Notices
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications Discussion of power adding modifications

BHR Mid-Pipe Sound Video

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 04:43 AM
  #1  
Flashwing's Avatar
Thread Starter
3-wheeler
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,734
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix
BHR Mid-Pipe Sound Video

Ok, it's finally been put together.

Here's the link for the youtube video with our sound samples.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0ocVv5Vx_w

Last edited by Flashwing; May 1, 2009 at 05:11 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 06:22 AM
  #2  
WAR CRUNK's Avatar
U.S ARMY 11B
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
From: I AM THE INFANTRY FOLLOW ME!
dmn my computer is sloow
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 06:47 AM
  #3  
Zeon's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
These threads crack me up. Has anyone taken any sort of SPL measurements yet? I mean I bought an exhaust because it sounded awesome on Youtube, but when I had it installed it practically made me deaf...

Edit: I'm specifically curious about the in-cabin volume levels.

Last edited by Zeon; Apr 30, 2009 at 06:53 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 07:16 AM
  #4  
jsjjr's Avatar
His 8
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
From: Leander, Tx
Nice! You could really tell the difference in tone between the 2 mid-pipes on Flashwing's ride and the stocker. The stocker still 'sounded' stock, but it has a slightly deeper tone to it. The way Flashwing described the difference's with the pipe is spot on.. You could really tell his has been mellowed out...I also noticed that he had a significant drop in the pop pop popping noise. (Man, I'm sooo glad I don't have a stock exhaust anymore, they sound terrible!)
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 07:24 AM
  #5  
michaelsk8er's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington, DE
Sounds pretty good. Any idea on completion dates? I haven't kept up with the other thread.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 08:54 AM
  #6  
Flashwing's Avatar
Thread Starter
3-wheeler
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,734
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix
Originally Posted by Zeon
These threads crack me up. Has anyone taken any sort of SPL measurements yet? I mean I bought an exhaust because it sounded awesome on Youtube, but when I had it installed it practically made me deaf...

Edit: I'm specifically curious about the in-cabin volume levels.
Yes we did take some sound level measurements and Charles Hill has the results. He's more of an expert regarding sound and could probably better explain the results.

If you want something to compare it to, simply listen to my first #1 sample as that's the sound you DO NOT want. Otherwise, if you enjoy the sound of your cat-back then you'll like this pipe.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 09:30 AM
  #7  
Charles R. Hill's Avatar
Owner of BHR
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,101
Likes: 45
Now, before any of you think we did an incomplete and ****-poor job of this I would like to point out a few things. This was just a preliminary test to see if we should spend any more time with this particular pursuit. We will also do spectral analysis, at some point before release of the midpipe and we will do backpressure-testing, as well (not that anybody will really understand the implications but we have a lot of data-****** around here who like to gaze at numbers ).

Here is what we measured with my professional sound-pressure level meter;
1) 6' distance at idle.
2) 25' distance at 4K rpms.
3) In-cabin at idle.
4) In-cabin at 4K rpms.

Espelir Cat-Back w/B+B midpipe. Espelir Cat-back w/BHR prototype.
1) 79 1) 75
2) 82 2) 77
3) 73 3) 67
4) 72 4) 73

Stock Cat-back/Stock Catpipe. Stock Cat-back/BHR prototype
1) 68 1) 68
2) 67 2) 67
3) 67 3) 69
4) 70 4) 72

Tanabe/Mazsport. Tanabe/BHR
1) 71 1) 73
2) 65 2) 68
3) 67 3) 67
4) 73 4) 71

Keep in mind that most people cannot even distinguish changes in the 1-2dB range and that THIS test does not account for frequency groupings that are dampened/accentuated between the various pipes. Until we do the spectral analysis, all I can tell you to do is ask those who owned the test cars for their descriptions of the before/after.

Last edited by Charles R. Hill; Apr 30, 2009 at 10:11 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 10:10 AM
  #8  
dondo's Avatar
100% baller (finally!)
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,385
Likes: 2
From: Seattle, WA
nice vid.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 10:26 AM
  #9  
Zeon's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Originally Posted by Charles R. Hill
Now, before any of you think we did an incomplete and ****-poor job of this I would like to point out a few things. This was just a preliminary test to see if we should spend any more time with this particular pursuit. We will also do spectral analysis, at some point before release of the midpipe and we will do backpressure-testing, as well (not that anybody will really understand the implications but we have a lot of data-****** around here who like to gaze at numbers ).

Here is what we measured with my professional sound-pressure level meter;
1) 6' distance at idle.
2) 25' distance at 4K rpms.
3) In-cabin at idle.
4) In-cabin at 4K rpms.

Espelir Cat-Back w/B+B midpipe. Espelir Cat-back w/BHR prototype.
1) 79 1) 75
2) 82 2) 77
3) 73 3) 67
4) 72 4) 73

Stock Cat-back/Stock Catpipe. Stock Cat-back/BHR prototype
1) 68 1) 68
2) 67 2) 67
3) 67 3) 69
4) 70 4) 72

Tanabe/Mazsport. Tanabe/BHR
1) 71 1) 73
2) 65 2) 68
3) 67 3) 67
4) 73 4) 71

Keep in mind that most people cannot even distinguish changes in the 1-2dB range and that THIS test does not account for frequency groupings that are dampened/accentuated between the various pipes. Until we do the spectral analysis, all I can tell you to do is ask those who owned the test cars for their descriptions of the before/after.
Thanks Charles, thats exactly what I was looking for. Numbers are looking pretty good from inside the cabin!
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 10:29 AM
  #10  
jsjjr's Avatar
His 8
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
From: Leander, Tx
You could def tell a difference with Flashwing's car. The levels for the others sounded about the same for me except for the stock one. I guess it was really just the 'tone' that made it seem louder.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 10:39 AM
  #11  
Razz1's Avatar
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 3
From: Cali
I think there is something wrong with the video.

All I can hear is music.

It would be nice to get a sound level at 60, 65, and 70 mph on the freeway.

Even a Video with sound while driving may be helpful.

Edit: Tone sounds good
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 10:44 AM
  #12  
Atilla's Avatar
I am THAT guy
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,994
Likes: 12
From: Caca Cali
Wow that's AWESOME! Great info on the sound readings Charles That should help a lot of people that are concerned about sound.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 11:20 AM
  #13  
Jedi54's Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 22,606
Likes: 3,474
From: The Dark Side
so far so good guys. Nicely done
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 11:23 AM
  #14  
shaunv74's Avatar
Power!!
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,412
Likes: 3
From: Sunny See attle
Thanks Ray for providing both the video and the data with baselines so we can get an understanding of the differences from a subjective and objective standpoint.

That's great stuff!
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 11:27 AM
  #15  
Easy_E1's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,675
Likes: 5
From: Bellevue WA
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 11:42 AM
  #16  
Kane's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,364
Likes: 44
From: PCB
This is nice...

Might be time for me to ditch the gutted stock cat.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 11:47 AM
  #17  
Mazmart's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,794
Likes: 67
I kept seeing some bald guy walking around in the video; totally distracted me from the exhaust analysis.

Sounds good thus far. Good luck guys.

Paul.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 12:15 PM
  #18  
G3tR3DDY2GR3DDY's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 1
From: Asheville, NC
not too sure what Paul is complaining about

Ray, if you could get an agency power DR pipe comparison im sure interest in this would go way up. Its obvious this pipe is better than most other single resonated, but your real competition is in the dual resonated pipes. That being the racing beat coming up, agency power, and the mazsport, which already looks like your pipe is quieter in cabin atleast (the important part for people wanting a quiet one)

Good job though guys! i wish i lived in your area to hang out for these shenanigans
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 12:19 PM
  #19  
Easy_E1's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,675
Likes: 5
From: Bellevue WA
Originally Posted by G3tR3DDY2GR3DDY
not too sure what Paul is complaining about

Ray, if you could get an agency power DR pipe comparison im sure interest in this would go way up. Its obvious this pipe is better than most other single resonated, but your real competition is in the dual resonated pipes. That being the racing beat coming up, agency power, and the mazsport, which already looks like your pipe is quieter in cabin atleast (the important part for people wanting a quiet one)

Good job though guys! i wish i lived in your area to hang out for these shenanigans
We are one up on the Dual pipes. We are lighter. Lighter is better.

Mazsport is not an issue. Theirs requires modification to the cross members.And it wears out in about 10-15,000 miles. I have some video of one.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 12:43 PM
  #20  
Cattywampus's Avatar
Turbos blow!!
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
From: my engine bay
Wish I could hear that in person. You keep coming out with stuff my wife will ban me from spending. For some reason she thinks saving money for the baby is more important.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 12:56 PM
  #21  
Flashwing's Avatar
Thread Starter
3-wheeler
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,734
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix
The primary issue is the fact that there's no flow data with any of the dual resonated mid-pipes to suggest that there's any kind of a performance gain. Couple that with a heavier and bulkier design AND the fact that the glass/wool packing will burn out due to the excessive exhaust gas temperatures.

In the end, you're looking at minimal performance gains, if any, and a product which will only work less as time goes by. In the end, all done to keep a mostly stock sound.

Our goal was to be able to produce a quality tone with a single resonator. While we clearly could fabricate a dual resonated version of our pipe I'm pretty sure that people will enjoy the sound.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 12:57 PM
  #22  
Razz1's Avatar
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 3
From: Cali
Well... doesn't the baby need a horn to toot?

You can clean up your old exhaust and make it into a horn.

Music helps creat intelligence so you win both ways.
A musical intrument and a musical sounding car.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 01:49 PM
  #23  
nikkdizzle's Avatar
Daddy's Home...
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
From: sevenONEfour
this is exciting news guys.

defintely can't wiat till you guys put it into production. defintely looking to get a midpipe.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 02:34 PM
  #24  
Ross_Dawg's Avatar
Registered Toker
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,545
Likes: 1
From: Bend, OR
start production already!
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 02:58 PM
  #25  
Cattywampus's Avatar
Turbos blow!!
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
From: my engine bay
Remember: Perfection over patience
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:00 AM.