Notices
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications Discussion of power adding modifications

HF CAT without Catback

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Nov 5, 2005 | 07:08 PM
  #1  
Tastic's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
HF CAT without Catback

Does putting in a highflow cat without getting an aftermarket catback make sense?
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2005 | 07:17 PM
  #2  
expo1's Avatar
He's as bad as Can
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,309
Likes: 3
From: Manchester, NJ
Yes, if money is an issue. The high flow CAT will give you a louder exhaust and a very slight HP increase for under $500. Where as the high flow cat + aftermarket exhaust will set you back to close to $1,000 with no significant increase in HP over a OEM exhaust & High flow CAT setup.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2005 | 07:26 PM
  #3  
FLybOi drE's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: NJ
screw high flow...just get a catless midpipe xP
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2005 | 07:49 PM
  #4  
Tastic's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Cool. The main reason id want the new cat is because I'm afraid if i do any tuning, the stock one will melt.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2005 | 08:20 PM
  #5  
Jabberwock's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
The stock one won't melt right away. But if you aggresively tune the 8, you will just shorten the life span of the cat. Instead of lasting 100,000 miles it will last you like 50,000 miles.

Anyways, go with the HF Cat if your going to tune it. It will give you great gains to accompany the tuning.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2005 | 08:30 PM
  #6  
mikefrombarrie's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by FLybOi drE
screw high flow...just get a catless midpipe xP

Tried it before, the smell of the fumes were very bad. Now I am back to stock
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2005 | 08:46 PM
  #7  
Jabberwock's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Yeah catless has terrible fumes. Plus, I might be a little environmental, but catless pollutes too much.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2005 | 10:24 PM
  #8  
Fanman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 1
From: Glendale, CA
Also going catless has a big chance of your CEL going off.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2005 | 05:37 PM
  #9  
r0tor's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 1
From: PA
i've had this setup for a few weeks now...

- cheaper then a catback

- its definately louder, not sure if it sounds better though to my ear at least (will wait a few more weeks to give my final verdict on sound quality as its starting to sound deeper)

- backfires a lot more

- tends to lean the tuning out a bit which could help in power if your stock. After readjusting my cz back to the before-cat afr, the gains are maybe 2hp at most - but still better then most catbacks... -shrug-
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2005 | 05:53 PM
  #10  
FLybOi drE's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Originally Posted by mikefrombarrie
Tried it before, the smell of the fumes were very bad. Now I am back to stock
hahahahahhahhaha YES I AGREEE....thats why i drive faster with the windows down to get rid of the fumes inside the car xP
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
92trbolzr
Series I Trouble Shooting
31
May 18, 2025 09:04 AM
mdl0209
Series I Trouble Shooting
14
May 23, 2019 05:46 PM
XianUnix
Series I Trouble Shooting
6
Sep 29, 2015 03:48 PM
pjwermuth
RX-8 Discussion
5
Sep 28, 2015 11:36 PM
FubarI33t
New Member Forum
12
Sep 28, 2015 08:45 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:35 PM.