Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Let's compare VIN numbers and fuel economy

Thread Tools
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 4.67 average.
 
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 11:58 AM
  #51  
ptiemann's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco Bay Area
Question to everyone: Does it seem that the higher the number the newer the car is? E.g. 110311, the second from the bottom is on his second tank. If they don't give out the numbers consecutively, then this "survey" makes not much sense.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 12:04 PM
  #52  
pmacwill's Avatar
Sponge Bob RotorPants
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
after you state the fuel economy and your vin, multiply your fuel economy by 707, divide by the last 5 digits of your vin, raise to the power of (your age - 16), divide by the last 4 digits of your social security number, and then add the surface area of contact between your driving shoe and the gas pedal. This will tell us the relative keys to our existence.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 01:23 PM
  #53  
ptiemann's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco Bay Area
Originally posted by pmacwill
after you state the fuel economy and your vin, multiply your fuel economy by 707, divide by the last 5 digits of your vin, raise to the power of (your age - 16), divide by the last 4 digits of your social security number, and then add the surface area of contact between your driving shoe and the gas pedal. This will tell us the relative keys to our existence.
social security numbers are not the same worldwide..
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 01:40 PM
  #54  
LesPaul's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: Pennsylvania
106064 13-15 mpg 1,200 miles

I wish we included the number of miles on the car. Plotting that against mpg may be more informative than VIN to mpg.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 01:49 PM
  #55  
Racer X-8's Avatar
Coming thru in waves...
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere between Yesterday and Tomorrow.
Originally posted by LesPaul
106064 13-15 mpg 1,200 miles

I wish we included the number of miles on the car. Plotting that against mpg may be more informative than VIN to mpg.
I agree...

edit: I've removed the chart here cuz it was obsolete. See my 10/22 post for the current one.

Last edited by Racer X-8; Oct 23, 2003 at 09:32 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 02:05 PM
  #56  
Haze's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia, PA USA
112741 20 MPG every fill up give or take

Mostly city driving; 1,500 miles; no DSC/TC
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 02:30 PM
  #57  
rxeightr's Avatar
M0D Squad -charter member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
I wish we included the number of miles on the car. Plotting that against mpg may be more informative than VIN to mpg.
I have just added to my listing below:

100112 ...... 17.5 to 19.8
105730 ...... 17 to 22
100717 ...... 16 to 25
100804 ...... 20 to 21
100849 ...... 17.5 to 23.3
100879 ...... 18 to 20
101058 ...... 18 to 21
101083 ...... 15 to 19 (10% highway)
101145 ...... 13 to 19
101212 ...... 21 to 22 (4600 miles-80% Hwy,15% City,5% 9K rpm)
101365 ...... 13 <-- LOW
101450 ...... 15.3 to 19.3 (mostly city to 60% highway, normally around 17-18, just once above 18.4)
101604 ...... 15.9 average after 2400 miles
101897 ...... 16.7 mpg typically
102878 ...... I get 12-17 (85% city mostly, 6 mile work commute)
102974....... 17 to 23...2500 miles
103130 ...... 13 to 15 <-- LOW
103727 ...... 17.8 to 22.2
103841....... 13-20.5 (13 is hard driving, 20.5 is purely highway)
104226 ...... 15 to 17 (city)
105899 ...... 22 to 23
106429 ...... 17.3 to 21.3
106454 ...... 17.5 to 21
106647 ...... 14.9 to 25.6
106908 ...... 15.3 to 20.1 (avg 17.7 mostly) only 1400 miles on it.
107891 ...... 14 to 17 <-- LOW
108417 ...... 18 to 20 mpg
108583 ...... 18.3 to 19.5
108837 ...... 14.28 - 22.58, lifetime avg=17.36
109058 ...... 16.5 to 22
109161 ...... 19 to 21
110311 ...... 17 (on first 2 tanks, very new car)
112585 ...... 21 - getting a consistent 21 mpg (combo of city & highway)
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 03:21 PM
  #58  
Haris's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
RENESIS is hand built so all cars wont be 100% same and wont work 100% same. That's my theory on why many Rx8's have different performance, gas milage, etc.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 03:28 PM
  #59  
oosik's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
From: Mobile, AL
my .02!

second time I put 93 octane in it, tho, this is the only time I'm checking, forgot the first time, owned it since Friday. approx 230+ miles on it so far.

113952........20 {Predominanatly city-type driving}
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 03:47 PM
  #60  
ptiemann's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco Bay Area
New Summary


100112 ...... 17.5 to 19.8
100717 ...... 16 to 25
100804 ...... 20 to 21
100849 ...... 17.5 to 23.3
100879 ...... 18 to 20
101058 ...... 18 to 21
101083 ...... 15 to 19 (10% highway)
101145 ...... 13 to 19
101212 ...... 21 to 22 (4600 miles-80% Hwy,15% City,5% 9K rpm)
101365 ...... 13 <-- LOW
101450 ...... 15.3 to 19.3 (mostly city to 60% highway, normally around 17-18, just once above 18.4)
101604 ...... 15.9 average after 2400 miles
101897 ...... 16.7 mpg typically
102878 ...... I get 12-17 (85% city mostly, 6 mile work commute)
102974....... 17 to 23...2500 miles
103130 ...... 13 to 15 <-- LOW
103727 ...... 17.8 to 22.2
103841....... 13-20.5 (13 is hard driving, 20.5 is purely highway)
104226 ...... 15 to 17 (city)
105899 ...... 22 to 23
105730 ...... 17 to 22
106064 ...... 13-15 mpg 1,200 miles
106429 ...... 17.3 to 21.3
106454 ...... 17.5 to 21
106647 ...... 14.9 to 25.6
106908 ...... 15.3 to 20.1 (avg 17.7 mostly) only 1400 miles on it.
107891 ...... 14 to 17 <-- LOW
108417 ...... 18 to 20 mpg
108583 ...... 18.3 to 19.5
108837 ...... 14.28 - 22.58, lifetime avg=17.36
109058 ...... 16.5 to 22
109161 ...... 19 to 21
110311 ...... 17 (on first 2 tanks, very new car)
112585 ...... 21 - getting a consistent 21 mpg (combo of city & highway)
113952 ...... 20 {Predominanatly city-type driving}


Congrats to oosik getting 20 in city driving, and that on the first tank. I'm impressed.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 04:19 PM
  #61  
jdaled's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis, IN
105069 -- 16 - 20

A typical day is mostly city / short highway hops; work is less than 10mi from home.

I haven't had any purely highway tanks yet to test total hwy mileage.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 05:37 PM
  #62  
matt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
114502

20 city / 26 highway

300 miles in 3 days of ownership
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 06:21 PM
  #63  
Hayseed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: New England
Originally posted by Racer X-8
I agree...
Nice graph. What's apparent is the lack of a trend.

It might also be informative to know mpg controlling for age and/or sex of the driver? Or how long you've been driving a stick?
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 06:26 PM
  #64  
ptiemann's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco Bay Area
Lack of trend. true.
Lots of factors, like age, driving environment e.g. I drive a windy mountain highway to work.
Climate (temperature , wind) plays a role.

But:

Those 3 folks who get only 13 mpg definitely have some material now in their hands to go to their dealer with.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 06:27 PM
  #65  
ptiemann's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco Bay Area
100112 ...... 17.5 to 19.8
100717 ...... 16 to 25
100804 ...... 20 to 21
100849 ...... 17.5 to 23.3
100879 ...... 18 to 20
101058 ...... 18 to 21
101083 ...... 15 to 19 (10% highway)
101145 ...... 13 to 19
101212 ...... 21 to 22 (4600 miles-80% Hwy,15% City,5% 9K rpm)
101365 ...... 13 <-- LOW
101450 ...... 15.3 to 19.3 (mostly city to 60% highway, normally around 17-18, just once above 18.4)
101604 ...... 15.9 average after 2400 miles
101897 ...... 16.7 mpg typically
102878 ...... I get 12-17 (85% city mostly, 6 mile work commute)
102974....... 17 to 23...2500 miles
103130 ...... 13 to 15 <-- LOW
103727 ...... 17.8 to 22.2
103841....... 13-20.5 (13 is hard driving, 20.5 is purely highway)
104226 ...... 15 to 17 (city)
105069 ...... 16 to 20
105899 ...... 22 to 23
105730 ...... 17 to 22
106064 ...... 13-15 mpg 1,200 miles
106429 ...... 17.3 to 21.3
106454 ...... 17.5 to 21
106647 ...... 14.9 to 25.6
106908 ...... 15.3 to 20.1 (avg 17.7 mostly) only 1400 miles on it.
107891 ...... 14 to 17 <-- LOW
108417 ...... 18 to 20 mpg
108583 ...... 18.3 to 19.5
108837 ...... 14.28 - 22.58, lifetime avg=17.36
109058 ...... 16.5 to 22
109161 ...... 19 to 21
110311 ...... 17 (on first 2 tanks, very new car)
112585 ...... 21 - getting a consistent 21 mpg (combo of city & highway)
113952 ...... 20 {Predominanatly city-type driving}
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 09:25 PM
  #66  
SikRedRX-8's Avatar
That krayzie Mexican
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 319
Likes: 1
From: Albuquerque
my 6 digits are: 106206. I am getting about 15mpg. about 50/50 for highway/city.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 10:01 PM
  #67  
ptiemann's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco Bay Area
100112 ...... 17.5 to 19.8
100717 ...... 16 to 25
100804 ...... 20 to 21
100849 ...... 17.5 to 23.3
100879 ...... 18 to 20
101058 ...... 18 to 21
101083 ...... 15 to 19 (10% highway)
101145 ...... 13 to 19
101212 ...... 21 to 22 (4600 miles-80% Hwy,15% City,5% 9K rpm)
101365 ...... 13 <-- LOW
101450 ...... 15.3 to 19.3 (mostly city to 60% highway, normally around 17-18, just once above 18.4)
101604 ...... 15.9 average after 2400 miles
101897 ...... 16.7 mpg typically
102878 ...... I get 12-17 (85% city mostly, 6 mile work commute)
102974....... 17 to 23...2500 miles
103130 ...... 13 to 15 <-- LOW
103727 ...... 17.8 to 22.2
103841....... 13-20.5 (13 is hard driving, 20.5 is purely highway)
104226 ...... 15 to 17 (city)
105069 ...... 16 to 20
105899 ...... 22 to 23
105730 ...... 17 to 22
106064 ...... 13-15 mpg 1,200 miles
106206 ...... 15 about 50/50 for highway/city.
106429 ...... 17.3 to 21.3
106454 ...... 17.5 to 21
106647 ...... 14.9 to 25.6
106908 ...... 15.3 to 20.1 (avg 17.7 mostly) only 1400 miles on it.
107891 ...... 14 to 17 <-- LOW
108417 ...... 18 to 20 mpg
108583 ...... 18.3 to 19.5
108837 ...... 14.28 - 22.58, lifetime avg=17.36
109058 ...... 16.5 to 22
109161 ...... 19 to 21
110311 ...... 17 (on first 2 tanks, very new car)
112585 ...... 21 - getting a consistent 21 mpg (combo of city & highway)
113952 ...... 20 {Predominanatly city-type driving}
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 10:02 PM
  #68  
ptiemann's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco Bay Area
Originally posted by Racer X-8
Here's the latest. I thought I was actually starting to see a trend & the excel polynomial trend line saw it too...(the black line). I dunno...let's keep adding to this & see if it gains definition...
interesting. Looks like there's a valley. The stats are maybe not precise 'cause some are new to stick or different habits, but if we collect a LOT of numbers, then I hope it'll make up for those problems.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 10:08 PM
  #69  
khoney's Avatar
FX8TED on my RX-8
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio
102035 - typically 19.5 MPG
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 10:20 PM
  #70  
Racer X-8's Avatar
Coming thru in waves...
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere between Yesterday and Tomorrow.
I changed the chart X axis. Previous versions were equally spaced between data points, not accounting for how close or far away the vin numbers are from one to the next. Looks different, I think it's more accurate this way.

edit: I've removed the chart here cuz it was obsolete. See 10/22 post for the current one.

Last edited by Racer X-8; Oct 23, 2003 at 09:30 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 10:28 PM
  #71  
miata2rx8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
my full digits are 101365. Averaged around 15 until the last few weeks then around 12-13. Got a new engine (picking up car tomorrow) so I'll let you know what the new numbers are.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2003 | 12:16 PM
  #72  
ptiemann's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco Bay Area
Originally posted by miata2rx8
my full digits are 101365. Averaged around 15 until the last few weeks then around 12-13. Got a new engine (picking up car tomorrow) so I'll let you know what the new numbers are.
good luck with the new engine, I'm sure it'll achieve the 20 mpg that almost everyone seems to get.

-Peter
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2003 | 04:04 PM
  #73  
SQ88's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Can someone convert KM/L to MPG for me...thx!

I have been getting around 6.6km/L or 15.15L/100km here in Toronto.

80% City, 20% Highway.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2003 | 05:56 PM
  #74  
claude4's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, N.Y.
So my VIN# is 119173.

I haven't taken delivery yet (1 month 2 go)

Based on the chart, which seems to curve up as the VIN numbers increase, I wonder what my MPG w/b when I break her in.

Claude H.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2003 | 06:07 PM
  #75  
ptiemann's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco Bay Area
Originally posted by SQ88
Can someone convert KM/L to MPG for me...thx!

I have been getting around 6.6km/L or 15.15L/100km here in Toronto.

80% City, 20% Highway.

15.15L/100km

is

15.53 mpg

(1 m = 1.60935 km, 1 G = 3.78541 l)

I'll add it to a new summary
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 4.67 average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:01 PM.