2tone

iTrader: (3)

Wow, what a complete waste of time!! I normally like yahoo blogs/articles, but this is the dumbest, DUMBEST one I've ever read. How on earth did this thing get the go ahead to be a listed article on their homepage?!?! I mean, really, first the study was stupid, but to actually write about it?!?! Who did NOT realize a porsche or mercedes would be more expensive to insure than a tribute or a minivan?!

http://autos.yahoo.com/articles/auto...ars-to-insure/



PS - i am surprised that some of the cars don't cost MORE to insure...

mscamp02

iTrader: (3)

I dont think it even says how long the coverage is for. 1 year? 6 months?

article is just ****

The Reverend

iTrader: (1)

c'mon guys mr. muaddi tried his best

bose

iTrader: (5)

Wow, that's really suprising. Sports cars cost more to insure than a minivan or small suv??? That's weird, you learn something new everyday.

2tone

iTrader: (3)

ha ha ha. i was reading it and waiting to hear something insightful...

i wonder if company made writer write it, or writer talked company into allowing him to post it. either way, one of two parties is s-t-u-p-i-d

2tone

iTrader: (3)

ha ha ha. i can see someone reading this though and saying, "oh honey, wow, check this out! we could save $50 (a year??) by buying the mazda tribute i instead of the mazda tribute s." "wow sweety, that's great, nice work! i'm really glad we saw this article, otherwise we might have gone ahead with the s, when clearly we should get the i."

ugh

rotarygod

Sometimes your best just isn't good enough.