Notices
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications Discussion of power adding modifications

Intakes Reviewed: Racing Beat VS K&NII

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-01-2008, 12:26 AM
  #1  
I don't buy Kool-Aid
Thread Starter
 
DOMINION's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Vegas Baby!
Posts: 8,823
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Post Intakes Reviewed: Racing Beat VS K&NII

So i decided to change my intake setup from the k&n typhoon 2 W/ Racing Beat air duct to the full Racing Beat intake system.
Opened the box nice packing lots of bubble rap, the instruction were great nice and detailed, the actual box was kinda cheap (scratches real easy) but real nice looking, instructions says bout 1hr but since i have the Racing Beat air duct install it only took about 15min.
With the Racing Beat on I start the car up, rev it up alittle first thing i notice that i lost the grunt that the K&NII gives, I expected that but did not expect to notice it gone with all my mods, but suprisingly it was gone.
The K&NII on the other hand sounds great w/intake header, and exhaust gave much more rasp(extra grunt).

So driving with the full Racing Beat intake setup and i notice, idle was no different from the k&n, seem like the rpms would not go up as fast as the K&NII, acceleration felt a bit slower, and on the freeway 4th gear about 80mph floored, top end did not seem as great took abit longer than im used to to about 120mph.1st, 2nd ,and 3rd gear with the K&NII W/Racing Beat air duct setup i was also able to loose traction when shifting and felt a nice pull back when flooring on a roll, but with the rb setup the car just didnt do that, car didnt feel as quick.

Overall on the Revi the price is alittle steep, but real nice product looks great if your into that stock look and want no intake sound and more exhaust sound.....but between the two, K&NII w/Racing Beat duct felt alot better than the full Racing Beat setup.
In the end i end up putting the K&N typhoon 2 back on and got back all the missing pull, sold the Racing Beat Revi.
For what its worth the rb revi also weighs more than the k&n.

Mike and Gil
DOMINION is offline  
Old 03-01-2008, 12:42 AM
  #2  
RX-8s Official Cool Guy
 
HiTMaNN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 2,150
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
LoL Maybe the lack of noise was causing the horse power loss Gil :P
HiTMaNN is offline  
Old 03-01-2008, 12:46 AM
  #3  
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
swoope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: orlando, fl
Posts: 14,602
Received 35 Likes on 31 Posts
xxxxxx2222222222

at most you are talking about 2 to 5 hp at any given point. gas or temp could change more than that.. btw the ecu reset, makes it more moot.

sorry dom.. fail..


beers
swoope is offline  
Old 03-01-2008, 04:32 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
Fanman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's all in your head. The human body ain't going to feel a 5 hp difference (if there even was that). Your head's playing tricks on you. The K&N is louder, so it must give you more power.
Fanman is offline  
Old 03-01-2008, 06:44 AM
  #5  
Doppelgänger
 
mysql's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
airflow with the revi will be better across the maf than the k&n. you'll get more gains with the cobb accessport if you had stayed with the revi.
mysql is offline  
Old 03-01-2008, 11:37 AM
  #6  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
yep^
zoom44 is offline  
Old 03-01-2008, 12:47 PM
  #7  
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Razz1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cali
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Dyno charts show different.

Revi has more pull through out the range.

It may be 2 hp less only at 8 grand

How often tdo you drive at 8 grand? How long do you keep it there?
Razz1 is offline  
Old 03-01-2008, 12:57 PM
  #8  
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
Im thinking of Revi, not that I hate my K&N, just want to try something else, you know

but hmm another 2-300 bux ....
nycgps is offline  
Old 03-01-2008, 04:59 PM
  #9  
Banned
 
Mikeluvs8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: from the SF BAY to LAS VEGAS
Posts: 1,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by swoope
xxxxxx2222222222

at most you are talking about 2 to 5 hp at any given point. gas or temp could change more than that.. btw the ecu reset, makes it more moot.

sorry dom.. fail..


beers
ecu was reseted at all changes, this was done on my car and believe me if i felt a benifit from the revi i would have kept it, and that box i noticed when i drove hard and long the was real hot. overall the k&n w/rb air duct comb felt more responsive even around mid range . btw just cause the revi is a closed box intake doesnt mean you'll get cold air the whole pupose of the box was to reduce intake noise, and that box does get hot.
Mikeluvs8 is offline  
Old 03-01-2008, 05:02 PM
  #10  
Doppelgänger
 
mysql's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Plastic isn't a good conductor of heat. It's better the exterior of the intake get hot from the air in the engine bay than sucking that hot air into the engine.
mysql is offline  
Old 03-01-2008, 05:04 PM
  #11  
Banned
 
Mikeluvs8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: from the SF BAY to LAS VEGAS
Posts: 1,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Razz1
Dyno charts show different.

Revi has more pull through out the range.

It may be 2 hp less only at 8 grand

How often tdo you drive at 8 grand? How long do you keep it there?
i honestly dout that, have you tried this setup?
Mikeluvs8 is offline  
Old 03-01-2008, 05:08 PM
  #12  
Banned
 
Mikeluvs8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: from the SF BAY to LAS VEGAS
Posts: 1,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mysql
Plastic isn't a good conductor of heat. It's better the exterior of the intake get hot from the air in the engine bay than sucking that hot air into the engine.

but you will still not have the coldest of air.
Mikeluvs8 is offline  
Old 03-01-2008, 05:11 PM
  #13  
Banned
 
Mikeluvs8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: from the SF BAY to LAS VEGAS
Posts: 1,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
probably if you are not moving the revi will have better air flow, but i will tell you that when the car is moving the k&n w/rb duct will have the better affect in performance.
Mikeluvs8 is offline  
Old 03-01-2008, 05:11 PM
  #14  
Doppelgänger
 
mysql's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Mikeluvs8
but you will still not have the coldest of air.
What are you talking about? Revi + Air duct is fine.

Having a short intake filter in the engine bay is useless. There's a reason why one of the first mods people do with FI is a cold air intake by getting the filter out of the engine bay.
mysql is offline  
Old 03-01-2008, 05:14 PM
  #15  
Doppelgänger
 
mysql's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
At highway speeds the air in the engine bay is the same as ambient. Even without the air duct.

You want the smoothest airflow over the MAF. The OEM air box isn't a restriction to begin with, so how you expect another filter to give you noticeable gains over it is a good question.
mysql is offline  
Old 03-01-2008, 05:17 PM
  #16  
Banned
 
Mikeluvs8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: from the SF BAY to LAS VEGAS
Posts: 1,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mysql
At highway speeds the air in the engine bay is the same as ambient. Even without the air duct.

You want the smoothest airflow over the MAF. The OEM air box isn't a restriction to begin with, so how you expect another filter to give you noticeable gains over it is a good question.
at high speeds the hot air is not just going to linger there.
Mikeluvs8 is offline  
Old 03-01-2008, 05:21 PM
  #17  
Banned
 
Mikeluvs8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: from the SF BAY to LAS VEGAS
Posts: 1,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mysql
What are you talking about? Revi + Air duct is fine.

Having a short intake filter in the engine bay is useless. There's a reason why one of the first mods people do with FI is a cold air intake by getting the filter out of the engine bay.
never said there was anything wrong with it. i was just posting and informing by experience. this is what i got with a couple of weeks with the revi. its a great intake i just noticed that the car felt a bit more reponsive with the k&n and rb duct.
Mikeluvs8 is offline  
Old 03-01-2008, 05:24 PM
  #18  
Doppelgänger
 
mysql's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Mikeluvs8
at high speeds the hot air is not just going to linger there.
You're short sighted. Your car is not always in motion. If you sit around at a traffic light then punch the throttle, your intake air is going to be close to 180 degrees. This can mean problems if you have serious horse power.

Moreso if you're on a track and there aren't a lot of straights.
mysql is offline  
Old 03-01-2008, 05:28 PM
  #19  
Banned
 
Mikeluvs8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: from the SF BAY to LAS VEGAS
Posts: 1,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^^^^ i know that but when your racing are you stopped?
Originally Posted by Mikeluvs8
probably if you are not moving the revi will have better air flow, but i will tell you that when the car is moving the k&n w/rb duct will have the better affect in performance.
Mikeluvs8 is offline  
Old 03-01-2008, 05:32 PM
  #20  
Banned
 
Mikeluvs8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: from the SF BAY to LAS VEGAS
Posts: 1,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
im not talking bout on the stop, my experience with both intake setups was on the move, i was not trying to calculate how hot the air near the engine gets at a stop, im talking bout the on the move the k&n w/the rb duct felt better, than the revi.
Mikeluvs8 is offline  
Old 03-01-2008, 05:35 PM
  #21  
Doppelgänger
 
mysql's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You aren't reading what I'm saying. So it's not worth trying to explain it a second time to you.
mysql is offline  
Old 03-01-2008, 05:40 PM
  #22  
Banned
 
Mikeluvs8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: from the SF BAY to LAS VEGAS
Posts: 1,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mysql
You aren't reading what I'm saying. So it's not worth trying to explain it a second time to you.
what are you trying to say then???? you were just saying something bout 180 deg at a stop, then you puch it the air is not going to be cold, i know that.
Mikeluvs8 is offline  
Old 03-01-2008, 05:44 PM
  #23  
Banned
 
Mikeluvs8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: from the SF BAY to LAS VEGAS
Posts: 1,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by HiTMaNN
LoL Maybe the lack of noise was causing the horse power loss Gil :P
my car is loud to begin with.
Mikeluvs8 is offline  
Old 03-01-2008, 05:44 PM
  #24  
Doppelgänger
 
mysql's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'm saying that the car is not always moving at 70 mph. When you travel slower, heat isn't fully evacuated from the engine bay and can still build up.
mysql is offline  
Old 03-01-2008, 05:46 PM
  #25  
Banned
 
Mikeluvs8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: from the SF BAY to LAS VEGAS
Posts: 1,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Fanman
It's all in your head. The human body ain't going to feel a 5 hp difference (if there even was that). Your head's playing tricks on you. The K&N is louder, so it must give you more power.
yeah its amazing how you got 5hp out of this. where did you read this?
Mikeluvs8 is offline  


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Intakes Reviewed: Racing Beat VS K&NII



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:00 AM.