Notices
RX-8 Racing Want to discuss autocrossing, road-racing and drag racing the RX-8? Bring it here. This is NOT a kills/street racing forum.

2007 SCCA Nationals B-Stock Weights

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 04:59 PM
  #26  
mwood's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 0
Supposedly the new 1.6L is going to make "36% more horsepower" than the 1.3L...or around 315hp...I wonder if that is Mazda hp or real hp?
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 08:36 PM
  #27  
tomsn16's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: Nashville,Tn
Originally Posted by ULLLOSE
Mazda also said the RX-8 made 247 hp when it came out.
Many of us LLLOSERS believe that the 48 car does in fact have 247 HP...maybe more!!!
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 10:07 PM
  #28  
ULLLOSE's Avatar
05-08 SCCA BS Natl Champ
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,478
Likes: 1
From: Coto de Caza, CA
Originally Posted by tomsn16
Many of us LLLOSERS believe that the 48 car does in fact have 247 HP...maybe more!!!
Come on, you saw my dyno chart in SportsCar. Well 7000 or so RPMs worth.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 10:10 PM
  #29  
chiketkd's Avatar
Row faster, I hear banjos
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 2
From: Charlottesville, VA
Originally Posted by mwood
Supposedly the new 1.6L is going to make "36% more horsepower" than the 1.3L...or around 315hp...I wonder if that is Mazda hp or real hp?
If that ends up being a reality - it'll probably end up in AS.
Originally Posted by ULLLOSE
Well 7000 or so RPMs worth.
That's right. I did 'wonder' what hp #'s your car would make @ 9 grand!
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 12:28 PM
  #30  
FTD's Avatar
FTD
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ULLLOSE
Your "heavier" SSRs are 16.5lbs VS 16.3lbs. The other item people often don't think about is your magnetic numbers, I bet your stack of stuff was 10 lbs.

I was under the impression that the "new" SSRs were weighing in at 17.5lbs. Do they actually weight 16.5? Maybe they were listed incorrectly on the Tire Rack site I was looking at.

Thanks
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 12:32 PM
  #31  
mwood's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by FTD
I was under the impression that the "new" SSRs were weighing in at 17.5lbs. Do they actually weight 16.5? Maybe they were listed incorrectly on the Tire Rack site I was looking at.

Thanks
The set Jason is referring to is an older set of the 5 spoke SSR's, which a friend locally was kind enough to lend to the cause for Topeka
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 12:50 PM
  #32  
ULLLOSE's Avatar
05-08 SCCA BS Natl Champ
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,478
Likes: 1
From: Coto de Caza, CA
Originally Posted by mwood
The set Jason is referring to is an older set of the 5 spoke SSR's, which a friend locally was kind enough to lend to the cause for Topeka
Yes, the SSR GT2, the same wheel Goeke has. I seem to recall they were 16.8ish.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 05:09 PM
  #33  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,933
Likes: 2,139
with or without valve stems?
Reply
Old May 22, 2008 | 06:16 AM
  #34  
NeoTuri's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: ATL, GA
Nevermind

Last edited by NeoTuri; May 22, 2008 at 06:19 AM.
Reply
Old May 26, 2008 | 12:40 AM
  #35  
xsnipersgox's Avatar
One Shot One Kill
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 2
From: Houston
hehe.. i am under the impression the most weight saving is probably around your waist? XD
Reply
Old May 26, 2008 | 01:07 AM
  #36  
CodingParadox's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
From: Redmond, WA
Huh, somehow managed to miss this when it started...

Wow, my car was 2875 with 1/4 tank of gas at the packwood tour. It's a sport, not a base, but still. I was on stock wheels, 22 lbs each i think they are, so 20-25 pounds for those, 2850... Already have a lightweight exhaust. Stock front bar (now on the SFR bar, but I doubt that saved much weight). Are my fog lights 50 pounds or something? :P 1/4 tank of gas is 20 lbs. Still, how the heck are people under 2800?...
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 12:17 AM
  #37  
APB4ME's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: dallas/Ft. Worth
QUOTE=FTD;2216900]I was under the impression that the "new" SSRs were weighing in at 17.5lbs. Do they actually weight 16.5? Maybe they were listed incorrectly on the Tire Rack site I was looking at.

Thanks[/QUOTE]
I have the new style SSRs and they are 17lbs 8oz.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 11:28 AM
  #38  
SilverSurfer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
2898? Jeez. That aero kit is fat. Kinda makes me wish that I knew what autocross was when I bought my car.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 12:13 PM
  #39  
Zoom4Three's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by CodingParadox
Huh, somehow managed to miss this when it started...

Wow, my car was 2875 with 1/4 tank of gas at the packwood tour. It's a sport, not a base, but still. I was on stock wheels, 22 lbs each i think they are, so 20-25 pounds for those, 2850... Already have a lightweight exhaust. Stock front bar (now on the SFR bar, but I doubt that saved much weight). Are my fog lights 50 pounds or something? :P 1/4 tank of gas is 20 lbs. Still, how the heck are people under 2800?...
06' and later models have a heavier battery and starter to address some of the cold starting issues. Your weight seems in-line with my 06' Base model which was about 2850 with OZ's, solid bar, light exhaust and 1/4 tank at Nat'ls.

Chris H
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 01:06 PM
  #40  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,933
Likes: 2,139
scales vary more than you think, that's why you always weigh your car upon arriving at an event in a weight min class and adjust accordingly

the Heartland Park scales were reading light IMO ...

the orignal 1-pc SSR Comp wheels weigh 1 lb less than the current 2-pc version
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 07:37 PM
  #41  
chiketkd's Avatar
Row faster, I hear banjos
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 2
From: Charlottesville, VA
Originally Posted by Zoom4Three
06' and later models have a heavier battery and starter to address some of the cold starting issues. Your weight seems in-line with my 06' Base model which was about 2850 with OZ's, solid bar, light exhaust and 1/4 tank at Nat'ls.

Chris H
That's good to know. Hopefully, I'll get to weigh my car at the DC Pro and see what number we're at. The plan is to run our full Nationals set-up...
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2008 | 08:44 PM
  #42  
chiketkd's Avatar
Row faster, I hear banjos
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 2
From: Charlottesville, VA
2008 nationals weight for #170 and #70 BS -- 2840lbs on the HPT in-ground scale.

Car was running at least 2 gals of extra fuel as we fuel starved on Day 1 (tried a lower-than-usual fuel load).
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2008 | 12:32 AM
  #43  
CodingParadox's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
From: Redmond, WA
I fuel starved on the West course around the long sweeper too. I had 1/8th tank at the time, and I'd never fuel starved before with the fuel tank above empty. I've only starved in the past with the gas gauge well past empty.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2008 | 09:42 AM
  #44  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,933
Likes: 2,139
1/4 tank and new fuel pump, no problem
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2008 | 12:17 PM
  #45  
CodingParadox's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
From: Redmond, WA
Yeah, we filled up to 1/4 tank and the problem went away.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2008 | 11:27 AM
  #46  
BryanH's Avatar
2009 BS Nat'l Champ
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
From: Central CA
If anyone's curious, that "other" BS car in the trophies weighed 2,750lbs on the Topeka scales. About 50lbs lighter than I expected.

Not that it helped.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2008 | 11:30 AM
  #47  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,933
Likes: 2,139
the drive on scales at HPT read 50 lb less than anyone is expecting ....
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2014 | 11:26 AM
  #48  
Nadrealista's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 673
Likes: 33
From: Here
resurrecting this old thread.

From digging around looks like 04-05 S1 base model is the lightest @ 2800-2900lb in stock trim.

Mazda claims they reduced weight with the S2 but they list base model @ 3065lb?

what gives?

Anyone knows actual weight of the R3?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
New_Mazda_Guy
NW RX-8 Forum
14
Sep 19, 2019 11:20 AM
fourwhls
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
7
Feb 20, 2019 05:16 PM
Michael Bryant
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension
5
Oct 12, 2015 03:07 PM
jasonrxeight
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
2
Sep 30, 2015 01:53 PM
XianUnix
Series I Trouble Shooting
6
Sep 29, 2015 03:48 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:18 PM.