Notices
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications Discussion of power adding modifications

General RX-8 Engine Performance Upgrades Info/Questions

Old Aug 14, 2003 | 10:25 AM
  #26  
CMYCI's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
yes but its not practical
i get a dented fender because some jerk opened his door on my car i have to pay like $2000 to get it fixxed and order parts from japan or if it gets stuck in ahail storm
but also i like the rx-8 because its different
but like you said there will be a sc or turbo kit coming out?
and what about the rx-7 i heard?
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2003 | 10:48 AM
  #27  
panda's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: houston, tx
the rx7 is meant to be released in 2006(correct me if im wrong!), but its just a concept right now, which means that all could change.... but it would be turbo, rotary, two seats etc... again..

aftermarket for the rx8 is going to be very very good, but the car has only been out a few months max, but hopefully by january febuary time aftermarket will be starting to break through, i think the car has a lot of potential to be in the 12 second range given the right time, parts, and love :D




andrew
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2003 | 11:27 AM
  #28  
Sputnik's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,045
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO, USA
Originally posted by panda
the rx7 is meant to be released in 2006(correct me if im wrong!), but its just a concept right now, which means that all could change.... but it would be turbo, rotary, two seats etc... again...
Mazda hasn't even committed itself to anything yet, and noone but rumour mongers said anything about a turbo.

---jps
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2003 | 12:39 PM
  #29  
CMYCI's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
is the mazdaspeed kit a popular kit for the rx-8
if i was to get one and put it on would i be just another 1 around that everyone has.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2003 | 10:24 PM
  #30  
nd4spd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: South Carolina
Originally posted by Sputnik
Mazda hasn't even committed itself to anything yet, and noone but rumour mongers said anything about a turbo.

---jps

speakin of turbo, do you think that there will be a turbo model available?
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2003 | 01:08 AM
  #31  
Emsdad's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
From: Puyallup, WA
Skylines are not "ALL that", trust me. I lived on the little island of Okinawa for a couple years. Skylines are a dime a dozen. Yes the GT-Rs are rare, but you can get better performance for the money.


I may be biased but the 8 is a better looking car by far. It's not in the same performance catagory, but for the money you'll get an incredible car.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2003 | 08:17 PM
  #32  
ProtoConVert's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
For ex-Supra guys... or anyone I guess

What makes a BPU a BPU? Like what is the definition, and did the definition just evolve among the tuner community out of nowhere?

also, just to gratify my curiosity... what modifications were included in a BPU, and what performance increase was typical?
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2003 | 01:35 AM
  #33  
panda's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: houston, tx
bpu=basic power upgrade, bpu's are basically, i/e/h

they are available for any car im thinking but most ppl say "a supra with bpu's will beat ..........(place car here)

im pretty sure thats what bpu means, unless im thinking of a completley different thing



andrew
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2003 | 12:21 PM
  #34  
dcfc3s's Avatar
RX-7 Guru
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 347
Likes: 6
From: Pensacola, FL
Actually, BPU was coined by the Supra twin-turbo world. People discovered that some very reasonably priced and simple mods resulted in an astounding amount of horsepower.

On a Supra, BPU consists of a cat-back, downpipe, boost controller, and a boost cut controller of some type (to keep the ecu from cutting fuel due to higher boost). That's it. With that combo, 400-420 RWHP is EASY to obtain, and is still very solid, reliable, and easy to drive.

The twin turbo Supra is definitely a solid platform to build a LOT of power on - that engine is one strong bastard.

BTW, this is kind of off-topic...

Dale
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2003 | 11:12 PM
  #35  
rx7aggie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Texas A&M U.
that basic power increase list also includes turbocharged rx-7's.

i've done the same thing, 3" exhaust, intake, FCD, and gotten some great gains from it.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2003 | 08:34 PM
  #36  
SSR Engineering's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix
There will be a few turbo kits out soon (Single turbo and Twin Turbo)
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2003 | 08:35 PM
  #37  
SSR Engineering's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix
Along with exhaust systems, including turbo exhaust systems (3'') and NA 2.5''
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2003 | 01:51 AM
  #38  
Kev's Avatar
Kev
[rapidus octus]
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Australia
Combined intake and exhaust mods

The thing I anticipate the most are the results of the performance impact for combined intake and exhaust upgrades...

ie; gross improvement with K&N intake and a Borla exhaust, etc

I'd imagine there's potential for 20~25 rwhp gains if this is done right - but the impact on the cars everyday lower rev driving nature will be a big issue too. (You've got to live with the car!)

Any facts or theories out there on this and how it will impact or enhance the cars character?
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2003 | 02:57 AM
  #39  
wakeech's Avatar
mostly harmless
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
From: Greater Vancouver Area, BC
Re: Combined intake and exhaust mods

Originally posted by Kev
the impact on the cars everyday lower rev driving nature will be a big issue. (You've got to live with the car!)
will impact or enhance the cars character?
...these are mild modifications. the impact on drivability and fuel economy should be very small, but noise on both ends will surely increase.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2003 | 12:49 PM
  #40  
mikeb's Avatar
100% Italian
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,422
Likes: 0
From: orange,ca
there is really no point having one without the other.
I want headers too
there are some headers on rotaryextreme.com but no price yet
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2003 | 08:22 PM
  #41  
Digisan's Avatar
Alpha Powered
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
From: VA
Originally posted by mikeb
there is really no point having one without the other.
I want headers too
there are some headers on rotaryextreme.com but no price yet
I want headers too! How the heck can you mount them without tearing the eninge out??? Hmmmm
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2003 | 08:38 PM
  #42  
Kev's Avatar
Kev
[rapidus octus]
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Australia
Yes, I think the installation of headers would be like building a ship in a bottle.

It'll be interesting to see what headers do to the low end of the torque curve too. I want the best of both worlds, more power up top and no loss of torque down low ... with the only cost being a little induction noise and a slightly louder exhaust. (oh, I want world peace too! )

:D
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2003 | 10:58 PM
  #43  
colin204's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Tx
A header should be able to be installed from the bottom no problem.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2003 | 11:47 PM
  #44  
wakeech's Avatar
mostly harmless
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
From: Greater Vancouver Area, BC
Originally posted by Kev
I want the best of both worlds, more power up top and no loss of torque down low
yeah, noooooooo problem

hahaha...
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2003 | 01:20 AM
  #45  
panda's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: houston, tx
yea, im guna be interested in how much the headers are for one and secondly, what kinda performance gains they will give, i am going to try to get some when the price is released, i think they should be able to be installed from underneath??


andrew
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2003 | 09:02 AM
  #46  
Irish_in_a_RX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 1
From: Philly
Some good products here :

http://www.corksport.com/main.php3?p...3Fcat%3D260821
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2003 | 03:35 PM
  #47  
Node's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, Pa, USA
intake and exhaust will actually help your fuel economy by presenting less of a restriction.
As long as you drive the same and don't use your extra power anyways.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2003 | 06:00 PM
  #48  
mikeb's Avatar
100% Italian
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,422
Likes: 0
From: orange,ca
your avatar makes me dizzy
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2003 | 10:50 AM
  #49  
Lee Chun's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Re: Combined intake and exhaust mods

Originally posted by Kev
I'd imagine there's potential for 20~25 rwhp gains if this is done right - but the impact on the cars everyday lower rev driving nature will be a big issue too. (You've got to live with the car!)
\
I want to know how he came to the conclusion that 20-25rwhp is waiting with an exhaust and an intake.

Oh yea, intake (15hp) and exhaust (10hp) = 25, rigght?

riiiiiight.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2003 | 12:53 PM
  #50  
colin204's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Tx
10 for intake and 10 for exhaust.

20 hp max.

I could see another 10hp for header and high flow cat.
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 13 votes, 5.00 average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:07 AM.