Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.

K&N Filters void warranty??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 07-28-2006, 07:57 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Blue_Chameleon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bay Area - Central Valley, CA
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
K&N Filters void warranty??

Okay...I've been taking my car to this mechanic for about a year now and he's been pretty straight forward with a lot of things. Today, I took my Accord to have one of the major services done for maintenance and he told me that I have a K&N filter. I told him that I had placed it there to replace the worn out one.

He tells me that about a year ago, GM and Ford had told dealerships and mechanics out there to inform them if a customer of theirs has installed a K&N filter on their vehicles. Once they are notified, they keep track of it at GM or Ford's database indicating that they have a K&N filter. At that time, no matter how recent the car was purchased, GM and Ford will void the warranty of the vehicle.

He says that the filters are screwing everything up and letting too much dirt in.

I was going to place one in my RX8. Has anyone heard of this?
Old 07-28-2006, 08:06 PM
  #2  
He's as bad as Can
 
expo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manchester, NJ
Posts: 4,309
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Old 07-28-2006, 08:23 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
kartweb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's all about filtering capacity as in micron size. The reason K&N filters breathe better is because they have larger "pores" as in take in larger sized particles measured in microns.

Anyone who's run a Gauze type filter for a while should have noticed - that without frequent service the intake begins to take on a grime that wasn't there with a paper filter.

It's probably not as bad on a rotory as it is a 4 stroke motor. That grime tends to find it's way in the oil, especially those who live in dusty dry climates where the dust is really fine.

Look at it this way; Do you really think cars would come with paper filters if the engineers felt they would last as long with a gauze filter?
Old 07-28-2006, 08:24 PM
  #4  
Its all about Style...
 
Clavius's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: South of Boston, MA
Posts: 3,337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I could see if it was a Cold Air Intake kit but if its just a normal filter then personaly I think its wrong. Unless Ford and GM start making their own filters what do they expect us to do? I am gonna read that K&N Take on things after I post this up...
Old 07-28-2006, 08:51 PM
  #5  
I want an RX-8
 
MazdaTed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: GA
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kartweb
It's probably not as bad on a rotory as it is a 4 stroke motor. That grime tends to find it's way in the oil, especially those who live in dusty dry climates where the dust is really fine.

I would think that poor filtration on a wankel would be much worse than a reciprocating engine. The wankel has more sealing surfaces than Reciprocating engines of the same size.

Just my opinion.
Old 07-28-2006, 09:06 PM
  #6  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally Posted by Clavius
I could see if it was a Cold Air Intake kit but ..
then you clearly dont understand the law

google Magnusson Moss act
Old 07-28-2006, 09:11 PM
  #7  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
actually just read what the CEO of K&N wrote there. its a clear, precise and accurate explanation of the law. and it applies to aftermarket cold air intakes as well. and exhausts and wheels and lightbulbs and etc etc etc
Old 07-28-2006, 09:12 PM
  #8  
Its all about Style...
 
Clavius's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: South of Boston, MA
Posts: 3,337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by zoom44
then you clearly dont understand the law

google Magnusson Moss act

Damn you Zoom making me read.
I just meant in my post that most/some dealerships once they see a modified filter/intake they assume abuse (atleast that is what I tend to read here on the boards). And I saved the site I found to my favorites just for general info
Old 07-28-2006, 10:14 PM
  #9  
Rotary Superstar
 
AdRoCK3217's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It should be fine..putting it on the RX-8. With Mazda's warranty system, unless they can prove the aftermarket modification caused a problem, they cannot void the warranty.
Old 07-28-2006, 10:17 PM
  #10  
May Cause Anal Leakage
 
tiggerlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Orlando & Chicago
Posts: 3,191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Blue_Chameleon
Okay...I've been taking my car to this mechanic for about a year now and he's been pretty straight forward with a lot of things. Today, I took my Accord to have one of the major services done for maintenance and he told me that I have a K&N filter. I told him that I had placed it there to replace the worn out one.

He tells me that about a year ago, GM and Ford had told dealerships and mechanics out there to inform them if a customer of theirs has installed a K&N filter on their vehicles. Once they are notified, they keep track of it at GM or Ford's database indicating that they have a K&N filter. At that time, no matter how recent the car was purchased, GM and Ford will void the warranty of the vehicle.

He says that the filters are screwing everything up and letting too much dirt in.

I was going to place one in my RX8. Has anyone heard of this?

That's BS!
Old 07-28-2006, 10:49 PM
  #11  
I don't buy Kool-Aid
 
DOMINION's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Vegas Baby!
Posts: 8,823
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I find this disturbing and has BS all over it.
Old 07-28-2006, 11:09 PM
  #12  
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Razz1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cali
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
What's new?

They try to void your warrenty if you do your own oil changes, when they find out you need a major engine work.

Half te the time those statements work and they save money.

The question is ....................

Are you gulliable or smart?
Old 07-28-2006, 11:23 PM
  #13  
1.21 Jiggawatts
 
Stavesacre21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Lima, OH
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
that really is BS. what's next? if you don't use a mazda oil filter, yur engine is no longer warranted?!

Good gosh peoples...i mean seriously...wtf.
Old 07-29-2006, 12:35 AM
  #14  
I don't buy Kool-Aid
 
DOMINION's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Vegas Baby!
Posts: 8,823
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Thumbs down

Originally Posted by Stavesacre21
that really is BS. what's next? if you don't use a mazda oil filter, yur engine is no longer warranted?!

Good gosh peoples...i mean seriously...wtf.
If its not "OEM", Yup. God forbid they have a tester for synthetic oil
Old 07-29-2006, 01:20 AM
  #15  
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
LOL

I've used K&N Typhoon Version 1, nothing happens. Altho it suck ***.

Version 2 for almost a year. no issues. Going Strong still.

My bro's SE-R, using K&N drop in since day 1 !!!!! no issues, Car still pulling strong, dealership dont give a ****.

My father's 95 PoS old Mini Van, well, been using K&N since about 70K miles. now 130K, still running strong, no issues with engine. Dealership ? Who cares ? He never been to it except for the 2 recall he had.

We ALL use aftermarket Oil filters, Aftermarket Engine Oil, Aftermarket ..... just whatever thats better.

No offence but your Honda "buddy" is just full of ****. Maybe its time to ask him to take some Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act lessons other than his ASE book.
Old 07-29-2006, 01:40 AM
  #16  
Club Marbles Member
 
Raptor2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 3,252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Clavius
Damn you Zoom making me read.
lmfao!
Old 07-29-2006, 03:27 AM
  #17  
Ultimate ****** Goderator
 
dtorre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So then a midpipe would be covered under the Magnusson Moss act?
Old 07-29-2006, 08:17 AM
  #18  
He's as bad as Can
 
expo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manchester, NJ
Posts: 4,309
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by dtorre
So then a midpipe would be covered under the Magnusson Moss act?
Removing your CAT is a violation of Federal law, and gives the dealer a major out. Don’t expect one law to help when you break another.
Old 07-29-2006, 08:54 AM
  #19  
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by dtorre
So then a midpipe would be covered under the Magnusson Moss act?

Just like what ^^ said.

Its just like removing your air filter gives ya the best airflow, but its going to nuke your engine and void the engine warranty. Yes it has been "prove" that removing Air filter will kill an engine.

But they cant void your warranty when you have K&N, cuz they still cant prove anything.

What Im thinking is that, lots of "inexperience" users just got themselfs some K&N, then they thought that "oh, it saids million mile warranty, so that means Im good for million miles !"

Sorry but we clean our filters every 5-10K. Yet to have any problems.

Last edited by nycgps; 07-29-2006 at 08:57 AM.
Old 07-29-2006, 10:32 AM
  #20  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Blue_Chameleon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bay Area - Central Valley, CA
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't get me wrong. I think its idiotic that any car maker will automatically void a warranty just because they said so. You might as well tell all the car makers of the world not to have private auto mechanics anymore and that all vehicles must go back to the dealership for maintenance. In any case, I'm keeping my filter in my Accord and I'm planning on getting a little something for my RX8 too.
Old 07-29-2006, 11:17 AM
  #21  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally Posted by Stavesacre21
that really is BS. what's next? if you don't use a mazda oil filter, yur engine is no longer warranted?!

Good gosh peoples...i mean seriously...wtf.

did you actually read the k&n response or do the google search for magnusson-moss act?
Old 07-29-2006, 01:35 PM
  #22  
I want an RX-8
 
MazdaTed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: GA
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Blue_Chameleon
Don't get me wrong. I think its idiotic that any car maker will automatically void a warranty just because they said so.

Why so idiotic? Mazda is a buisiness, A buisinesses sole job is to make money. Providing FREE warrenty service costs THEM money, therefore they lose money. So exept for the fact of poor customer service (running off futer car buyers) Its a real good Idea.


Oh, BTW, I dont like the fact that automakers are voiding warrentys, but it does make sense to me.
Old 07-29-2006, 03:14 PM
  #23  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Blue_Chameleon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bay Area - Central Valley, CA
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MazdaTed
Why so idiotic? Mazda is a buisiness, A buisinesses sole job is to make money. Providing FREE warrenty service costs THEM money, therefore they lose money. So exept for the fact of poor customer service (running off futer car buyers) Its a real good Idea.
Okay...maybe if I was a major marketing business type of guy, I can see how that would be good. But from my standpoint, it still sucks for little guys like myself :
Old 07-29-2006, 07:59 PM
  #24  
Its all about Style...
 
Clavius's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: South of Boston, MA
Posts: 3,337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by zoom44
did you actually read the k&n response or do the google search for magnusson-moss act?
No Zoom I was the only moron who googled it grr.. making me read and shyt.. no fair!!!
Old 07-29-2006, 08:39 PM
  #25  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
hahahahah


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: K&N Filters void warranty??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:29 PM.