Notices

APR GTC-200 wing fitment

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Mar 6, 2013 | 12:30 PM
  #26  
Dan507's Avatar
Rotary Rocket
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 238
Likes: 1
From: England
I've Been speaking to Topgear8 about his spoiler. He said he used the OE holes.

My bases are a lot inwards compared to yours still. I'll see how the spoiler compares to the templates for the OE holes but i can see me doing what you said. lining the spoiler up and drill it own stress free holes.

It would be a big help mate if you could get the measurements.

It is a PIA, I'm going to have a mate help me fit it. i'm not going to try it on my own again.

Still waiting for my 2.5 Inch risers to.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2013 | 10:47 AM
  #27  
HiFlite999's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,257
Likes: 5
From: MI
Since the brackets come down at an angle, adding risers will change the mounting positions somewhat.

FWIW, here are some measurements (tape measure, so not super accurate).

From the outside edges of the bracket mounted to the wing and across the bolt holes: 47 1/4" (front), 46 5/8" (rear).

From the outside edges of the bracket, mounted to the base, and inside the 'triangle': 47 3/4" (front), 46 1/2" (rear).

Distance from the closest side of the base to the side edge of the trunk: 7/16" (front), 3/4" (rear).

Distance from the back of the base to the upwards vertical line made by the trunk lip: 9/16" (I need to double check this, seems too close - wasn't fully awake ... but it's as far back as I could go without encountering the curve folding down from the deck to the lip)

I leave you to do the conversions to metric -- anyone that can deal with weight in [I]stones[I], I'm sure can handle it!
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2013 | 03:42 PM
  #28  
Dan507's Avatar
Rotary Rocket
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 238
Likes: 1
From: England


the faint circles are the oe mounting points.



After lots of pissing about it's on!





It looks good. Definitely needs the risers.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2013 | 10:07 PM
  #29  
monchie's Avatar
I HATE SPEEDBUMPS!
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 8,549
Likes: 8
From: Las Vegas, NV
^ That's not high enough for you... and you need risers too?
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2013 | 03:32 AM
  #30  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,932
Likes: 2,137
I hated taking mine off, stupid rules ....
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2013 | 01:34 PM
  #31  
halimsteven's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,401
Likes: 0
From: NJ
sorry for the lateness to chime in, but if you buy for RX8 one, everything should fit..what happen is that the installation is tricky...
you have to loose everything before you tight them up...all of them...especially on the bottom/base, otherwise, the wing will look like, not fit at all...

I think the height is pretty good, but if you wanna be higher, you should get the 300

looks good, love it..
steven
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2013 | 08:16 PM
  #32  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,932
Likes: 2,137
I told him that when he bought it, but apparently it was lost in translation
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2013 | 08:48 AM
  #33  
HiFlite999's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,257
Likes: 5
From: MI
^ Sure, one can do it that way - if you don't mind bent mounting studs. Also, it's physically impossible for the mounting points to be the same with both the standard and the extended riser. YMMV. I'm quite happy with how mine came out with the better hole locations; very solid.

Not sure it helps with downforce at normal speeds, but girls like it ...
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2013 | 02:48 PM
  #34  
halimsteven's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,401
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Originally Posted by HiFlite999
^ Sure, one can do it that way - if you don't mind bent mounting studs. Also, it's physically impossible for the mounting points to be the same with both the standard and the extended riser. YMMV. I'm quite happy with how mine came out with the better hole locations; very solid.

Not sure it helps with downforce at normal speeds, but girls like it ...
last time, i took my wing out, and going fast, i felt like lighter..lol..but when i put the wing, i felt the difference..it is just me...no lie...it was around 80mph both, with and without...
steven
Reply
Old May 1, 2013 | 05:26 PM
  #35  
HiFlite999's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,257
Likes: 5
From: MI
Originally Posted by halimsteven
last time, i took my wing out, and going fast, i felt like lighter..lol..but when i put the wing, i felt the difference..it is just me...no lie...it was around 80mph both, with and without...
steven
After 1700 miles with it on, I have to agree.

Even when set to as flat as possible, my car is much more stable on the highway, best noticeable when punching through the bow wave off of big trucks. The wing kills any sensation of being sucked one way, then pushed the other.

When set to full tilt, even as slow as ~50 mph, the extra downforce on the rear makes itself felt in the balance of the car in fast corners.

At DGRR, when sharing with Dan from Assaultech, he stated that they were more effective than other wings on the market. When I asked how he knew that, he stated that it was the only model he's sold where owners reported back with positive comments regarding effectiveness.
Reply
Old May 4, 2013 | 09:48 AM
  #36  
Dan507's Avatar
Rotary Rocket
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 238
Likes: 1
From: England
I think I read somewhere that APR wings are only one of a few company who actually test there wings in a wind tunnel.

In other news,

Risers.

Reply
Old May 4, 2013 | 07:30 PM
  #37  
halimsteven's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,401
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Originally Posted by HiFlite999
After 1700 miles with it on, I have to agree.

Even when set to as flat as possible, my car is much more stable on the highway, best noticeable when punching through the bow wave off of big trucks. The wing kills any sensation of being sucked one way, then pushed the other.

When set to full tilt, even as slow as ~50 mph, the extra downforce on the rear makes itself felt in the balance of the car in fast corners.

At DGRR, when sharing with Dan from Assaultech, he stated that they were more effective than other wings on the market. When I asked how he knew that, he stated that it was the only model he's sold where owners reported back with positive comments regarding effectiveness.
yeah, i try on MSpeed, i think they are good too...btw, how do you tilt it to? like forward down? lol..i never try to tilt more, just kept it regular way..lol..

Originally Posted by Dan507
I think I read somewhere that APR wings are only one of a few company who actually test there wings in a wind tunnel.

In other news,

Risers.

i like it, but, do you mind taking picture from side and front? i wanna see if it's over the roof if you see it from the front..

thank you
Reply
Old May 5, 2013 | 05:08 AM
  #38  
Dan507's Avatar
Rotary Rocket
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 238
Likes: 1
From: England
only other photo I have at the moment is this one. When sat in the car looking at the rear view you can just see the bottom of the spoiler at the top of the window rather than in the middle.

... And yes, you can see it over the roof from the front.

Reply
Old Sep 30, 2013 | 09:32 PM
  #39  
Billy Marcial's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
APR GTC-200 wing fitment-left-straight.jpg

Love this wing

(Thread revival)
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2013 | 01:26 PM
  #40  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,932
Likes: 2,137
APR just recently revised the GTC-200 to a slightly different chord design


APR Performance - GTC-200 New Version

Announcing the release of the New GTC-200 Carbon Fiber Wing. Designed using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) modeling, the New GTC-200 includes these features and benefits:

- Larger chord than the original GTC-200
- More aggressive camber than the original GTC-200
- Higher lift/drag (L/D) ratio than the original GTC-200
- More downforce than the original GTC-200
- Backwards compatible with all original GTC-200 mounting brackets and pedestals

If you are familiar with the original GTC-200 design, you will notice the slightly larger chord and more aggressive camber on the New GTC-200...
Reply
Old May 1, 2015 | 10:30 PM
  #41  
Ccrosskno21's Avatar
Ccrosskno21
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Diffusers

Where did you get those apr diffusers? I can't find them anywhere!
Reply
Old May 2, 2015 | 07:32 AM
  #42  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,932
Likes: 2,137
wut?
Reply
Old May 2, 2015 | 07:50 AM
  #43  
Ccrosskno21's Avatar
Ccrosskno21
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
wut?
The diffusers on the side of the rear bumper
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2023 | 08:50 AM
  #44  
TreFatKids's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Those aren't APR. They're RE-Amemiya. Someone must have put a APR sticker on them
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2023 | 11:10 AM
  #45  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,932
Likes: 2,137
^^try again …
.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2023 | 11:13 AM
  #46  
TreFatKids's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
^^try again …
.

that's where I got mine at least🤷🏼‍♂️
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2023 | 03:27 PM
  #47  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,932
Likes: 2,137
that’s not an APR wing, you claiming the others aren’t APR is incorrect.
.

Reply
Old Sep 7, 2023 | 03:32 PM
  #48  
TreFatKids's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
that’s not an APR wing, you claiming the others aren’t APR is incorrect.
.
Nooooo. I'm talking about the side diffusers, not the wing itself. Yes, mine is a Mazdaspeed wing- correct. But the side diffusers on the rear bumper are RE-Amemiya as I mentioned. I forgot to quote the reply I was replying to, couldn't figure out how to edit my reply.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2023 | 06:41 PM
  #49  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,932
Likes: 2,137
I suppose it was both our bad then, since 8 years later from when he had asked is 6 years since he was last on this forum (2017), but thanks for straightening me out just the same.
.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
yale02
RX-8 Racing
25
Aug 27, 2012 11:55 PM
kwescott
Series I Exterior Appearance and Body Kits
30
Oct 6, 2009 09:33 PM
ramathorne
Series I Exterior Appearance and Body Kits
2
May 9, 2007 05:33 PM
KYRX8
Series I Exterior Appearance and Body Kits
4
Feb 28, 2006 01:36 PM
Modena4RE
RX-8 Discussion
0
Nov 23, 2004 06:59 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:07 PM.