Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.

Underhood pic discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 11-05-2002, 07:06 PM
  #26  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
see if you wait long enough someone else posts what you were thinking:D has any one seen a hood prop that hangs down from the hood?
Old 11-05-2002, 07:42 PM
  #27  
Registered User
 
Sputnik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Posts: 2,045
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by zoom44
...this is why i am opposed to obstructing the airflow with that @#%@& front plate holder...
Don't forget, that's less than half of the equation. Once you get the air inside, it needs to flow well, and then it needs a way to get out. You could put the biggest shogun style grille opening on the car, but if you don't have vents to allow the air out, the airflow will simply stall, and you won't gain anything.

---jps
Old 11-05-2002, 08:13 PM
  #28  
Moderator
 
BlueAdept's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: London (England)
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking of airflow, I hope this car has good electric fans... AND a big alternator...

It's amasing how little cooling you can get when stationary with no airflow unless you have really decent fans.

I nearly got stranded the other day in the landrover I use to carry junk and bits of engine etc..... got stuck in stationary traffic for 1 1/2 hours... night time, pouring rain etc.... with everything switched on and 35-40 amps of engine cooling fans it took out the battery!... I noticed when the relay for the fans clicked and the stereo switched off!!!

Glanced down at the voltmeter and it read 7 volts... you've never seen me switch everything off and rev the engine so fast!!!

Good thing the ignition system on that thing has no computers or anything... I bet I was on the verge of loosing the ignition too!
Old 11-05-2002, 08:50 PM
  #29  
2009 BS Nat'l Champ
 
BryanH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Central CA
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I see where the prop rod clips into when it's down.

Soon as I get my RX-8 (if I ever get one...) that plastic crap will be first to go. I want to see the engine dagnabbit!

Once you get the air inside, it needs to flow well, and then it needs a way to get out. You could put the biggest shogun style grille opening on the car, but if you don't have vents to allow the air out, the airflow will simply stall, and you won't gain anything.
Methinks that's what the vents behind the front wheels are for.
Old 11-05-2002, 08:54 PM
  #30  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally posted by BryanH
I see where the prop rod clips into when it's down. ...
where?
Old 11-05-2002, 09:00 PM
  #31  
Moderator
 
BlueAdept's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: London (England)
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by zoom44

where?
Exactly opposite where it's hinge mounts...
Old 11-05-2002, 09:13 PM
  #32  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
here?:
Old 11-05-2002, 09:20 PM
  #33  
Registered User
 
Hercules's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,744
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by zoom44
here?:
Doesn't look right to me.. that's the same thing on the other side.
Old 11-05-2002, 09:27 PM
  #34  
Registered User
 
Takumi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the skinny silver rod on the left side of the engine oil dipstick? or some dipstick tranny?
Old 11-06-2002, 08:32 AM
  #35  
Registered User
 
Sputnik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Posts: 2,045
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by BryanH
...Methinks that's what the vents behind the front wheels are for.
Are they functional? They weren't necessarilly so on the FD.

---jps
Old 11-06-2002, 09:47 AM
  #36  
Registered User
 
twifosp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They are functional actually. They cool the brake housings.

Orginally they were going to be full swept intakes going over the wheel wells but they didn't have the room. So they scrapped them...

The engineers came back later and said they needed better break cooling so they came back, only without the well intakes.

Plust the styling guys wanted them. Win for everyone.

But we almost didn't get them.
Old 11-06-2002, 02:40 PM
  #37  
Registered User
 
RX7 Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: California
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Keep that oil cool!!!

Twifosp,

Since you’re new to this board, would it be possible for you to provide a little background on your rotary engine experience & your source(s) of information???

I was sure that if the vents were functional, they’d be used to cool the oil.

If the vents are in fact being used to cool the breaks, I’d have to say that Mazda picked the easiest rather than most beneficial thing to cool for the sake of having functional vents @ the lowest cost.
Old 11-06-2002, 08:59 PM
  #38  
Registered User
 
Sputnik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Posts: 2,045
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by twifosp
...The engineers came back later and said they needed better break cooling so they came back...
The vents located directly behind the wheels are for brake cooling!? Why is my BS detector going off?

---jps
Old 11-06-2002, 09:57 PM
  #39  
Registered User
 
RedRotaryRocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Sputnik
Are they functional? They weren't necessarilly so on the FD.

---jps
Every FD had functional driver's side ducts. The passenger side ducts were only functional if the car was an R model.
Old 11-07-2002, 09:00 AM
  #40  
Registered User
 
Sputnik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Posts: 2,045
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by RedRotaryRocket
Every FD had functional driver's side ducts. The passenger side ducts were only functional if the car was an R model.
On the FD that I looked at, the driver's side was blocked off.

---jps
Old 11-07-2002, 12:04 PM
  #41  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally posted by Sputnik
The vents located directly behind the wheels are for brake cooling!? Why is my BS detector going off?

---jps
you gotta vent the hot air out somewhere and that is the best place to do it that i can think of
Old 11-07-2002, 12:22 PM
  #42  
Registered User
 
RedRotaryRocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Sputnik
On the FD that I looked at, the driver's side was blocked off.

---jps
Hmm, the only thing I can think is that maybe you just weren't looking at it the right way? It's very hard to see that the vent is functional without actually removing the wheel well liner. In fact, I had come to the same conclusion you have by inspecting the car completely assembled. One day I removed the wheel well liner and realized that I was wrong. If you didn't look at it with the liner off, you haven't looked at it closely enough.

The side vent provides the exhaust for the oil cooler air. Oil cooling is very important to the rotary, and every FD RX-7 has an oil cooler on the driver's side. It simply can't have been blocked off, unless someone "modified" it for some reason.

This is not inteded as a flame, it's just that I am confident that this was the case on all cars.

Don't make me get out my digital camera and remove my wheel well liner! :D
Old 11-07-2002, 12:50 PM
  #43  
Registered User
 
Macabre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by zoom44

you gotta vent the hot air out somewhere and that is the best place to do it that i can think of
The brakes are located way out at the ends of the suspension. There's no way to duct the hot air FROM the brakes, routed to the rear. If there are brake ducts on this car, they would be in the front. Where the air goes onces it has hit the rotors is it's own business.

I think those rear vents are an aesthetic feature...
Old 11-07-2002, 12:52 PM
  #44  
mostly harmless
 
wakeech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Greater Vancouver Area, BC
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hey zoom... that's a good guess, and actually i thought those vents were there to expire the wheel well, so you don't get that turbulent venturi you can plainly see billowing out of the back side of any wheel well during a rainy day on the freeway...

anyhoo, the best way to vent that warm air from the brakes is to push it out through the wheel itself... Ferrari first perfected this, using some kind of impeller or something to thrust air out of the spokes in the wheel and added a non-rotating sleeve which smooths the airflow inside the rim... many other constructors have copied this, but even without the impeller, the good ol' big-duct-ram-system still does the same thing... just look at the front wheels of an F1 car as they brake for a very slow corner, coming down from 300kph, on a really hot day... brake dust from the disc and pad will blow out into clouds of black haze...

anyhoo, ya, that's the consensus for the best way to ventilate brakes... this is also because with a car trying to use the ground effect, moving the air from under the car out of the wheels cools the brakes while at the same time lowers the air pressure under it... so ya...
:D good idea though, i'm imagining what you mean... it would work (using a small inlet duct, then using negative pressure behind the brake to pull the air through), just maybe not so efficiently as ramming the air across the brake...
Old 11-07-2002, 12:57 PM
  #45  
Registered User
 
RX-7_16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Yardley,PA
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
guys lets not forget that this is still a CONCEPT model. I bet you they are trying to cover the final engine layout and design. This is probably the last concept, maybe even pre -production....but it i still a concept as you notice on the mazda site for rx-8 design, the final model is blacked out...so ill bet you they are just covering the engine design until final release..
Old 11-07-2002, 01:04 PM
  #46  
RE member
 
Buger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Aurora, CO
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by RedRotaryRocket


Hmm, the only thing I can think is that maybe you just weren't looking at it the right way? It's very hard to see that the vent is functional without actually removing the wheel well liner. In fact, I had come to the same conclusion you have by inspecting the car completely assembled. One day I removed the wheel well liner and realized that I was wrong. If you didn't look at it with the liner off, you haven't looked at it closely enough.

The side vent provides the exhaust for the oil cooler air. Oil cooling is very important to the rotary, and every FD RX-7 has an oil cooler on the driver's side. It simply can't have been blocked off, unless someone "modified" it for some reason.

This is not inteded as a flame, it's just that I am confident that this was the case on all cars.

Don't make me get out my digital camera and remove my wheel well liner! :D
I have also read that the passenger side vent was functional on all 3rd gens. There was a duct that went from the oil cooler over the wheel arch and to the side vent.

The r1 had 2 oil coolers so both side vents were functional.

Brian
Old 11-07-2002, 01:08 PM
  #47  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally posted by wakeech
:D good idea though, i'm imagining what you mean... it would work (using a small inlet duct, then using negative pressure behind the brake to pull the air through), just maybe not so efficiently as ramming the air across the brake...
thanks wakeech. but after reading your post i understand more. i stand corected! so are the vents just for looks or do they offer some aerodynamic effects like you spoke of?
Old 11-07-2002, 01:21 PM
  #48  
mostly harmless
 
wakeech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Greater Vancouver Area, BC
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
uh, i don't think they ventilate the wheel well, the rubber thingy gets in the way, i think (from reading RRR's post) they just do what you were describeing for the brakes, but do it for the oil coolers...
Old 11-07-2002, 02:03 PM
  #49  
Registered User
 
RedRotaryRocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Buger


I have also read that the passenger side vent was functional on all 3rd gens. There was a duct that went from the oil cooler over the wheel arch and to the side vent.

The r1 had 2 oil coolers so both side vents were functional.

Brian
That's right, except that it's the driver's side that always has an oil cooler and functional vent. The passenger side has the optional oil cooler for the R model. (passenger side USA that is) Either way, you are correct about the duct over the wheel arch. The duct is attached to the back side of the wheel well liner and takes the air back to the side vent.
Old 11-07-2002, 03:57 PM
  #50  
Rotary Freak
 
Styjan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Williamsburg, VA
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't mean to toot my own horn too much, but I love my R1!


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Underhood pic discussion



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:07 PM.