Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

2011 Compression Test Results at 45K Miles

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jun 13, 2019 | 10:07 PM
  #76  
Joe's Mazda's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Yes they were. Car is all stock, could not find 1 think on it besides needing tires wrong.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2019 | 08:36 AM
  #77  
fylpa17's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Compression results

Hello, I am new in the forum.
I have nearly decided to buy a 192hp 2008 challenge with the following compression at sea level. The car has 28.000miles.
The numbers are in Kpa:
Front rotor:
245RPM:
840
870
840
Back rotor:
255RPM
790
780
800.

I am really worried about the difference between rotors. Any thoughts?
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2019 | 09:18 AM
  #78  
Joe's Mazda's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Those were normalized at 250 RPM and 23 feet above sea level.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2019 | 11:41 AM
  #79  
Steve Dallas's Avatar
Thread Starter
Water Foul
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,521
Likes: 266
From: Republic of Texas
Originally Posted by fylpa17
Hello, I am new in the forum.
I have nearly decided to buy a 192hp 2008 challenge with the following compression at sea level. The car has 28.000miles.
The numbers are in Kpa:
Front rotor:
245RPM:
840
870
840
Back rotor:
255RPM
790
780
800.

I am really worried about the difference between rotors. Any thoughts?
That engine is technically passing. It is common for the rear rotor to have lower compression due to its proximity to the cat.

Originally Posted by Joe's Mazda
Those were normalized at 250 RPM and 23 feet above sea level.
You scored a rare good one at a great price. Congrats!
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2019 | 11:45 AM
  #80  
fylpa17's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Steve Dallas
That engine is technically passing. It is common for the rear rotor to have lower compression due to its proximity to the cat.
Thanks for the answer. Is it something I should worry about though?
I have read the passing limit is 1.0 (100kpa). I am at 0.9 after normalizing the results.
Is it possible that the back rotor will deteriorate so much against the front one, so that it will cause an issue? Again thank you for your time.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2019 | 02:19 PM
  #81  
UnknownJinX's Avatar
Smoking turbo yay
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,119
Likes: 674
From: BC, Canada
Originally Posted by Joe's Mazda
Those were normalized at 250 RPM and 23 feet above sea level.
That's very good numbers! Definitely jealous.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2019 | 04:21 PM
  #82  
Steve Dallas's Avatar
Thread Starter
Water Foul
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,521
Likes: 266
From: Republic of Texas
Originally Posted by fylpa17
Thanks for the answer. Is it something I should worry about though?
I have read the passing limit is 1.0 (100kpa). I am at 0.9 after normalizing the results.
Is it possible that the back rotor will deteriorate so much against the front one, so that it will cause an issue? Again thank you for your time.
The FSM lists the spec as 150kpa. It does not specify, but I assume that is the mean front vs. the mean rear. The difference between rotors is not as important as the difference between rotor faces and overall compression of each rotor. The rear rotor will coninue to deteriorate, at least as long as the car has a restrictive cat.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2019 | 04:34 PM
  #83  
Steve Dallas's Avatar
Thread Starter
Water Foul
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,521
Likes: 266
From: Republic of Texas
I did a dumb thing Friday. I occasionally have to drive out west to Cisco, TX for work at my new job. From my house in the country outside of Fort Worth, that means a 90 minute drive, where 2/3 is high quality, relatively high speed, twisty back roads, and 1/3 is nicely repaved I-20. I had forgotten what a great car this is for that kind of daily driving--especially with a normal alignment. Now I'm questioning whether I can part with it. Keeping it means selling my old Tacoma and parking something else outside. RX-8 vs. Miata vs. Bimmer. The 8 is currently the only one with glycol in it. The other two are D water and MoCool at the moment. Hmmm...

Last edited by Steve Dallas; Jun 16, 2019 at 04:45 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2019 | 04:35 PM
  #84  
UnknownJinX's Avatar
Smoking turbo yay
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,119
Likes: 674
From: BC, Canada
Originally Posted by Steve Dallas
The FSM lists the spec as 150kpa. It does not specify, but I assume that is the mean front vs. the mean rear. The difference between rotors is not as important as the difference between rotor faces and overall compression of each rotor. The rear rotor will coninue to deteriorate, at least as long as the car has a restrictive cat.
He is talking about the difference between rotors, where the passing spec is <100 kPa difference.



IMO this is okay, but I think the rear rotor deterioration has more to do with the coolant path versus whether or not there is a cat. Coolant loops around the rear rotor so there will be more heat there, which causes faster deterioration.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2019 | 04:42 PM
  #85  
Steve Dallas's Avatar
Thread Starter
Water Foul
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,521
Likes: 266
From: Republic of Texas
Originally Posted by UnknownJinX
He is talking about the difference between rotors, where the passing spec is <100 kPa difference.



IMO this is okay, but I think the rear rotor deterioration has more to do with the coolant path versus whether or not there is a cat. Coolant loops around the rear rotor so there will be more heat there, which causes faster deterioration.
Oops! I misread that! Is there such a thing as verticle dyslexia?
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2019 | 10:20 PM
  #86  
sinkas's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 477
Likes: 71
From: Fremantle, Western Australia
Steve,
did you have adjustment extenders on your rear Ohlins?, if so how long are they,
want to order some for my KW's,
but unsure if I can just get the short ones or need the long ones?
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2019 | 07:59 AM
  #87  
Steve Dallas's Avatar
Thread Starter
Water Foul
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,521
Likes: 266
From: Republic of Texas
I do have the rear extenders. I think they are about a foot long and are just long enough to be convenient.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2019 | 06:47 PM
  #88  
sinkas's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 477
Likes: 71
From: Fremantle, Western Australia
cheers
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2019 | 07:38 PM
  #89  
Fijibluefg2's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 89
Likes: 9
From: Jacksonville
Originally Posted by Steve Dallas
I did a dumb thing Friday. I occasionally have to drive out west to Cisco, TX for work at my new job. From my house in the country outside of Fort Worth, that means a 90 minute drive, where 2/3 is high quality, relatively high speed, twisty back roads, and 1/3 is nicely repaved I-20. I had forgotten what a great car this is for that kind of daily driving--especially with a normal alignment. Now I'm questioning whether I can part with it. Keeping it means selling my old Tacoma and parking something else outside. RX-8 vs. Miata vs. Bimmer. The 8 is currently the only one with glycol in it. The other two are D water and MoCool at the moment. Hmmm...

LOL.

Thats the thing about the RX-8... it has amazing driving dynamics for certain driving conditions. Beyond that, it’s a tough call of a car / engine to maintain.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
revivo73
Series I Tech Garage
7
Sep 28, 2013 06:47 PM
missycola
Series I Tech Garage
11
Jul 1, 2011 10:11 PM
Maries8
RX-8 Discussion
6
May 23, 2011 05:20 PM
tuj
Series I Trouble Shooting
4
Jul 8, 2010 06:28 AM
Jaguar_MBA
Series I Tech Garage
36
Dec 30, 2005 12:20 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:39 PM.