Premium Gas
#2
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: SW Missouri
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#5
The Art Of Sound
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's also worth noting that as in everything.. there is regular gas.. and there is 'regular gas..'
My own RX8 is fine with Shell or Texaco Regular 87.. but performs badly with other 'cheaper' brands of gas.. I tend to stick with Shell 91 myself because i find I do get a noticable improvement in performance as well as better milage compared to other Premium Octane brands.. but as they say.. "Your mileage may vary"!
Cheers.
Mag
My own RX8 is fine with Shell or Texaco Regular 87.. but performs badly with other 'cheaper' brands of gas.. I tend to stick with Shell 91 myself because i find I do get a noticable improvement in performance as well as better milage compared to other Premium Octane brands.. but as they say.. "Your mileage may vary"!
Cheers.
Mag
#7
Metatron
iTrader: (1)
Sum-it-up....
Mr. RX8-OWNZ is right, the '8 runs fine on 87, and Razpewton is taking good care of his ride with the higher-test.
Don't forget that people who have taken the Renesis apart (porting, etc.) are shocked by the amount of crud built up on the rotor on such low-mileage motors.
The 'premium' from the major oil companies (Optimax for instance) has WAY more than the minimum additives to prevent crud buildup - it has to pass stringent long term deposit resistance tests, and it's their main marketing claim.
I am running the Canzoomer with Stage Two maps that include significant timing advance.
Trust me, if you advance your timing, you BETTER be on 'the juice'!
S
Don't forget that people who have taken the Renesis apart (porting, etc.) are shocked by the amount of crud built up on the rotor on such low-mileage motors.
The 'premium' from the major oil companies (Optimax for instance) has WAY more than the minimum additives to prevent crud buildup - it has to pass stringent long term deposit resistance tests, and it's their main marketing claim.
I am running the Canzoomer with Stage Two maps that include significant timing advance.
Trust me, if you advance your timing, you BETTER be on 'the juice'!
S
#8
Bummed, but bring on OU!
Originally Posted by StealthTL
Mr. RX8-OWNZ is right, the '8 runs fine on 87, and Razpewton is taking good care of his ride with the higher-test.
#9
Registered User
A search on "premium gas" on this forum yields these results:
https://www.rx8club.com/rx-8-discussion-3/does-anyone-know-if-rx-8-needs-premium-gas-43406/
https://www.rx8club.com/australia-new-zealand-forum-37/premium-unleaded-fuel-50036/
https://www.rx8club.com/lounge-4/put-mid-grade-my-car-first-time-46778/
https://www.rx8club.com/rx-8-discussion-3/regular-87-octane-fuel-usage-42326/
https://www.rx8club.com/series-i-tech-garage-22/87-octane-vs-91-octane-fact-myth-22681/
https://www.rx8club.com/rx-8-discussion-3/octane-requirements-41170/
https://www.rx8club.com/rx-8-discussion-3/am-i-only-one-running-93-octane-35857/
https://www.rx8club.com/rx-8-discussion-3/fuel-octane-rating-1119/
https://www.rx8club.com/rx-8-discussion-3/octane-milage-34030/
https://www.rx8club.com/rx-8-discussion-3/87-octane-rattling-6000-rpm-32878/
https://www.rx8club.com/rx-8-discussion-3/does-anyone-know-if-rx-8-needs-premium-gas-43406/
https://www.rx8club.com/australia-new-zealand-forum-37/premium-unleaded-fuel-50036/
https://www.rx8club.com/lounge-4/put-mid-grade-my-car-first-time-46778/
https://www.rx8club.com/rx-8-discussion-3/regular-87-octane-fuel-usage-42326/
https://www.rx8club.com/series-i-tech-garage-22/87-octane-vs-91-octane-fact-myth-22681/
https://www.rx8club.com/rx-8-discussion-3/octane-requirements-41170/
https://www.rx8club.com/rx-8-discussion-3/am-i-only-one-running-93-octane-35857/
https://www.rx8club.com/rx-8-discussion-3/fuel-octane-rating-1119/
https://www.rx8club.com/rx-8-discussion-3/octane-milage-34030/
https://www.rx8club.com/rx-8-discussion-3/87-octane-rattling-6000-rpm-32878/
#10
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Boston
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I just got 170 miles with my last tank of 93. I did probably 80% city driving however. In comparison I got 240 miles with 89 octane with 90% highway. Amazing difference.
#11
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I tend to get right at about 19 mpg with mostly city driving. Doesn't seem to matter whether it's 89 or 93 (both usually Shell), I will say when I switched back to the 93 this week I surprisingly seem to be getting marginally better mileage than my 89 average - will know more when I refill. Car also seems to start quicker with the 93, no problems at all with idle and either.
#12
Balance and Endurance
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Coralville, Iowa, USA
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So, I'm too lazy to look it up and I know it's there, but....what are peoples results with ethanol blend so far? I live in Iowa, and every mid-grade brand is a blend. Ethanol obviously burns cleaner than regular fuel, but it also burns at a lower temp...so would I have less build up but be losing power? And, is ethanol a no-no for the rotary? I've had my 8 for just under a year, and the majority of the time, I use BP premium, mostly because there are no Shell stations to be found where I live. I average about 19mpg give or take.
#13
i think there should be a section in the owners manual, if not on the window sticker, concerning the differences in the octane.
here's my input: low octane will burn fast and high octane will burn slowly. i also get to hear my motorcycle friends commenting on the same topic.
yamajj
here's my input: low octane will burn fast and high octane will burn slowly. i also get to hear my motorcycle friends commenting on the same topic.
yamajj
#14
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There is a slight burb in the owners manual on this. They recommend using premium fuel. They say you can use lower grade fuel, but it will degrade performance. Essentially the car's normal running pattern is set for 91/93 octane, if you use lower grade gasoline the engine will retard the timing a bit and you will lose some hp. If you do not care then by all means use 87/89, if you want peak performance out of your car than use 91. I linked an article in the previous thread where they test out various vehicle & the differences in performance.
#15
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Fanman
There is a slight burb in the owners manual on this. They recommend using premium fuel. They say you can use lower grade fuel, but it will degrade performance. Essentially the car's normal running pattern is set for 91/93 octane, if you use lower grade gasoline the engine will retard the timing a bit and you will lose some hp. If you do not care then by all means use 87/89, if you want peak performance out of your car than use 91. I linked an article in the previous thread where they test out various vehicle & the differences in performance.
Sometime I feel my 8 is pulling harder on 87, is it just me?
So...you're saying "higher octane, better performance"?
#16
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RX8_Ownz
I couldnt find the difference in performance b/w 87 and 91, but I'm pretty sure when I use on 87, I get better mpg.
Sometime I feel my 8 is pulling harder on 87, is it just me?
So...you're saying "higher octane, better performance"?
Sometime I feel my 8 is pulling harder on 87, is it just me?
So...you're saying "higher octane, better performance"?
Yes, the engine/electronics are set for use with 91 octane. In not using 91 octane, gasolines with 87 octane ratings the engine is set s that timing will be retarded further at WOT. In essence you will lose hp because the engine is lowering the timing so as not to get detonation. In the article they tested an M3 (req. 91 octane), Saab Turbo (req. 91 octane), Honda Accord (87) & Ford Mustang (87). The M3 & Saab both suffered between 6%-12% decreases in performance from using lower octane fuel.
#17
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Fanman
Butt dynos are notoriously inaccurate :D
Yes, the engine/electronics are set for use with 91 octane. In not using 91 octane, gasolines with 87 octane ratings the engine is set s that timing will be retarded further at WOT. In essence you will lose hp because the engine is lowering the timing so as not to get detonation. In the article they tested an M3 (req. 91 octane), Saab Turbo (req. 91 octane), Honda Accord (87) & Ford Mustang (87). The M3 & Saab both suffered between 6%-12% decreases in performance from using lower octane fuel.
Yes, the engine/electronics are set for use with 91 octane. In not using 91 octane, gasolines with 87 octane ratings the engine is set s that timing will be retarded further at WOT. In essence you will lose hp because the engine is lowering the timing so as not to get detonation. In the article they tested an M3 (req. 91 octane), Saab Turbo (req. 91 octane), Honda Accord (87) & Ford Mustang (87). The M3 & Saab both suffered between 6%-12% decreases in performance from using lower octane fuel.
If it will, Im gonna change from 87 to 91 for a while.
#18
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New York, Northern NYC Burbs
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I tried 87 once, about three weeks ago. I noticed that when it idled in my garage (while warming up) it made a very faint popping sound in the engine. I am assuming the fuel was igniting due to the compression not the spark. I thought that sound was the pinging on a rotary engine. I need to try it out again, because it also dropped near or below zero for several nights.
#19
Rotary Public
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern Virginia near DC
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
I haven't tried lower octane yet, but I've compared different brands of 93 Octane. So far, I've found that Citgo runs rougher and gets slightly lower gas mileage (.5 mpg) than Mobil or Shell. Next I'll try lower octane and see what happens to mileage vs. power.
#21
Originally Posted by Fanman
Butt dynos are notoriously inaccurate :D
Yes, the engine/electronics are set for use with 91 octane. In not using 91 octane, gasolines with 87 octane ratings the engine is set s that timing will be retarded further at WOT. In essence you will lose hp because the engine is lowering the timing so as not to get detonation. In the article they tested an M3 (req. 91 octane), Saab Turbo (req. 91 octane), Honda Accord (87) & Ford Mustang (87). The M3 & Saab both suffered between 6%-12% decreases in performance from using lower octane fuel.
Yes, the engine/electronics are set for use with 91 octane. In not using 91 octane, gasolines with 87 octane ratings the engine is set s that timing will be retarded further at WOT. In essence you will lose hp because the engine is lowering the timing so as not to get detonation. In the article they tested an M3 (req. 91 octane), Saab Turbo (req. 91 octane), Honda Accord (87) & Ford Mustang (87). The M3 & Saab both suffered between 6%-12% decreases in performance from using lower octane fuel.
#22
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 5Gen_Prelude
BUT! That same article stated the Accord actually lost power with higher octane fuel (but not much).
#23
Well clearly none of you live in Los Angeles where it doesn't matter what kind of gas you put in; you'll be sitting in traffic so much, you won't be able to gauge what works best.
I've put in all three (87, 89, 91 -- usually I stay on 91 except lately the gas price has gone up so I've been cheap and tried 87 and 89) and haven't noticed anything except that L.A. traffic sucks. :-P
I've put in all three (87, 89, 91 -- usually I stay on 91 except lately the gas price has gone up so I've been cheap and tried 87 and 89) and haven't noticed anything except that L.A. traffic sucks. :-P
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: DC Metro Area, USA
Posts: 1,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RX8CaliGirl
Well clearly none of you live in Los Angeles where it doesn't matter what kind of gas you put in; you'll be sitting in traffic so much, you won't be able to gauge what works best. .....
My car is quite happy with Shell 87 octane.
#25
Insanely Yellow
I've seen absolutely no difference in running performance between 87 and 93 octane gas. In cold weather, the engine is less likely to knock and detonate, so I switched to 87 for the winter, and I do notice better cold and partly-cold starting on the 87, presumably because of its higher volatilaty.
I'll likely switch to 93 again once warm weather arrives (highs in the 70's and up).
That said, interesting "butt dyno" comment back in the thread a bit. I just got a gTech to fiddle around with. I'll do some "performance testing" with it and see if I can see any difference between 87 and 93 octane. I'd bet that there's none that's consistently measurable.
Stew
I'll likely switch to 93 again once warm weather arrives (highs in the 70's and up).
That said, interesting "butt dyno" comment back in the thread a bit. I just got a gTech to fiddle around with. I'll do some "performance testing" with it and see if I can see any difference between 87 and 93 octane. I'd bet that there's none that's consistently measurable.
Stew