Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.

messing with my gas.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 10-27-2004, 10:20 AM
  #1  
Revin 9500k
Thread Starter
 
xxdevilzeroxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Orange County
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
messing with my gas.

i just filled up my car and i have been cruising on 3rd the whole day, im trying to see if chillin at 4000-5000k will change my gas issue. 3-4th gear at around 30-50 mph, this is of course city driving, in the freeway i stay at 4 maybe 5th....ill see in 3 days if my gas is any better =) lighter gear = less load on the motor

Last edited by xxdevilzeroxx; 10-27-2004 at 10:23 AM.
Old 10-27-2004, 10:26 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
shaolin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I read that if you drive in 1st, 3rd, and 5th, skipping gears 2 and 4, you'd save more gas. I think in our cases we could go to 6 too, but I was always afraid to do this to my cars....
Old 10-27-2004, 10:50 AM
  #3  
czr
RX8 RX8!
iTrader: (3)
 
czr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Tampa Bay, FL
Posts: 1,189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by shaolin
I read that if you drive in 1st, 3rd, and 5th, skipping gears 2 and 4, you'd save more gas. I think in our cases we could go to 6 too, but I was always afraid to do this to my cars....

Sometimes, I skip 5 th. Does anyone know if this (or skipping gears in general) is good/bad/indifferent?
Old 10-27-2004, 12:48 PM
  #4  
Follower of CHRIST!!!!!!!
 
rx8wannahave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, the company that brought this out...as far as I know, was Chevy. They made you force an upshift in the Camaro/Firebird in some type of order like you listed. 1-3-5 or 1-4-5-6, but anyway...the reason they did it was to save gas.

The owners of those cars really did not like it, but Chevy forced the upshifts to save gas. Now the question is...was the cars ECU ready for something like that? If you do it by yourself, I've done it in my Probe GT, would it help? Is it dangerous the rotary to upshift in that manner?

Only testing will tell...

PS. I've done it, but never really done it long enough to test it out...maybe I should considering my old Prob has alot of miles on it and no one will indanger their RX-8
Old 10-27-2004, 01:43 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
RACER X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
skip this..........................
Old 10-27-2004, 01:46 PM
  #6  
Mmmmm... Rotary Donut
 
G8rboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lake in the Hills, IL (NW Chicago Burbs)
Posts: 2,376
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by czr
Sometimes, I skip 5 th. Does anyone know if this (or skipping gears in general) is good/bad/indifferent?
I skip gears all the time... for me it's not a matter of saving gas, but with the crazy tall RPM range you hardly need 6 gears. I'm almost never in 4th- If I'm accelerating onto a highway or major road, I'll wind it out in 2nd or 3rd, then go directly to the appropriate cruising gear (5th or 6th) depending on the speed. When downshifting for passing power, I go from 6th or 5th directly down to 3rd. As long as the revs are where they should be for that gear, there's no harm in skipping a gear or two.
Old 10-27-2004, 02:09 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
merlin00gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Plano, Tx
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GM did that in the Camaro/TransAm/Firebird in the late 90's models. It actually only forced a shift from one to three, skipping second gear, and only when the RPM were under 3000, or similiar (can't remember the exact RPM). You're right, it was a gas saving measure. I don't think the ECU was tuned to expect this, as the mechanical piece was just a solonoid lockout on second gear in the transmission, much like the reverse lockout solonoid found on most manual transmissions. There were even companies that provided a "Skip-Shift Eliminator" for those cars. It was just a resistor that changed the voltage to the solonoid, so it thought it was never shifting to second gear, thus eliminating the lockout.
Old 10-27-2004, 03:12 PM
  #8  
Follower of CHRIST!!!!!!!
 
rx8wannahave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exactly...thanks for the further explanation. In my Probe, I do a 1-3-5 shift and it works without a problem. Now, again...I have not tested this for fuel savings so I can't say anything more.

I wish a Chevy guy could explain in detail how much fuel savings this gives a car, heck or anyone else.

Note: The basic idea is simple, keep the RPM's as low as you can and you will save gas. Now, shouldn't that work in any car...??? It makes sense...
Old 10-27-2004, 03:20 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
merlin00gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Plano, Tx
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, it worked for the GM V8's, as they have as much torque at 2krpm as we do at peak, so the effect may be quite different with the RENESIS. I'm speaking in terms of which RPM to shift at. Just because GM picked 3k doesn't mean that's the magic RPM for fuel savings on all cars.

I doubt you'll find any GM guy that still has that in effect on his car Most of the ones I know had it removed, because with a 5.6l V8, who cares about fuel consumption?
Old 10-27-2004, 03:31 PM
  #10  
RX-VIII
 
Vaillant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by merlin00gt
GM did that in the Camaro/TransAm/Firebird in the late 90's models. It actually only forced a shift from one to three, skipping second gear, and only when the RPM were under 3000, or similiar (can't remember the exact RPM). You're right, it was a gas saving measure. I don't think the ECU was tuned to expect this, as the mechanical piece was just a solonoid lockout on second gear in the transmission, much like the reverse lockout solonoid found on most manual transmissions. There were even companies that provided a "Skip-Shift Eliminator" for those cars. It was just a resistor that changed the voltage to the solonoid, so it thought it was never shifting to second gear, thus eliminating the lockout.
I'm pretty sure it was from 1st to 4th, and I think the Vette still has it.

~ Matt
Old 10-27-2004, 10:10 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
merlin00gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Plano, Tx
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, maybe it was first to fourth. As of 2003, the vette had it, but the rpm was rediculously low. Too low to notice; something like 2000 rpm. I know, as I had one before the 8. I mean, who shifts out of first that low?!

Thanks for the clarification.
Old 10-27-2004, 10:19 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
Rupes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbus Ohio
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was 1st to 4th, and it was fluid as can be, never seemed to bother most people because it just slid right into 4th gear like it would into 2nd.

-Rupes
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fc2se
NE For Sale/Wanted
2
06-01-2016 08:55 PM
Draken
RX-8 Discussion
4
09-21-2015 06:14 PM
Forevermore
Series I Trouble Shooting
6
09-20-2015 01:04 PM
tgaffner
New Member Forum
3
09-07-2015 08:49 PM
LMURailsplitter02
New Member Forum
1
09-06-2015 10:56 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: messing with my gas.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:20 PM.