MZR swap
okay, nobody get your feelings hurt...i know the 8 is all about rotary power and its uniqueness. Plus it's not like I'm thinking about doing this, I do not have even close to the time, skill, nor money to do this. but... what do you guys think about a 2.3 MZR engine swap from a speed3? would it be ridiculously expensive and hard? maybe a little easier because its same brand? would the engine bolt to the rx8 tranny? discuss.
|
Isn't that like almost the same HP? I know that you can get more power out of it than the RENE, but it kinda seems like a waste, why not just go ls1 if you are going to pull the rene, making big power out of a 4 banger is unreliable and a recipe for disaster.
|
Originally Posted by Kinky_Kelsey
(Post 3839199)
okay, nobody get your feelings hurt...i know the 8 is all about rotary power and its uniqueness. Plus it's not like I'm thinking about doing this, I do not have even close to the time, skill, nor money to do this. but... what do you guys think about a 2.3 MZR engine swap from a speed3? would it be ridiculously expensive and hard? maybe a little easier because its same brand? would the engine bolt to the rx8 tranny? discuss.
|
Originally Posted by Dirt_Nasty
(Post 3839208)
Isn't that like almost the same HP? I know that you can get more power out of it than the RENE, but it kinda seems like a waste, why not just go ls1 if you are going to pull the rene, making big power out of a 4 banger is unreliable and a recipe for disaster.
|
Originally Posted by Kinky_Kelsey
(Post 3839212)
No they dyno around 235whp/257tq to the ground, while to get around 250whp with the renny you gotta drop 10g's on the greddy kit or run nitrous which is more unreliable. Plus in the MZR you get the extra tq, and it would make a more reliable 300whp daily driver.
There is no such thing as a reliable a turbo four cylinder daily driver. And your comment about nitrous, I think is misinformed. |
Originally Posted by Dirt_Nasty
(Post 3839216)
Yeah that's is not much of a difference for the jump to make a swap, and for the price of the swap I am pretty sure you could drop some thing better in, an fd motor perhaps.
There is no such thing as a reliable a turbo four cylinder daily driver. And your comment about nitrous, I think is misinformed. And I may not be a nitrous expert, but I have in fact run it myself. and it is pretty hard on your engine, maybe not worse that FI. but just as bad, maybe a little less. |
If you did all the work yourself (meaning no outside labor costs), it would still cost at least as much as an FI kit would for the renesis. Considering the effort, I'd say it would be worth going FI renesis before doing a swap like that even if you knew for sure the renesis wouldn't last too long. It's so much work for a gain that can be had for less money and effort. It might be a good engine and produce gains rather easily, but if you're doing a swap, there are more worthwhile swaps to do.
I don't think anyone has had issues with nitrous on the renesis. While that doesn't prove it to be reliable, it shows that it's not a huge liability as you originally made it sound. I ran nitrous on my 8 and never had issues. I had about 60k miles on my 8 when I sold it and the engine ran strong as far as I could tell. Nitrous gets risky when you push the limits. The benefit of nitrous (in terms of reliability) is that you don't always have it there. There's an on off switch. With turbos, that's much harder to control. Sure, you can stay out of boost, but self control is difficult when you always have it right there to use. My current car has turbos and I almost always find myself pushing up to at least 10 psi a few times per drive... Once I hit that, it's hard to resist hitting 23 psi. |
Originally Posted by 8 Maniac
(Post 3839225)
If you did all the work yourself (meaning no outside labor costs), it would still cost at least as much as an FI kit would for the renesis. Considering the effort, I'd say it would be worth going FI renesis before doing a swap like that even if you knew for sure the renesis wouldn't last too long. It's so much work for a gain that can be had for less money and effort. It might be a good engine and produce gains rather easily, but if you're doing a swap, there are more worthwhile swaps to do.
I don't think anyone has had issues with nitrous on the renesis. While that doesn't prove it to be reliable, it shows that it's not a huge liability as you originally made it sound. I ran nitrous on my 8 and never had issues. I had about 60k miles on my 8 when I sold it and the engine ran strong as far as I could tell. Nitrous gets risky when you push the limits. The benefit of nitrous (in terms of reliability) is that you don't always have it there. There's an on off switch. With turbos, that's much harder to control. Sure, you can stay out of boost, but self control is difficult when you always have it right there to use. My current car has turbos and I almost always find myself pushing up to at least 10 psi a few times per drive... Once I hit that, it's hard to resist hitting 23 psi. Of course there are FAR cheaper/better ways to get the same power/reliability. I just thought it was an interesting swap. |
Maybe you should drop a reliable diesel merc engine in it then, for that torque and reliability you crave :P
|
who said I was dropping anything into in my car? there's always gotta be some sarcastic post...
|
you wouldnt use the MZR. ITs not made to go longitudinally and the cost for result would be prohibitive. There are other MUCH better choices for swaps that would be easier to do and less costly for more gain.
|
I can understand some people wanting to do an engine swap in their 8, but swapping for that engine just doesn't make much sense to me. The gains you would get don't seem high enough to justify the time, money and all around hassle of doing an engine swap... If I was going to go to all that trouble, I'd wanna do it for an engine with significantly higher numbers that would give me a real noticeable difference in performance....
And the swapping an engine for the reliability doesn't make much sense to me..... The reliability trouble with the Renesis is that it has been known to fail with time. This is a problem because it means you have to get a new engine.... So it seems to me that you are buying a new engine and putting it in, so that you don't have to buy a new engine and put it in haha. |
That's the thing I was trying to point out above (kind of). Even if you are going for power and reliability, it seems makes more sense to go for FI because it would still be easier to do an FI build and then replace the engine when necessary.
A V8 might not be as unique and heavier, but it at least puts out power to really justify that kind of effort. The gas mileage might not be on par with a turbo 4 cylinder, but (depending on the engine), I think you'd be surprised at the mileage you'd get. |
Um, the MZR has proven to have it's own problems. Lot's of snapped rods in modded ones from what I've seen. Not to mention all of the other points mentioned above. The main being that it's designed to mount sideways.
|
Originally Posted by zoom44
(Post 3839521)
you wouldnt use the MZR. ITs not made to go longitudinally and the cost for result would be prohibitive. There are other MUCH better choices for swaps that would be easier to do and less costly for more gain.
As far as durability and power production vs cost, to each his own. A strong MZR (L3 or LF engine) does require some pricey mods to make the power and to make it live with the power. Paul. |
Having tuned a gaggle of Speed6 and Speed3 cars, I can tell you that you will not produce much more peak power or torque than a well-tuned turbo Renesis and you will spend more money (in the conversion) and give up 3000 RPM or more in the process.
The DISI system is very limited and expensive (if not nearly impossible) to modify and has a very narrow tuning window. There are a multitude of other difficulties - not impossibilities - involved. I just don't think it makes sense. I have contemplated other motors in the RX-8, including the MZR and I discounted it. Now, a well-built, turbo BP might be interesting. It is a conventional engine, already set-up for RWD and easily brought up to 400 HP by well-proven means. If I don't do the other conversion that I am contemplating, the BP will be the route that I follow. |
thanks Paul. forgot:(
|
I dealt with a guy who decided that he wanted to swap a BP Turbo into his RX8. After sufficient fabrication nightmare he had us build him an RX8 engine to go back in.
One of the big advantages with the LF, L3 over a BP is the exhaust routing on the R side of the vehicle just like the 13B (And all Mazda rotaries except the Premacy RE). I think someone will make 600hp with a renesis this year. Paul. |
Originally Posted by Mazmart
(Post 3840023)
I dealt with a guy who decided that he wanted to swap a BP Turbo into his RX8. After sufficient fabrication nightmare he had us build him an RX8 engine to go back in.
Originally Posted by Mazmart
(Post 3840023)
I think someone will make 600hp with a renesis this year.
|
Interesting. If that wasn't a joke, it's not cool to say something like that and leave it unexplained.
|
well there is hope, continued researching it, and found out the ms6 rear diff is the same as the rx8's. there's at least one similarity. awd rx8 anyone? ;)
|
Originally Posted by Kinky_Kelsey
(Post 3843748)
well there is hope, continued researching it, and found out the ms6 rear diff is the same as the rx8's. there's at least one similarity. awd rx8 anyone? ;)
|
Originally Posted by Kinky_Kelsey
(Post 3843748)
found out the ms6 rear diff is the same as the rx8's.
|
Originally Posted by Mazmart
(Post 3840023)
I think someone will make 600hp with a renesis this year.
Paul. |
Originally Posted by Mazmart
(Post 3840023)
I think someone will make 600hp with a renesis this year. |
Originally Posted by Roidz24
(Post 3843904)
Yeah, and get 100 miles to the gallon. Uh huh. :rofl:
|
Originally Posted by Roidz24
(Post 3843904)
Yeah, and get 100 miles to the gallon. Uh huh. :rofl:
100 miles to a gallon ? thats nothing. |
Originally Posted by 8 Maniac
(Post 3844044)
You seem new around here... I'm assuming Mazmart is serious, which means he knows something we don't and that that quote may very well be accurate. Obviously, we don't know the full story though.
|
While it does still have to too good to be true feel, it's not just some random asshole who said he read something on the internet. I was mostly pointing out that because it was Mazmart, there could very well be some truth behind that statement.
|
Believe me Paul doesnt just throw stuff out there.
It will not be a 60K mile engine ---hell if it was--it would be MINE. OD |
i was researchign this and noticed a guy doing a swap of a renny engine into an mx5 and used the mx5 subframe to fit the renny without mordification now since the mx5 can be found with a 2L mzr engine i believe that the 2.3 L mzr will also be able to fit in the mx5 ( the difference between the 2 being a different crankshaft giving a longer stroke producing 2.3L ) so if the renny can fit in the mx5 the 2.3L mxr should be able to fit into the rx8 u will have to mordify the firewall and posiblly remove the cabin heater now the only thing i can see as a major proble is which gearbox to use the rx8 or the mx5 gearbox and the engines electronics that i have yet to figure out
|
Originally Posted by vulcan_20
(Post 4528715)
i was researchign this and noticed a guy doing a swap of a renny engine into an mx5 and used the mx5 subframe to fit the renny without mordification now since the mx5 can be found with a 2L mzr engine i believe that the 2.3 L mzr will also be able to fit in the mx5 ( the difference between the 2 being a different crankshaft giving a longer stroke producing 2.3L ) so if the renny can fit in the mx5 the 2.3L mxr should be able to fit into the rx8 u will have to mordify the firewall and posiblly remove the cabin heater now the only thing i can see as a major proble is which gearbox to use the rx8 or the mx5 gearbox and the engines electronics that i have yet to figure out
You also posted something completely unrelated in a thread having nothing to do with a mzr fitting in an mx5... please make another thread.. |
Originally Posted by Mazmart
(Post 3840023)
I think someone will make 600hp with a renesis this year. Paul.
Originally Posted by Kinky_Kelsey
(Post 3839238)
who said I was dropping anything into in my car? there's always gotta be some sarcastic post...
. |
Team, they made those posts almost 3 years ago... and the OP hasn't been on in just over 2 years. I'd expect that your smarts would have picked up on that
|
Duh, but while asking about the status of the 600 hp Renesis it wasn't any more effort to kick mr kinky in teh nutz
|
Try sending him a PM so he can come back online to receive the kick, otherwise your foot is a little late.
|
It seems fitting for such a retarded thread, no?
|
Originally Posted by RIWWP
(Post 4528728)
Team, they made those posts almost 3 years ago... and the OP hasn't been on in just over 2 years. I'd expect that your smarts would have picked up on that
|
It's even more amusing that after all these years you still think that your opinion influences me
I knew the dates when I replied, you do realize the thread was revived several posts ahead of mine? We could just as easily ask why it's still open. Yet it is so the stupidity continues. I'm game. |
It isn't often that you leave such an easy opening, sometimes it's too much to resist. :)
|
It was only an opening if I had mistakenly done so, but if it floats your boat to think that you 'got me' then by all means be happy :)
|
Other's perceived ideas are only stupidity if you happen to see it, but if it floats your boat to think that you 'are superior' then by all means be happy :)
(So many of your little sayings are ones that you could do well to apply to yourself, after all, isn't it just making you happy to offer the little zings you do?) |
I'm not superior at all. I make more mistakes and do more stupid stuff than most people on this forum. The perception issue is your own, but then we've beaten that rotten equine corpse to death all ready.
|
Oh we know you aren't superior. No misperceptions there. Your demonstrations of humility are exceedingly effective at ensuring that you want everyone to be aware of that fact.
|
I suppose it's my good fortune that the opinion carries all the weight that pointless futility can weakly muster ...
|
Originally Posted by Xero Ryuu
(Post 4528722)
http://tusb.stanford.edu/wp-content/...mmar-vader.jpg
You also posted something completely unrelated in a thread having nothing to do with a mzr fitting in an mx5... please make another thread.. |
The 2.3L MZR was only ever used with a transverse mounting.
The 2.0L in the 2006+ MX-5 was longitudinal mounted, and a varation on the transverse mounted 2.0L There is a significant difference there that makes the "matching subframes" not really applicable any more when you start talking 2.3L MZR |
Originally Posted by vulcan_20
(Post 4528931)
maybe if u could actually read and read past the first line u would see what i was saying does relate to placing an mzr in an rx8 as it compares what the guy is doing and similarities between there sub-frames and how the mzr would be able to fit in the rx8 so if u forgot how to read im sure there are adult education classes somewhere in ur area where u can learn |
The 2.3 and 2.5 MZRs swap into the MX5 with a little work. Here are the instructions:
2.5 swap instructions - MX-5 Miata Forum The most important take-away is that the, "Motor mounts are direct bolt-ons, trans bolts up the same, [and the] exhaust manifold is the same." So you would just need the subframe from an mx5 and the other appropriate electrical equipment. |
Thanks for bumping this informative thread. I am sure many were dying for information needed for doing this engine swap.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:16 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands