Notices
New Member Forum A place for new members to get their feet wet

Low compression results at low rpms, 31k mile engine.

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Apr 8, 2022 | 05:17 AM
  #1  
grx8br's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: Apr 2022
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Low compression results at low rpms, 31k mile engine.

Hi everyone!

I just had a compression test done at my local Mazda dealer and got some results i can't really wrap my head around. The readings were taken at sea level and read directly off the OEM Mazda compression tester and not through the USB.

Front rotor @ 182rpm
5.3
5.6
6.1
x 100 kPa

Rear rotor @ 184rpm
6.0
6.0
5.9
x 100 kPa

Rear rotor as far as i can tell is doing good however the front is looking a little worse for wear. However this test was done with a bad battery and probably a gen 1 starter witnessed by the very low crank rpms.
The car starts right up cold and only takes a bit longer while warm with the same battery and starter. Uses normal amounts of gas. And objectively has great power. Engine was replaced with a Mazda reman 31k miles ago.

Is there a possibility that the results are skewed to look worse than they are or is my relatively fresh engine dead already?
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2022 | 06:09 AM
  #2  
200.mph's Avatar
FULLY SEMI AUTOMATIC
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,028
Likes: 3,474
From: BALLS DEEP
the compression #s should be adjusted for the 250rpm cranking iirc
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2022 | 06:18 AM
  #3  
grx8br's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: Apr 2022
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
When normalized to 250 rpms with the foxed.ca calculator the readings are still not in my favor. However i still wonder if the low crank rpms may have impacted the readings in such a way that the numbers are useless? I cant find many posts about people having their tests done at low crank rpms. I would do another test with a fresh battery but the test is quite frankly too expensive where i live.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2022 | 06:21 AM
  #4  
200.mph's Avatar
FULLY SEMI AUTOMATIC
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,028
Likes: 3,474
From: BALLS DEEP
if normalized and the #s are still below the threshold its most likely low comp. 31k isnt unheard of for an engine to crap out. was it a reman? if not who rebuilt it? what parts were replaced? housings?
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2022 | 06:30 AM
  #5  
grx8br's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: Apr 2022
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Well now im sad

Was really hoping the numbers were skewed because of how healthy the engine seems in general. I actually took a compression test to confirm how good it was but it turned out to be the opposite.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2022 | 08:23 AM
  #6  
Loki's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,396
Likes: 1,111
From: Montreal
So it sounds like you don't have any actual problems?
I'd put the upgraded starter model on it l and continue enjoying. Maybe retest in some while.

Not that you shouldn't trust the results but like anything, there can be outliers. I had 1 comp test show failing in 2014 and not ever since then.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2022 | 10:23 AM
  #7  
jcbrx8's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,105
Likes: 404
From: Collierville, TN
Your compression #s appear fine ...after 30k+ mi. and viewed wrt rpm. If difficulty starting as has been recommended... upgrade your starter, and, if you don't already, premix.

Happy rotarying.
.

Reply
Old Apr 8, 2022 | 01:42 PM
  #8  
grx8br's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: Apr 2022
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Sounds like i should just disregard the numbers and just enjoy the car while it lasts
I think i'm going to do that.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rods
Series I Tech Garage
47
Jan 27, 2022 10:56 PM
K.C.C.
RX-8 Discussion
10
Jul 6, 2018 03:51 PM
Maninder
Series I Trouble Shooting
8
Mar 24, 2010 07:38 PM
LytHka
Series I Tech Garage
29
Feb 16, 2010 01:14 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:31 PM.