Notices
RX-8 Racing Want to discuss autocrossing, road-racing and drag racing the RX-8? Bring it here. This is NOT a kills/street racing forum.

Stats on RX-8?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 07-22-2004, 08:55 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Apocalypse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stats on RX-8?

Can someone provide me with some stats on the RX-8? For example, weight, 1/4 mile time, lateral g's, braking distance. Also, anyone know the weight for the 350Z and it's weight distribution. Thanks
Old 07-22-2004, 09:49 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
AbusiveWombat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RX8
weight: 3060 lbs +/- 50 depending on equipment
1/4 mile: 14.8 - 15.3
g's: ~0.92

350Z
weight: 3225 lbs
weight dist: 50/50
Old 07-22-2004, 10:39 AM
  #3  
RX-8: Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm.....
 
Smoker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
See if you can dig up the Road and Track review of the RX-8, they have lots of stats on this car.
Old 07-26-2004, 05:29 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
RobDickinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
350z is 48/52

RX8 is 50/50

Same lateral g. RX8 has quicker turn in but takes longer to settle.
Old 07-28-2004, 01:22 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Artifex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Irvine CA
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not sure if it's techinically ok to post these, but here's the Road and Track datasheets for both cars...
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
2004_Mazdarx-8.pdf (85.8 KB, 531 views)
File Type: pdf
2003_Nissan350z.pdf (83.5 KB, 377 views)
Old 07-28-2004, 10:31 AM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Apocalypse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for all your help guys.

Jay
RX-7 TT

Last edited by Apocalypse; 05-15-2005 at 07:44 AM.
Old 07-28-2004, 07:15 PM
  #7  
Riot Controller
 
epitrochoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 2,142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
im pretty sure the Z is nose heavy (52/48). the motor's CoG sites over the front 'axle' as opposed to comfortably behind it as in our case. nissan tried to justify it by saying it goes 50/50 under acceleration, but that's a load of malarky. apparently in a Z you have to be accelerating for the car to handle well.

interestingly enough, R&T (i think) has a sidebar with data from ferrari on how a slightly rear weight distribution is best for RWD.
Old 07-28-2004, 10:40 PM
  #8  
Music and Cars!!! :)
 
VikingDJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Road and Track results are over generous in giving the rx8 a 14.5, as to where all other road tests revealed 14.8 or higher. The 350z is basically right on with it's 14.1. I'm sure (and I PRAY) by 2006 mazda will have one that's capable of running with a Z. People have run as well as 13.9 with the Z in complete stock form. Give the nod to the rx8 on handling, but a HUGE nod and advantage to the 350z on power.
Old 07-29-2004, 03:31 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
RobDickinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
sorry I meant the 350z is 52/48 (i.e. front heavy).

As forstraight line power the Z walks it, to 60 theres not a lot in it but to 100 the z is miles ahead. 13sec compared to 17.
Old 07-31-2004, 03:21 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
Artifex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Irvine CA
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by VikingDJ
The Road and Track results are over generous in giving the rx8 a 14.5, as to where all other road tests revealed 14.8 or higher.
Yup. Keep in mind that the R&T car(s) were hand built mules. I was lucky enough to get to drive one of the hand built mules and there is a difference - I had no doubt it could lay down a low 14 vs a 15 for production cars.
Old 08-01-2004, 07:49 AM
  #11  
Whuumpha!!
 
Velocity-8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here's a timeslip from Atco Raceway. Everything is stock except exhaust. Atco does not have a scale like some tracks so I did not get it weighed.

My car is #202 on the left...
Attached Thumbnails Stats on RX-8?-atco-2.jpg  
Old 08-02-2004, 11:44 AM
  #12  
Space Cadet
 
rev-2-9k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RobDickinson
As forstraight line power the Z walks it, to 60 theres not a lot in it but to 100 the z is miles ahead. 13sec compared to 17.

Maybe I am missing something but with a 1/4 mile time of 14.5 at 98 mph how does it take. 2.5 secs to shift to 4th?

Also the best 1/4 mile track times i have seen for the 350z have been in the low 14's possibly geeting a 13.9.
Old 08-02-2004, 01:45 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
AbusiveWombat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by epitrochoid
im pretty sure the Z is nose heavy (52/48). the motor's CoG sites over the front 'axle' as opposed to comfortably behind it as in our case. nissan tried to justify it by saying it goes 50/50 under acceleration, but that's a load of malarky. apparently in a Z you have to be accelerating for the car to handle well.

interestingly enough, R&T (i think) has a sidebar with data from ferrari on how a slightly rear weight distribution is best for RWD.
You don't need 50/50 weight distribution to have good handling. The EVO does it with 60/40 and the Porsche 911 GT2 has 38/62....both handle as good if not better than most 50/50 cars.
Old 08-03-2004, 12:20 AM
  #14  
Music and Cars!!! :)
 
VikingDJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rev-2-9k
Maybe I am missing something but with a 1/4 mile time of 14.5 at 98 mph how does it take. 2.5 secs to shift to 4th?

That 14.5 at 98mph is WAYYY off for the production rx8. Maybe in future, but for now, that just isn't happening without mods. 14.8-15.0 is a more realistic time for what the rx8 can do.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BillBertelli
NE For Sale/Wanted
4
03-19-2016 03:01 PM
Brokegang
New Member Forum
27
01-03-2016 12:45 PM
arexatemate
RX-8 Parts For Sale/Wanted
2
10-09-2015 06:23 PM
Chapsy
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
1
09-22-2015 09:57 AM
Tsurugi
New Member Forum
0
09-07-2015 08:27 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Stats on RX-8?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:53 AM.