Notices
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications Discussion of power adding modifications

Rx8 & 350 Dynos

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Apr 11, 2007 | 05:06 PM
  #51  
eviltwinkie's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 2
From: everywherez...
I at one time also thought about that...I even went as far as to think...

Why not only dish them in a little bit...but ALSO make a progressive center ridge in the direction of travel to sort of "scoop" if you will the combustion outwards and to the sides...

Think of a "W"...maybe multiple small "W's" on the face of the rotor in the direction of travel to promote a more complete burn and gas evacuation...

Speaking of burns...tis time to don the asbestos suit right about......NOW!
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2007 | 06:39 PM
  #52  
LabDad's Avatar
Doggie Style :)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu, HI
Originally Posted by Red Devil
Meanwhile, Nissan has the whole industry to draw ideas from, and from one generation to the next they only manage a 16% increase??? Hooray for Nissan, add another .5 liters of displacement and make a bloated pig of a sports car to cover their lack of engineering prowess.
It's much more complex than your simplistic view of it. Please don't tell me you're an engineer.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2007 | 06:45 PM
  #53  
Endgame's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by tajabaho1
I hope its 4 port, if my 07 dynoed 140-150 I ma go to dealer and shoot them >.<
Ehh. It's got to be the 4 port...
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2007 | 06:47 PM
  #54  
Endgame's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by crimson-rain
Actually, I've never seen a 350 dyno. From what i saw, this one is modded. CAI, exhaust, headers, and ECU tune. Correct me if I'm wrong, 350s weigh about 3300 lbs. right? The 8 weighs in at 3000 - 3100 lbs. ... huh.

....

+1 post
I have seen the weight for Z's from 3300-3430! I think the track edition is 3300 pounds. Still heavy in my mind. The 06's were almost 3400 pounds if I remember correct. Another thing that turned me off from buying one. My old 02 Stang GT was only 3450!!
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2007 | 08:45 AM
  #55  
Red Devil's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 1
From: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
Originally Posted by LabDad
It's much more complex than your simplistic view of it. Please don't tell me you're an engineer.
Please tell me you didn't take what I wrote as implying my "simplistic" math was more complex. If so, I might have to question your reading comprehension skills.

Granted Nissan had to deal with rising emissions requirements, economies of scale, etc…for the new VQ, but Mazda has to do the same. The point is simple enough, Mazda has done quite a lot with this engine. Both in producing more power out of identical displacement, and considering the lack of support even in dealing with their parent Ford.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2007 | 11:11 AM
  #56  
nycgps's Avatar
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,881
Likes: 36
From: Planet Earth
I WANT A FREE POST ! YESsss I MADE IT ! ! YEASSSSSSSS
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2007 | 11:30 AM
  #57  
PhotoMunkey's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
RENESIS displacement increases have been discussed, and dismissed because of the way the flame front behaves in the rotary combustion chamber. Also even if the displacement increased, the physical size of the intake ports couldn't, so there would still be a horsepower-limiting factor involved.

BTW-My 2006 Base 6MT weighs in at 2950 WITH a half tank of gas and some luggage in the trunk! It will weigh less one I get the brake system done.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
05TR1CH
New Member Forum
14
Apr 18, 2023 04:56 AM
Skyl3r
New Member Forum
148
Dec 2, 2019 04:51 PM
SupraG
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
7
Sep 21, 2015 12:09 AM
vetteor8
New Member Forum
14
Jul 25, 2015 11:43 AM
RX7.9
New Member Forum
0
Jul 20, 2015 12:01 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:07 AM.