Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

About had it with the MPG ...

Old Sep 20, 2006 | 01:25 PM
  #76  
zeblien's Avatar
general user
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
From: New Mexico
what does it mean?
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 01:35 PM
  #77  
nycgps's Avatar
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,881
Likes: 36
From: Planet Earth
This **** is mad funny, a smart *** floor the car the whole time and complain about MPG. HAHAHAHA

Sell it, but dont buy anything after. Cuz no matter what you get, as long as you floor it, mpg will suck.
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 01:40 PM
  #78  
zeblien's Avatar
general user
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
From: New Mexico
Unless he floors that new electric car called the ??? dang it... someoen find the name.
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 01:53 PM
  #79  
danhilde's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Well, don't worry about anyone giving me ****; I don't even hear it. But I am fascinated about this extra gas tank possibility. The loss of the warranty, if true (and probably is) would probably stop me from doing it. I'll check it out with my dealer and I'll report back. Dan
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 01:57 PM
  #80  
zeblien's Avatar
general user
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
From: New Mexico
Your more likly to get an expanded gas tank. adding an extra gas tank isnt worth the 1000's i dont think.
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 01:58 PM
  #81  
danhilde's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Second Gas Tank - nope

Well, shoot .. that took about two seconds. My dealer told me that he has never heard of anyone putting a second gas tank into the 8 (doesn't mean it can't be done) and that if it was done, it would void the warranty immediately. I think that the warranty on the 8 is very important not to void. And I agree with those who say that Mazda should be investigating this variance in MPH experience. Dan
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 01:58 PM
  #82  
Raptor75's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
Sorry Rotary God but you have told me nothing I don't know or haven't tried already and still could get no higher then 13mpg at the best. The fact that you and many others can obtain this mileage is great I just wish my car could. You are making assumings which are based on your best guess as to why my mileage is poor and in this case your assumption is incorrect. Despite what you would like to believe I am fully capable of and have driven as you suggest with little to no improvement.

We appear to be barking up two different trees here. You are trying to tell me it is my driving style, which I have already ruled out through experimentation and I am trying to tell you that their is something wrong with my RX and other on this board that Mazda refuses to acknowledge.

I am hoping that this engine recall will allow an opportunity to correct my mileage problem. I am not doubting that the RX is capable of better mileage then I receive but as long as Mazda insists that 12mpg is normal I will warn other that they might get a bad one which dose get 12 mpg and no use of low rpms or soft peddle treatment will alter this. May I suggest that we focus our efforts into forcing Mazda to resolve this issue instead of attempting to blame each other for the poor mileage.

Originally Posted by rotarygod
You live in Chicago so the ground is relatively flat as it is here. I used to own a 425 rwhp RX-7 years ago and I could get 17 mpg city here all day every day if I drove it normally. It was hard to though because that car was so fun you wanted to keep your foot planted to the floor. If you are driving on roads that are so slow and congested that you can't move fast enough to get better mileage than you are, you probably shouldn't be driving a car and should find an alternative source of transportation through that route such as a bicycle as it sounds like it would be faster. If you lived up in the mountains, I'd understand

Last year during the hurricane Rita evacuation, I drove Brillo's RX-8 out of here. He was with me. Since traffic was the worst I've ever seen or heard about anywhere, we took many small stop and go back roads. For several hours we were caught in barely moving traffic and at one point in the course of 3 hours we probably moved 3-4 miles. All of that time is a waste of gas and much of it was move a few feet at a time, stop, move a few feet, stop. That wastes gas. Sometimes we were in a line that was moving at 20 mph. This is a speed that gets terrible mileage. All of those little roads we were on required lots of acceleration and deceleration. We never turned the car off when sitting in traffic. When we filled up, I had still gotten over 20 mpg. 18 is SIMPLE!!!! It's about how you drive it. Learn to!

For daily driving, there is no point in revving the engine up over 3000 rpm before you shift. Even this is still faster in acceleration than my Honda and many small cars so don't think this is driving like a snail. It easily keeps up with traffic. By 35 mph when cruising around, I am usually already in 6th gear. Brillo always thinks it's weird and tends to look over at the rpm's just to be sure. We drive very differently and I don't get where I am going any slower. For freeway driving there is no point in anyone anywhere going over 70 mph. Your gas mileage will fall like a rock above this. When you decelerate, do it in gear. There is fuel cutoff during deceleration and this is free mileage. Try to drive as close to 55 as possible. This means driving slower on surface streets is less efficient. Just don't get carried away and do 55 in a 20. That wouldn't be good. I get around no slower than Brillo or anyone else on the road. I just know how to drive a rotary and get at least the mileage it is rated for. It's easy.

Some cars may have issues. If some have low compression, they probably do get worse mileage. These are the cars that need to be taken in to be checked by the current recall. If your engine is running fine and your mileage is low, it's not the car!

Last edited by Raptor75; Sep 20, 2006 at 08:52 PM.
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 02:09 PM
  #83  
zeblien's Avatar
general user
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
From: New Mexico
That is true too. thanks abbid. The insurance on the 8 is much lower, being a 1.3ltr 2 stroke engine with 4 doors.
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 02:12 PM
  #84  
danhilde's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Insurance ...

Yup .. it's the 4-door Coupe classification that I believe keeps the rates down. But sheeat; don't talk about this too loud. I'm still expecting the big INS companies to figure this one out and F us. Dan
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 02:36 PM
  #85  
alcimedes's Avatar
The burninator
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Raptor75, sorry if I've missed this answer from you in the past, but what happens if you drive 100% highway miles with your car?
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 02:44 PM
  #86  
dynamho's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,963
Likes: 7
From: Norwood, NJ
Originally Posted by rotarygod
When you decelerate, do it in gear. There is fuel cutoff during deceleration and this is free mileage.
My goodness. All this time, I disengaged the transmission when slowing down to idle RPM in the hope of saving gas.

Last edited by dynamho; Sep 20, 2006 at 04:13 PM.
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 03:37 PM
  #87  
Raptor75's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by alcimedes
Raptor75, sorry if I've missed this answer from you in the past, but what happens if you drive 100% highway miles with your car?
Sorry missed this. I do OK on the highway. I hit 18 to 22mpg. If I drive steady I do 22 and if I'm zipping around and run high speeds it will drop to 18mpg. I haven't yet driven with the cruse control but I am pretty sure I could hit 24mpg with it. I will admit that it adds more questions then answers when com paired to the city mileage.
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 03:47 PM
  #88  
zeblien's Avatar
general user
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
From: New Mexico
Originally Posted by dynamho
RotaryGod, is this true?!? My goodness, all this time, I disengaged the clutch when slowing down to idle RPM in the hope of saving gas.
Manual transmission bleh!
I have a swtich on my shift consol that will automaticly strive to give me beter gas milage. I belive its [D] without the M.
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 06:26 PM
  #89  
whylde's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Mbrown655
Ok, I have never posted her before but feel I must chime in. Dan is right, the mpg sucks in this car. I traded a 2001 Ford F-150 Supercrew truck that got way better milage than this car. Now having said that, I would make the same trade all over again. I love this car! It makes driving fun and it's worth every dime at the pump!
same here i traded an 2003 GMC envoy for my 8 and i would do it all over again . but sadly my 8 will be gone in a few years. (i plan on getting the 2009 comaro, what a great car) but in the mean time i love my 2004 gas sucking rotory rx8
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 06:54 PM
  #90  
otherside's Avatar
I dont care...
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
From: Pleasantville
Originally Posted by zeblien
That is true too. thanks abbid. The insurance on the 8 is much lower, being a 1.3ltr 2 stroke engine with 4 doors.
1.3 litre 2 stroke?
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 07:22 PM
  #91  
cruzdreamer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
From: Algonquin, Il....west of Chicago
39,000 miles and now getting 19mpg city!! I was getting 17.5 mpg city for a long time. Last 4 fill ups 19!
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 09:26 PM
  #92  
zeblien's Avatar
general user
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
From: New Mexico
ya i duno, mine is considered a 2 stroke engine to my insurance agency
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 10:01 PM
  #93  
Raptor2k's Avatar
Club Marbles Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,252
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
Originally Posted by dynamho
My goodness. All this time, I disengaged the transmission when slowing down to idle RPM in the hope of saving gas.
Me too
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 10:13 PM
  #94  
Clavius's Avatar
Its all about Style...
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,337
Likes: 0
From: South of Boston, MA
Hmm.. I gotta find all my gas reciepts and redo my avg mpg. Last time I avgeraged it out for a months worth I got 13.4 mpg. Lowest was 10.3 highest was 13.9. Also my highest ever was 16.2mpg. Tried everything but 'eh.. I'm hoping the recall will fix this (I hope) or maybe its a bad cat I dunno again hopefully the recall with help me out.
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 10:48 PM
  #95  
swerver's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
For all the ranting and raving, I don't think the original point is without merit.........

It's all about perception (not about costs of buying another car, etc)

1) My last car was a Miata. I could rag that thing out to all extremes and it always, always registered 24 city/26 highway, always..........

2) Now in the 8, everytime I wanna have some fun, I unconciously do a mental calculation about how quickly I have to find a gas station as I watch the fuel guage plummet.

3) We all know maximum/any torgue is at or near redline; read #2

4) Although I was well aware of mpg before I bought this car, Mazda promised us a whole lot better in the beginning...

So, in speaking of terms of perspective, like the Mustang owner or the the Z drivers, while gas milage might be similar, we have to wring the hell out of the car to come close to matching their performance...............

I bought the car cause I love Mazda's knack for handling and all the little things the 8 has going for it. But make no mistake, the car is a gas demon in the same league as American built V-8s......................
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 11:38 PM
  #96  
Chakara's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
I should let this tread die, but I just can't! As a new 8 owner, what I know is that an 8 is an 8. It is a rotary engine. It is unique. It is fun. It seems to make it's drivers have a **** eating grin.

Enjoy your cars, don't let the small things get to ya.....

(PS: 18-19 first tanks - 15 last one - car is broke in so I'm having fun!)
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 07:50 AM
  #97  
Roaddemon's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee Wi.
I for one don't want want a V8. I have to have the rotary. I'm not crazy about v8 power. Gas mileage isn't an issue with me. My rx8 gets decent gas mileage. I sympathize with those who do not. Hopefully the new recall will fix that. Mazda is backing it's product and is aware of the problem. They're finally doing something about it.
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 08:59 AM
  #98  
Smileynh's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 197
Likes: 1
From: none


Here you go Mileage problem solved. This is the wonderful Ford Focus I have for the day while my 8 is in for the recall. Note the smooth lines, sporty exterior, fine dieing cat exhaust note.

:P

I WANT MY CAR BACK!
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 09:03 AM
  #99  
zeblien's Avatar
general user
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
From: New Mexico
Hay I had the Focus wagon, and it was a great car no complaints... it was just kinda old. No power windows and squeeking breaks made me trade it in instead of keeping it as a side car.
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 09:06 AM
  #100  
Stavesacre21's Avatar
1.21 Jiggawatts
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 0
From: Lima, OH
Originally Posted by swerver
the car is a gas demon in the same league as American built V-8s
I was about to make the same comment as roaddemon on that...

while one person may drool over a large V8 at the cost of gas efficiency, another might consider the cost of a unique, ungodly smooth rotary to be more important than MPG.

To some, that large, rumbling american-built V8 may not be their cup-o-joe...and if they don't want one, it's irrelvant as to how it's milage compares to a V8, relatively.

Ive got both right now (V8 and rotary), and although the 8 gets slightly under what the Cobra gets, I couldn't care less. The ride, feel, and overall appeal of the 8 still draws me its way more often than not.

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:55 PM.