Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.

Comparing the RX-8 and BMW 330i. S0 Why Does the 330i Cost $15k More? Really.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 10-10-2005, 12:24 PM
  #26  
Purveyor of fine bass
 
Astral's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 1,618
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Krankor
Saves you from that dreaded drudgery of having to *gasp* push the fob button to unlock the door (or even *shudder* unlock the door with a key!) Only one slight wisp of a problem with it: if the car battery dies, YOU CAN'T OPEN THE DOOR. Not just you can't unlock it, YOU CAN'T OPEN IT. (I know this because the idiot dealer I went to had actually let the floor model's battery die). And oh, the sharp engineers had thought about this problem, and provided a convenient solution: there's a secret magic manual switch *in the trunk* that will open the dead doors, and you can open the trunk with a key.
The keyless entry is nice. Opening doors without a key is a very convenient feature and is not nearly in the same league of "kinda pointless" as keyless start and rain-sensing wipers.
Old 10-10-2005, 03:52 PM
  #27  
Registered User
 
griffe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BMW----good grief. Yeah they are known for their racing prowess, but also is Mazda. I remember one of my previous posts which discussed value. Value can be such a subjective thing. I have driven BMW's, Benzs, Audis and RX8's. I realized that the German cars cost more because let's face it....they're German! Yeah it's sounds snotty, but the German's have played that card for years. Back in the what?...70's and 80's when American cars were total junk mobiles, the Germans were building a better product. Like the Japaneese, they gave Americans a good quality automobile with nice features that American cars didn't have, but unlike the Japaneese, they charged us dearly for that 3-pointed star, propellers, and 4 rings. I remember first looking at an '85 Audi 5000 and noticing that it had rear headrests! I was so amazed by something like that cuz you wouldn't find them in a Caddy, or Lincoln? Then I noticed how Mercedes had them, BMW....

How about 4 wheel disc brakes on a luxury sedan? Please, you think Chrysler would do something like that? I remember those rear drums! Or how about an interior that had real leather chairs instead of something that was leather like or heaven forbid...VINYL! Back in the day, and sometimes even to this day...some American cars break down as soon as you make that last payment. But before then, they are shaking, rattling and rolling all along the way. Remember Cadillac in the 90's, they were RATTLACS!

Germans made better products. I know this thread is about BMW vs. Mazda...and to be honest I would rather have an Acura TL vs. a 3 series, but would never get one as long as it's front-wheel drive. I think the fit and finish of it is better or at least on par with the Bimmer and you get a greater value. In my opinion, I think Audis are superior to BMW and Mercedes automobiles when it comes to fit and finish...especially Audi's interiors. They have no equal, but again that's just my opinion. I had an '83 Mazda RX7 that was 12 years old when I let it go, and the only thing that rattled in it was somewhere near where the headliner met the windshield, and it had to be near freezing temps. for that to happen. Now fast forward to my '94 Probe GT, that has so many rattles it sounds like a box of Cracker Jacks, and it's around 11 yrs. old.

BMW is continuing to play the " Well it's a BMW...the ultimate driving machine " as long as a person perceives that....then they will more than gladly pay the premium price to have it in their driveway. Let's face it, a lot of people like labels....would you rather wear DKNY or the K-Mart blue light special? That depends on where your priorities lie. I just want a car that is sporty, built well, is unique and is a great handler. Mazda could have probably charged 5-8 grand more for the 8 than it does, but they have learned from the FD....too high of a price will kill yah! The eight meets all of my qualifications, so when April of '06 rolls around, you can best bet that I will be in someone' s Mazda dealership signing the dotted line for my Winning Blue RX8 finished over black leather. Good Lawd I'm tired...let me go an get some water!
Old 10-11-2005, 02:29 AM
  #28  
Int'l Man of Mystery
 
Japan8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You do know that the Ford Probe was just a rebadged Mazda?
Old 10-11-2005, 04:29 AM
  #29  
Rexella's Daddy
 
Gerael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Japan8
You do know that the Ford Probe was just a rebadged Mazda?
lol
Old 10-11-2005, 06:38 AM
  #30  
Registered
 
djgiron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Denver
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Mugatu, you now know 5 people that will never purchase a BMW again.
Old 10-11-2005, 07:09 AM
  #31  
Registered
 
crimson-rain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You know it's kind of weird that the 8 is so cheap. Considering it has an engine that practically no one else has (I'M FINE WITH IT'S CURRENT COST). The 8 is unique. The BMW is like worth the same as the 8 (and isn't very unique) but the rest name, status, and luxury. It's almost like sneakers. Add Michael Jordan name to a sneaker or T-shirt for that matter and see what happens to the price.
Old 10-11-2005, 08:05 AM
  #32  
Purveyor of fine bass
 
Astral's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 1,618
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by crimson-rain
You know it's kind of weird that the 8 is so cheap. Considering it has an engine that practically no one else has
Shhhh! MNAO might be reading...

Originally Posted by crimson-rain
(I'M FINE WITH IT'S CURRENT COST)
Nice save!
Old 10-11-2005, 09:24 AM
  #33  
Rotary Wanker
 
Ericok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think one of the reasons that Mazda sticks with the Rotary engine is cost. It's no secret that with far fewer (and cheaper) components the rotary is significantly cheaper to produce than a piston engine. That might explain part of the BMW/RX-8 cost difference. It also explains why Mazda doesn't have to sell that many RX-8s to make a profit on them - the engine's so much cheaper to build that they make a ton of money on each car.
Old 10-11-2005, 09:26 AM
  #34  
Purveyor of fine bass
 
Astral's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 1,618
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Ericok
I think one of the reasons that Mazda sticks with the Rotary engine is cost. It's no secret that with far fewer (and cheaper) components the rotary is significantly cheaper to produce than a piston engine. That might explain part of the BMW/RX-8 cost difference. It also explains why Mazda doesn't have to sell that many RX-8s to make a profit on them - the engine's so much cheaper to build that they make a ton of money on each car.
Actually, I think the RX-8 engines are hand-built and so are more expensive to produce than typical engines.
Old 10-11-2005, 09:51 AM
  #35  
I am Goober Wafflelips
 
Frostee's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Look at the history of BMW. They always used to be for the rich people, people with large amounts of money. Only the high-class citizens could/would have one. Nowadays that may not hold, but the brand still tries to reflect that 'prestige'...

And Astral is right about the engines being hand-built. I think Mazda does it because they are the only to have done it, and they made themselves a following after the RX7
Old 10-11-2005, 11:57 AM
  #36  
Evil Genius
 
RexApex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RotoRocket
These cars have different personalities, but very similar similar specs on paper.

Both have the same weight distribution, similar horsepower ratings (manual tranny) nearly the same 0-60 (mph) times (RX-8 is faster, though), nearly the same skidpad performance (RX-8 is slightly more capable), and pretty close braking performance (RX-8 again bests the 330i, though).

Yet the 330i costs at least $15,000 more. Why? A case of mere teutonic snobbery, or something more substantive?
Germans get paid more than Japanese?
--R.

BTW: skidpad is more a measure of the tires than the chassis, not a particulary useful measurement, try slalom speed, it's not great, but it's the closest thing to a number of for handling.
Old 10-11-2005, 03:19 PM
  #37  
Registered
 
crimson-rain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wonder how much would a Michael Jordan edition Beemer cost?
Old 10-12-2005, 01:11 PM
  #38  
Registered User
 
MTLbroker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Montreal
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RotoRocket
These cars have different personalities, but very similar similar specs on paper.

Both have the same weight distribution, similar horsepower ratings (manual tranny) nearly the same 0-60 (mph) times (RX-8 is faster, though), nearly the same skidpad performance (RX-8 is slightly more capable), and pretty close braking performance (RX-8 again bests the 330i, though).

Yet the 330i costs at least $15,000 more. Why? A case of mere teutonic snobbery, or something more substantive?
Conspicuous consumption. It's what the market will bear. There are plenty of people out there who will pay the extra bucks to let people know that they own it because they can.
Old 10-12-2005, 05:09 PM
  #39  
Registered User
 
iateyourcheese's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmm... aren't we comparing apples and oranges here.

For me... I was actually wondering why the RX-8 was so expensive when you add the options. So I guess it's just a matter of opinion.

Consider this before you jump all over me:

2006 330i
0-60 5.6s
hp/tq 255/220
Mpg 21/31

2005 RX-8
0-60 6.6
hq/tq 238/159
Mpg 18/24

Remember people, it's a sedan! BMW has a family-carrier that is darn quick, handles well (not as well as the RX-8, given), and yet still gets decent fuel mileage. But to get this you have to pay the entrance fee.

Cheers.
Old 10-12-2005, 05:52 PM
  #40  
Registered User
 
ECHO1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: So. King Co.
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i agree that this is an apples/oranges debate, but where are you quoting these numbers from? BMWusa.com lists the 0-60 at 6.1s for manual and 6.3s for the auto.

the redesigned i6 that they're using is quite a piece of work. the 3.0L diesel took international engine of the year honors and the other petrol variants all placed in the top three. lots of magnesium to reduce weight and improved valvetronic/double vanos make this engine pretty damn impressive.
Old 10-12-2005, 07:59 PM
  #41  
Registered
 
Brandon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hehee! you picked the fastest 330i 0-60 ever published and the slowest RX-8 0-60 ever published.

One difference is you can get AWD with the beemer (even more expensive). And I'd say the backseat and trunk are bigger.
Old 10-12-2005, 09:25 PM
  #42  
Mulligan User
iTrader: (1)
 
ZoomZoomH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: caddyshack
Posts: 4,612
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
beemer's backseat are pretty much about the same size as the 8's, minus the center tunnel, which will make it *seem* roomier than it actually is
Old 10-12-2005, 10:09 PM
  #43  
Registered User
 
griffe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Japan8
You do know that the Ford Probe was just a rebadged Mazda?

Yes it is a rebadged Mazda, but.....the interior and exterior is of Ford's doing. The engine and tranny (by Mazda, yes) is the only good thing about it.
Old 10-12-2005, 10:47 PM
  #44  
Registered
 
Slick8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Philly
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Buy the RX-8, put the money you saved from not buying the bimmer into a few good stocks. After six years, you will be able to buy the future RX-7 (or bimmer if you must) in cash from the capital gains.

Expensive depreciating assets make you poor

All the people I know that own the 3 series (excluding the M3) live paycheck to paycheck and do not have any investment assets.
Old 10-13-2005, 03:55 PM
  #45  
Registered User
 
iateyourcheese's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brandon
Hehee! you picked the fastest 330i 0-60 ever published and the slowest RX-8 0-60 ever published.
Whatever. I went to C&D and got their numbers. Check them yourselves.

Originally Posted by Brandon
One difference is you can get AWD with the beemer (even more expensive). And I'd say the backseat and trunk are bigger.
The backseat and trunk are bigger in the Bimmer, there's no question of that.

The whole premise of this thread is silly. There's not a 15k difference unless you're comparing a fully loaded 330i (Nav., leather, etc.) to a stripped RX-8.

RX-8 GT -> $32k
330i with leather -> $39k
Old 10-13-2005, 06:18 PM
  #46  
Registered
 
Slick8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Philly
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good luck finding a new 2006 330i w/ leather for $39K

Last edited by Slick8; 10-13-2005 at 06:24 PM.
Old 10-13-2005, 08:24 PM
  #47  
Banned
 
Reactionary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The reason the BMW costs more is because it is more expensive.
Old 10-13-2005, 08:29 PM
  #48  
Rotary Wanker
 
Ericok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Brilliant! Most definitive answer in the whole thread.

Originally Posted by Reactionary
The reason the BMW costs more is because it is more expensive.
Old 10-13-2005, 08:50 PM
  #49  
Registered
 
Mikelikes2drive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
they provide full maintanence for 4 years and is a dream to drive...
luxury performance
Old 10-13-2005, 09:05 PM
  #50  
Registered User
 
iateyourcheese's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Slick8
Good luck finding a new 2006 330i w/ leather for $39K
Ok $38k? I quoted full MSRP. There's no reason you can't get it for less.

Me, I'd forget the leather and for $39k have the sport package.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Comparing the RX-8 and BMW 330i. S0 Why Does the 330i Cost $15k More? Really.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:09 AM.