Notices
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications Discussion of power adding modifications

RX tuner Magazine tests rb intake

Old 05-01-2006, 08:09 PM
  #1  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
willsrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Brooklyn/Roosevelt, LI/Rosedale, NY
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RX tuner Magazine tests rb intake

Everyone on the forum says that you will get minimal gains with a racing beat intake but RX tuner magazine tested it in this article and says that he got 10 hp at 6750 rpms. Why the discrepancy?
Old 05-01-2006, 08:18 PM
  #2  
Representin'!
 
RazzyBRX-8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
is 10 hp a lot for an intake?

Everyone says the only way to get a significant power increase is through forced induction. I honestly believe them.
Old 05-01-2006, 08:24 PM
  #3  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
willsrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Brooklyn/Roosevelt, LI/Rosedale, NY
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They are saying everywhere on this forum that max gains are very minimal with a intake, like 2-3 hp. If I can expect 10 hp from the intake I will be ordering 1 right away.
Old 05-01-2006, 08:26 PM
  #4  
X-Sapper
 
army_rx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: where angle's fear to tread
Posts: 2,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
10hp is a lot for an intake...especially with our car. the discrepancy is most likely where people are looking in the rev range when they talk abotu gains...most people look for top end power (that is where the bigger numbers are)...but you feel and can use more power in the low to mid range. the revi only adds like 3.5 or 4 at the top end..but it helps out more in the low-mid range. racing beat said this when the first came out with the revi (i believe don't quote me it's been a while)....it'll add 3.5 at the top end...but you'll be pleasently surprised int eh rest of the rev range....or something to that effect.

so hopfully that made some sense
Old 05-01-2006, 08:26 PM
  #5  
Bummed, but bring on OU!
 
therm8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
that's because alot of people are brainwashed by peak hp.
Old 05-02-2006, 02:44 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
Fanman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, Polak did that test, but also if you read the article he had installed a lightweight flywheel, that probably opened up a few ponies right there too. Import Tuner did a "Power Pages" test and got like 4 hp from the REVi alone...didn't have the RAM Air Duct yet.
Old 05-02-2006, 07:16 AM
  #7  
Storm Trooper
 
Moostafa29's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Freakmont, CA
Posts: 3,908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think the RAM Air Duct was available when Polak tested, but I could be wrong on that. If so, then there may be a few more gains to be had.
Old 05-02-2006, 10:54 AM
  #8  
Registered
 
rotarygod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
The benefit of the ram air duct should really only be seen with the car moving. Just sitting on a dyno it shouldn't add anything. Dyno's can't measure real world usable power very well as you aren't in a real world driving situation. Their biggest benefit is for comparison to show changes but even then it is sometimes limited such as in the case of ram air.
Old 05-02-2006, 02:19 PM
  #9  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,718
Received 2,005 Likes on 1,634 Posts
lol, my dyno can outrun your dyno ...
Old 05-02-2006, 04:21 PM
  #10  
Registered
 
crimson-rain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wonder why nobody has tried the AEM CAI or MS CAI (probably too new)?
Old 05-02-2006, 05:59 PM
  #11  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
r0tor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
if i remember right, the 10hp gain was a result of a random blip in the dyno that only showed up on 1 out of the 4 dyno runs... then gain was more in the 5whp range
Old 05-02-2006, 09:32 PM
  #12  
dmp
RX8 and a Truk....
 
dmp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: OKC
Posts: 4,658
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
AVERAGE HP folks...Peaks are for mountains and junk.

OVER-ALL the Intake provides SOLID gains.
Old 05-03-2006, 03:39 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
Fanman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by r0tor
if i remember right, the 10hp gain was a result of a random blip in the dyno that only showed up on 1 out of the 4 dyno runs... then gain was more in the 5whp range
Was discussed before Rotor by you & me, even POLAK who did the runs and he stated the other runs produced 7 & 9 hp gains in the rev range. If you said 5 hp because that is what Import Tuner got that's fine but stop with this "random blip" BS. "Random blip" was repeated making it a dynoed result. If your going to start this again we may as well kill the thread right here again, before the RB hatin' starts.

Their claims are in line to what has been shown in seperate dynoes (From RB website):

"Stock vs Racing Beat

REVi Intake Adds An Average 1.95 HP Over The Stock System - 2000-8900 RPM Range

Peak RPM Gains Over Stock + 3.5 HP @ 8300 RPM

Maximum Power Gain Over Stock + 5.8 HP @ 8900 RPM"

Last edited by Fanman; 05-03-2006 at 03:56 AM.
Old 05-03-2006, 12:29 PM
  #14  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
r0tor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The fact of the matter remains the 10hp increase was at 6755 rpms where the stock power was 166 and revi in 5th gear on that run was 176. If you look, the teriary ports on that revi run opened before they otherwise should have, hence you have the dyno blip at an earlier rpm, and a 10hp "gain".

The next dyno shows revi in third gear and 168 hp at 6867 rpms. The last dyno shows revi+exhaust+flywheel+clutch and 179hp at 6867 rpms.

https://www.rx8club.com/showthread.p...highlight=REVi

Last edited by r0tor; 05-03-2006 at 12:33 PM.
Old 05-03-2006, 12:33 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
Fanman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'll believe Polak, the guy who actually did the tests, who came on & explained the differences, and stated the results (7, 9 & 10 hp gains). The original test was done in 5th gear back to back (car & car with RB Revi), while the 2nd test was done with car & RB Revi, then car taken off, tranny dropped flywheel & clutch added & in 3rd gear. Not exactly a job where you can leave the car on the dyno for best repeatability.

Last edited by Fanman; 05-03-2006 at 12:43 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Carbon8
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
42
02-27-2020 08:39 AM
RXFEVER
RX-8 Parts For Sale/Wanted
38
08-29-2018 10:14 AM
WranglerFan
New Member Forum
4
11-05-2017 09:35 AM
DVerdeyen
Series I Trouble Shooting
6
09-13-2015 11:19 AM
yapakanichi
Series I Tech Garage
20
09-10-2015 07:17 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: RX tuner Magazine tests rb intake



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:35 AM.