they did was take cold air from the car's engine and turbo. The result would be less efficiency. The car may be smoother in a wind tunnel but it doesn't mean the engine is breathing properly....and let's face it, you're going nowhere without the engine.
My sarcasm was towards the reverse vents not ram-air hoods (the functionality of which is clear - cold air in - these guys have it right). I hope you understood that I was also teasing about the position of the radiator.
I think most would agree that the more places hot air can escape from an engine bay the better. So, vents in generally are not inherently bad. The greater the heat soak the less efficient the engine. So, are some hood vents better than no hood vents? Sure. Maybe. Vents for everyone.
The notion, however, that cold air tumbling over the reverse vents will create a vacuum to suck out the hot air just doesn't make sense especially since (a) the hood doesn't allow for any additional cold airflow INTO the engine bay; and (b) cold air is more dense, thus heavier than hot air! To me, it's much like doing a FMIC without an exhaust. You get the add'l cold air into the engine but you don't give it anywhere to go. Air may be invisible but it doesn't just disappear. In this case you're supposedly extracting air more quickly but not feeding it into the engine at an equal rate. Doesn't make sense to me...but what do I know?
The explanation you provided also said the vents reduced drag which only further discredits the source in my book! I'll ignore the comments about marginal (if any) downforce created by the product....but how does creating add'l turbulent airflow on the front of a car reduce drag? Adding something, anything, to a smooth surface will create drag. In some instances, there is a greater benefit to the element creating the drag: a front wing on an F1 car, which creates downforce.
If you've ever driven a convertible for an extended period of time your neck is certainly familiar with the way turbulent air flows over the windshield and into the cabin. The air in the cabin doesn't get sucked out into the ether.
I'd say whatever marginal benefit the reverse vents may provide is seriously offset by the sheer heinous-ness of the design...but that's not very scientific, now is it? The notion of venting isn't bad, but side or flush vents would probably be equally as helpful in cooling, and any vents are likely to create drag issues...some more than others.
That's my non-scientific $.02. And, of course, all of this is assuming there isn't a larger intake or grill on the front air dam.
-Eric
P.S. Regarding the pic of the EVO, I'd say the removal of the forward intakes on that car would be a big mistake. All they did was take cold air from the car's engine and turbo. The result would be less efficiency. The car may be smoother in a wind tunnel but it doesn't mean the engine is breathing properly....and let's face it, you're going nowhere without the engine.
Last edited by Sue Esponte; 04-02-2004 at 11:00 AM.
#25
Thank you for the refreshingly coherent response. Here is my reply:
Originally posted by Sue Esponte
Rob,
The notion, however, that cold air tumbling over the reverse vents will create a vacuum to suck out the hot air just doesn't make sense especially since (a) the hood doesn't allow for any additional cold airflow INTO the engine bay...
Rob,
The notion, however, that cold air tumbling over the reverse vents will create a vacuum to suck out the hot air just doesn't make sense especially since (a) the hood doesn't allow for any additional cold airflow INTO the engine bay...
I defer the explanation of drag coefficients, spoilers, air movement across your neck within a convertible, etc. to smarter, more capable people than I.