Notices
New Member Forum A place for new members to get their feet wet

Premium vs Regular Gas

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jun 4, 2013 | 04:26 PM
  #1  
battlehawk77's Avatar
Thread Starter
Buzz bomb
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 71
Likes: 3
From: Norfolk, VA
Question Premium vs Regular Gas

I did a search about this subject but couldn't find any threads on it, so I figured I'd ask here:

Is there any appreciable difference between running premium versus regular gas? Are the effects on fuel mileage? On performance? On engine life? I know there is a cost difference (about 30 cents a gallon in my area), but I am wondering if the cost difference is justified.

I ask because the fuel filler door says Premium Recommended. I know some vehicles recommend it but do just fine on regular, but I also know a rotary is a different beast from a piston engine.

Thanks in advance!
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2013 | 04:31 PM
  #2  
RIWWP's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 266
From: Pacific Northwest
Yes, engine life.

An engine that is dying and has low compression on ALL 6 faces of the engine and is already performing terribly in power and mileage will be safe to run on 87.

An engine with even one face at good compression, 87 octane will blow your seals from detonation. 89 CAN work for high altitudes, hot temperatures, but it isn't recommended. 91+ is really required.


Mileage and power are the same as long as the octane is high enough to be safe for the engine.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2013 | 04:39 PM
  #3  
Ricky SE3P's Avatar
Project Seca
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,763
Likes: 623
From: SoCal
My last motor ran great on 87 octane.
Then I got a compression test, 5.3 5.2 5.1 front rotor and 4.7 4.6 4.4 rear rotor @ 251 rpm.. which kinda explains why
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2013 | 04:41 PM
  #4  
battlehawk77's Avatar
Thread Starter
Buzz bomb
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 71
Likes: 3
From: Norfolk, VA
Okay. So the moral is to run premium unless the engine is dying. Got it.
I was thinking about running a tank each of premium, mid-grade, and regular, but I'll nix that idea now.

Thank you.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2013 | 04:43 PM
  #5  
RIWWP's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 266
From: Pacific Northwest
Keep in mind that you could have a dying engine with 7s in the front rotor and 5s in the rear rotor. Running 87 would blow the seals in the front rotor and shred what you had left in the engine. All you have to have is 1 face anywhere near proper compression and you are playing Russian roulette with octane.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2013 | 04:43 PM
  #6  
tonik's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
From: Toronto,On
search "octane"
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2013 | 04:52 PM
  #7  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,382
Likes: 11
i've run these cars on 87-89-and 91, and if its just going down the freeway i'll put 87 in it, and it doesn't seem to make a difference, but for anything else i actually get better mileage with the 91.

in fact i almost started a thread about it, 2mpg in the city is a HUGE difference.

i think if you factor in the MPG into the fuel cost, the 2mpg probably makes the 91 more cost effective
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2013 | 04:53 PM
  #8  
RIWWP's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 266
From: Pacific Northwest
I'd guess that the difference is almost certainly because the ECU is yanking timing trying to save your engine with 87.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2013 | 04:55 PM
  #9  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,382
Likes: 11
Originally Posted by RIWWP
I'd guess that the difference is almost certainly because the ECU is yanking timing trying to save your engine with 87.
i think so too. effect is more pronounced in city driving, where there are accelerations
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2013 | 04:59 PM
  #10  
battlehawk77's Avatar
Thread Starter
Buzz bomb
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 71
Likes: 3
From: Norfolk, VA
So, it'll cost me a little more in gas to run premium, but I figured it out to be less than $20 a month versus regular, which isn't much...

As the saying goes, nothing is too good for my girl.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2013 | 05:03 PM
  #11  
Ricky SE3P's Avatar
Project Seca
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,763
Likes: 623
From: SoCal
$20 a month or $2,500 tomorrow for a half decent rebuild. Pick your evil
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2013 | 05:10 PM
  #12  
battlehawk77's Avatar
Thread Starter
Buzz bomb
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 71
Likes: 3
From: Norfolk, VA
xero, that was my line of thinking, too. $20, I can handle. $2500, not so much.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2013 | 08:31 PM
  #13  
monchie's Avatar
I HATE SPEEDBUMPS!
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 8,549
Likes: 8
From: Las Vegas, NV
I always use 89 Chevron with techron. The techron helps clean the fuel system as well. Never had serious issues so far using 89 octane...
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2013 | 08:38 PM
  #14  
the1jesster's Avatar
Trained true Killers
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: Triad NC
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2013 | 08:40 PM
  #15  
RIWWP's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 266
From: Pacific Northwest
Vegas is higher altitude and hotter temps (compared to temperate at sea level), so thinner air from both reduces the dynamic compression a bit and makes 89 safer to use.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2013 | 08:55 PM
  #16  
monchie's Avatar
I HATE SPEEDBUMPS!
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 8,549
Likes: 8
From: Las Vegas, NV
Originally Posted by the1jesster

Read what's down here...

Originally Posted by RIWWP
Vegas is higher altitude and hotter temps (compared to temperate at sea level), so thinner air from both reduces the dynamic compression a bit and makes 89 safer to use.

Reply
Old Jun 8, 2013 | 01:21 PM
  #17  
ASH8's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,880
Likes: 339
From: Australia
For the record since 2008 (my RX-8 purchase) I use nothing else but Aussie High Premium 98 (RON) which is the equivalent to your US 91-92 (I think) for both my Mazda's, RX-8 and MX-5 (yes it is a banger).

I just wont use our 91 or 95 (RON).

It is a fact that for todays banger engines the Premium Fuel or higher grade 95 or 98 (RON) than normal fuels which makers recommend may cost you more but results in higher MPG...or Kilometers per litre.

End result it is actually cheaper to use the more expensive Premium Fuel..

Recently an Aussie test (2013) with Kia's proved this to be correct, all the same new cars running on different grades of petroleum fuel (gasoline), plus one diesel engined model running on diesel, only the diesel engined model achieved a higher KPL result.

Now as far as a rotary goes, well a normal Renny (10:1) is asked by Mazda to run on Premium fuel, however as RIWWP says if you have poor compressions you may get more than you wish for, but frankly if it is that bad a lower grade gas will not save your Renny..

Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
theblinkof
Series I Trouble Shooting
33
Oct 4, 2023 05:24 PM
mdl0209
Series I Trouble Shooting
14
May 23, 2019 05:46 PM
Eliseo Esquivel
RX-8 Discussion
2
Sep 30, 2015 08:28 PM
jasonrxeight
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
2
Sep 30, 2015 01:53 PM
Zube6115
Series I Trouble Shooting
8
Sep 30, 2015 12:57 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:15 PM.