RX8Club.com

RX8Club.com (https://www.rx8club.com/)
-   RX-8 Discussion (https://www.rx8club.com/rx-8-discussion-3/)
-   -   Is poor maintenance causing many of the problems? (https://www.rx8club.com/rx-8-discussion-3/poor-maintenance-causing-many-problems-171377/)

delhi Apr 14, 2009 08:21 PM

Problems of RX-8s are mostly due to first year (2004), automatics, neglect or little maintenance & hot climates. Add a totally ignorant owner and you have a recipe for disaster.

Renesis07 Apr 14, 2009 08:28 PM


Originally Posted by delhi (Post 2968858)
Problems of RX-8s are mostly due to first year (2004), automatics, neglect or little maintenance & hot climates. Add a totally ignorant owner and you have a recipe for disaster.

My feelings exactly.

exigent Apr 14, 2009 09:21 PM

I am a recent purchaser of a Copper Red 30k mile '06 Shinka. (Frickin' love it! Gorgeous color.) The car is an AT and in great running condition and I would like to keep it that way. I have been lurking around this site for years reading up on everything that I can so that when I bought one I could keep her in top form.

I travel 20 miles interstate daily for work and know enough about cars and general maintenance to get me by. When it comes to red-lining the 8, you guys are telling me to shift to manual and get on it from time to time? Thanks all.

ZoomZoomH Apr 14, 2009 09:38 PM

^yes.

you should immediately notice the engine idles and revs smoother after a nice thrashing :)

JinDesu Apr 14, 2009 09:45 PM


Originally Posted by exigent (Post 2968966)
I am a recent purchaser of a Copper Red 30k mile '06 Shinka. (Frickin' love it! Gorgeous color.) The car is an AT and in great running condition and I would like to keep it that way. I have been lurking around this site for years reading up on everything that I can so that when I bought one I could keep her in top form.

I travel 20 miles interstate daily for work and know enough about cars and general maintenance to get me by. When it comes to red-lining the 8, you guys are telling me to shift to manual and get on it from time to time? Thanks all.

Yes, that's what I read from all the other threads about maintenence.

Go into first, second, or third (depending on where you are), bring it up until you hear the beep, and keep it there for a bit before shifting or letting off. That's what I've been doing with mine. You really can't reach the 9k people stated since the AT is limited to about 8k or 8.5k (I forget), and you'll just bounce off it.

shazy Apr 14, 2009 10:01 PM

I wondered if anyone has changed their engines other than 04-05 owners. Since Mazda screwed up on those batches and fixed the other years (06-?), wouldn't those cars be in terrific condition?

exigent Apr 14, 2009 10:02 PM

Sounds good. I will do that first thing tomorrow.

JinDesu Apr 14, 2009 10:04 PM


Originally Posted by shazy (Post 2969049)
I wondered if anyone has changed their engines other than 04-05 owners. Since Mazda screwed up on those batches and fixed the other years (06-?), wouldn't those cars be in terrific condition?

There's a thread somewhere floating around on general discussion where people replied if their engines have been replaced or not. I'd assume the same thing you've assumed about the replacement ones =p

amacrx8 Apr 14, 2009 10:58 PM


Originally Posted by JinDesu (Post 2969015)
Yes, that's what I read from all the other threads about maintenence.

Go into first, second, or third (depending on where you are), bring it up until you hear the beep, and keep it there for a bit before shifting or letting off. That's what I've been doing with mine. You really can't reach the 9k people stated since the AT is limited to about 8k or 8.5k (I forget), and you'll just bounce off it.

Is this based on some sort of engineering principle? I still haven't heard anyone explain it.

delhi Apr 15, 2009 12:03 AM


Originally Posted by shazy (Post 2969049)
I wondered if anyone has changed their engines other than 04-05 owners. Since Mazda screwed up on those batches and fixed the other years (06-?), wouldn't those cars be in terrific condition?

I am sure there are. But alot less than 04s. I have a feeling Mitsubishi sees more EVO engine replacement claims than Mazda with 06+ rx-8s.

rotaryPilot Apr 15, 2009 03:27 AM

I guess that this is another similar thread having to do with renesis engine life span. I have started one also and many people will do the same.

I think that you cannot compare renesis life span with a classic piston engine. In this point somebody will quote me an example that the 4.0 liter piston engine died at 20K. Yes all the engine have the tendency to wear and die but you should take a representative sample if you want to compare rotary with piston engines concerning life span.

So people still searching to find out, what is wrong with renesis engines died early. Is it the maintenance ? Is it the difference kind of treatment and use?

Some say the OMP is a failure and you need premix. Some premix after 2 years and it is already late. Some premix from the first day and still their engine dies early. Some just change often their oil and the engine lasts more than 100K. Some say to redline everyday. I know people that redline everyday and they were left with no apex seals. Some say no to red line but yes to WOT in order to burn the carbon. A lot of people and tech ones also say a lot of things.

MAZDA say nothing !!! Just produces a Face lift with better lubrication to the apex seals.


So what do you do? You premix, you redline, you change your oil every 3K, you change your plugs, coils every 30K, you have to take care for your fuel pump filter and someday after all these you measure your compression and you find it low or near the min specs.

I believe that they are so many factors that affect the renesis life span that it is not possible to account all of them. You maintain according to your knowledge of the rotaries and this is the key to the equation. More knowledge about how renesis works better maintenance. This entails premix, frequent oil changes, careful use at high temps, good fuel quality, WOT to blow off carbon, care for the ignition systems that means, plugs, coils, etc, care for fuel supply and fuel filter.


Welcome to the Rotary World.

amacrx8 Apr 15, 2009 08:43 AM

So there is no specific reason why running the rotary engine hard most of the time is better for it than babying it? I can understand why you'd want to blow out the carbon for it every now and then, but run it hard all the time? Hocus pocus!

rotaryPilot Apr 15, 2009 08:52 AM


Originally Posted by amacrx8 (Post 2969538)
So there is no specific reason why running the rotary engine hard most of the time is better for it than babying it? I can understand why you'd want to blow out the carbon for it every now and then, but run it hard all the time? Hocus pocus!

Running hard the Renesis and Revving at red line without premix probable will blow the carbon and your apex seals as well. Probable WOT at certain rpm (i.e 6000rpm) will burn the carbon without the need to rich 9000rpm.

So use premix to protect your renesis at all times and WOT at 6000rpm.to burn the carbon Good fuel quality and change at 3k your oil. Change your plugs and coils at 20K and do not abuse the engine at high temps.

This will probably make your renesis to last for a lot of miles.

RX8-Frontier Apr 15, 2009 09:27 AM


Originally Posted by carcrazy95 (Post 2965576)
Reading the various threads on premature 'engine failures', I'm wondering if there is a correlation between early engine death and poor maintenance (and long life with good care), more so than would be seen with "conventional" engines.

By definition, if you're here on this forum, then you're into cars, and almost certainly give your car much higher than average care. Gearheads are into cars, we like to drive them and know how to take care of them.

But that's not most of the population. Most people could care less about changing their oil or doing anything else to take care of their car. So many people I know do nothing but put gas in their car - ever (my mother in law was shocked when her Chrysler's engine blew at 24,000 miles; when I asked her how often she changed the oil, she was incredulous, and honestly surprised and said "You mean you have to change the oil in the engine?!?"). My old secretary got her first oil change on her Toyota at 30,000 miles - after I had a seizure when she told me she had never had it changed (I wouldn't want to buy that car, it was a miracle it was still running).

The rotary is more sensitive to and needing of admittedly simple maintenance than the typical piston engine. I'm thinking mostly of the need to periodically check and add oil. Most of the (non-car) people I know have literally never checked their oil in their cars, and don't even know how to do it. A Toyota might go (for a while....) without ever checking the oil and changing it every 10k miles, but, not a Wankel.

I wonder if there is a correlation with rotary engines failing in the hands of people who treat them "like any other Japanese car", never check the oil, and try to drive them for many thousands of miles between oil changes - which in a rotary will result in a dry sump and a fried engine. I'm sure there are people here that have fastiduously cared for their cars and still had engines die, but I'm curious if anyone thinks there is a particularly strong relationship between more "casual" treatment of this particular engine and early rotary death? The corallary, I wonder if those that have the highest (trouble-free) mileage from their engines might be the ones that are also particularly meticulous about checking oil level and other maintenance?

I'm going to go out of the "norm" here, and say I seriously doubt it's due to poor maintenance.

Why's that, you ask?

Because I don't believe Mazda, or any other auto manufacturer, would extend the warranty on an engine from 60,000 miles to 100,000 miles if the reason there were issues were due to poor/lack or maintenance by the owners. Mazda would NOT lose as much money on the Rotary rebuild/replace program as they are if it boiled down to "poor maintenance" by owners...

Not to mention, there wouldn't have been several different oil metering revisions over the years to the ECU, because if the engines were just failing due to people not taking care of their engine, there wouldn't be a need to change the rate of oil injection...

While I'm willing to bet SOME engine failures have been user error, I don't think any car company in the world would voluntarily increase the warranty period and replace engines without questioning if they could use "poor maintenance" as a reason to deny a claim.

peterlemonjello Apr 15, 2009 09:29 AM


Originally Posted by amacrx8 (Post 2969538)
So there is no specific reason why running the rotary engine hard most of the time is better for it than babying it? I can understand why you'd want to blow out the carbon for it every now and then, but run it hard all the time? Hocus pocus!

Try searching the forums. This topic has been discussed at length.

RX8-Frontier Apr 15, 2009 09:41 AM


Originally Posted by Renesis07 (Post 2966146)
Standard oil change interval on ANY car is 3-5K miles

Umm, no it's not. MOST new cars these days have 7,500 mile oil change intervals. Only Jiffy Lube (the creator of the 3,000 mile change myth) still push that interval; manufacturers don't make cars with that recommendation anymore, and most don't recommend 5,000 mile intervals, either.

(psst... "standard" intervals are almost ALWAYS 7,500 miles. "severe duty" intervals are almost always 3,500 to 5,000 miles...but whether people want to believe it or not, MOST people are NOT "severe duty" drivers)

JinDesu Apr 15, 2009 10:59 AM


Originally Posted by amacrx8 (Post 2969538)
So there is no specific reason why running the rotary engine hard most of the time is better for it than babying it? I can understand why you'd want to blow out the carbon for it every now and then, but run it hard all the time? Hocus pocus!

The engine works better at higher RPMS, see the link below. It's not bad for the engine anyways, so run it hard, run it fast.


Originally Posted by amacrx8 (Post 2969174)
Is this based on some sort of engineering principle? I still haven't heard anyone explain it.


http://www.tocmp.com/manuals/engine/...taryTheory.htm

It's somewhere in there, regarding the cleaning of the plugs when the engine reaches higher RPMS. If you don't redline (or at least get the engine to a good RPM), it could foul the lagging set of plugs.

DarkBrew Apr 15, 2009 11:20 AM

The Renesis is very sensitive to carbon build up specifically around the apex seals and around the intake port valves. Some high RPM in any engine tends to burn off excess carbon deposits and the rotary is no exception.
I would like to warn people however that high RPM without proper engine warmup may damage the engine and negate the benefits. Also running the engine hard just before shutting down may result in damage as well so bit of easy running before shut down is probably a good idea.
Run it hard but look after it and it should last a long time.

P.S. Hey, post 3000

amacrx8 Apr 15, 2009 11:32 AM

Out of curiosity, how much does an out of warranty engine replacement cost at a dealership?

Sleepy-z Apr 15, 2009 05:53 PM

Geeze I can type for weeks on this subject....mostly personal opinions though, if you ask any of our supervisors at work they would tell you this especailly after getting my last review a few weeks back(good review but yeah I am a arguer).

My opinion is simple, design changes, exhaust ports were moved to the intermediate/front/rear housing as opposed to the rotor housings from previous motors, apex seals get carbon and cant push it out and the small exhaust holes on the walls dont help the side seals out too much either imo. There are those people who dont maintain there rotary though and that is a significant amount of the engines we get. There are a lot of people who bought the car and dont know the engine at all, they dont rev it up at all..so on. Just a few things that people already said as usual.

As for the increase in the warranty mileage, I dont know the real answer but my way to defend the idea that its due to the engines being poor is that it could have been a competitive move towards the other sport cars that all got the 100k miles warranties that started a few years back when hyundai did that 10yr/100k miles warranty or whatever they did. It may have been a sales move.

I know that the rx7 remans run $3-4k at a dealer core charge is in that price but I dont know how much they give for the core at a dealer, the 09's are brand new engines as of right now if you buy a 09 reman but its different wiring, I wonder if we will ever get around to building them but they haven't had any issues with them on the road outside of road damage to the enigne and non internal issues.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:29 AM.


© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands