Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

89 vs 91 octane

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jun 26, 2004 | 03:27 PM
  #1  
rifle's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
89 vs 91 octane

Just got my 8, it is alot of fun. Other than performance issues, is there any problem with using the 89 octane? I am sure this was discussed before but I couldn't find it.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2004 | 03:38 PM
  #2  
Bankotsu's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: Arlington, TX
I used 87 octane today. I got used to using it on my old car and I used it on this. I totally forgot about it. Oh well.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2004 | 03:43 PM
  #3  
mysql101's Avatar
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,625
Likes: 5
From: USA
I tried two tanks of 87 instead of 91 that I had been religiously using prior. In both tanks, I've gotten 30+ miles more per tank with no other changes other than fuel grade.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2004 | 04:50 PM
  #4  
Riccio's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: Upland, CA
I have used 87 octane for 4 months now - no loss of performance, and better gas mileage for me as well.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2004 | 05:47 PM
  #5  
JSE RX-8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
From: NJ
my dealer told me not to put any octane under 92 in the car. they said anything under 92 will hurt the internals. i think its also in the manual but i'm not sure
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2004 | 06:15 PM
  #6  
StphNieuw's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia
Octane Rating

According to the owners manual that I downloaded from the mazda site it says that "you may use a regular unleaded fuel with Octane Rating from 87 to 90 (91 to 95 RON) but this will slightly reduce performance." (Qoute from "Fuel Requirements" Page 4-2)

I have been using 89 in mine for quite a while and have not noticed any differences in performance so unless you are going to the track I really wouldn't think that it makes a difference. Just my thoughts.
_______________________________________________
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2004 | 11:10 AM
  #7  
rjacobs's Avatar
Sideways, No not me sir
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis
I have been running 87 for a while now and the only thing I noticed as a difference from 93 was a poor idle. I can definitly tell when the rest of the 87 is out when I fill up with 93 cause the idle smooths out and vice versa. No performance loss though. I am sure once I start doing mods (canzoomer, midpipe/cat, possible exhaust) I will definitly use 93 all the time.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2004 | 11:22 AM
  #8  
Seenitall's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: GREAT WHITE NORTH
Originally posted by JasonHamilton
I tried two tanks of 87 instead of 91 that I had been religiously using prior. In both tanks, I've gotten 30+ miles more per tank with no other changes other than fuel grade.
I'm kinda slow,JH-you get better mileage with 87 ??
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2004 | 11:41 AM
  #9  
-8-'s Avatar
-8-
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 198
Likes: 1
From: Cybertron
I've noticed NO difference between using 87, 89, 91, or 93 octane with the same driving habits, in terms of gas mileage or performance. I have had the car for a year now.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2004 | 01:01 PM
  #10  
ShowandDriftRX8's Avatar
The 8 is back
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: NOR CAL
Has any on the board tested the VP racing 100 octane? I am supposed to have my Velocity Red this Monday and I was thinking of doing some tests with 87 vs 100 and see what differences I see. Anyone done this yet?
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2004 | 01:04 PM
  #11  
RX-GR8's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,098
Likes: 3
From: Cherry Hill, NJ
i have tried 89 and 91 but not 87 yet. cant see much difference between 89 and 91.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2004 | 01:13 PM
  #12  
mysql101's Avatar
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,625
Likes: 5
From: USA
Originally posted by Seenitall
I'm kinda slow,JH-you get better mileage with 87 ??
Yes. Instead of 200-230 per tank, I'm getting 230-250 range.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2004 | 01:18 PM
  #13  
Seenitall's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: GREAT WHITE NORTH
Originally posted by JasonHamilton
Yes. Instead of 200-230 per tank, I'm getting 230-250 range.
JH thankx
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2004 | 06:27 PM
  #14  
Equis's Avatar
Speeding Ticket Magnet
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
I see no diffrence or feel no diffrence between 87 or 91, I do see I am saving about $3 per fill up though.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2004 | 07:29 PM
  #15  
ShadowX's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: TX
Your car should get better gas mileage on a lower octance fuel. Higher octane does not mean more power, it just means that it takes more heat to ignite the fuel. The obly problem with the lower octance fuel is that they preignite easier than higher octane fuels.
Higer octane does not clean your engine. And the only way you'll get more power is if your engine can be tuned to take advantage of it. The RX-8 may automatically adjust it "timing" to protect against damaging pre-ign, which is why it would make less power with the lower grade.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RevMeHarder
New Member Forum
7
Jul 12, 2025 07:22 PM
OnebaddRx8
Series I Trouble Shooting
24
Aug 25, 2019 11:34 PM
Modern2Strokez
New Member Forum
7
Aug 16, 2015 01:07 AM
CMRine04
New Member Forum
15
Jul 29, 2015 02:07 PM
Belalnabi
New Member Forum
9
Jul 17, 2015 07:48 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:17 PM.