Notices
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications Discussion of power adding modifications

General Intake Info/Questions

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Dec 29, 2003 | 03:14 PM
  #176  
donald121's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: Pomona, CA
Wow, we have one more choice for intake now. It is AUTO EXE Ram-air Intake, cost $1085.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2003 | 03:15 PM
  #177  
donald121's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: Pomona, CA
another pic
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2003 | 03:40 PM
  #178  
donald121's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: Pomona, CA
air flow design
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2003 | 05:14 PM
  #179  
success07's Avatar
I'm Kind of a Big Deal
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 918
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, Ohio
Looks awesome, great find! - Is that carbon fiber that they've used on the housing? Do you think the price would be reduced if they used another material? $1085 is some serious coin for an intake, IMO. Any hp numbers that you can share with us? Thanks in advance.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2003 | 05:42 PM
  #180  
donald121's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: Pomona, CA
I found that filter on corksport.com

http://www.corksport.com/main.php3?p...3Fcat%3D260821

no dyno chart, hp claims, nothing.

It looks like to me it is a carbon fiber housing.

Yes, I agree. $1085 for an intake is VERY EXPENSIVE.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2004 | 03:53 PM
  #181  
Hymee's Avatar
Race Steward
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,430
Likes: 2
From: Brisbane, Australia
The fact of this matter is that until we get some OBDII data logged for the MAP (Manifold Absolute Pressure) on a power run (i.e. dyno or street) then we can't actually say the stock intake is bad.

I have had the opportunity to try a so-called "CAI" on my car. It increased the induction noise "buzz" to what I would consider verging on rice.

My coitometer (my term for butt dyno) really can't detect a few kW at the wheels like the makers claim.

My eye and brain did inspect both the aftermarket and stock setups, and I report the following:
  • The standard air box is a true CAI. I have not seen better on a production car.
  • The standard air box has VERY fine mesh screen to smooth the airflow over the MAF sensor. A smooth flow is essential for an accurate reading.
  • The aftermarket setup did not have any devices to provide laminar flow to the MAF. When I removed the filter and just started the engine with the MAF tube only, the engine did not idle properly.
  • The aftermarket tube did not have a lovely bell shaped opening like the stock setup.
  • The aftermarket setup was NOT a CAI. It was open to HOT engine bay air. This is a definate no-no. Even though it was shielded, it was not sealed (or even close to being sealed. It was well manufacturerd, but the design was lacking.
  • I did not measure the diameter of the tube, but if it differs from the stock one, then the PCM will calculate incorrect air flow. This is because the MAF signal is based around velocity of air, with a known cross-section of tube. If the cross-sectional area changes, then the true air-flow requirements of the engine are incorrect.

I also was privy to reading a RX-8 technical training manual. It made particular mention of replacement air intakes. It said if a vehicle was presented with a running/idling problem, and it had a non-standard air intake, then it should be replaced with the factory unit. I also mentioned that an aftermarket "wet" filter element could provide a false reading in the MAF.

When we get some valid MAP data, we can tell if there is a "restriction". The goal is to get as close to ATMO as possible inside the manifold.

Anyway - some information for everyone to digest, listen to, or ignore.

Cheers,
Hymee.

PS - my buddy did some scientific/controlled real world tests with a stopwatch. An acceleration run in his RX-8 at WOT from low RPM to high RPM in one gear, showed the aftermarket intake setup was 2 - 3% SLOWER than the stock one. This was the average result over 4 runs with each intake. Speaks volumes really!

Last edited by Hymee; Jan 1, 2004 at 03:56 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2004 | 10:17 PM
  #182  
neit_jnf's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,277
Likes: 7
From: Around
So Hymee, what's your take on drop-in KN type "high performance" filters? Do you think this would be better than a replacement aftermarket intake or stock paper element filter or is it better to leave everything stock on this intake?
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2004 | 11:20 PM
  #183  
Hymee's Avatar
Race Steward
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,430
Likes: 2
From: Brisbane, Australia
To be honest I was surprised when I read the training manual, and it discouraged the use of the "wet element" type filter.

I would have thought that they would be OK. I have a KingDragon replacement element left over from my previous LS1 powered vehicle. Not the correct size though - not surprising. But it is important to note that the element for the LS1 (a 5.7L engine) was SMALLER than the RX-8's element. So the RX-8 one would seem an adequate size.

I suppose I really want to see how the MAP figures shape up!

Cheers,
Hymee.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2004 | 09:05 AM
  #184  
layzieb36's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Killeen, TX
Question cai-needed?

I was wondering if someone could tell me if i need to upgrade my intake, when i upgrade the exhaust. Right now i have the money for both, but i could live with just the exhaust as then i could buy some other things like a valentine 1 radar det.

The problem that I'm thinking may happen is that when you free up the exhaust side it might put an extra pull on the intake side but I'm not sure. As you can tell I'm fairly new at this.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2004 | 09:14 AM
  #185  
Omicron's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 7,966
Likes: 4
From: Boulder County, Colorado
No, the factory intake is actually pretty good. Results of intakes are varied, some claiming up to 10HP gain, but you won't lose anything to the intake if you just upgrade the exhaust.

Hope this helps.

Last edited by Omicron; Jan 9, 2004 at 09:17 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2004 | 09:15 AM
  #186  
layzieb36's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Killeen, TX
Originally posted by Omicron
No, the factory intake is actually pretty good. Results of intakes are varied, some claiming up to 10HP gain, but you won't lost anything to the intake if you just upgrade the exhaust.

Hope this helps.
Thank you very much, gonna drive up to garland now.

Thanks,

Chris
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2004 | 09:18 AM
  #187  
Omicron's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 7,966
Likes: 4
From: Boulder County, Colorado
Enjoy the drive!
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2004 | 09:34 AM
  #188  
layzieb36's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Killeen, TX
Originally posted by Omicron
Enjoy the drive!
I know right gonna take about 3 hours, sheesh, but it would be major fun on the way back :p

Chris
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2004 | 05:36 PM
  #189  
mikeb's Avatar
100% Italian
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,422
Likes: 0
From: orange,ca
I would get both

they work better together
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2004 | 06:39 PM
  #190  
JimW's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
Wouldn't it be safe to say that the cars computer via the mass air sensor is only going to allow a certain amount of air anyway, regardless of what type of air inducton one has,due to the factory setting parameters, Does it work that way? Or is it, that if the car is getting more or denser airflow it will automatically compensate with more fuel and spark? Anyway I like the stock setup better, due to the fact it is totaly enclosed and is made of plastic which doesn't retain heat like metal, I think a better flowing filter element is all it needs!
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2004 | 08:17 PM
  #191  
2_furious's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
cold air intake?

hom many horses does the leading Cold air intake give a stock RX-8 engine?
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2004 | 08:29 PM
  #192  
mental pimp's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
From: miami,fl
have u meet mikeb?
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2004 | 08:36 PM
  #193  
2_furious's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
no, who is he?
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 02:36 PM
  #194  
XDEEDUBBX's Avatar
RX8 HA HA
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,772
Likes: 5
From: Gardena Cali 310
im him...he's the guy with 10.000 posts...haaha
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 02:52 PM
  #195  
mikeb's Avatar
100% Italian
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,422
Likes: 0
From: orange,ca
I'm mikeb

and he probably said that because I love fast and furious cars

and I already have the K&N intake
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 02:59 PM
  #196  
2_furious's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
hows it preform
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 03:05 PM
  #197  
mikeb's Avatar
100% Italian
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,422
Likes: 0
From: orange,ca
I'm really happy with it

it is loud as hell and the car seems faster off the line
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 03:31 PM
  #198  
Gord96BRG's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,845
Likes: 1
From: Calgary, AB
Re: cold air intake?

Originally posted by 2_furious
hom many horses does the leading Cold air intake give a stock RX-8 engine?
Many of us are sceptical that they actually give any power increase - the stock air box and giant filter are very well designed. So far, the intake vendors claim around 5 hp, but very few (maybe nobody) that has purchased one of these has done back-to-back dyno tests of intake before/after. Canzoomer, who has developed the piggyback ECU mod that gives 20 hp for $500, is one who did some testing and is very doubtful that any of the intakes on the market will add any power.

They sound great, though!

Regards,
Gordon
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 05:49 PM
  #199  
XDEEDUBBX's Avatar
RX8 HA HA
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,772
Likes: 5
From: Gardena Cali 310
like peanut butter and jelly...
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2004 | 02:45 PM
  #200  
huhsler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
From: Northern Virginia
...or chocolate and kim-chee...
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:23 AM.