all of the above from 13b but one of the most interesting comments was in the recent wards article

 

it would be interesting if it is like this:
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j...TCU0S2rLAw9cgA

and this is one showing how DI can affect the charge--its the hydrogen engine--but its the best visualization I have found.

 

They have certain exhuast emission in japan, forgot exactly what it ws, but if they pass certain volume then they have to get a heavy fine.

They know its possible, but i dont think u want a rotary car that cost 5 times of what it is

 

There's a solution to your "Japanese emissions standards" that a 3 rotor engine "can't" meet, and its extremely simple:

Just don't sell the car that has a 3 rotor engine in Japan.

Really simple.
So simple, in fact, that it makes it plainly obvious to anyone who spends half a second thinking about it, that you realize that if the problem really was Japanese emissions standards preventing Mazda from selling a car with a 3 rotor engine, that they would just sell the car to the people in markets where that level of emissions standards don't exist.

But, since Mazda isn't selling a 3 rotor engine in non-Japanese markets, that there must be something else behind the reason for Mazda not selling a car with a 3 rotor engine in it to any market.

BC.

 

it would destroy their reputation in Japan. Could you imagine if Ford stopped selling v8 versions of the mustang in the US but still sold it world wide? Ford fans would revolt.

 

It doesn’t matter if Mazda is selling tons of cars if they aren’t in the black then some amount of cost cutting will ensue as they try to position themselves to be in the black. A niche project like the rotary although core to the company’s persona is a hard sell in the current environment Mazda finds itself in.

I’m sure Mazda would love to do a new rotary and perhaps have more than one rotary car but the question is does that make economic sense at the current time. It’s not like they are Apple with 100 billion in cash reserves that they can use for niche product development.

 

No one seems to remember the fact that Mazda is selling more and more cars every year. Their financial situation is due to nothing more than currency conversions, and their current round of investors proved that they're a strong company worth investing in. Once they start manufacturing in more countries than Japan, then their profits will increase rapidly.

Not necessarily... All they would have to do is charge more for the package in Japan, and make them a special order item. Not to mention the number of engine sales to all the race teams using the current 3 rotor tech when you make them upgrade to the new engines too. I think they could produce more than enough engines to make them cost effective even if they were only installed as an optional component in their "halo" car/package. We're talking what? 3~4 components that cant be shared with the 16x? Thick center iron, eshaft, center stationary gear, center bearing, and counterweight. Metal casting is dirt cheep and Mazda has their own foundries.

 

I'm really liking the direction Mazda is going lately. They're showing technological innovation across the board, and sticking to their "Zoom Zoom" mantra. I really dig the CX-5 as a mini-CUV, and I'm not even a fan of such vehicles. I actually seriously considered getting one to replace my totaled 2012 Focus Titanium daily driver.

 

Investors tell it like it is, and they tell it with their wallets.


When Mazda puts on a stock sale that is oversold three times on average, EIGHT times over sold in one market, it means that investors have real faith in Mazda. The rest of the investors (car buyers) are saying the same thing, as their market share continues to increase, both in the US as well as other countries.

Mazda has a pain point right now, but they are hardly dying.

 

Selling equipment to racing teams is completely different that selling to the general public. I don't see how they could forgo selling their top tier car in japan and not draw the ire of their customer base there. And if they did sell the 3 rotor as a option then (assuming it didn't pass emissions requirements) then it would cost 3-4 times as much as it would normally, and consequently wouldn't sell...or be heavily criticized for it's price-to-performance level. I was specifically talking about in japan, but that kind of applies everywhere. keep in mind the rx-8 couldn't pass the current euro standards. So unless there are mind boggling improvements done on the 16x, there is no way a 3 rotor version of the 16x would pass them, much less future regulations. And again would cost hugely more than it would otherwise if mazda tried to sell it those markets.

 

oh no! Revolting Ford fans!

 

Mazda needs to quickly emulate VW and build production facilities that can be used to build a wide range of vehicles in the U.S. and maybe in Central or South American, as well.

This would really help them on the path towards sustainable profitability.

Having said this, the currency wars are heating up again, and we're likely to see a wild ride ahead for the value of the yen vs. the USD and euro, as the Bank of Japan really is on a mission to devalue the yen against foreign currencies in order to shore up Japanese manufacturing and exports, but Mazda needs to still hedge against every possibility by diversifying the geographic scope of the manufacture of their parts and components as well as assembly.

 

They are working on it. The Mexico plant should be able to help them , they will use that plant to build smaller cars like Mazda3. I hope they can devalue the yen more cuz there are a whole bunch of stuff I wanna buy but right.now it doesn't make any sense, it simply costs too much

Rotary engine cars will always be build in Japan tho, so when the next one comes out don't expect it to be cheap

 

I know I am ignorant, but there are two things that I would like Mazda could improve on:

1) Quality of Product/Vehicles
2) Quality of Customer Service

I know that they are really great at R&D and Innovation, and even manufacturing! However, I feel like the materials used in Mazda vehicles are not up to par like maybe those found in Toyota, and/or Honda.

Again, take what I say as a grain of salt, because I don't really know much about this. Just something I have been observing, and feeling, but I don't know the technical/engineering/manufacturing side of Mazda.

 

Mazda's interior are way above the rest IMO. Have you ever compared a Mazda 3 and a Corolla? Or say a CX-7 to a Rav4? It's obvious you have not since you made that comment.

My girlfriend bought a new Mazda 3S 2.5L and she cross shopped the new Corolla since she was coming out of a 2008 Corolla and the Mazda 3 was better in a 100 ways, the Corolla interior was essentially the same bland crap interior she had in her 2008 Corolla. She also looked at the Civic but the interior in that was way too busy and she just did not like the looks of it even though the quality seemed great. Her 3 now has 30,000 trouble free miles on it and she is now in love with the new CX-5.

I am actually a huge Honda fan and have owned quite a few but the late model styling is for the birds. I also like Nissan but they are lacking in styling amongst the small cars in my opinion. But my mother has a pretty new Altima Coupe and I do like it in and out.

Mazda 3S interior


Corolla interior

 

^
On the contrary, I have seen the interior of a Mazda3 and also a Corolla and the Honda...first of all, I do not understand why you had to come off so strongly to what I was saying, especially after I said that "I am ignorant" about the issue.

In any case, I was not talking about interior trim, because I personally love the interior trim. I am talking about raw material quality. And I personally have not done the research myself, but from what I can see and read online and from forums, it seems like there are more people complaining about the poor customer services in Mazda dealerships (at least in Ontario), than other dealerships (and please do not misread what I said to "people complain about Mazda dealerships while no other dealerships have customer service problems", obviously there are).

In addition, there seems to have been more Mazda rusting easily than other brands - again, please do not misread me and think I am saying that other brands does not rust at all.

In any case, there is nothing wrong with what I am saying about Mazda improving their customer service and quality, because those are key success factors in an automotive industry, so I do not understand why you had to react so strongly to what I am saying.

I am a Mazda fan, and Mazda will always be #1 in my heart! I want Mazda to be #1 in the entire world, that is why I am coming up with things I think Mazda can do better, obviously because I care about the company. If I did not, I would not care about giving my two cents about how the company can be more successful in the industry.

Geez...

 

9k's post didn't come across as "reacting strongly" to me at all...



And 9k, there is only one part of those pictures that needs eyeballing to find the winner. It's the thing sticking up in the lower right of each picture.

 

^
you're right. I over-reacted. Sorry about that, 9k...

 

Honestly, looking at the comparison between the MX-3 and the Corolla, they're both about on-par. Mazda has a few more silver-painted bits, brighter colors, and a stickshift. It also lacks the touchscreen GPS/stereo that the Corolla has, and has more angular edges on parts the driver touches, like the steering wheel. I don't think you can really say Mazda is better just because you prefer one trim package vs. another.

The real reason for liking the MX-3 better is under the hood.

 

Japanese People are really amazing. TtHis are really interesting news I'm really looking forward to see and drive a car with these engines.

 

If they come out with this rotary soon, I hope we can put this in our Rx-8 ha

 

I think I've got it figured out. At least from a geometry standpoint. The clue was in the statement about the trochoid dimensions but the answer is actually in one of the videos talking about the skyactiv gasoline engine improvements. It was mentioned on the piston engines that a big key to increasing efficiency is in the thermal aspect which means they need a better volume to surface ratio. A large bore and short stroke engine has a larger total cylinder surface area than one that has a smaller bore but longer stroke but the same displacement. The larger surface area will lose heat faster. Heat is just lost energy.

The 16X engine had a narrower combustion chamber but larger total diameter (internally). It's relative stroke, aka eccentric lobe offset, however remained the same geometrically. They were trying to increase efficiency by maximizing the volume compared to the very large surface area of the rotary. It also helped during combustion as the flame front typically never gets towards the outsides of the rotors even though it may get farther through the chamber along the length of the rotor. This was just the beginning though. More was yet to be had and this is where I think this "breakthrough" lies.

I believe they did change the actual shape a bit. The way they could have done this is to increase the "stroke" with a greater eccentric lobe offset. This would by default change the trochoid and rotor shape dimensions as well. The chamber would be even more figure 8 shaped and the rotors would be more triangular. It doesn't have to be drastic though. This shape change would answer the question about how the seals can actually seal better. The apex seals would be traveling at an average speed that is faster than they do now, even with the same displacement engine. You can run a rotary engine with no apex seal springs if you can get it started. You just have to hold the rpms up a bit. The faster they move, the better they seal. At least as long as they don't run into a chatter issue like the older seals did. This can be held to a minimum with seal design. The combination of a faster average apex seal speed combined with a higher volume to surface ratio inside the engine would bring about a more efficient and cleaner engine. If they add in the direct injection with proper spray pattern aimed at specific points rather than just the arbitrary fine mist, as weird as this sounds, could more evenly allow a better air fuel mixture which again would leave less waste. This means less heat to the cooling systems and out the exhaust. A more efficient engine leads to one of two other things. One is that the engine can make the same power but be smaller in displacement than the 13B. The other is that it an keep the same size but have an increase in power. Now keep in mind that a longer "stroke" will most certainly mean a lower rpm limit.

I admit this is a guess on my part but it is one based on all of their skyactiv designs applied to the rotary. It all fits. Only time will tell if this is what is being done and any exact dimensions or the extent of the changes is a mystery at this point but I think this is where they are going with it. Then again, maybe I'm completely wrong.

 

/\

I actually read that post

That's some serious engineering there man. Seriously, quite interesting ideas. I even showed your post to a friend who is a mechanical engineer - and rotary enthusiast - and he liked it too.

You should be working for Mazda

 

RG,

Do you know why the 13A that was built for a couple of years in Japan for Mazda's front wheel drive car back in the '80's, (I think)? It had the width of the 12A but larger trochoidal dimensions, but I don't know how the eccentricity was.

It seems that it is somewhat the same as what you might recommend to attain the Skyactive attributes.

 

The 13A uses rotor housings the width of the 10A and did indeed have greater eccentricity than other Mazda wankels.

Paul.