SCCA announces new autocross class: STU
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SCCA announces new autocross class: STU
SCCA announces Street Touring Ultra to include WRX STi, Evo 8 and RX-8.
Uh, which of those three cars is not like the others?
________
Paxil Settlement
Uh, which of those three cars is not like the others?
________
Paxil Settlement
Last edited by PUR NRG; 05-01-2011 at 02:59 AM.
#2
Blue By You
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interesting, I think the RX-8 will do rather well on a tight course against the cars listed. Will certainly be interesting to see how the class shapes up even if it doesn't.
#4
Prodigal Wankler
Originally posted by IkeWRX
If anyone is wondering the PAX it's 0.827.
If anyone is wondering the PAX it's 0.827.
Since this class has only just appeared, how can there be any data upon which to base a PAX?
#5
Blue By You
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#6
Prodigal Wankler
This Index was developed by Rick Ruth and reflects study of results from over 160 nationwide Solo II events including, the Tire Rack® Solo II National Championships, National Tour, Subaru CenDiv Series, Chicago Region SCCA, Tri-State Sports Car Council, Wisconsin Autocrossers Inc., Southeast Divisional Series, San Francisco, San Diego and New England events.
Granted, the base vehicles involved may have run in various other classes last year, but not with the same set of allowable modifications, nor with the same tire restrictions. This PAX figure must be a guess at best, since there is no hard data.
#7
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You're wondering about PAX logic why? Take an RX-8 from BS and you get a better PAX and more allowed mods in SM than in BSP.
________
Medical marijuana
________
Medical marijuana
Last edited by PUR NRG; 05-01-2011 at 02:59 AM.
#8
Blue By You
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It should be an interesting class, and one I will follow closely. It may have to get mixed up a bit come seasons end. Any predictions on what the 3 best cars will be, and which you think will win nats.? It's a tough call, but I feel confident it will be AWD. I really want to vote STi, but they still have a lot of kinks to work out with mods, so EVO8 wins nats this year. Followed closely by the STi and RX-8. Though the F-body may just spoil the import parade, but I've got a Nat Champ F-body driver, and another national contender at my local events so maybe they've skewed my perception a bit.
Anyone else care to make some predictions?
Anyone else care to make some predictions?
#9
Registered
iTrader: (2)
E36 M3 will be one to watch as well.
I don't think the RX-8 will be competitive in this class, especially on a tight course. No low-end torque + tight course = slow times. Although I suppose the guys looking to win nats won't have the reluctance I have relative to downshifting into first to get the punch out of pivot cones and tight sweepers. I suppose if you did that, the RX-8 might have a chance.
What the RX-8 does very well is transition. On a faster course with lots of transitions and a few large radius sweepers the RX-8 should post some respectable times.
I don't think the RX-8 will be competitive in this class, especially on a tight course. No low-end torque + tight course = slow times. Although I suppose the guys looking to win nats won't have the reluctance I have relative to downshifting into first to get the punch out of pivot cones and tight sweepers. I suppose if you did that, the RX-8 might have a chance.
What the RX-8 does very well is transition. On a faster course with lots of transitions and a few large radius sweepers the RX-8 should post some respectable times.
#10
Blue By You
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by GeorgeH
E36 M3 will be one to watch as well.
I don't think the RX-8 will be competitive in this class, especially on a tight course. No low-end torque + tight course = slow times. Although I suppose the guys looking to win nats won't have the reluctance I have relative to downshifting into first to get the punch out of pivot cones and tight sweepers. I suppose if you did that, the RX-8 might have a chance.
What the RX-8 does very well is transition. On a faster course with lots of transitions and a few large radius sweepers the RX-8 should post some respectable times.
E36 M3 will be one to watch as well.
I don't think the RX-8 will be competitive in this class, especially on a tight course. No low-end torque + tight course = slow times. Although I suppose the guys looking to win nats won't have the reluctance I have relative to downshifting into first to get the punch out of pivot cones and tight sweepers. I suppose if you did that, the RX-8 might have a chance.
What the RX-8 does very well is transition. On a faster course with lots of transitions and a few large radius sweepers the RX-8 should post some respectable times.
#11
Registered
iTrader: (2)
I just noticed that while wheel widths are unrestricted, AWD cars are limited to 245 section tires, while FWD and RWD are limited to 275s. That makes it a little more interesting for the RX-8. Ike, do you know if there are limitations on wheel diameter? If not, you could fit 275-40-17s, which are a bit smaller than stock. Otherwise, 265-35-18s are available, which give a 9mm lower rolling radius, helping the gearing issues in the RX-8.
These same observations help the other 2WD cars in the class. Perhaps the Evo isn't the obvious winner after all.
These same observations help the other 2WD cars in the class. Perhaps the Evo isn't the obvious winner after all.
#12
Blue By You
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by GeorgeH
I just noticed that while wheel widths are unrestricted, AWD cars are limited to 245 section tires, while FWD and RWD are limited to 275s. That makes it a little more interesting for the RX-8. Ike, do you know if there are limitations on wheel diameter? If not, you could fit 275-40-17s, which are a bit smaller than stock. Otherwise, 265-35-18s are available, which give a 9mm lower rolling radius, helping the gearing issues in the RX-8.
These same observations help the other 2WD cars in the class. Perhaps the Evo isn't the obvious winner after all.
I just noticed that while wheel widths are unrestricted, AWD cars are limited to 245 section tires, while FWD and RWD are limited to 275s. That makes it a little more interesting for the RX-8. Ike, do you know if there are limitations on wheel diameter? If not, you could fit 275-40-17s, which are a bit smaller than stock. Otherwise, 265-35-18s are available, which give a 9mm lower rolling radius, helping the gearing issues in the RX-8.
These same observations help the other 2WD cars in the class. Perhaps the Evo isn't the obvious winner after all.
I still think there a chance you're going to see a lot of former ESP Camaro drivers dominating this class, they're already going to be well sorted and they will be very used to their cars. Also, turns out this class won't even be considered for full national status until 2007.
Last edited by IkeWRX; 03-25-2004 at 03:34 AM.
#13
Registered
iTrader: (2)
Just looked at my 2004 rule book, and it appears that the only limitation on wheel diameter is that the wheel must fit over the OEM brakes. So you could go with a 17" wheel on the RX-8. Also noticed that piggy-back ECU mods are legal, so the Canzoomer mod could be used (as I read the rules, anyway). Lower gearing + Canzoomer = punchy RX-8 (but still no STi/Evo killer in a straight line).
As for the F-bodies coming from ESP, it may not be that easy. ESP allows for more lightening mods, inlcuding back-dating parts, so moving to STU might not be easy for the top-prepared cars. I know that the best CSP Miatas are "frankenstein" cars, with various parts such as the engine, doors, even the dash being carefully choosen from the year that can donate the lightest part. Such a car would require quite a bit of "un-doing" to be legal in STU.
I still think the RX-8 has a shot on a momentum course. At our season opener, a well-prepared (but not bleeding-edge) and well-driven CSP Miata delivered FTD, over some well driven high performance cars, such as Z06s, F-bodies, etc. It was a momentum course, loads of fun in a Miata - acceleration just didn't play much of a role. I took first in CSP in my Miata, on street tires to boot! (Overall winner competed in PAX, so I wasn't competing directly with him).
As for the F-bodies coming from ESP, it may not be that easy. ESP allows for more lightening mods, inlcuding back-dating parts, so moving to STU might not be easy for the top-prepared cars. I know that the best CSP Miatas are "frankenstein" cars, with various parts such as the engine, doors, even the dash being carefully choosen from the year that can donate the lightest part. Such a car would require quite a bit of "un-doing" to be legal in STU.
I still think the RX-8 has a shot on a momentum course. At our season opener, a well-prepared (but not bleeding-edge) and well-driven CSP Miata delivered FTD, over some well driven high performance cars, such as Z06s, F-bodies, etc. It was a momentum course, loads of fun in a Miata - acceleration just didn't play much of a role. I took first in CSP in my Miata, on street tires to boot! (Overall winner competed in PAX, so I wasn't competing directly with him).
#14
Registered
iTrader: (2)
OK, I've red the rules a bit more. You can also use a high flow cat, which means a Canzoomer stage 2 might work. Hmmm.... +40 hp, 275 G-Force KDs on 17x9's, (or 10s if they fit) , a set of JICs. Sounds pretty fast. Ike, do you how much hp STis can pick up using the STX rules?
#15
Blue By You
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by GeorgeH
OK, I've red the rules a bit more. You can also use a high flow cat, which means a Canzoomer stage 2 might work. Hmmm.... +40 hp, 275 G-Force KDs on 17x9's, (or 10s if they fit) , a set of JICs. Sounds pretty fast. Ike, do you how much hp STis can pick up using the STX rules?
OK, I've red the rules a bit more. You can also use a high flow cat, which means a Canzoomer stage 2 might work. Hmmm.... +40 hp, 275 G-Force KDs on 17x9's, (or 10s if they fit) , a set of JICs. Sounds pretty fast. Ike, do you how much hp STis can pick up using the STX rules?
But HP on the STi will not be a problem even if they they weren't allowed any mods. Some guys may be out there with Praxis suspension and those cars with a good driver might be scary good. I think suspension mods are what's really going to make or break the STi in STU. However I think you're going to see more STis in SP or SM since altering boost and changing out turbos is is a big thing with the STi, especially since this will not be a nationals level class most of the best drivers will stay away.
The more I think about it the more I just don't see the class working out in the long run, but I do see a AWD class in the not too distant future.
Ike
#16
What's next?
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SE Mass
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But HP on the STi will not be a problem even if they they weren't allowed any mods. Some guys may be out there with Praxis suspension and those cars with a good driver might be scary good. I think suspension mods are what's really going to make or break the STi in STU. However I think you're going to see more STis in SP or SM since altering boost and changing out turbos is is a big thing with the STi, especially since this will not be a nationals level class most of the best drivers will stay away.
There's a move to let otherwise STX legal WRXs and DSMs in with boost mods into STU. The WRX stage 2 right now only see about 275 wheel HP, and you don't want to go any higher than that without new injectors, which are, again, not legal. DSMs are in the same boat, and they have issues with suspension design. Sure you can get decent HP, but wth the limit of 245 street tires and not the best suspension, it becomes an issue there to.
It would definitely help the class become a little more populated from the get-go, along with helping those guys with teh DSMs or WRXs that have done a couple mods stick around and do Solo on the local level.... and they go to SM right now and get killed.
--KC
Last edited by Imp; 03-29-2004 at 03:24 PM.
#17
I like cheese!
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Little Rock, AR (was vegas)
Posts: 957
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
Originally posted by eccles
Did they just pull that number out of their ***? PAX factors are based on performances in state- or national-level competition over the past year.
Since this class has only just appeared, how can there be any data upon which to base a PAX?
Did they just pull that number out of their ***? PAX factors are based on performances in state- or national-level competition over the past year.
Since this class has only just appeared, how can there be any data upon which to base a PAX?
STU sucks, I'm banning SCCA this year.
#18
Blue By You
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Imp
Praxxis is not legal in Street Touring or ESP. In the case of a Subaru, you're changing the 'Type' of suspension from Struts to AirBag. Changing 'type' is specifically not allowed in those classes.
There's a move to let otherwise STX legal WRXs and DSMs in with boost mods into STU. The WRX stage 2 right now only see about 275 wheel HP, and you don't want to go any higher than that without new injectors, which are, again, not legal. DSMs are in the same boat, and they have issues with suspension design. Sure you can get decent HP, but wth the limit of 245 street tires and not the best suspension, it becomes an issue there to.
It would definitely help the class become a little more populated from the get-go, along with helping those guys with teh DSMs or WRXs that have done a couple mods stick around and do Solo on the local level.... and they go to SM right now and get killed.
--KC
Praxxis is not legal in Street Touring or ESP. In the case of a Subaru, you're changing the 'Type' of suspension from Struts to AirBag. Changing 'type' is specifically not allowed in those classes.
There's a move to let otherwise STX legal WRXs and DSMs in with boost mods into STU. The WRX stage 2 right now only see about 275 wheel HP, and you don't want to go any higher than that without new injectors, which are, again, not legal. DSMs are in the same boat, and they have issues with suspension design. Sure you can get decent HP, but wth the limit of 245 street tires and not the best suspension, it becomes an issue there to.
It would definitely help the class become a little more populated from the get-go, along with helping those guys with teh DSMs or WRXs that have done a couple mods stick around and do Solo on the local level.... and they go to SM right now and get killed.
--KC
What are your plans for the season? I heard something about you not being able to make many national events and defend your crown, if that's the case sorry to hear it.
I really think an AWD class of some sort would be nice and is something the SCCA should seriously consider, and thoughts on that?
#19
What's next?
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SE Mass
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Work's got me pinned to the wall. They want a 9 month project in 6 months. Can't complain... OTs been approved. :D
Most of the events I've been going to have been with the support of the company giving me leave without pay. Since the closest event this year is 9 hrs away and the next is about 14-16 hrs, I need to take quite a bit of time off (usually about 2.5 days... 1.5 out, 1 back), at no pay for it. I might do the DC tour. That's up in the air, but no more ProSolos.
So with the added work, and getting paid (and a few other things that need to be done outside of work) I had to make a decision.
So I'll still go to nationals... just not the ProFinale. STX or ESP... still up in the air. Going to be running locally in ESP to see if the wagon, as it stands, takes to Hoosiers well.
Most of the events I've been going to have been with the support of the company giving me leave without pay. Since the closest event this year is 9 hrs away and the next is about 14-16 hrs, I need to take quite a bit of time off (usually about 2.5 days... 1.5 out, 1 back), at no pay for it. I might do the DC tour. That's up in the air, but no more ProSolos.
So with the added work, and getting paid (and a few other things that need to be done outside of work) I had to make a decision.
So I'll still go to nationals... just not the ProFinale. STX or ESP... still up in the air. Going to be running locally in ESP to see if the wagon, as it stands, takes to Hoosiers well.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hufflepuff
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension
6
05-30-2016 10:45 AM
{WTB/WTT} WTB Right Undertray Riser and Guard
archon
RX-8 Parts For Sale/Wanted
3
10-01-2015 06:08 AM