RX8Club.com

RX8Club.com (https://www.rx8club.com/)
-   Series I Engine Tuning Forum (https://www.rx8club.com/series-i-engine-tuning-forum-63/)
-   -   Stinksause Attempts tunning (https://www.rx8club.com/series-i-engine-tuning-forum-63/stinksause-attempts-tunning-201668/)

stinksause 07-23-2010 11:29 PM

Stinksause Attempts tunning
 
1 Attachment(s)
So I finally got my cobb and made the following changes to the stock map:

Fan temp A at 200
Fan temp B at 210

P0420 CEL hidden

I drove around for a bit to set my fuel trims and today I made the following logs to calibrate my MAF

first 2 are cruises
last one is idle followed by a 1st gear pull

My LTFT is a bit over 6% across the board

so I multiplied my MAF by 1.03 across the board.

I am stock up front, with a midpipe and catback out back

Discuss, gimme suggestions etc?


I fucked up the #1 and #3 datalogs when saving them ....

stinksause 07-23-2010 11:29 PM

reserved

stinksause 07-23-2010 11:30 PM

reserved.

stinksause 07-23-2010 11:31 PM

reserved..

TeamRX8 07-24-2010 07:58 AM

Congrats, it's not that difficult to do.

arghx7 07-24-2010 01:13 PM

Wait, you rescaled your MAF on a stock intake?

stinksause 07-24-2010 10:16 PM

yeah .... something weird happened tho .... I got a crank position CEL when I flashed to the new map .... I spent half the day trying to figure it out until I flashed back to the last one ... anyone else experience this?

Mawnee 07-24-2010 11:02 PM

yes, if you skew your maf too far you'll get a crank sensor code.

stinksause 07-24-2010 11:05 PM

3% is too far??? Does it go away after a drive cycle?

arghx7 07-25-2010 09:16 AM

What the heck is the point of rescaling the MAF on a completely stock intake? If the trims aren't near zero, so what. It's well within the design parameters that Mazda established. Fuel trims change with the weather, that's ok if the underlying calibration is ok and there are no mechanical problems.

Kane 07-25-2010 09:26 AM


Originally Posted by arghx7 (Post 3647407)
What the heck is the point of rescaling the MAF on a completely stock intake? If the trims aren't near zero, so what. It's well within the design parameters that Mazda established. Fuel trims change with the weather, that's ok if the underlying calibration is ok and there are no mechanical problems.

The idea is to minimize it some so you can run more aggressive in open loop. But the injectors also need to be scaled, so the whole thing can become a chase your tail experience really fast.

stinksause 07-26-2010 12:40 PM

so is there ANY way to scale it without throwing that CEL?

Kane 07-26-2010 12:49 PM

Leave the first two cells alone (the far left), they stay stock, scale the rest and you'll be fine.

stinksause 07-26-2010 01:28 PM

oh okay ... thanks ... that's idle anyhow I guess

MazdaManiac 07-27-2010 07:45 PM


Originally Posted by stinksause (Post 3647139)
something weird happened tho .... I got a crank position CEL when I flashed to the new map

Leave the bottom-most MAF scale cell alone (as we discussed in the seminar).
Moving it can cause an ESS cell on some models.


Originally Posted by arghx7 (Post 3646790)
Wait, you rescaled your MAF on a stock intake?

The OE intake can be off by as much as 12%.


Originally Posted by TeamRX8 (Post 3646605)
Congrats, it's not that difficult to do.

Like you have any clue.

TeamRX8 08-09-2010 08:19 PM


Originally Posted by MazdaManiac (Post 3650936)
Like you have any clue.


More than you think, apparently.

So anyway, I popped in to see how the tunaing project was going. Catch anything yet?


.

stinksause 08-09-2010 10:40 PM

thanks for checking in .... my cobb has an overheating issue and I sent it out for maintenance ... It also will refuse to connect live to ATR ... so I will be back when I receive it

MazdaManiac 08-10-2010 10:54 AM


Originally Posted by TeamRX8 (Post 3667822)
More than you think, apparently.

Think? You demonstrated this fundamental ignorance. I don't have to think anything about it for it to be apparent.

TeamRX8 08-10-2010 01:08 PM


Originally Posted by MazdaManiac (Post 3668424)
Think? You demonstrated this fundamental ignorance. I don't have to think anything about it for it to be apparent.


It's apparent that you're doing a pretty good job of this yourself. :)



.

MazdaManiac 08-10-2010 01:44 PM


Originally Posted by TeamRX8 (Post 3668631)
It's apparent that you're doing a pretty good job of this yourself.

Well, yeah. Gutting other people's ill-founded remarks is my specialty.

TeamRX8 08-10-2010 01:50 PM


Originally Posted by MazdaManiac (Post 3668702)
Well, yeah. Gutting other people's ill-founded remarks is my specialty.

I could have sworn that gutting yourself was your specialty above all else :wink2:

stinksause 08-10-2010 03:17 PM

guys ... both of you have demonstrated and contributed lots of knowledge on this forum ... and I have nothing but respect for both of you ... but seriously, why do you feel the need to shit on each other on my thread

MazdaManiac 08-10-2010 03:49 PM


Originally Posted by stinksause (Post 3668829)
but seriously, why do you feel the need to shit on each other on my thread

Because it's fun.

Brettus 08-10-2010 04:33 PM


Originally Posted by MazdaManiac (Post 3650936)
Leave the bottom-most MAF scale cell alone (as we discussed in the seminar).
Moving it can cause an ESS cell on some models.

.

Interesting - never seen that . But mine is an 03 so i gues it doesn't have that issue .

MazdaManiac 08-10-2010 05:09 PM


Originally Posted by Brettus (Post 3668923)
Interesting - never seen that . But mine is an 03 so i gues it doesn't have that issue .

The AUDM/JDM 2003 model is the 2004 export model.
There were no significant changes from the start of production until the switchover to the 2005 MY.

Since you have some significant tuning issues with your PCM, it isn't likely that your example would be relevant.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:31 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands