Notices
RX-8 Media News Report the latest RX-8 related news stories here.

New Mazdaspeed RX-8?

 
Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 11:51 AM
  #126  
emfollin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
I was just at my local Mazda dealer looking at a silver '04 RX8 and the dealer mentioned that a turbocharged RX8 should be released by next summer. I know you shouldn't believe what dealers say but does anybody know anything about this? I love the styling of the car but it is so underpowered and this could be a def. solution.

Last edited by emfollin; Oct 20, 2004 at 04:18 PM.
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 12:10 PM
  #127  
another8owner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
^
^
^
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 12:15 PM
  #128  
snizzle's Avatar
Shakezula, the Mic Rula
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
no, we know nothing about it.... that's the problem :D
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 12:25 PM
  #129  
Nemesis8's Avatar
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 1
From: Missouri
Originally Posted by emfollin
I was just at my local Mazda dealer looking at a silver '04 RX8 and the dealer mentioned that a turbocharged RX8 should be released by next summer. I know you shouldn't believe what dealers say but does anybody know anything about this? I love the styling of the car but it is so underpowered and this could be a def. solution.
I would not beleive a single thing that a salesman will tell you. Trust me - I am in sales myself. We will say anything to hook your interest before we make our kill.

Underpowered my *** - wanna go for a ride? It is all a misconception - this power thing. Do you want to go straight and fast? If so, buy an STI or an EVO. You will look like a refrigerator with a beer opener on the trunk. My 8 is has plenty of power for me thank you. This car is built for long winding roads with LOTS of turns. It is a sport car, not a dragster.
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 12:38 PM
  #130  
philodox's Avatar
Rangers Lead The Way!
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 2
From: Athens, Georgia
Originally Posted by Nemesis8
I would not beleive a single thing that a salesman will tell you. Trust me - I am in sales myself. We will say anything to hook your interest before we make our kill.

Underpowered my *** - wanna go for a ride? It is all a misconception - this power thing. Do you want to go straight and fast? If so, buy an STI or an EVO. You will look like a refrigerator with a beer opener on the trunk. My 8 is has plenty of power for me thank you. This car is built for long winding roads with LOTS of turns. It is a sport car, not a dragster.
Exactly, if I wanted straight line quick, I'd strap myself to the nose of a bullet and ride a crotch rocket motorcycle.. Not much can keep up with the 8 on a twisty road...

I just hope that the extra weight in the engine compartment from the forced induction stuff doesn't throw off the weight distribution and hamper the handling
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 12:58 PM
  #131  
Fanman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 1
From: Glendale, CA
It was just estimated in the mag, but they said about 5.5 sec. 0-60 (from 6.1 sec.), and 14.0 flat@100 mph (from 14.5 sec.). No estimate of additional cost. They listed the tire as Bridgestone Potenzas, but not which models.

Nice additional article on Mazda Grand Am Cup cars

I have access to a scanner but I'm not sure how to add pictures on my posts (call me technically illiterate)

I agree with Nemesis, don't believe a word a salesman says. You can tell they are lying, because their lips are moving. If anything my purchase experience with my RX8 taught me that salesman have none of your interest at heart, they just see you as a paycheck.
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 01:10 PM
  #132  
AbusiveWombat's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by philodox
Exactly, if I wanted straight line quick, I'd strap myself to the nose of a bullet and ride a crotch rocket motorcycle.. Not much can keep up with the 8 on a twisty road...

I just hope that the extra weight in the engine compartment from the forced induction stuff doesn't throw off the weight distribution and hamper the handling
Obviously for some the power is adequate but when compared against similarly priced competitors the RX8 is the runt. Many agree that the RX8 is underpowered and would welcome a bump in power...hell if it had 280+hp I'd probably be in an RX8 rather than the EVO.

Also, you don't need 50/50 weight distribution for good handling. The EVO does fine with 60/40 and Porsche does fine with 40/60.
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 01:30 PM
  #133  
philodox's Avatar
Rangers Lead The Way!
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 2
From: Athens, Georgia
Please correct me if I am wrong.. but doesn't having 50/50 weight distribution dramaticaly help with understeer/oversteer? sorry for getting a bit off topic
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 02:18 PM
  #134  
penman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC
Originally Posted by AbusiveWombat
Obviously for some the power is adequate but when compared against similarly priced competitors the RX8 is the runt. Many agree that the RX8 is underpowered and would welcome a bump in power...hell if it had 280+hp I'd probably be in an RX8 rather than the EVO.

Also, you don't need 50/50 weight distribution for good handling. The EVO does fine with 60/40 and Porsche does fine with 40/60.
As an 8 owner i would certainly like a little extra hp/torque. However, 50/50 disty is a bit of a holy grail - it does make for a better handling car. Are the EVO and Porsche poor? Not at all. But you can bet if the engineers could make them 50/50, they would.
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 03:37 PM
  #135  
zoom44's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21,958
Likes: 115
From: portland oregon
Originally Posted by Fanman
I actually asked Jim Mederer if they have tested any FI'ed on the RX8, and he graciously told me that they had a SC'ed Renesis. I asked him how much they were getting, and he told me about 285 hp. No problems.
MANY OF US SAW one of the tested sc'd renesis engines at racing beat. well the housing anyway. it did have a problem that we have discussed at length.


Originally Posted by davefzr
No problems? Why the heck are they not producing it then?

They would have so many customers and be first to market....?
2 reasons

a. there is/was aproblem
b. they are still at work cracking the ecu for engine management. their goal is to write maps to the stock pcm.

Originally Posted by philodox

I just hope that the extra weight in the engine compartment from the forced induction stuff doesn't throw off the weight distribution and hamper the handling

the suspension has been retuned- no doubt with weight distribution in mind.
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 03:58 PM
  #136  
Perth11's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Sunset Beach, Calif.
Question

What does it cover?
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 03:58 PM
  #137  
BaneSpirit's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Originally Posted by emfollin
I was just at my local Mazda dealer looking at a silver '04 RX8 and the dealer mentioned that a turbocharged RX8 should be released by next summer. I know you shouldn't believe what dealers say but does anybody know anything about this? I love the styling of the car but it is so underpowered and this could be a def. solution.
I am a Mazda Salesman. I've been one for only 2 weeks, but none the less I am one. I got the job because of my 8. Anyway, that's a lil off subject. There are ALOT of stupid salesman in the car business. However, there is a turbo mazda coming out early next summer. It's just a mazdaspeed Mazda6.
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 04:14 PM
  #138  
zoom44's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21,958
Likes: 115
From: portland oregon
yeah bane we know about the MS6 already. the problem is the salesmen going around telling people there is a turbo 8 coming out next summer- when we know there isnt.
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 04:17 PM
  #139  
emfollin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
The RX8 is definately underpowered. I know the car really wasn't engineered to be a dragster; but neither is any car that is mass produced. You all say that car is so much fun to drive, and it is pretty fun, but torque is a great thing to have. It can make a great handling car even more fun to drive. The STi was more fun to drive because it never once lost traction or anything, has loads of torque, and handles very, very nicely. I just wish Mazda did turbocharge the RX8 because it does have very nice styling. I guess I got my hopes up for nothing...
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 04:21 PM
  #140  
DreRX8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
maybe you did emfollin.
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 04:46 PM
  #141  
another8owner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by emfollin
The RX8 is definately underpowered. I know the car really wasn't engineered to be a dragster; but neither is any car that is mass produced. You all say that car is so much fun to drive, and it is pretty fun, but torque is a great thing to have. It can make a great handling car even more fun to drive. The STi was more fun to drive because it never once lost traction or anything, has loads of torque, and handles very, very nicely. I just wish Mazda did turbocharge the RX8 because it does have very nice styling. I guess I got my hopes up for nothing...
uh oh, here come the ....

Old Oct 20, 2004 | 04:48 PM
  #142  
Nemesis8's Avatar
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 1
From: Missouri
It's going to happen, a turbo and/or a supercharger will be here for us one day - we just have to be patient - that is a virtue I guess
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 05:10 PM
  #143  
Nemesis8's Avatar
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 1
From: Missouri
M12 - I bet you are having a blast reading this thread. See what you started! A supercharged Renesis must be fun to drive. Sam Mitani - if you are sitting next to M12, have a beer on me!
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 05:14 PM
  #144  
Dan_'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: Montreal, Canada
Don't think a SC will significantly throw off the weight distribution. SCs + accessories arent that heavy.
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 05:30 PM
  #145  
emfollin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Patience is definately a virtue. Something I do have really have... And I love ******** who cannot let someone voice their opinion and just flame them. I did not come on here to bash the RX8 but to voice my opinion and try and get the opinions of RX8 owners.
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 05:49 PM
  #146  
Cam's Avatar
Cam
this space for rent
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 0
From: Indy
Originally Posted by emfollin
Patience is definately a virtue. Something I do have really have... And I love ******** who cannot let someone voice their opinion and just flame them. I did not come on here to bash the RX8 but to voice my opinion and try and get the opinions of RX8 owners.
I agree everyone should have the right to voice their opinion. However, when you come on a board and make a statement such as the one above (with 3 posts total) some members will label you a troll and flame. That internet forums for you.

For me... different strokes for different folks. If the STI is your thing.. cool. The 8 is underpowered..your opinion. I love care, handling and the power, but I would love to throw a SC/Turbo on it.

My advice, tone it down a litlle bit. (maybe edit out the @sshole part)
Show some respect, and this board will give it right back.

Enjoy the forum and Welcome!
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 06:10 PM
  #147  
Fanman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 1
From: Glendale, CA
Originally Posted by AbusiveWombat
Obviously for some the power is adequate but when compared against similarly priced competitors the RX8 is the runt. Many agree that the RX8 is underpowered and would welcome a bump in power...hell if it had 280+hp I'd probably be in an RX8 rather than the EVO.

Also, you don't need 50/50 weight distribution for good handling. The EVO does fine with 60/40 and Porsche does fine with 40/60.
Given a choice between a having a SC or not, the answer is pretty obvious. I did look at the EVO, but the interior and exterior is not my cup of tea, no matter how much horsepower it has. Also 50/50 is the best. I had a 911 Carrera, while it was nice, and handled very well on the track (I had the factory stage 1 sports suspension), I also had a chance to drive the Boxster S and thought that because of the mid engine, near 50/50 weight balance the handling was better.
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 06:51 PM
  #148  
BaneSpirit's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Originally Posted by Nemesis8
It's going to happen, a turbo and/or a supercharger will be here for us one day - we just have to be patient - that is a virtue I guess

Patience may be the only virtue that will wait itself for us to attain....

Or will it?

Damn it, hurry up and tell me!
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 08:45 PM
  #149  
Razz1's Avatar
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 3
From: Cali
Best part is the carbon fiber flywheel.

Can't wait to get one of those.
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 09:12 PM
  #150  
murix's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
From: La La Land
Why do people keep using an evo as a reference when talking about straight line acceleration? An evo kicks *** going forward, turning, or stopping. It does all of the above with lots of grip, power, and brake. It does it for the same price of a 8. It does not project the image or type of fun I was looking for, but I would really not resort to belittling what is one of the best performance deals around.

I love my 8, but why are people so afraid of power? My 8 kicks ***. Power would only make it better. I would also pay more for it with more power. It does everything right, but it would do more so with more power. I am lost on why that is not such a simple statement?


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:22 PM.