Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Rim width

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Oct 1, 2002 | 08:42 PM
  #26  
Grimace's Avatar
Certifiable car nut
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
I posted this in a really old thread, but it seems appropriate to bring it up now (edited for brevity). These are different tire sizes, in 16" and 17", that are approximately the same height as the tires we have been told are coming on the car (225/45R18). If you are plus-sizing (or in this case, minus-sizing) your tires/rims, you should stay within 1" of height of the original tires meant for the car, or else handling, braking, ride quality, etc. deteriorates. Ideally, you should keep within 0.5" to stay on the safe side.


Ok, so a 225/45R18 setup has an overall height of 25.97". Some tire sizes that come close in 16" sizes: (Note, I'm assuming a max width of 225 mm to avoid rubbing)

205/60R16, height 25.69" --> 60 series tires = mushy response
215/55R16, height 25.31" --> also mushy, plus this isn't a popular size
225/55R16, height 25.74" --> mushy
225/50R16, height 24.86" --> too short, you lose over 1" of ride height

For fun, lets try 17" sizes:

P205/55R17 = height 25.88"
P215/50R17 = 25.46"
P225/50R17 = 25.86"

Last edited by Grimace; Oct 1, 2002 at 08:44 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2002 | 09:40 PM
  #27  
Quick_lude's Avatar
Love to rev!
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 0
From: Mississauga - Ontario
Staggering widths depends on suspension design.. It helps control oversteer afaik.. A lot of rwd sports cars have staggered wheels/tires.. Corvette, Porsches, S2000's..
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2002 | 09:16 AM
  #28  
Sputnik's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,045
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO, USA
Originally posted by Grimace
I posted this in a really old thread, but it seems appropriate to bring it up now (edited for brevity). These are different tire sizes, in 16" and 17", that are approximately the same height as the tires we have been told are coming on the car (225/45R18)....
Ya know, looking at the numbers has made me realize that I was getting caught up in the pictures after all. A 225/45 sidewall height is actually what I've found to be the perfect medium for me. The bigger wheels and quality of the "spy" shots made it look different.

Okay, I'm happy with the 18s again...

---jps
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2002 | 12:05 PM
  #29  
PatrickB's Avatar
FAQMeister
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque, NM
Originally posted by Sputnik
Ya know, looking at the numbers has made me realize that I was getting caught up in the pictures after all. A 225/45 sidewall height is actually what I've found to be the perfect medium for me. The bigger wheels and quality of the "spy" shots made it look different.

Okay, I'm happy with the 18s again...

---jps
Heh. The Road and Track article has been quoting 18x8 225/45R18s since it came out. A quick check at tirerack.com... tires in this size (besides cheapo continentals) are $187 Bridgestone Potenza Pole Position, $193 Pirelli PZero, $211 Bridgestone Blizzak winter tires, and $251 Michelin Pilots.

-Patrick
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2002 | 03:20 AM
  #30  
Renesis Rex's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, Ohio
i have no problem with 18x8 because i'll just be buying Kumho Supra Ecsta 712.... the current price for a Kumho Ecsta Supra 712 235/40-18 is $125 US. and they're such great tires, too...
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2002 | 12:27 PM
  #31  
Quick_lude's Avatar
Love to rev!
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 0
From: Mississauga - Ontario
Originally posted by Renesis Rex
i have no problem with 18x8 because i'll just be buying Kumho Supra Ecsta 712.... the current price for a Kumho Ecsta Supra 712 235/40-18 is $125 US. and they're such great tires, too...
The are not as good as the Bridgestone Pole Position, Pirelli P7000Z, Toyo T1-S or Michelin Pilot.
A good tire for the money but not the best.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2002 | 12:27 AM
  #32  
Renesis Rex's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, Ohio
not the best by far, that's agreed. if i was gonna pick my favorite tire in general it would be the Potenza S03's..... yummy tire.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2002 | 10:57 PM
  #33  
Quick_lude's Avatar
Love to rev!
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 0
From: Mississauga - Ontario
Originally posted by Renesis Rex
not the best by far, that's agreed. if i was gonna pick my favorite tire in general it would be the Potenza S03's..... yummy tire.
Yup me too.. expensive though.. I've also heard good things about Pilots and BF KD's.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2002 | 11:45 PM
  #34  
fuz's Avatar
fuz
non sequitr
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
I dunno if I can stomach blowing though $800 (+ installation) in tires every 20k...

I guess that'd be funny, either me burning my 325i at every turn, or driving an RX-8 like a granny. :D
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2002 | 11:45 PM
  #35  
R.Cade's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
I like wider tires myself. I had 245s all the way around on my 3rd gen 7, the orginal Toyo Proxies and they where awsome.

Will 245's fit on an 8 inch rim? I'm hoping the bolt pattern/offest will be the same as the 7, cause I got a nice set of 18x10's waiting for it already :P
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2002 | 03:55 PM
  #36  
Rexman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
245's all the way around will be awesome. The original 225's are good tho.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2002 | 05:17 PM
  #37  
RedRotaryRocket's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: Cupertino, CA
Rich,

While your discussion of tire pressure / vehicle weight = contact patch is correct, your conclusion that the contact patch is ultimately the same is dependent on the assumption that the tire pressure stays the same when going to a wider tire.

Every tire has an optimum pressure for a given load. We all know that if you put too much air in your tires, you get more wear in the center... this is because the increased pressure has reduced your contact patch and are only riding on the center of the tire. Therefore, it is easy to see that even with the same tire, the contact patch is variable dependent on the pressure you are running.

The reason a wider tire provides a larger contact patch, as I've always understood it, is that the optimum tire pressure for a wider tire is lower than the optimum pressure for a narrower tire. Since the operating pressure will be lower, the tire must have a larger contact patch to support the vehicle weight.

This is how I've always understood it anyway. If this is incorrect, I'd appreciate some enlightenment.

EDIT - Oops! Somehow I missed a whole page of this thread...it looks like you guys have already discussed this....nevermind me.....

Last edited by RedRotaryRocket; Oct 29, 2002 at 05:20 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2002 | 06:11 PM
  #38  
wakeech's Avatar
mostly harmless
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
From: Greater Vancouver Area, BC
225's are "good"?? wow... too much rubber for me... if i ever get an 8, or (more probably) an FD, i'd be downsizing the rims a cm or two... maybe... for sure on the winter set though...
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2002 | 12:22 PM
  #39  
Beemer's Avatar
Technical prodigy
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: Belgium - Diepenbeek
As for the tire choise, let me help a bit. My dad sells tires so we have quite some experience with some brands and models.
The best tire at the moment is the Michelin pilot sport. And second best very close to the Michelins are the Bridgestone potenza S02-03's. Other brands are more average except Continental because they can make the most kilometers/miles. A brand I sure would dissuade is Pirelli. They have an average grip but excessive wear and they make the car very nervous. I have to say, I don't know about Yokohama's but I've heard they're also pretty good.

About the width issue:
You could compare with skates on ice. The sharper they are, the better they have grip on a skiddy surface. So when it rains, your tires have to keep grip by cutting through the water (thats also why they have ribs, to cut and to guide all the water around the contact surface). When the tire is wider, it also has to process more water, not in the length, because when you're driving, the length is continuously growing, but in the width.
That's why rally cars also use smaller tires in bad weather conditions.

I hope this can help a bit, feel free to correct me
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2002 | 03:09 PM
  #40  
wakeech's Avatar
mostly harmless
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
From: Greater Vancouver Area, BC
exactly my point Beemer...
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2002 | 04:42 PM
  #41  
pelucidor's Avatar
Pure Gold
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
From: Bucks County, PA
Originally posted by Beemer
A brand I sure would dissuade is Pirelli. They have an average grip but excessive wear and they make the car very nervous.
Spot on anlysis for Pirelli (at least for some models). I got a great deal on a set of Pirelli P7000 Supersport (all-season) - but they are absolutely awful and in hindsight not worth the savings. The original Goodyear Eagle GS-D summer tires (not a well-regarded tire in it's own right) were noticeably better - even my wife can easily tell the difference and is nervous about driving with these new tires in the rain.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2002 | 09:33 PM
  #42  
Quick_lude's Avatar
Love to rev!
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 0
From: Mississauga - Ontario
Really? I've got the Pirelli P7000 Summer version and they are great. Dry and wet, not too loud.. Grip like mad at the track, in the rain too! True treadwear is 160 but I got a good deal and unfortunately there is a tradeoff between grip and treadwear usage..
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2002 | 04:39 PM
  #43  
pelucidor's Avatar
Pure Gold
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
From: Bucks County, PA
Pirelli 7000 SS

It could be that there is a huge difference between the all-season (which squeal too easily and feel nervous in the rain - the TC kicks in much too often) and the summer versions. Just after I got the new tires I had to move from NJ to Houston, where summer tires all year round would have been fine. Typical.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2002 | 05:42 PM
  #44  
DakarM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: CA, northern
staggered size would suck.

my current car has stagger size. 7.5 front and 9 rear.

The difference in the tire sizes generates too much understeer and my car is 50/50 and weighs ~3100pounds (wet including driver).

I know a few folks who have gone to 235/45 all around to eliminate understeering and be more competitive in autox.


Also Kumhos are good street tires, but for track/autox they are not very good. Many people have commented that they get wayyyyy to greasy and also chunks of tires coming off is not very good either.


18X8 sounds good to me, 17x8 would be even better.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rx8 VA Guy
RX-8 Parts For Sale/Wanted
7
Jun 4, 2016 12:42 AM
Brokegang
New Member Forum
27
Jan 3, 2016 12:45 PM
hppy4u
Gulf For Sale/Wanted
9
Dec 3, 2015 09:11 PM
Trancemission
RX-8 Multimedia/Photo Gallery
46
Dec 2, 2015 07:26 PM
Rote8
Series I Interior, Audio, and Electronics
1
Sep 22, 2015 03:43 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:17 PM.