2007 RX-8 Official Press Release
|
wow...new colors. Last I checked, nobody was complaining about the lack of colors.
|
I'm not impressed.
|
All I have to say is the Whitewater pearl is the same darn color that we have been seeing each year. I was driving by the local Mazda dealership today(San Bernardino) and noticed that they had a what seemed to be fully loaded RX-8 so i thought i would stop to see what year it was and how much. When i saw up on the top that it was an 07 i was in shock and went inside the dealership to see if they had any of the Stormy Blues in. Nah, the only one they got in was the white one. Oh well. :eyetwitch
|
Same here ^
|
That standard 6-disc changer should make us go a lot faster, you guys should be excited! :jump:
|
So what's the diff between the whites?
|
Originally Posted by devious12
That standard 6-disc changer should make us go a lot faster, you guys should be excited! :jump:
|
This can't be true. According to 80% of the members on this site the RX-8 was being discontinued. Who would have thought, another year of production.
|
Originally Posted by DARKMAZ8
So what's the diff between the whites?
|
*sigh*
The RX7 FC had two updates after just 2 years (went from S4 to S5 and gained 20HP in N/A and Turbo trim), and the FD saw numerous updates (from the original S1 to the final S8 version), both in exterior/interior and in mechanical/engine. And if you knew how, you could "update" your own older model as well (except the N/A FC). And here we are, almost 4 years after it's initial release, and we get what ? 2 new colors and a new 6AT (which means diddly squat, since the 4AT sucked hairy monkey balls). whoppdy doo :boring: |
Nice. I wish they'd give it a "real" oil pressure gauge, but all in all… nice. Especially considering how I kept reading there'd be no 2006, let alone a 2007. :yelrotflm
|
Yeah and I thought Mazda read this forum? Don't you think they would get the hint that new colors aren't going to cut it? I mean come on now 2 years and counting how long does it really take to do R&D on an upgraded version of the 8, not just color change and some more bells and wistles?
|
Originally Posted by New Yorker
Nice. I wish they'd give it a "real" oil pressure gauge, but all in all… nice. Especially considering how I kept reading there'd be no 2006, let alone a 2007. :yelrotflm
|
Originally Posted by Gambit
the name
You sure? I kknow whitewater pearl and snow flake pearl are the same but why would mazda advertise chrystal white pearl as a new colour if it's basically the same as the former 2? |
Originally Posted by Red Devil
This can't be true. According to 80% of the members on this site the RX-8 was being discontinued. Who would have thought, another year of production.
|
I must say new colors, WOW that's it... It would be nice to have a coolant and oil temp gauges reflecting real temps. Also, they could have updated the car to show your mpg, miles left ect... NO HP gains... I am happy that the RX-8 will live on for another production year but Mazda will need to make some bigger changes in 2008 to keep sales going..
|
Guys, I wanted to make an official press release announcement that I changed my shirt and took a crap.
That is all. |
Oh schnap. No more Shinka?? Wonder if any model year only colors like Black Cherry and Copper Red anymore. Interesting....
Time |
Originally Posted by zoom44
me when i posted the specs and changes 4 months ago:)
|
Originally Posted by DARKMAZ8
You sure? I kknow whitewater pearl and snow flake pearl are the same but why would mazda advertise chrystal white pearl as a new colour if it's basically the same as the former 2?
|
Originally Posted by NMOcho
I must say new colors, WOW that's it... It would be nice to have a coolant and oil temp gauges reflecting real temps. Also, they could have updated the car to show your mpg, miles left ect... NO HP gains... I am happy that the RX-8 will live on for another production year but Mazda will need to make some bigger changes in 2008 to keep sales going..
|
I don't get the huge surprise and disappointment over the lack of changes for 2007. I mean, the information for 2007 models have been available on this forum for only about 4 months, and it was even a sticky!
For what it's worth, Crystal White is different from Whitewater Pearl. |
Originally Posted by sunilseru
because they don't have a clue about what to do with this car...
|
i can't contain my excitement for the 2007 model year.
|
Originally Posted by ZoomZoomH
i can't contain my excitement for the 2007 model year.
|
To counter all your whinning:
A) static models generally mean lower depreciation rates for owners of that vehicle because everyone isn't rushing out to buy the much-improved newer one. B) RX-8s or any other sports cars don't matter for crap in overall car sales. Many are loss leaders for their company. Mustangs are probably the exception, I'm guessing Ford makes significant money off that model. It is more of a muscle car though and those fall under a slightly different buyer and market segment than sports cars. Take the Z for example. Nissan sells more 350Z's than Mazda does 8's. However, I bet that Nissan sells many many more XTerras and Altimas than 350Z's and makes a hell of a lot better profit margin on them. So it should come as no suprise that Mazda has dumped all their R&D into other cars that needed it more desperately last year. Both the 3 and the 6 now have performance champions to help re-invigorate those models and pull decent sales themselves. They have a handsome crossover SUV that stands to make the company a buttload of cash. They have a roadster which would have lost a lot of sales to new competitors if it didn't have a timely redisgn. Does it come as a suprise to anyone that Mazda is acting like a (GASP!) business? All considering, they have done an amazing amount over this last year and to expect them to update their least important model when they have bigger fish to fry is rediculous. That being said they make cars and thus like cars and are probably really like the RX-8 themselves. As long as the bean-counters don't axe it, I garauntee you they have the long term, personal interest. Just be patient. I would not be suprised if Mazda gets to take a breather now and can devout some time to the RX-8 or pass it off to Mazdaspeed for the majic touch. I suspect good things outta 2008, but if they don't come to fruition I will wait another year and enjoy the resale value. |
Originally Posted by flomulgator
To counter all your whinning:
A) static models generally mean lower depreciation rates for owners of that vehicle because everyone isn't rushing out to buy the much-improved newer one. B) RX-8s or any other sports cars don't matter for crap in overall car sales. Many are loss leaders for their company. Mustangs are probably the exception, I'm guessing Ford makes significant money off that model. It is more of a muscle car though and those fall under a slightly different buyer and market segment than sports cars. Take the Z for example. Nissan sells more 350Z's than Mazda does 8's. However, I bet that Nissan sells many many more XTerras and Altimas than 350Z's and makes a hell of a lot better profit margin on them. So it should come as no suprise that Mazda has dumped all their R&D into other cars that needed it more desperately last year. Both the 3 and the 6 now have performance champions to help re-invigorate those models and pull decent sales themselves. They have a handsome crossover SUV that stands to make the company a buttload of cash. They have a roadster which would have lost a lot of sales to new competitors if it didn't have a timely redisgn. Does it come as a suprise to anyone that Mazda is acting like a (GASP!) business? All considering, they have done an amazing amount over this last year and to expect them to update their least important model when they have bigger fish to fry is rediculous. That being said they make cars and thus like cars and are probably really like the RX-8 themselves. As long as the bean-counters don't axe it, I garauntee you they have the long term, personal interest. Just be patient. I would not be suprised if Mazda gets to take a breather now and can devout some time to the RX-8 or pass it off to Mazdaspeed for the majic touch. I suspect good things outta 2008, but if they don't come to fruition I will wait another year and enjoy the resale value. |
I knew there would be a 2007 model, but this will be the last year. There will not be a 2008 RX8. How do I know you ask? My Ouija board spelled out the phrase"08, no more mulligans".......Freaky......
|
guys be pattient is not 07 yet
|
Its time to go rape Mazda by asking for a ridiculously low price on a 05 RX-8 with the MSRP of $35k Hum i am was thinking of shoot for about $26k OTD after takes and license.
|
Maybe… just maybe… Mazda likes the car pretty much the way it is. Maybe they have the wisdom to recognize that the 8 is a truly wonderful car and they don't want to screw it up. If it was up to me, I certainly wouldn't change it in any significant way. And, reading all the articles, I doubt most auto journalists would either. When a car knocks it out of the park the first time up, why change it?
Don't know about you, but I'd take a 240Z over a 260Z any day. |
^^^ The first 280z was cool too. Got rid of those damn carbs!!
|
Dont worry guys 2008 will be the year for the Mazdaspeed RX8 , MEANWHILE MAZDA IS SAVING ITS PENNIES :bootyshak
Michael |
Originally Posted by Grizzly8
Dont worry guys 2008 will be the year for the Mazdaspeed RX8 , MEANWHILE MAZDA IS SAVING ITS PENNIES :bootyshak
Michael |
The paddle shifters sound cool but other than that I have nothing to say
|
Originally Posted by CarAndDriver
How much are you willing to bet?
yeah i'm a high roller :Eyecrazy: |
Originally Posted by ZoomZoomH
i have some pennies a some lint in my pants pocket
yeah i'm a high roller :Eyecrazy: |
Originally Posted by New Yorker
Maybe… just maybe… Mazda likes the car pretty much the way it is. Maybe they have the wisdom to recognize that the 8 is a truly wonderful car and they don't want to screw it up. If it was up to me, I certainly wouldn't change it in any significant way. And, reading all the articles, I doubt most auto journalists would either. When a car knocks it out of the park the first time up, why change it?
Don't know about you, but I'd take a 240Z over a 260Z any day. They got it so right they stopped counting the surveys :Peace: Must have been to many postive responses messing up the curve for the regular cars they didn't do well on. |
Originally Posted by Shoafb
They got it so right they stopped counting the surveys :Peace:
Must have been to many postive responses messing up the curve for the regular cars they didn't do well on. |
Originally Posted by New Yorker
Like many cars, the 8 had teething problems in its first year of production—mostly with flooding. Since then the car has been reliable. The current recall on all 8's is basically a very generous public relations ploy—generous because, in fact, only a small percentage of cars in hot/low humidity environments have problems. If you want to give the 8 a Fox News-esque bullshit spin on the truth, that's fine, it's a free country. But the truth is the RX-8 is a reliable car. (I realize "truth" is somewhat out of fashion these days, but heck—it still means something to me.)
|
Originally Posted by saturn
Do you have any proof of any kind to go with your angry biased statement? What does "reliable" even mean. It's a relative term and means different things to different people.
|
Sure, we would all like more power. But outside of power, I wouldn't change a thing. Oh, and my 56k mile 04 is still humming along very reliably.
|
What is amazing is that they still have not added automatic climate control (which all the international models have had since 2003), auto-off headlights, auto door locks, power passenger seat, power rear window controls (so people will actually use them for once), and a more functional cluster gauge. They'll ignore simple crap like that which other less expensive cars they sell come standard with, but will waste resources making an advanced remote entry system and start button feature.
|
Originally Posted by New Yorker
Like many cars, the 8 had teething problems in its first year of production—mostly with flooding. Since then the car has been reliable. The current recall on all 8's is basically a very generous public relations ploy—generous because, in fact, only a small percentage of cars in hot/low humidity environments have problems. If you want to give the 8 a Fox News-esque bullshit spin on the truth, that's fine, it's a free country. But the truth is the RX-8 is a reliable car. (I realize "truth" is somewhat out of fashion these days, but heck—it still means something to me.)
The recall is not generous. You really think they did this out of the kindess of their hearts? As I said before, they stopped counting our surveys>>>>>>>>> that is how many complaints they recieved! However trivial you might consider the complaints Mazda has to see the bottom line. They have shown by the numbers of the 8 produced that they intended to sell many more then they have. |
Originally Posted by JeRKy 8 Owner
What is amazing is that they still have not added automatic climate control (which all the international models have had since 2003), auto-off headlights, auto door locks, power passenger seat, power rear window controls (so people will actually use them for once), and a more functional cluster gauge. They'll ignore simple crap like that which other less expensive cars they sell come standard with, but will waste resources making an advanced remote entry system and start button feature.
|
i would love power rear windows. i dont think i've opened them in the 2.5 years ive had the car and am always wanting to, but its just a pain.
|
you're kidding me! the rear windows are manual crank? That's crazy.
I suppose you can spin it as a child-proofing feature but come on... and what do you mean by 'they need to add auto door locks'? Can't you lock all the doors with one blip of a button? |
Originally Posted by roland_beech
you're kidding me! the rear windows are manual crank? That's crazy.
I suppose you can spin it as a child-proofing feature but come on... and what do you mean by 'they need to add auto door locks'? Can't you lock all the doors with one blip of a button? the rear windows push out, like in minivans kind of. i could care less about auto lock doors as well. |
You guys need to reach back and pop those rear quarter windows open every once in a while. You get the sweet burble of exhaust without the wind noise. I agree that an option would be nice, but I for one don't want the added weight of more electric motors for quarter windows that are so small.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:39 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands