Driving impression, Part II
#1
Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: So Cal
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Driving impression, Part II
Hey!
Rotarynews.com just posted part 2 of the report from Laguna Seca. I expected to see some reactions from you guys by now!
The overall article seems very positive, but like many of the other reviews, stops just short of calling the RX-8 a true sports car
So what do you all think?
Rotarynews.com just posted part 2 of the report from Laguna Seca. I expected to see some reactions from you guys by now!
The overall article seems very positive, but like many of the other reviews, stops just short of calling the RX-8 a true sports car
So what do you all think?
#5
Drive it like U stole it!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Woodbridge, Ontario
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is it a sports car? Well, if it talks like a duck, acts like a duck, but doesn’t look like a duck…What might it be?
#10
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Pullman, WA
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Jeeze! Who cares if it's a "true sports car" or not as long as it performs and is fun to drive?
A BMW M3 is not a "true sports car", but I've never heard anyone complain about an M3 not being a "true sports car". Why not? It can run with a Corvette (almost) and STILL has back seats roomy enough for your kids or adults you don't like much.
From all the driving impressions I've read, the RX-8 seems to be the same kind of deal.
1) It'll run with "true sports cars" in its price range (almost), like the S2000 or 350Z
2) It'll probably smoke all the sports coupes in it's price range (G35, RSX-S, Accord Coupe V-6)
3) It's roomier than both the sports cars AND sports coupes in its price range.
Best of all, the driving impressions I've read have been reassuring as far as interior quality and room go. I think it's a great car. No, it won't work for everybody, but what car does?
A BMW M3 is not a "true sports car", but I've never heard anyone complain about an M3 not being a "true sports car". Why not? It can run with a Corvette (almost) and STILL has back seats roomy enough for your kids or adults you don't like much.
From all the driving impressions I've read, the RX-8 seems to be the same kind of deal.
1) It'll run with "true sports cars" in its price range (almost), like the S2000 or 350Z
2) It'll probably smoke all the sports coupes in it's price range (G35, RSX-S, Accord Coupe V-6)
3) It's roomier than both the sports cars AND sports coupes in its price range.
Best of all, the driving impressions I've read have been reassuring as far as interior quality and room go. I think it's a great car. No, it won't work for everybody, but what car does?
#11
Drive it like U stole it!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Woodbridge, Ontario
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Schneegz
Jeeze! Who cares if it's a "true sports car" or not as long as it performs and is fun to drive?
A BMW M3 is not a "true sports car", but I've never heard anyone complain about an M3 not being a "true sports car". Why not? It can run with a Corvette (almost) and STILL has back seats roomy enough for your kids or adults you don't like much.
From all the driving impressions I've read, the RX-8 seems to be the same kind of deal.
1) It'll run with "true sports cars" in its price range (almost), like the S2000 or 350Z
2) It'll probably smoke all the sports coupes in it's price range (G35, RSX-S, Accord Coupe V-6)
3) It's roomier than both the sports cars AND sports coupes in its price range.
Best of all, the driving impressions I've read have been reassuring as far as interior quality and room go. I think it's a great car. No, it won't work for everybody, but what car does?
Jeeze! Who cares if it's a "true sports car" or not as long as it performs and is fun to drive?
A BMW M3 is not a "true sports car", but I've never heard anyone complain about an M3 not being a "true sports car". Why not? It can run with a Corvette (almost) and STILL has back seats roomy enough for your kids or adults you don't like much.
From all the driving impressions I've read, the RX-8 seems to be the same kind of deal.
1) It'll run with "true sports cars" in its price range (almost), like the S2000 or 350Z
2) It'll probably smoke all the sports coupes in it's price range (G35, RSX-S, Accord Coupe V-6)
3) It's roomier than both the sports cars AND sports coupes in its price range.
Best of all, the driving impressions I've read have been reassuring as far as interior quality and room go. I think it's a great car. No, it won't work for everybody, but what car does?
#13
Originally posted by MikeW
Now all they have to do is get rid of that torque sensitive differential, and get a speed sensitive differential like the BMW M3 and Nissan 350Z.
Now all they have to do is get rid of that torque sensitive differential, and get a speed sensitive differential like the BMW M3 and Nissan 350Z.
The 2.0 TBR is too high for you but luckily it isn't anywhere near as high as the TBR on that crappy handling fd3s huh Mike? :D
#14
Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: So Cal
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
sheesh!!
I'm sorry for making the comment -- I certainly didn't intend for everyone to get hung up on the "true sports car" part of my post. It was just an observation, not an invitation to start the whole debate yet again! I was just interested in hearing everyone's thoughts on the article in general!!
I'll go back to reading mode again now...
I'm sorry for making the comment -- I certainly didn't intend for everyone to get hung up on the "true sports car" part of my post. It was just an observation, not an invitation to start the whole debate yet again! I was just interested in hearing everyone's thoughts on the article in general!!
I'll go back to reading mode again now...
#15
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Torque sensitive differentials do not make any sense for vehicle that want to turn. (not go straight)
When cornering more weight is on the outer side (as evident in body roll, weight distribution 65/35 under 0.5 lateral acceleration-generalization) so there is more weight and a longer arc there (not that huge of a difference, less than <55/45). So power should be favored to the outer side, but the torque sensitive differentials favors the inner side. Just plain ridculous.
I didn't know the fd3s rx-7 had crappy handling? :D :p
I could live with a TBR of 1.5:1, that is enough to spin both wheels, in a straigh line from a dead stop.
When cornering more weight is on the outer side (as evident in body roll, weight distribution 65/35 under 0.5 lateral acceleration-generalization) so there is more weight and a longer arc there (not that huge of a difference, less than <55/45). So power should be favored to the outer side, but the torque sensitive differentials favors the inner side. Just plain ridculous.
I didn't know the fd3s rx-7 had crappy handling? :D :p
I could live with a TBR of 1.5:1, that is enough to spin both wheels, in a straigh line from a dead stop.
#16
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Detroit Rock City!
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by MikeW
Torque sensitive differentials do not make any sense for vehicle that want to turn. (not go straight)
Torque sensitive differentials do not make any sense for vehicle that want to turn. (not go straight)
Anyway, other characteristics of the diff are debatable (I like a toque biasing diff, personally) but I just thought I would add this consideration.
Alex
#17
so...
-what tires are they running?
-any brake fade from track use? (pretty unreal if there aren't any, IFF these demo uses street pad)
-would love to have a 12000rpm all rotary, even if i have to get a monster tech
the more i read, the more itchy i got in wanting to drive the 8.
but i guess, nothing i've read so far describe what i have in mind
guess i'll just have to drive it to see for myself
-what tires are they running?
-any brake fade from track use? (pretty unreal if there aren't any, IFF these demo uses street pad)
-would love to have a 12000rpm all rotary, even if i have to get a monster tech
the more i read, the more itchy i got in wanting to drive the 8.
but i guess, nothing i've read so far describe what i have in mind
guess i'll just have to drive it to see for myself
#18
Originally posted by TerenceT
so...
-what tires are they running?
so...
-what tires are they running?
-any brake fade from track use? (pretty unreal if there aren't any, IFF these demo uses street pad)
-would love to have a 12000rpm all rotary, even if i have to get a monster tech
the more i read, the more itchy i got in wanting to drive the 8.
but i guess, nothing i've read so far describe what i have in mind
guess i'll just have to drive it to see for myself
Cheers,
Berny H.
Last edited by bern; 01-24-2003 at 05:11 PM.
#19
VW coulda had it...
In regards to the true sports car: (sorry to bring that up again) I consider my '85 RX-7s to be one. With that said, I'm sure the RX-8 will blow its doors off in every area: accelleration, handling, comfort, fuel economy, etc. I don't care how people want to categorize it!
#20
Drive it like U stole it!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Woodbridge, Ontario
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by ajmacdon
One aspect to keep in mind is the dynamic stability control. I develop/test DSC for American OEM's and any limited slip differential behavior during the active brake interventions you see with DSC is very difficult to deal with. There has been considerable development in this area and the result is that DSC works best with a torque biasing diff like RX-8 uses. We are actually quite pleased with the interaction between DSC and torsen diffs, it is somewhat responsible for the positive comments the RX-8 DSC is getting from the press (they usually hate stability control)
Anyway, other characteristics of the diff are debatable (I like a toque biasing diff, personally) but I just thought I would add this consideration.
Alex
One aspect to keep in mind is the dynamic stability control. I develop/test DSC for American OEM's and any limited slip differential behavior during the active brake interventions you see with DSC is very difficult to deal with. There has been considerable development in this area and the result is that DSC works best with a torque biasing diff like RX-8 uses. We are actually quite pleased with the interaction between DSC and torsen diffs, it is somewhat responsible for the positive comments the RX-8 DSC is getting from the press (they usually hate stability control)
Anyway, other characteristics of the diff are debatable (I like a toque biasing diff, personally) but I just thought I would add this consideration.
Alex
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
xAgyex
Series I Trouble Shooting
19
11-13-2023 07:51 AM
akagc
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
7
08-11-2015 07:07 PM