Notices
RX-8 Media News Report the latest RX-8 related news stories here.

rx-8 versus 350z in italian magazine

 
Old Dec 15, 2003 | 03:38 PM
  #1  
Matteo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Cremona ITALY
rx-8 versus 350z in italian magazine

On the january number of italian mag
"auto" there is a comparison between the two cars:
Both are euro-spec (obviusly)

0-100(kmh)
Mazda 6"79 Nissan 6"09

0-400 (meters)
Mazda 14" 95
Nissan 14"25

top speed
Mazda 231,4
Nissan 252,1

Overall on pure chassis basis (stability, handling, brakes) the two cars are very near (Mazda on track suffer a little bit a softer suspension set-up ,but on the road is quite more confortable)

Nissan's engine is overall better: more power and torque and less gas consumption (important in Europe).

The great advantage of Mazda are the 4 real seats that make the car more usable by most of people.
Audi tt 3.2 quattro is considered a possible competitor (but more expensive)

I think that the most natural competitor of 8 is BMW 330i (w/sport susp kit and 18")
Old Dec 15, 2003 | 04:07 PM
  #2  
racerdave's Avatar
F125er/Future RX-8er
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: WI, USA
Thanks for the summary.

I do not think the Audi TT is a competitor, as it's back seat is ridiculously small and hard to climb in.

Also, the 330 is very nice, but again more expensive.
Old Dec 15, 2003 | 11:36 PM
  #3  
zthang's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Re: rx-8 versus 350z in italian magazine

Originally posted by Matteo
On the january number of italian mag
"auto" there is a comparison between the two cars:
Both are euro-spec (obviusly)

0-100(kmh)
Mazda 6"79 Nissan 6"09

0-400 (meters)
Mazda 14" 95
Nissan 14"25

top speed
Mazda 231,4
Nissan 252,1

Overall on pure chassis basis (stability, handling, brakes) the two cars are very near (Mazda on track suffer a little bit a softer suspension set-up ,but on the road is quite more confortable)

Nissan's engine is overall better: more power and torque and less gas consumption (important in Europe).

The great advantage of Mazda are the 4 real seats that make the car more usable by most of people.
Audi tt 3.2 quattro is considered a possible competitor (but more expensive)

I think that the most natural competitor of 8 is BMW 330i (w/sport susp kit and 18")
Someone clarify me if i'm wrong...but is 0-100kph equivalent to 0-62mph? Ive always wondered, so someone tell me what it is.
Old Dec 16, 2003 | 12:06 AM
  #4  
Gord96BRG's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,845
Likes: 1
From: Calgary, AB
Re: Re: rx-8 versus 350z in italian magazine

Originally posted by zthang
Someone clarify me if i'm wrong...but is 0-100kph equivalent to 0-62mph? Ive always wondered, so someone tell me what it is.
Yes, 62.1 mph to add one more digit of precision. 400 metres is darn close to 1/4 mi, too (400m = 1312 ft, 1/4 mi = 1320 ft).

Regards,
Gordon
Old Dec 16, 2003 | 02:44 AM
  #5  
zthang's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Re: Re: Re: rx-8 versus 350z in italian magazine

Originally posted by Gord96BRG
Yes, 62.1 mph to add one more digit of precision. 400 metres is darn close to 1/4 mi, too (400m = 1312 ft, 1/4 mi = 1320 ft).

Regards,
Gordon
Thanks!! I've always wondered why those British mags always quote 0-62 mph times.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BillBertelli
NE For Sale/Wanted
4
Mar 19, 2016 03:01 PM
Brokegang
New Member Forum
27
Jan 3, 2016 12:45 PM
Chapsy
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
1
Sep 22, 2015 09:57 AM
Frosty8
New Member Forum
2
Sep 11, 2015 10:27 PM
Tsurugi
New Member Forum
0
Sep 7, 2015 08:27 PM


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:58 AM.