Notices
NW RX-8 Forum Serving WA, OR, ID, AK

Oregon Cell Phone Law 2010

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Dec 8, 2009 | 03:58 PM
  #1  
pdxhak's Avatar
Thread Starter
Official Post Whore
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,462
Likes: 32
From: Portland,OR
Oregon Cell Phone Law 2010

http://www.drivinglaws.org/oregon.php

New Cell Phone Law Effective 1 / 2010

House Bill 2377 prohibits all drivers from using a mobile communication device while operating a motor vehicle. A mobile communication device is defined as "a text messaging device or a wireless, two-way communication device designed to receive and transmit voice or text communication".

Under the new law, if you are over the age of 18, you may use a wireless device if you are using a hands free accessory that allows you to keep both hands on the wheel while you are driving. Drivers that are under the age of 18 may not use a wireless device in any case except specific situations such as an emergency or farming or agricultural operations. For other exceptions to the new law please use the link provided below to read the bill.

Like all hands-free laws the usual exceptions include emergencies, safety workers, persons 18 years of age or older using a "Hands-Free Accessory" and emergency services personnel. Prior to this bill only driver's under the age of 18 were prohibited from using an Cell Phone while they were driving.

To read the details of this new law, please to to House Bill 2377
Oregon Driving and Cell-Phone Legislation

House Bill 2872 prohibits drivers that are under 18 years of age from using any type of mobile communication device such as a cell-phone. This includes text-messaging and does not allow for hands-free operation of a cell-phone. This law applies if you are under 18 and driving with a provisional drivers license, a special student driver permit, or a instruction driver permit.

Like many other states around the country, the violation of this cell-phone driving law is a secondary offense. A secondary offense means that the driver using a cell-phone or mobile communication device must first be violating a primary enforcement law such as reckless driving, speeding or running a red light before they can be ticketed for violating the State of Oregon's cell-phone law.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2009 | 04:12 PM
  #2  
Anijo's Avatar
Cone Abuser
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 0
From: Redmond, WA
Wait... the wording on that is really vague. Does that include 2-way radios and now block CB's and other devices essential in many commercial (and government for that matter) vehicles?
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2009 | 04:22 PM
  #3  
RIWWP's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 267
From: Pacific Northwest
Reading the more detailed text, police, fire, and rescue drivers are excluded. CBs themselves are included in the description of 2-way communication device designed to transmit and receive voice, however...

...this exclusion is so wide that just about anyone might be eligible:
{exclusion}(g) To a person operating a motor vehicle in the scope of the person¢s employment if
operation of the motor vehicle is necessary for the person¢s job;
So pizza deliveries boys, truck drivers, couriers are clearly excluded, and it would be easy to make a case that you are working at the time, as required.

Last edited by RIWWP; Dec 8, 2009 at 04:30 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2009 | 04:45 PM
  #4  
RawrX8's Avatar
Grocery Getter
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 10
From: Seattle
Just put your phone down when you see a cop roll by like we all do in Seattle.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2009 | 04:45 PM
  #5  
pdxhak's Avatar
Thread Starter
Official Post Whore
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,462
Likes: 32
From: Portland,OR
Makes sense if they are going to outlaw cell phones then two way radios would be included.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2009 | 04:57 PM
  #6  
AlexWhi020's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: Statesboro, GA
georgia has this law too, does not really get enforced unless you are pulled over for soemthing else or if you cause an accident
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2009 | 05:08 PM
  #7  
pdxhak's Avatar
Thread Starter
Official Post Whore
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,462
Likes: 32
From: Portland,OR
Wash and Calf have this law as well so Oregon is lagging a bit on the West Coast.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2009 | 05:11 PM
  #8  
icyur2's Avatar
Shonen
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
From: Keizer, OR
About time this law got into place..they already have this in Japan..granted, people still do it..

However, if they want to take it to the next step, should start fining people on doing their make-ups while driving, eating, and even saw a guy pulling out his eyebrow hair or something..like..WTF???
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2009 | 05:14 PM
  #9  
Gr8Bullet's Avatar
Im Sir Earl of Sandwich!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 0
From: Sterling, VA
people will still do it none the less. hell i........ umm yeah.....
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2009 | 05:26 PM
  #10  
RIWWP's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 267
From: Pacific Northwest
Originally Posted by AlexWhi020
georgia has this law too, does not really get enforced unless you are pulled over for soemthing else or if you cause an accident
It is a secondary offense, so by definition, you can't be pulled over for that alone. The cop has to find something else to pull you over for that is a primary offense, so they can cite you for the cell phone usage. Granted, the cop can make up a reason or tail you until they find a reason, and they probably will, but the letter of the law is just that.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2009 | 12:51 PM
  #11  
dondo's Avatar
100% baller (finally!)
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,385
Likes: 2
From: Seattle, WA
booo. this is stupid.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2009 | 11:24 PM
  #12  
GeorgeH's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 3
From: Portland OR
I'm actually in favor of this. It's simply not a good idea to attempt to operate a device with a little LCD screen that requires you to take your eyes off the road far longer than is safe while operating a moving vehicle. And I'm only talking about scrolling through the contact list to initiate a call. Don't even get me started about texting.

Hang up and drive.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2009 | 11:54 PM
  #13  
dondo's Avatar
100% baller (finally!)
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,385
Likes: 2
From: Seattle, WA
^ though i agree with your post, it's still not the government's job to control our cell phone usage. this is just another rule for them to catch people breaking so they can generate more revenue.

nonsense.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 01:44 AM
  #14  
josuar88's Avatar
The Crawlster
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
From: Fort Lewis WA
Or get so good with doing it you don't even have to look to do it. I don't entirely agree with what is said above me its about safety. I'm guilty I've done it but I do it at relights and stops signs
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 09:38 AM
  #15  
GeorgeH's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 3
From: Portland OR
True, it can be done safeley, just like speeding. But, we need speed limits. Sad but true. Same difference.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fourwhls
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
7
Feb 20, 2019 05:16 PM
crimson809
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
1
Aug 14, 2016 10:03 PM
jasonrxeight
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
2
Sep 30, 2015 01:53 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:44 PM.